You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
postgres/src/backend/executor/nodeSubqueryscan.c

204 lines
5.3 KiB

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* nodeSubqueryscan.c
* Support routines for scanning subqueries (subselects in rangetable).
*
* This is just enough different from sublinks (nodeSubplan.c) to mean that
* we need two sets of code. Ought to look at trying to unify the cases.
*
*
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* src/backend/executor/nodeSubqueryscan.c
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
/*
* INTERFACE ROUTINES
* ExecSubqueryScan scans a subquery.
* ExecSubqueryNext retrieve next tuple in sequential order.
* ExecInitSubqueryScan creates and initializes a subqueryscan node.
* ExecEndSubqueryScan releases any storage allocated.
* ExecReScanSubqueryScan rescans the relation
*
*/
#include "postgres.h"
#include "executor/execdebug.h"
#include "executor/nodeSubqueryscan.h"
static TupleTableSlot *SubqueryNext(SubqueryScanState *node);
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* Scan Support
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* SubqueryNext
*
* This is a workhorse for ExecSubqueryScan
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
static TupleTableSlot *
SubqueryNext(SubqueryScanState *node)
{
TupleTableSlot *slot;
/*
* Get the next tuple from the sub-query.
*/
slot = ExecProcNode(node->subplan);
/*
* We just return the subplan's result slot, rather than expending extra
* cycles for ExecCopySlot(). (Our own ScanTupleSlot is used only for
* EvalPlanQual rechecks.)
*/
return slot;
}
/*
* SubqueryRecheck -- access method routine to recheck a tuple in EvalPlanQual
*/
static bool
SubqueryRecheck(SubqueryScanState *node, TupleTableSlot *slot)
{
/* nothing to check */
return true;
}
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ExecSubqueryScan(node)
*
* Scans the subquery sequentially and returns the next qualifying
* tuple.
* We call the ExecScan() routine and pass it the appropriate
* access method functions.
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
TupleTableSlot *
ExecSubqueryScan(SubqueryScanState *node)
{
return ExecScan(&node->ss,
(ExecScanAccessMtd) SubqueryNext,
(ExecScanRecheckMtd) SubqueryRecheck);
}
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ExecInitSubqueryScan
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
SubqueryScanState *
ExecInitSubqueryScan(SubqueryScan *node, EState *estate, int eflags)
{
SubqueryScanState *subquerystate;
/* check for unsupported flags */
Assert(!(eflags & EXEC_FLAG_MARK));
/* SubqueryScan should not have any "normal" children */
Assert(outerPlan(node) == NULL);
Assert(innerPlan(node) == NULL);
/*
* create state structure
*/
subquerystate = makeNode(SubqueryScanState);
subquerystate->ss.ps.plan = (Plan *) node;
subquerystate->ss.ps.state = estate;
/*
* Miscellaneous initialization
*
* create expression context for node
*/
ExecAssignExprContext(estate, &subquerystate->ss.ps);
/*
* initialize child expressions
*/
Faster expression evaluation and targetlist projection. This replaces the old, recursive tree-walk based evaluation, with non-recursive, opcode dispatch based, expression evaluation. Projection is now implemented as part of expression evaluation. This both leads to significant performance improvements, and makes future just-in-time compilation of expressions easier. The speed gains primarily come from: - non-recursive implementation reduces stack usage / overhead - simple sub-expressions are implemented with a single jump, without function calls - sharing some state between different sub-expressions - reduced amount of indirect/hard to predict memory accesses by laying out operation metadata sequentially; including the avoidance of nearly all of the previously used linked lists - more code has been moved to expression initialization, avoiding constant re-checks at evaluation time Future just-in-time compilation (JIT) has become easier, as demonstrated by released patches intended to be merged in a later release, for primarily two reasons: Firstly, due to a stricter split between expression initialization and evaluation, less code has to be handled by the JIT. Secondly, due to the non-recursive nature of the generated "instructions", less performance-critical code-paths can easily be shared between interpreted and compiled evaluation. The new framework allows for significant future optimizations. E.g.: - basic infrastructure for to later reduce the per executor-startup overhead of expression evaluation, by caching state in prepared statements. That'd be helpful in OLTPish scenarios where initialization overhead is measurable. - optimizing the generated "code". A number of proposals for potential work has already been made. - optimizing the interpreter. Similarly a number of proposals have been made here too. The move of logic into the expression initialization step leads to some backward-incompatible changes: - Function permission checks are now done during expression initialization, whereas previously they were done during execution. In edge cases this can lead to errors being raised that previously wouldn't have been, e.g. a NULL array being coerced to a different array type previously didn't perform checks. - The set of domain constraints to be checked, is now evaluated once during expression initialization, previously it was re-built every time a domain check was evaluated. For normal queries this doesn't change much, but e.g. for plpgsql functions, which caches ExprStates, the old set could stick around longer. The behavior around might still change. Author: Andres Freund, with significant changes by Tom Lane, changes by Heikki Linnakangas Reviewed-By: Tom Lane, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20161206034955.bh33paeralxbtluv@alap3.anarazel.de
9 years ago
subquerystate->ss.ps.qual =
ExecInitQual(node->scan.plan.qual, (PlanState *) subquerystate);
/*
* tuple table initialization
*/
ExecInitResultTupleSlot(estate, &subquerystate->ss.ps);
ExecInitScanTupleSlot(estate, &subquerystate->ss);
/*
* initialize subquery
*/
subquerystate->subplan = ExecInitNode(node->subplan, estate, eflags);
/*
* Initialize scan tuple type (needed by ExecAssignScanProjectionInfo)
*/
ExecAssignScanType(&subquerystate->ss,
ExecGetResultType(subquerystate->subplan));
/*
* Initialize result tuple type and projection info.
*/
ExecAssignResultTypeFromTL(&subquerystate->ss.ps);
ExecAssignScanProjectionInfo(&subquerystate->ss);
return subquerystate;
}
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ExecEndSubqueryScan
*
* frees any storage allocated through C routines.
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
void
ExecEndSubqueryScan(SubqueryScanState *node)
{
/*
* Free the exprcontext
*/
ExecFreeExprContext(&node->ss.ps);
/*
* clean out the upper tuple table
*/
ExecClearTuple(node->ss.ps.ps_ResultTupleSlot);
ExecClearTuple(node->ss.ss_ScanTupleSlot);
/*
* close down subquery
*/
ExecEndNode(node->subplan);
}
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* ExecReScanSubqueryScan
*
* Rescans the relation.
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
void
ExecReScanSubqueryScan(SubqueryScanState *node)
{
ExecScanReScan(&node->ss);
/*
* ExecReScan doesn't know about my subplan, so I have to do
* changed-parameter signaling myself. This is just as well, because the
* subplan has its own memory context in which its chgParam state lives.
*/
if (node->ss.ps.chgParam != NULL)
UpdateChangedParamSet(node->subplan, node->ss.ps.chgParam);
/*
* if chgParam of subnode is not null then plan will be re-scanned by
* first ExecProcNode.
*/
if (node->subplan->chgParam == NULL)
ExecReScan(node->subplan);
}