8 Commits (5cd1880daa048a685da689c7f41a2e50486494de)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Christoph Wurst	caff1023ea	Format control structures, classes, methods and function ... To continue this formatting madness, here's a tiny patch that adds unified formatting for control structures like if and loops as well as classes, their methods and anonymous functions. This basically forces the constructs to start on the same line. This is not exactly what PSR2 wants, but I think we can have a few exceptions with "our" style. The starting of braces on the same line is pracrically standard for our code. This also removes and empty lines from method/function bodies at the beginning and end. Signed-off-by: Christoph Wurst <christoph@winzerhof-wurst.at>	6 years ago
Christoph Wurst	afbd9c4e6e	Unify function spacing to PSR2 recommendation ... Signed-off-by: Christoph Wurst <christoph@winzerhof-wurst.at>	6 years ago
John Molakvoæ (skjnldsv)	07a592bd27	Users list acceptance tests ... Signed-off-by: John Molakvoæ (skjnldsv) <skjnldsv@protonmail.com>	8 years ago
John Molakvoæ (skjnldsv)	3d99a9d24e	Header acceptance features ... Signed-off-by: John Molakvoæ (skjnldsv) <skjnldsv@protonmail.com>	8 years ago
Daniel Calviño Sánchez	c1fa0f8b86	Add automatic handling of NoSuchElement exceptions ... NoSuchElement exceptions are sometimes thrown instead of StaleElementReference exceptions. This can happen when the Selenium2 driver for Mink performs an action on an element through the WebDriver session instead of directly through the WebDriver element. In that case, if the element with the given ID does not exist, a NoSuchElement exception would be thrown instead of a StaleElementReference exception, so those cases are handled like StaleElementReference exceptions. Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>	8 years ago
Daniel Calviño Sánchez	deb2495f89	Add automatic handling of MoveTargetOutOfBounds exceptions ... MoveTargetOutOfBounds exceptions are sometimes thrown instead of ElementNotVisible exceptions. This can happen when the Selenium2 driver for Mink moves the cursor on an element using the "moveto" method of the Webdriver session, for example, before clicking on an element. In that case, if the element is not visible, "moveto" would throw a MoveTargetOutOfBounds exception instead of an ElementNotVisible exception, so those cases are handled like ElementNotVisible exceptions. Note that MoveTargetOutOfBounds exceptions could be thrown too if the element was visible but "out of reach"; there is no problem in handling those cases as if the element was not visible, as the exception will be thrown again anyway once it is verified that the element is indeed visible. Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>	8 years ago
Arthur Schiwon	26ca563545	Fix and extend acceptance tests ... Signed-off-by: Arthur Schiwon <blizzz@arthur-schiwon.de>	9 years ago
Daniel Calviño Sánchez	9313c9797f	Add automatic handling of common command failures of Mink elements ... Commands executed on Mink elements may fail for several reasons. ElementWrapper is introduced to automatically handle some of those situations, like StaleElementReference exceptions and ElementNotVisible exceptions. StaleElementReference exceptions are thrown when the command is executed on an element that is no longer attached to the DOM. When that happens the ElementWrapper finds again the element and executes the command again on the new element. ElementNotVisible exceptions are thrown when the command requires the element to be visible but the element is not. When that happens the ElementWrapper waits for the element to be visible before executing the command again. These changes are totally compatible with the current acceptance tests. They just make the tests more robust, but they do not change their behaviour. In fact, this should minimize some of the sporadic failures in the acceptance tests caused by their concurrent nature with respect to the web browser executing the commands. However, the ElementWrapper is not a silver bullet; it handles the most common situations, but it does not handle every possible scenario. For example, the acceptance tests would still fail sporadically if an element can become staled several times in a row (uncommon) or if it does not become visible before the timeout expires (which could still happen in a loaded system even if the components under test work right, but obviously it is not possible to wait indefinitely for them). Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>	9 years ago