|
|
|
|
@ -1427,3 +1427,69 @@ TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M16320=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org Thu Dec 6 10:16:20 2001 |
|
|
|
|
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M16320=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org> |
|
|
|
|
Received: from west.navpoint.com (west.navpoint.com [207.106.42.13]) |
|
|
|
|
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id fB6FGJZ29347 |
|
|
|
|
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:16:19 -0500 (EST) |
|
|
|
|
Received: from rs.postgresql.org (server1.pgsql.org [64.39.15.238] (may be forged)) |
|
|
|
|
by west.navpoint.com (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id fB6FGIE25797 |
|
|
|
|
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:16:18 -0500 (EST) |
|
|
|
|
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) |
|
|
|
|
by rs.postgresql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB6F8MR55154 |
|
|
|
|
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:12:12 -0600 (CST) |
|
|
|
|
(envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M16320=candle.pha.pa.us=pgman@postgresql.org) |
|
|
|
|
Received: from dendrite.sacadia.com (adsl-64-168-22-137.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.168.22.137]) |
|
|
|
|
by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fB3NNfm32380 |
|
|
|
|
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 18:23:42 -0500 (EST) |
|
|
|
|
(envelope-from mkscott@sacadia.com) |
|
|
|
|
Received: from sacadia.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) |
|
|
|
|
by dendrite.sacadia.com (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id fB3NKiK16816 |
|
|
|
|
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:20:44 -0800 (PST) |
|
|
|
|
Message-ID: <3C0C08CC.917CC04B@sacadia.com> |
|
|
|
|
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 15:20:44 -0800 |
|
|
|
|
From: mkscott@sacadia.com |
|
|
|
|
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) |
|
|
|
|
X-Accept-Language: en |
|
|
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
To: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> |
|
|
|
|
Subject: [HACKERS] Using Threads (again) |
|
|
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
|
|
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
|
|
|
|
Precedence: bulk |
|
|
|
|
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org |
|
|
|
|
Status: OR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since I last posted to this list I have done some work |
|
|
|
|
on a multi-threaded port of Postgres 7.0.2 that I have been kicking |
|
|
|
|
around for a while. There has been some mild interest |
|
|
|
|
in this in the past so I thought I might try and start a sourceforge |
|
|
|
|
project with what I have so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>From past discussions, it is clear to me that a direct port |
|
|
|
|
of postgres which uses threads instead of processes is not a |
|
|
|
|
good idea, how about an embedded version that uses threads. |
|
|
|
|
A multi-threaded postgres might be good for that. |
|
|
|
|
The version I am working on is slower in terms of transaction |
|
|
|
|
throughput than the current postgres but it uses less system |
|
|
|
|
resources and does not require shared memory. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I know it is possible to embed the current postgres but I |
|
|
|
|
believe that is a single user system. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Myron Scott |
|
|
|
|
mkscott@sacadia.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate |
|
|
|
|
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your |
|
|
|
|
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Momjian
24 years ago