|
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ |
|
|
|
|
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml,v 1.73 2007/02/01 00:28:16 momjian Exp $ --> |
|
|
|
|
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml,v 1.74 2007/05/03 15:05:56 neilc Exp $ --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<chapter id="ddl"> |
|
|
|
|
<title>Data Definition</title> |
|
|
|
@ -2233,7 +2233,7 @@ VALUES ('New York', NULL, NULL, 'NY'); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<listitem> |
|
|
|
|
<para> |
|
|
|
|
When queries or updates access a large percentage of a a single |
|
|
|
|
When queries or updates access a large percentage of a single |
|
|
|
|
partition, performance can be improved by taking advantage |
|
|
|
|
of sequential scan of that partition instead of using an |
|
|
|
|
index and random access reads scattered across the whole table. |
|
|
|
@ -2556,7 +2556,7 @@ DO INSTEAD |
|
|
|
|
</programlisting> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that the <literal>WHERE</literal> clause in each rule |
|
|
|
|
exactly matches the the <literal>CHECK</literal> |
|
|
|
|
exactly matches the <literal>CHECK</literal> |
|
|
|
|
constraint for its partition. |
|
|
|
|
</para> |
|
|
|
|
</listitem> |
|
|
|
|