mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres
parent
0a7fb4e918
commit
305d3ce576
@ -0,0 +1,409 @@ |
||||
Proposal for function-manager redesign 24-May-2000 |
||||
-------------------------------------- |
||||
|
||||
We know that the existing mechanism for calling Postgres functions needs |
||||
to be redesigned. It has portability problems because it makes |
||||
assumptions about parameter passing that violate ANSI C; it fails to |
||||
handle NULL arguments and results cleanly; and "function handlers" that |
||||
support a class of functions (such as fmgr_pl) can only be done via a |
||||
really ugly, non-reentrant kluge. (Global variable set during every |
||||
function call, forsooth.) Here is a proposal for fixing these problems. |
||||
|
||||
In the past, the major objections to redoing the function-manager |
||||
interface have been (a) it'll be quite tedious to implement, since every |
||||
built-in function and everyplace that calls such functions will need to |
||||
be touched; (b) such wide-ranging changes will be difficult to make in |
||||
parallel with other development work; (c) it will break existing |
||||
user-written loadable modules that define "C language" functions. While |
||||
I have no solution to the "tedium" aspect, I believe I see an answer to |
||||
the other problems: by use of function handlers, we can support both old |
||||
and new interfaces in parallel for both callers and callees, at some |
||||
small efficiency cost for the old styles. That way, most of the changes |
||||
can be done on an incremental file-by-file basis --- we won't need a |
||||
"big bang" where everything changes at once. Support for callees |
||||
written in the old style can be left in place indefinitely, to provide |
||||
backward compatibility for user-written C functions. |
||||
|
||||
Note that neither the old function manager nor the redesign are intended |
||||
to handle functions that accept or return sets. Those sorts of functions |
||||
need to be handled by special querytree structures. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Changes in pg_proc (system data about a function) |
||||
------------------------------------------------- |
||||
|
||||
A new column "proisstrict" will be added to the system pg_proc table. |
||||
This is a boolean value which will be TRUE if the function is "strict", |
||||
that is it always returns NULL when any of its inputs are NULL. The |
||||
function manager will check this field and skip calling the function when |
||||
it's TRUE and there are NULL inputs. This allows us to remove explicit |
||||
NULL-value tests from many functions that currently need them. A function |
||||
that is not marked "strict" is responsible for checking whether its inputs |
||||
are NULL or not. Most builtin functions will be marked "strict". |
||||
|
||||
An optional WITH parameter will be added to CREATE FUNCTION to allow |
||||
specification of whether user-defined functions are strict or not. I am |
||||
inclined to make the default be "not strict", since that seems to be the |
||||
more useful case for functions expressed in SQL or a PL language, but |
||||
am open to arguments for the other choice. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The new function-manager interface |
||||
---------------------------------- |
||||
|
||||
The core of the new design is revised data structures for representing |
||||
the result of a function lookup and for representing the parameters |
||||
passed to a specific function invocation. (We want to keep function |
||||
lookup separate from function call, since many parts of the system apply |
||||
the same function over and over; the lookup overhead should be paid once |
||||
per query, not once per tuple.) |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
When a function is looked up in pg_proc, the result is represented as |
||||
|
||||
typedef struct |
||||
{ |
||||
PGFunction fn_addr; /* pointer to function or handler to be called */ |
||||
Oid fn_oid; /* OID of function (NOT of handler, if any) */ |
||||
short fn_nargs; /* 0..FUNC_MAX_ARGS, or -1 if variable arg count */ |
||||
bool fn_strict; /* function is "strict" (NULL in => NULL out) */ |
||||
void *fn_extra; /* extra space for use by handler */ |
||||
} FmgrInfo; |
||||
|
||||
For an ordinary built-in function, fn_addr is just the address of the C |
||||
routine that implements the function. Otherwise it is the address of a |
||||
handler for the class of functions that includes the target function. |
||||
The handler can use the function OID and perhaps also the fn_extra slot |
||||
to find the specific code to execute. (fn_oid = InvalidOid can be used |
||||
to denote a not-yet-initialized FmgrInfo struct. fn_extra will always |
||||
be NULL when an FmgrInfo is first filled by the function lookup code, but |
||||
a function handler could set it to avoid making repeated lookups of its |
||||
own when the same FmgrInfo is used repeatedly during a query.) fn_nargs |
||||
is the number of arguments expected by the function, and fn_strict is |
||||
its strictness flag. |
||||
|
||||
FmgrInfo already exists in the current code, but has fewer fields. This |
||||
change should be transparent at the source-code level. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
During a call of a function, the following data structure is created |
||||
and passed to the function: |
||||
|
||||
typedef struct |
||||
{ |
||||
FmgrInfo *flinfo; /* ptr to lookup info used for this call */ |
||||
Node *context; /* pass info about context of call */ |
||||
Node *resultinfo; /* pass or return extra info about result */ |
||||
bool isnull; /* function must set true if result is NULL */ |
||||
short nargs; /* # arguments actually passed */ |
||||
Datum arg[FUNC_MAX_ARGS]; /* Arguments passed to function */ |
||||
bool argnull[FUNC_MAX_ARGS]; /* T if arg[i] is actually NULL */ |
||||
} FunctionCallInfoData; |
||||
typedef FunctionCallInfoData* FunctionCallInfo; |
||||
|
||||
flinfo points to the lookup info used to make the call. Ordinary functions |
||||
will probably ignore this field, but function class handlers will need it |
||||
to find out the OID of the specific function being called. |
||||
|
||||
context is NULL for an "ordinary" function call, but may point to additional |
||||
info when the function is called in certain contexts. (For example, the |
||||
trigger manager will pass information about the current trigger event here.) |
||||
If context is used, it should point to some subtype of Node; the particular |
||||
kind of context can then be indicated by the node type field. (A callee |
||||
should always check the node type before assuming it knows what kind of |
||||
context is being passed.) fmgr itself puts no other restrictions on the use |
||||
of this field. |
||||
|
||||
resultinfo is NULL when calling any function from which a simple Datum |
||||
result is expected. It may point to some subtype of Node if the function |
||||
returns more than a Datum. Like the context field, resultinfo is a hook |
||||
for expansion; fmgr itself doesn't constrain the use of the field. |
||||
|
||||
nargs, arg[], and argnull[] hold the arguments being passed to the function. |
||||
Notice that all the arguments passed to a function (as well as its result |
||||
value) will now uniformly be of type Datum. As discussed below, callers |
||||
and callees should apply the standard Datum-to-and-from-whatever macros |
||||
to convert to the actual argument types of a particular function. The |
||||
value in arg[i] is unspecified when argnull[i] is true. |
||||
|
||||
It is generally the responsibility of the caller to ensure that the |
||||
number of arguments passed matches what the callee is expecting; except |
||||
for callees that take a variable number of arguments, the callee will |
||||
typically ignore the nargs field and just grab values from arg[]. |
||||
|
||||
The isnull field will be initialized to "false" before the call. On |
||||
return from the function, isnull is the null flag for the function result: |
||||
if it is true the function's result is NULL, regardless of the actual |
||||
function return value. Note that simple "strict" functions can ignore |
||||
both isnull and argnull[], since they won't even get called when there |
||||
are any TRUE values in argnull[]. |
||||
|
||||
FunctionCallInfo replaces FmgrValues plus a bunch of ad-hoc parameter |
||||
conventions, global variables (fmgr_pl_finfo and CurrentTriggerData at |
||||
least), and other uglinesses. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Callees, whether they be individual functions or function handlers, |
||||
shall always have this signature: |
||||
|
||||
Datum function (FunctionCallInfo fcinfo); |
||||
|
||||
which is represented by the typedef |
||||
|
||||
typedef Datum (*PGFunction) (FunctionCallInfo fcinfo); |
||||
|
||||
The function is responsible for setting fcinfo->isnull appropriately |
||||
as well as returning a result represented as a Datum. Note that since |
||||
all callees will now have exactly the same signature, and will be called |
||||
through a function pointer declared with exactly that signature, we |
||||
should have no portability or optimization problems. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Function coding conventions |
||||
--------------------------- |
||||
|
||||
As an example, int4 addition goes from old-style |
||||
|
||||
int32 |
||||
int4pl(int32 arg1, int32 arg2) |
||||
{ |
||||
return arg1 + arg2; |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
to new-style |
||||
|
||||
Datum |
||||
int4pl(FunctionCallInfo fcinfo) |
||||
{ |
||||
/* we assume the function is marked "strict", so we can ignore |
||||
* NULL-value handling */ |
||||
|
||||
return Int32GetDatum(DatumGetInt32(fcinfo->arg[0]) + |
||||
DatumGetInt32(fcinfo->arg[1])); |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
This is, of course, much uglier than the old-style code, but we can |
||||
improve matters with some well-chosen macros for the boilerplate parts. |
||||
I propose below macros that would make the code look like |
||||
|
||||
Datum |
||||
int4pl(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) |
||||
{ |
||||
int32 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT32(0); |
||||
int32 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT32(1); |
||||
|
||||
PG_RETURN_INT32( arg1 + arg2 ); |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
This is still more code than before, but it's fairly readable, and it's |
||||
also amenable to machine processing --- for example, we could probably |
||||
write a script that scans code like this and extracts argument and result |
||||
type info for comparison to the pg_proc table. |
||||
|
||||
For the standard data types float4, float8, and int8, these macros should |
||||
hide the indirection and space allocation involved, so that the function's |
||||
code is not explicitly aware that these types are pass-by-reference. This |
||||
will offer a considerable gain in readability, and it also opens up the |
||||
opportunity to make these types be pass-by-value on machines where it's |
||||
feasible to do so. (For example, on an Alpha it's pretty silly to make int8 |
||||
be pass-by-ref, since Datum is going to be 64 bits anyway. float4 could |
||||
become pass-by-value on all machines...) |
||||
|
||||
Here are the proposed macros and coding conventions: |
||||
|
||||
The definition of an fmgr-callable function will always look like |
||||
|
||||
Datum |
||||
function_name(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) |
||||
{ |
||||
... |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
"PG_FUNCTION_ARGS" just expands to "FunctionCallInfo fcinfo". The main |
||||
reason for using this macro is to make it easy for scripts to spot function |
||||
definitions. However, if we ever decide to change the calling convention |
||||
again, it might come in handy to have this macro in place. |
||||
|
||||
A nonstrict function is responsible for checking whether each individual |
||||
argument is null or not, which it can do with PG_ARGISNULL(n) (which is |
||||
just "fcinfo->argnull[n]"). It should avoid trying to fetch the value |
||||
of any argument that is null. |
||||
|
||||
Both strict and nonstrict functions can return NULL, if needed, with |
||||
PG_RETURN_NULL(); |
||||
which expands to |
||||
{ fcinfo->isnull = true; return (Datum) 0; } |
||||
|
||||
Argument values are ordinarily fetched using code like |
||||
int32 name = PG_GETARG_INT32(number); |
||||
|
||||
For float4, float8, and int8, the PG_GETARG macros will hide the pass-by- |
||||
reference nature of the data types; for example PG_GETARG_FLOAT4 expands to |
||||
(* (float4 *) DatumGetPointer(fcinfo->arg[number])) |
||||
and would typically be called like this: |
||||
float4 arg = PG_GETARG_FLOAT4(0); |
||||
Note that "float4" and "float8" are the recommended typedefs to use, not |
||||
"float32data" and "float64data", and the macros are named accordingly. |
||||
But 64-bit ints should be declared as "int64". |
||||
|
||||
Non-null values are returned with a PG_RETURN_XXX macro of the appropriate |
||||
type. For example, PG_RETURN_INT32 expands to |
||||
return Int32GetDatum(x) |
||||
PG_RETURN_FLOAT4, PG_RETURN_FLOAT8, and PG_RETURN_INT64 hide the pass-by- |
||||
reference nature of their datatypes. |
||||
|
||||
fmgr.h will provide PG_GETARG and PG_RETURN macros for all the basic data |
||||
types. Modules or header files that define specialized SQL datatypes |
||||
(eg, timestamp) should define appropriate macros for those types, so that |
||||
functions manipulating the types can be coded in the standard style. |
||||
|
||||
For non-primitive data types (particularly variable-length types) it |
||||
probably won't be very practical to hide the pass-by-reference nature of |
||||
the data type, so the PG_GETARG and PG_RETURN macros for those types |
||||
probably won't do more than DatumGetPointer/PointerGetDatum plus the |
||||
appropriate typecast. Functions returning such types will need to |
||||
palloc() their result space explicitly. I recommend naming the GETARG |
||||
and RETURN macros for such types to end in "_P", as a reminder that they |
||||
produce or take a pointer. For example, PG_GETARG_TEXT_P yields "text *". |
||||
|
||||
For TOAST-able data types, the PG_GETARG macro will deliver a de-TOASTed |
||||
data value. There might be a few cases where the still-toasted value is |
||||
wanted, but I am having a hard time coming up with examples. For the |
||||
moment I'd say that any such code could use a lower-level macro that is |
||||
just ((struct varlena *) DatumGetPointer(fcinfo->arg[n])). |
||||
|
||||
Note: the above examples assume that arguments will be counted starting at |
||||
zero. We could have the ARG macros subtract one from the argument number, |
||||
so that arguments are counted starting at one. I'm not sure if that would be |
||||
more or less confusing. Does anyone have a strong feeling either way about |
||||
it? |
||||
|
||||
When a function needs to access fcinfo->flinfo or one of the other auxiliary |
||||
fields of FunctionCallInfo, it should just do it. I doubt that providing |
||||
syntactic-sugar macros for these cases is useful. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Call-site coding conventions |
||||
---------------------------- |
||||
|
||||
There are many places in the system that call either a specific function |
||||
(for example, the parser invokes "textin" by name in places) or a |
||||
particular group of functions that have a common argument list (for |
||||
example, the optimizer invokes selectivity estimation functions with |
||||
a fixed argument list). These places will need to change, but we should |
||||
try to avoid making them significantly uglier than before. |
||||
|
||||
Places that invoke an arbitrary function with an arbitrary argument list |
||||
can simply be changed to fill a FunctionCallInfoData structure directly; |
||||
that'll be no worse and possibly cleaner than what they do now. |
||||
|
||||
When invoking a specific built-in function by name, we have generally |
||||
just written something like |
||||
result = textin ( ... args ... ) |
||||
which will not work after textin() is converted to the new call style. |
||||
I suggest that code like this be converted to use "helper" functions |
||||
that will create and fill in a FunctionCallInfoData struct. For |
||||
example, if textin is being called with one argument, it'd look |
||||
something like |
||||
result = DirectFunctionCall1(textin, PointerGetDatum(argument)); |
||||
These helper routines will have declarations like |
||||
Datum DirectFunctionCall2(PGFunction func, Datum arg1, Datum arg2); |
||||
Note it will be the caller's responsibility to convert to and from |
||||
Datum; appropriate conversion macros should be used. |
||||
|
||||
The DirectFunctionCallN routines will not bother to fill in |
||||
fcinfo->flinfo (indeed cannot, since they have no idea about an OID for |
||||
the target function); they will just set it NULL. This is unlikely to |
||||
bother any built-in function that could be called this way. Note also |
||||
that this style of coding cannot pass a NULL input value nor cope with |
||||
a NULL result (it couldn't before, either!). We can make the helper |
||||
routines elog an error if they see that the function returns a NULL. |
||||
|
||||
(Note: direct calls like this will have to be changed at the same time |
||||
that their called routines are changed to the new style. But that will |
||||
still be a lot less of a constraint than a "big bang" conversion.) |
||||
|
||||
When invoking a function that has a known argument signature, we have |
||||
usually written either |
||||
result = fmgr(targetfuncOid, ... args ... ); |
||||
or |
||||
result = fmgr_ptr(FmgrInfo *finfo, ... args ... ); |
||||
depending on whether an FmgrInfo lookup has been done yet or not. |
||||
This kind of code can be recast using helper routines, in the same |
||||
style as above: |
||||
result = OidFunctionCall1(funcOid, PointerGetDatum(argument)); |
||||
result = FunctionCall2(funcCallInfo, |
||||
PointerGetDatum(argument), |
||||
Int32GetDatum(argument)); |
||||
Again, this style of coding does not allow for expressing NULL inputs |
||||
or receiving a NULL result. |
||||
|
||||
As with the callee-side situation, I propose adding argument conversion |
||||
macros that hide the pass-by-reference nature of int8, float4, and |
||||
float8, with an eye to making those types relatively painless to convert |
||||
to pass-by-value. |
||||
|
||||
The existing helper functions fmgr(), fmgr_c(), etc will be left in |
||||
place until all uses of them are gone. Of course their internals will |
||||
have to change in the first step of implementation, but they can |
||||
continue to support the same external appearance. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Notes about function handlers |
||||
----------------------------- |
||||
|
||||
Handlers for classes of functions should find life much easier and |
||||
cleaner in this design. The OID of the called function is directly |
||||
reachable from the passed parameters; we don't need the global variable |
||||
fmgr_pl_finfo anymore. Also, by modifying fcinfo->flinfo->fn_extra, |
||||
the handler can cache lookup info to avoid repeat lookups when the same |
||||
function is invoked many times. (fn_extra can only be used as a hint, |
||||
since callers are not required to re-use an FmgrInfo struct. |
||||
But in performance-critical paths they normally will do so.) |
||||
|
||||
Issue: in what context should a handler allocate memory that it intends |
||||
to use for fn_extra data? The current palloc context when the handler |
||||
is actually called might be considerably shorter-lived than the FmgrInfo |
||||
struct, which would lead to dangling-pointer problems at the next use |
||||
of the FmgrInfo. Perhaps FmgrInfo should also store a memory context |
||||
identifier that the handler could use to allocate space of the right |
||||
lifespan. (Having fmgr_info initialize this to CurrentMemoryContext |
||||
should work in nearly all cases, though a few places might have to |
||||
set it differently.) At the moment I have not done this, since the |
||||
existing PL handlers only need to set fn_extra to point at long-lived |
||||
structures (data in their own caches) and don't really care which |
||||
context the FmgrInfo is in anyway. |
||||
|
||||
Are there any other things needed by the call handlers for PL/pgsql and |
||||
other languages? |
||||
|
||||
During the conversion process, support for old-style builtin functions |
||||
and old-style user-written C functions will be provided by appropriate |
||||
function handlers. For example, the handler for old-style builtins |
||||
looks roughly like fmgr_c() used to. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
System table updates |
||||
-------------------- |
||||
|
||||
In the initial phase, two new entries will be added to pg_language |
||||
for language types "newinternal" and "newC", corresponding to |
||||
builtin and dynamically-loaded functions having the new calling |
||||
convention. |
||||
|
||||
There will also be a change to pg_proc to add the new "proisstrict" |
||||
column. |
||||
|
||||
Then pg_proc entries will be changed from language code "internal" to |
||||
"newinternal" piecemeal, as the associated routines are rewritten. |
||||
(This will imply several rounds of forced initdbs as the contents of |
||||
pg_proc change, but I think we can live with that.) |
||||
|
||||
The old language names "internal" and "C" will continue to refer to |
||||
functions with the old calling convention. We should deprecate |
||||
old-style functions because of their portability problems, but the |
||||
support for them will only be one small function handler routine, |
||||
so we can leave them in place for as long as necessary. |
||||
|
||||
The expected calling convention for PL call handlers will need to change |
||||
all-at-once, but fortunately there are not very many of them to fix. |
Loading…
Reference in new issue