mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres
If the database or user had no entry in pg_db_role_setting, RESET silently did nothing --- including not checking the validity of the given GUC name. This is quite inconsistent and surprising, because you *would* get such an error if there were any pg_db_role_setting entry, even though it contains values for unrelated GUCs. While this is clearly a bug, changing it in stable branches seems unwise. The effect will be that some ALTER commands that formerly were no-ops will now be errors, and people don't like that sort of thing in minor releases. Author: Vitaly Davydov <v.davydov@postgrespro.ru> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30783e-68c28a00-9-41004480@130449754pull/240/head
parent
f14ea34d6e
commit
9a71989a8f
Loading…
Reference in new issue