You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
postgres/src/include/executor/nodeModifyTable.h

44 lines
1.7 KiB

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* nodeModifyTable.h
*
*
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2018, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
* src/include/executor/nodeModifyTable.h
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#ifndef NODEMODIFYTABLE_H
#define NODEMODIFYTABLE_H
#include "nodes/execnodes.h"
extern ModifyTableState *ExecInitModifyTable(ModifyTable *node, EState *estate, int eflags);
extern void ExecEndModifyTable(ModifyTableState *node);
extern void ExecReScanModifyTable(ModifyTableState *node);
MERGE SQL Command following SQL:2016 MERGE performs actions that modify rows in the target table using a source table or query. MERGE provides a single SQL statement that can conditionally INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE rows a task that would other require multiple PL statements. e.g. MERGE INTO target AS t USING source AS s ON t.tid = s.sid WHEN MATCHED AND t.balance > s.delta THEN UPDATE SET balance = t.balance - s.delta WHEN MATCHED THEN DELETE WHEN NOT MATCHED AND s.delta > 0 THEN INSERT VALUES (s.sid, s.delta) WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN DO NOTHING; MERGE works with regular and partitioned tables, including column and row security enforcement, as well as support for row, statement and transition triggers. MERGE is optimized for OLTP and is parameterizable, though also useful for large scale ETL/ELT. MERGE is not intended to be used in preference to existing single SQL commands for INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE since there is some overhead. MERGE can be used statically from PL/pgSQL. MERGE does not yet support inheritance, write rules, RETURNING clauses, updatable views or foreign tables. MERGE follows SQL Standard per the most recent SQL:2016. Includes full tests and documentation, including full isolation tests to demonstrate the concurrent behavior. This version written from scratch in 2017 by Simon Riggs, using docs and tests originally written in 2009. Later work from Pavan Deolasee has been both complex and deep, leaving the lead author credit now in his hands. Extensive discussion of concurrency from Peter Geoghegan, with thanks for the time and effort contributed. Various issues reported via sqlsmith by Andreas Seltenreich Authors: Pavan Deolasee, Simon Riggs Reviewer: Peter Geoghegan, Amit Langote, Tomas Vondra, Simon Riggs Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANP8+jKitBSrB7oTgT9CY2i1ObfOt36z0XMraQc+Xrz8QB0nXA@mail.gmail.com https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkJdBuxj9PO=2QaO9-3h3xGbQPZ34kJH=HukRekwM-GZg@mail.gmail.com
8 years ago
extern TupleTableSlot *ExecPrepareTupleRouting(ModifyTableState *mtstate,
EState *estate,
struct PartitionTupleRouting *proute,
ResultRelInfo *targetRelInfo,
TupleTableSlot *slot);
extern TupleTableSlot *ExecDelete(ModifyTableState *mtstate,
ItemPointer tupleid, HeapTuple oldtuple, TupleTableSlot *planSlot,
EPQState *epqstate, EState *estate, bool *tupleDeleted,
bool processReturning, HeapUpdateFailureData *hufdp,
MergeActionState *actionState, bool canSetTag);
extern TupleTableSlot *ExecUpdate(ModifyTableState *mtstate,
ItemPointer tupleid, HeapTuple oldtuple, TupleTableSlot *slot,
TupleTableSlot *planSlot, EPQState *epqstate, EState *estate,
bool *tuple_updated, HeapUpdateFailureData *hufdp,
MergeActionState *actionState, bool canSetTag);
extern TupleTableSlot *ExecInsert(ModifyTableState *mtstate,
TupleTableSlot *slot,
TupleTableSlot *planSlot,
EState *estate,
MergeActionState *actionState,
bool canSetTag);
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
9 years ago
#endif /* NODEMODIFYTABLE_H */