|
|
|
|
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* nodeMergeAppend.c
|
|
|
|
|
* routines to handle MergeAppend nodes.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2018, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
|
|
|
|
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* IDENTIFICATION
|
|
|
|
|
* src/backend/executor/nodeMergeAppend.c
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
/* INTERFACE ROUTINES
|
|
|
|
|
* ExecInitMergeAppend - initialize the MergeAppend node
|
|
|
|
|
* ExecMergeAppend - retrieve the next tuple from the node
|
|
|
|
|
* ExecEndMergeAppend - shut down the MergeAppend node
|
|
|
|
|
* ExecReScanMergeAppend - rescan the MergeAppend node
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* NOTES
|
|
|
|
|
* A MergeAppend node contains a list of one or more subplans.
|
|
|
|
|
* These are each expected to deliver tuples that are sorted according
|
|
|
|
|
* to a common sort key. The MergeAppend node merges these streams
|
|
|
|
|
* to produce output sorted the same way.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* MergeAppend nodes don't make use of their left and right
|
|
|
|
|
* subtrees, rather they maintain a list of subplans so
|
|
|
|
|
* a typical MergeAppend node looks like this in the plan tree:
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* ...
|
|
|
|
|
* /
|
|
|
|
|
* MergeAppend---+------+------+--- nil
|
|
|
|
|
* / \ | | |
|
|
|
|
|
* nil nil ... ... ...
|
|
|
|
|
* subplans
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "postgres.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "executor/execdebug.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "executor/execPartition.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "executor/nodeMergeAppend.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "lib/binaryheap.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "miscadmin.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* We have one slot for each item in the heap array. We use SlotNumber
|
|
|
|
|
* to store slot indexes. This doesn't actually provide any formal
|
|
|
|
|
* type-safety, but it makes the code more self-documenting.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
typedef int32 SlotNumber;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static TupleTableSlot *ExecMergeAppend(PlanState *pstate);
|
|
|
|
|
static int heap_compare_slots(Datum a, Datum b, void *arg);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
* ExecInitMergeAppend
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Begin all of the subscans of the MergeAppend node.
|
|
|
|
|
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
MergeAppendState *
|
|
|
|
|
ExecInitMergeAppend(MergeAppend *node, EState *estate, int eflags)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
MergeAppendState *mergestate = makeNode(MergeAppendState);
|
|
|
|
|
PlanState **mergeplanstates;
|
|
|
|
|
Bitmapset *validsubplans;
|
|
|
|
|
int nplans;
|
|
|
|
|
int i,
|
|
|
|
|
j;
|
|
|
|
|
ListCell *lc;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* check for unsupported flags */
|
|
|
|
|
Assert(!(eflags & (EXEC_FLAG_BACKWARD | EXEC_FLAG_MARK)));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* create new MergeAppendState for our node
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ps.plan = (Plan *) node;
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ps.state = estate;
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ps.ExecProcNode = ExecMergeAppend;
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ms_noopscan = false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* If run-time partition pruning is enabled, then set that up now */
|
|
|
|
|
if (node->part_prune_info != NULL)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
PartitionPruneState *prunestate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* We may need an expression context to evaluate partition exprs */
|
|
|
|
|
ExecAssignExprContext(estate, &mergestate->ps);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prunestate = ExecCreatePartitionPruneState(&mergestate->ps,
|
|
|
|
|
node->part_prune_info);
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ms_prune_state = prunestate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Perform an initial partition prune, if required. */
|
|
|
|
|
if (prunestate->do_initial_prune)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
/* Determine which subplans survive initial pruning */
|
|
|
|
|
validsubplans = ExecFindInitialMatchingSubPlans(prunestate,
|
|
|
|
|
list_length(node->mergeplans));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* The case where no subplans survive pruning must be handled
|
|
|
|
|
* specially. The problem here is that code in explain.c requires
|
|
|
|
|
* a MergeAppend to have at least one subplan in order for it to
|
|
|
|
|
* properly determine the Vars in that subplan's targetlist. We
|
|
|
|
|
* sidestep this issue by just initializing the first subplan and
|
|
|
|
|
* setting ms_noopscan to true to indicate that we don't really
|
|
|
|
|
* need to scan any subnodes.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
if (bms_is_empty(validsubplans))
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ms_noopscan = true;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Mark the first as valid so that it's initialized below */
|
|
|
|
|
validsubplans = bms_make_singleton(0);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nplans = bms_num_members(validsubplans);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
/* We'll need to initialize all subplans */
|
|
|
|
|
nplans = list_length(node->mergeplans);
|
|
|
|
|
Assert(nplans > 0);
|
|
|
|
|
validsubplans = bms_add_range(NULL, 0, nplans - 1);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* If no runtime pruning is required, we can fill ms_valid_subplans
|
|
|
|
|
* immediately, preventing later calls to ExecFindMatchingSubPlans.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
if (!prunestate->do_exec_prune)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
Assert(nplans > 0);
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ms_valid_subplans = bms_add_range(NULL, 0, nplans - 1);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
nplans = list_length(node->mergeplans);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* When run-time partition pruning is not enabled we can just mark all
|
|
|
|
|
* subplans as valid; they must also all be initialized.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Assert(nplans > 0);
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ms_valid_subplans = validsubplans =
|
|
|
|
|
bms_add_range(NULL, 0, nplans - 1);
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ms_prune_state = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mergeplanstates = (PlanState **) palloc(nplans * sizeof(PlanState *));
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->mergeplans = mergeplanstates;
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ms_nplans = nplans;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ms_slots = (TupleTableSlot **) palloc0(sizeof(TupleTableSlot *) * nplans);
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ms_heap = binaryheap_allocate(nplans, heap_compare_slots,
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Miscellaneous initialization
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* MergeAppend nodes do have Result slots, which hold pointers to tuples,
|
Don't require return slots for nodes without projection.
In a lot of nodes the return slot is not required. That can either be
because the node doesn't do any projection (say an Append node), or
because the node does perform projections but the projection is
optimized away because the projection would yield an identical row.
Slots aren't that small, especially for wide rows, so it's worthwhile
to avoid creating them. It's not possible to just skip creating the
slot - it's currently used to determine the tuple descriptor returned
by ExecGetResultType(). So separate the determination of the result
type from the slot creation. The work previously done internally
ExecInitResultTupleSlotTL() can now also be done separately with
ExecInitResultTypeTL() and ExecInitResultSlot(). That way nodes that
aren't guaranteed to need a result slot, can use
ExecInitResultTypeTL() to determine the result type of the node, and
ExecAssignScanProjectionInfo() (via
ExecConditionalAssignProjectionInfo()) determines that a result slot
is needed, it is created with ExecInitResultSlot().
Besides the advantage of avoiding to create slots that then are
unused, this is necessary preparation for later patches around tuple
table slot abstraction. In particular separating the return descriptor
and slot is a prerequisite to allow JITing of tuple deforming with
knowledge of the underlying tuple format, and to avoid unnecessarily
creating JITed tuple deforming for virtual slots.
This commit removes a redundant argument from
ExecInitResultTupleSlotTL(). While this commit touches a lot of the
relevant lines anyway, it'd normally still not worthwhile to cause
breakage, except that aforementioned later commits will touch *all*
ExecInitResultTupleSlotTL() callers anyway (but fits worse
thematically).
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
7 years ago
|
|
|
* so we have to initialize them. FIXME
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Don't require return slots for nodes without projection.
In a lot of nodes the return slot is not required. That can either be
because the node doesn't do any projection (say an Append node), or
because the node does perform projections but the projection is
optimized away because the projection would yield an identical row.
Slots aren't that small, especially for wide rows, so it's worthwhile
to avoid creating them. It's not possible to just skip creating the
slot - it's currently used to determine the tuple descriptor returned
by ExecGetResultType(). So separate the determination of the result
type from the slot creation. The work previously done internally
ExecInitResultTupleSlotTL() can now also be done separately with
ExecInitResultTypeTL() and ExecInitResultSlot(). That way nodes that
aren't guaranteed to need a result slot, can use
ExecInitResultTypeTL() to determine the result type of the node, and
ExecAssignScanProjectionInfo() (via
ExecConditionalAssignProjectionInfo()) determines that a result slot
is needed, it is created with ExecInitResultSlot().
Besides the advantage of avoiding to create slots that then are
unused, this is necessary preparation for later patches around tuple
table slot abstraction. In particular separating the return descriptor
and slot is a prerequisite to allow JITing of tuple deforming with
knowledge of the underlying tuple format, and to avoid unnecessarily
creating JITed tuple deforming for virtual slots.
This commit removes a redundant argument from
ExecInitResultTupleSlotTL(). While this commit touches a lot of the
relevant lines anyway, it'd normally still not worthwhile to cause
breakage, except that aforementioned later commits will touch *all*
ExecInitResultTupleSlotTL() callers anyway (but fits worse
thematically).
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
7 years ago
|
|
|
ExecInitResultTupleSlotTL(&mergestate->ps);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* call ExecInitNode on each of the valid plans to be executed and save
|
|
|
|
|
* the results into the mergeplanstates array.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
j = i = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
foreach(lc, node->mergeplans)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
if (bms_is_member(i, validsubplans))
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
Plan *initNode = (Plan *) lfirst(lc);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mergeplanstates[j++] = ExecInitNode(initNode, estate, eflags);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
i++;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ps.ps_ProjInfo = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* initialize sort-key information
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ms_nkeys = node->numCols;
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ms_sortkeys = palloc0(sizeof(SortSupportData) * node->numCols);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < node->numCols; i++)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
SortSupport sortKey = mergestate->ms_sortkeys + i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sortKey->ssup_cxt = CurrentMemoryContext;
|
|
|
|
|
sortKey->ssup_collation = node->collations[i];
|
|
|
|
|
sortKey->ssup_nulls_first = node->nullsFirst[i];
|
|
|
|
|
sortKey->ssup_attno = node->sortColIdx[i];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* It isn't feasible to perform abbreviated key conversion, since
|
|
|
|
|
* tuples are pulled into mergestate's binary heap as needed. It
|
|
|
|
|
* would likely be counter-productive to convert tuples into an
|
|
|
|
|
* abbreviated representation as they're pulled up, so opt out of that
|
|
|
|
|
* additional optimization entirely.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
sortKey->abbreviate = false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PrepareSortSupportFromOrderingOp(node->sortOperators[i], sortKey);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* initialize to show we have not run the subplans yet
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
mergestate->ms_initialized = false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return mergestate;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
* ExecMergeAppend
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Handles iteration over multiple subplans.
|
|
|
|
|
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
static TupleTableSlot *
|
|
|
|
|
ExecMergeAppend(PlanState *pstate)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
MergeAppendState *node = castNode(MergeAppendState, pstate);
|
|
|
|
|
TupleTableSlot *result;
|
|
|
|
|
SlotNumber i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!node->ms_initialized)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
/* Nothing to do if all subplans were pruned */
|
|
|
|
|
if (node->ms_noopscan)
|
|
|
|
|
return ExecClearTuple(node->ps.ps_ResultTupleSlot);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* If we've yet to determine the valid subplans then do so now. If
|
|
|
|
|
* run-time pruning is disabled then the valid subplans will always be
|
|
|
|
|
* set to all subplans.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
if (node->ms_valid_subplans == NULL)
|
|
|
|
|
node->ms_valid_subplans =
|
|
|
|
|
ExecFindMatchingSubPlans(node->ms_prune_state);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* First time through: pull the first tuple from each valid subplan,
|
|
|
|
|
* and set up the heap.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
i = -1;
|
|
|
|
|
while ((i = bms_next_member(node->ms_valid_subplans, i)) >= 0)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
node->ms_slots[i] = ExecProcNode(node->mergeplans[i]);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!TupIsNull(node->ms_slots[i]))
|
|
|
|
|
binaryheap_add_unordered(node->ms_heap, Int32GetDatum(i));
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
binaryheap_build(node->ms_heap);
|
|
|
|
|
node->ms_initialized = true;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Otherwise, pull the next tuple from whichever subplan we returned
|
|
|
|
|
* from last time, and reinsert the subplan index into the heap,
|
|
|
|
|
* because it might now compare differently against the existing
|
|
|
|
|
* elements of the heap. (We could perhaps simplify the logic a bit
|
|
|
|
|
* by doing this before returning from the prior call, but it's better
|
|
|
|
|
* to not pull tuples until necessary.)
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
i = DatumGetInt32(binaryheap_first(node->ms_heap));
|
|
|
|
|
node->ms_slots[i] = ExecProcNode(node->mergeplans[i]);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!TupIsNull(node->ms_slots[i]))
|
|
|
|
|
binaryheap_replace_first(node->ms_heap, Int32GetDatum(i));
|
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
|
(void) binaryheap_remove_first(node->ms_heap);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (binaryheap_empty(node->ms_heap))
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
/* All the subplans are exhausted, and so is the heap */
|
|
|
|
|
result = ExecClearTuple(node->ps.ps_ResultTupleSlot);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
i = DatumGetInt32(binaryheap_first(node->ms_heap));
|
|
|
|
|
result = node->ms_slots[i];
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return result;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Compare the tuples in the two given slots.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
static int32
|
|
|
|
|
heap_compare_slots(Datum a, Datum b, void *arg)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
MergeAppendState *node = (MergeAppendState *) arg;
|
|
|
|
|
SlotNumber slot1 = DatumGetInt32(a);
|
|
|
|
|
SlotNumber slot2 = DatumGetInt32(b);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TupleTableSlot *s1 = node->ms_slots[slot1];
|
|
|
|
|
TupleTableSlot *s2 = node->ms_slots[slot2];
|
|
|
|
|
int nkey;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assert(!TupIsNull(s1));
|
|
|
|
|
Assert(!TupIsNull(s2));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (nkey = 0; nkey < node->ms_nkeys; nkey++)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
SortSupport sortKey = node->ms_sortkeys + nkey;
|
|
|
|
|
AttrNumber attno = sortKey->ssup_attno;
|
|
|
|
|
Datum datum1,
|
|
|
|
|
datum2;
|
|
|
|
|
bool isNull1,
|
|
|
|
|
isNull2;
|
|
|
|
|
int compare;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
datum1 = slot_getattr(s1, attno, &isNull1);
|
|
|
|
|
datum2 = slot_getattr(s2, attno, &isNull2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compare = ApplySortComparator(datum1, isNull1,
|
|
|
|
|
datum2, isNull2,
|
|
|
|
|
sortKey);
|
|
|
|
|
if (compare != 0)
|
Allow btree comparison functions to return INT_MIN.
Historically we forbade datatype-specific comparison functions from
returning INT_MIN, so that it would be safe to invert the sort order
just by negating the comparison result. However, this was never
really safe for comparison functions that directly return the result
of memcmp(), strcmp(), etc, as POSIX doesn't place any such restriction
on those library functions. Buildfarm results show that at least on
recent Linux on s390x, memcmp() actually does return INT_MIN sometimes,
causing sort failures.
The agreed-on answer is to remove this restriction and fix relevant
call sites to not make such an assumption; code such as "res = -res"
should be replaced by "INVERT_COMPARE_RESULT(res)". The same is needed
in a few places that just directly negated the result of memcmp or
strcmp.
To help find places having this problem, I've also added a compile option
to nbtcompare.c that causes some of the commonly used comparators to
return INT_MIN/INT_MAX instead of their usual -1/+1. It'd likely be
a good idea to have at least one buildfarm member running with
"-DSTRESS_SORT_INT_MIN". That's far from a complete test of course,
but it should help to prevent fresh introductions of such bugs.
This is a longstanding portability hazard, so back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180928185215.ffoq2xrq5d3pafna@alap3.anarazel.de
7 years ago
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
INVERT_COMPARE_RESULT(compare);
|
|
|
|
|
return compare;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
* ExecEndMergeAppend
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Shuts down the subscans of the MergeAppend node.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Returns nothing of interest.
|
|
|
|
|
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
|
ExecEndMergeAppend(MergeAppendState *node)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
PlanState **mergeplans;
|
|
|
|
|
int nplans;
|
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* get information from the node
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
mergeplans = node->mergeplans;
|
|
|
|
|
nplans = node->ms_nplans;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* shut down each of the subscans
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < nplans; i++)
|
|
|
|
|
ExecEndNode(mergeplans[i]);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
|
ExecReScanMergeAppend(MergeAppendState *node)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* If any PARAM_EXEC Params used in pruning expressions have changed, then
|
|
|
|
|
* we'd better unset the valid subplans so that they are reselected for
|
|
|
|
|
* the new parameter values.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
if (node->ms_prune_state &&
|
|
|
|
|
bms_overlap(node->ps.chgParam,
|
|
|
|
|
node->ms_prune_state->execparamids))
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
bms_free(node->ms_valid_subplans);
|
|
|
|
|
node->ms_valid_subplans = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < node->ms_nplans; i++)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
PlanState *subnode = node->mergeplans[i];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* ExecReScan doesn't know about my subplans, so I have to do
|
|
|
|
|
* changed-parameter signaling myself.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
if (node->ps.chgParam != NULL)
|
|
|
|
|
UpdateChangedParamSet(subnode, node->ps.chgParam);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* If chgParam of subnode is not null then plan will be re-scanned by
|
|
|
|
|
* first ExecProcNode.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
if (subnode->chgParam == NULL)
|
|
|
|
|
ExecReScan(subnode);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
binaryheap_reset(node->ms_heap);
|
|
|
|
|
node->ms_initialized = false;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|