|
|
|
|
@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ postgres 27093 0.0 0.0 30096 2752 ? Ss 11:34 0:00 postgres: ser |
|
|
|
|
<row> |
|
|
|
|
<entry><structfield>backend_type</structfield></entry> |
|
|
|
|
<entry><type>text</type></entry> |
|
|
|
|
<entry>Type of current backend. Possible types are |
|
|
|
|
<entry>Type of current backend. Possible types are |
|
|
|
|
<literal>autovacuum launcher</>, <literal>autovacuum worker</>, |
|
|
|
|
<literal>background worker</>, <literal>background writer</>, |
|
|
|
|
<literal>client backend</>, <literal>checkpointer</>, |
|
|
|
|
@ -1827,7 +1827,7 @@ SELECT pid, wait_event_type, wait_event FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE wait_event i |
|
|
|
|
the standby to catch up with the sending server assuming the current |
|
|
|
|
rate of replay. Such a system would show similar times while new WAL is |
|
|
|
|
being generated, but would differ when the sender becomes idle. In |
|
|
|
|
particular, when the standby has caught up completely, |
|
|
|
|
particular, when the standby has caught up completely, |
|
|
|
|
<structname>pg_stat_replication</structname> shows the time taken to |
|
|
|
|
write, flush and replay the most recent reported WAL location rather than |
|
|
|
|
zero as some users might expect. This is consistent with the goal of |
|
|
|
|
|