Fix EXIT out of outermost block in plpgsql.

Ordinarily, using EXIT this way would draw "control reached end of
function without RETURN".  However, if the function is one where we
don't require an explicit RETURN (such as a DO block), that should
not happen.  It did anyway, because add_dummy_return() neglected to
account for the case.

Per report from Herwig Goemans.  Back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/868ae948-e3ca-c7ec-95a6-83cfc08ef750@gmail.com
pull/69/merge
Tom Lane 4 years ago
parent df3640e529
commit 1bf2518dd6
  1. 11
      src/pl/plpgsql/src/expected/plpgsql_control.out
  2. 6
      src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_comp.c
  3. 12
      src/pl/plpgsql/src/sql/plpgsql_control.sql

@ -413,6 +413,17 @@ begin
raise notice 'should get here';
end$$;
NOTICE: should get here
-- check exit out of outermost block
do $$
<<outerblock>>
begin
<<innerblock>>
begin
exit outerblock;
raise notice 'should not get here';
end;
raise notice 'should not get here, either';
end$$;
-- unlabeled exit does match a while loop
do $$
begin

@ -1038,9 +1038,11 @@ add_dummy_return(PLpgSQL_function *function)
/*
* If the outer block has an EXCEPTION clause, we need to make a new outer
* block, since the added RETURN shouldn't act like it is inside the
* EXCEPTION clause.
* EXCEPTION clause. Likewise, if it has a label, wrap it in a new outer
* block so that EXIT doesn't skip the RETURN.
*/
if (function->action->exceptions != NULL)
if (function->action->exceptions != NULL ||
function->action->label != NULL)
{
PLpgSQL_stmt_block *new;

@ -311,6 +311,18 @@ begin
raise notice 'should get here';
end$$;
-- check exit out of outermost block
do $$
<<outerblock>>
begin
<<innerblock>>
begin
exit outerblock;
raise notice 'should not get here';
end;
raise notice 'should not get here, either';
end$$;
-- unlabeled exit does match a while loop
do $$
begin

Loading…
Cancel
Save