mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres
We were using != to compare strings, for which "ne" is the right thing. It's not clear why it works everywhere except on Pavan's machine, but it's clearly bogus anyway. Author and reporter: Pavan Deolasee Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdPhsHM+pX8skoEY1_T0OtKdO1udzUj4VCjU5VEt+bj4eA@mail.gmail.compull/20/head
parent
0502e85464
commit
a600ee9e3f
Loading…
Reference in new issue