postgres

Author SHA1 Message Date

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Tom Lane	0e5c823806	Make postgres_fdw's query_cancel test less flaky. This test occasionally shows +WARNING: could not get result of cancel request due to timeout which appears to be because the cancel request is sometimes unluckily sent to the remote session between queries, and then it's ignored. This patch tries to make that less probable in three ways: 1. Use a test query that does not involve remote estimates, so that no EXPLAINs are sent. 2. Make sure that the remote session is ready-to-go (transaction started, SET commands sent) before we start the timer. 3. Increase the statement_timeout to 100ms, to give the local session enough time to plan and issue the query. We might have to go higher than 100ms to make this adequately stable in the buildfarm, but let's see how it goes. Back-patch to v17 where this test was introduced. Jelte Fennema-Nio and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/578934.1725045685@sss.pgh.pa.us	1 year ago
Alvaro Herrera	90c1ba52e0	postgres_fdw: Split out the query_cancel test to its own file This allows us to skip it in Cygwin, where it's reportedly flaky because of platform bugs or something. Backpatch to 17, where the test was introduced by commit `2466d6654f`. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e4d0cb33-6be5-e4d5-ae49-9eac3ff2b005@gmail.com	1 year ago

Tom Lane

Make postgres_fdw's query_cancel test less flaky.

This test occasionally shows

+WARNING:  could not get result of cancel request due to timeout

which appears to be because the cancel request is sometimes unluckily
sent to the remote session between queries, and then it's ignored.

This patch tries to make that less probable in three ways:

1. Use a test query that does not involve remote estimates, so that
no EXPLAINs are sent.
2. Make sure that the remote session is ready-to-go (transaction
started, SET commands sent) before we start the timer.
3. Increase the statement_timeout to 100ms, to give the local
session enough time to plan and issue the query.

We might have to go higher than 100ms to make this adequately
stable in the buildfarm, but let's see how it goes.

Back-patch to v17 where this test was introduced.

Jelte Fennema-Nio and Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/578934.1725045685@sss.pgh.pa.us

1 year ago

Alvaro Herrera

90c1ba52e0

postgres_fdw: Split out the query_cancel test to its own file

This allows us to skip it in Cygwin, where it's reportedly flaky because
of platform bugs or something.

Backpatch to 17, where the test was introduced by commit 2466d6654f.

Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e4d0cb33-6be5-e4d5-ae49-9eac3ff2b005@gmail.com

1 year ago

2 Commits (022564f60ca5cade8fd663906f3ee514573b4b5e)