mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres
When COPYing into a partitioned table that does now permit the use of table_multi_insert(), we could error out with ERROR: could not read block NN in file "base/...": read only 0 of 8192 bytes because BulkInsertState->next_free was not reset between partitions. This problem occurred only when not able to use table_multi_insert(), as a dedicated BulkInsertState for each partition is used in that case. The bug was introduced inpull/145/head00d1e02be2
, but it was hard to hit at that point, as commonly bulk relation extension is not used when not using table_multi_insert(). It became more likely after82a4edabd2
, which expanded the use of bulk extension. To fix the bug, reset the bulk relation extension state in BulkInsertState in ReleaseBulkInsertStatePin(). That was added (inb1ecb9b3fc
) to tackle a very similar issue. Obviously the name is not quite correct, but there might be external callers, and bulk insert state needs to be reset in precisely in the situations that ReleaseBulkInsertStatePin() already needed to be called. Medium term the better fix likely is to disallow reusing BulkInsertState across relations. Add a test that, without the fix, reproduces #18130 in most configurations. The test also catches the problem fixed inb1ecb9b3fc
when run with small shared_buffers. Reported-by: Ivan Kolombet <enderstd@gmail.com> Analyzed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Analyzed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Bug: #18130 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18130-7a86a7356a75209d%40postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/257696.1695670946%40sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch: 16-
parent
8d140c5822
commit
22655aa231
Loading…
Reference in new issue