The description of deferrable constraints in create_table.sgml states
that deferrable constraints cannot be used as conflict arbitrators in
an INSERT with an ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE clause, but in fact this
restriction applies to all ON CONFLICT clauses, not just those with DO
UPDATE. Fix this, and while at it, change the word "arbitrators" to
"arbiters", to match the terminology used elsewhere.
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWsybvZP3ce8rGcVNx-QHuDOJZDz8y=p1SzqHwjRXyV4Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
Plus a similar fix to the README.
Backpatch as far back as the sgml issue exists. The README issue does
exist in v14, but that seems unlikely to harm anyone.
Author: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ed3db7ea-55b4-4809-86af-81ad3bb2c7d3@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
We were using SnapshotAny to do some index checks, but that's wrong and
causes spurious errors when used on indexes created by CREATE INDEX
CONCURRENTLY. Fix it to use an MVCC snapshot, and add a test for it.
This problem came in with commit 5ae2087202, which introduced
uniqueness check. Backpatch to 17.
Author: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Backpatch-through: 17
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANtu0ojmVd27fEhfpST7RG2KZvwkX=dMyKUqg0KM87FkOSdz8Q@mail.gmail.com
The documentation for CREATE/ALTER PUBLICATION previously showed:
[ ONLY ] table_name [ * ] [ ( column_name [, ... ] ) ] [ WHERE ( expression ) ] [, ... ]
to indicate that the table/column specification could be repeated.
However, placing [, ... ] directly after a multi-part construct was
misleading and made it unclear which portion was repeatable.
This commit introduces a new term, table_and_columns, to represent:
[ ONLY ] table_name [ * ] [ ( column_name [, ... ] ) ] [ WHERE ( expression ) ]
and updates the synopsis to use:
table_and_columns [, ... ]
which clearly identifies the repeatable element.
Backpatched to v15, where the misleading syntax was introduced.
Author: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PtsyvYL3KmA6C8f0ZpXQ=7FEqQtETVy-BOF+cm9WPvfMQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
When running on Windows (or EXEC_BACKEND) the SSL configuration will
be reloaded on each backend start, so the passphrase command will be
reloaded along with it. This implies that passphrase command reload
must be enabled on Windows for connections to work at all. Document
this since it wasn't mentioned explicitly, and will there add markup
for parameter value to match the rest of the docs.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5F301096-921A-427D-8EC1-EBAEC2A35082@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: 14
Commit 792353f7d5 updated the pg_dump and pg_dumpall documentation to
clarify which statistics are not included in their output. The pg_upgrade
documentation contained a nearly identical description, but it was not updated
at the same time.
This commit updates the pg_upgrade documentation to match those changes.
Backpatch to v18, where commit 792353f7d5 was backpatched to.
Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFnfgdGz8aGWVzgFCFwoWQU7KnFFjmxinf4RkQAkzmR+w@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
On the CREATE POLICY page, the "Policies Applied by Command Type"
table was missing MERGE ... THEN DELETE and some of the policies
applied during INSERT ... ON CONFLICT and MERGE. Fix that, and try to
improve readability by listing the various MERGE cases separately,
rather than together with INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE. Mention COPY ... TO
along with SELECT, since it behaves in the same way. In addition,
document which policy violations cause errors to be thrown, and which
just cause rows to be silently ignored.
Also, a paragraph above the table states that INSERT ... ON CONFLICT
DO UPDATE only checks the WITH CHECK expressions of INSERT policies
for rows appended to the relation by the INSERT path, which is
incorrect -- all rows proposed for insertion are checked, regardless
of whether they end up being inserted. Fix that, and also mention that
the same applies to INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING.
In addition, in various other places on that page, clarify how the
different types of policy are applied to different commands, and
whether or not errors are thrown when policy checks do not pass.
Backpatch to all supported versions. Prior to v17, MERGE did not
support RETURNING, and so MERGE ... THEN INSERT would never check new
rows against SELECT policies. Prior to v15, MERGE was not supported at
all.
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Viktor Holmberg <v@viktorh.net>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWqnfeChjK=n1V_dYZT4rt4mnq+ybf9c0qXDYTVMsy8pg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
Explicitly document that privileges are transferred along with the
ownership. Backpatch to all supported versions since this behavior
has always been present.
Author: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Gilles Parc <gparc@free.fr>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2023185982.281851219.1646733038464.JavaMail.root@zimbra15-e2.priv.proxad.net
Backpatch-through: 14
The synopsis for the ALTER PUBLICATION ... DROP ... command incorrectly
implied that a column list and WHERE clause could be specified as part of
the publication object. However, these options are not allowed for
DROP operations, making the documentation misleading.
This commit corrects the synopsis to clearly show only the valid forms
of publication objects.
Backpatched to v15, where the incorrect synopsis was introduced.
Author: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PsPu+47Q7b0o6h1r-qSt90U3zgbAHMHUag5o5E1Lo+=uw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
As usual, the release notes for other branches will be made by cutting
these down, but put them up for community review first.
Also as usual for a .1 release, there are some entries here that
are not really relevant for v18 because they already appeared in 18.0.
Those'll be removed later.
The following parameters can only be set at server start because
their context is PGC_POSTMASTER, but this information was missing
or incorrectly documented. This commit adds or corrects
that information for the following parameters:
* debug_io_direct
* dynamic_shared_memory_type
* event_source
* huge_pages
* io_max_combine_limit
* max_notify_queue_pages
* shared_memory_type
* track_commit_timestamp
* wal_decode_buffer_size
Backpatched to all supported branches.
Author: Karina Litskevich <litskevichkarina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwGfPzcin-_6XwPgVbWTOUFVZgHF5g9ROrwLUdCTfjy=0A@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
If these parameters are set without units, the values are interpreted
as blocks. This detail was previously missing from the documentation,
so this commit adds it.
Backpatch to v17 where io_combine_limit was added.
Author: Karina Litskevich <litskevichkarina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Reviewed-by: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACiT8iZCDkz1bNYQNQyvGhXWJExSnJULRTYT894u4-Ti7Yh6jw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
The docs for max_protocol_version suggested PQprotocolVersion()
instead of PQfullProtocolVersion() to find out the exact protocol
version. Since PQprotocolVersion() only returns the major protocol
version, that is bad advice.
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Reviewed-by: Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAGECzQSKFxQsYAgr11PhdOr-RtPZEdAXZnHx6U3avLuk3xQaTQ%40mail.gmail.com
The project Git server hasn't supported cloning with the Git protocol
in a very long time, but the documentation never got the memo. Remove
the mention of using the Git protocol, and while there wrap a mention
of Git in <productname> tags.
Backpatch down to all supported versions.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reported-by: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABwTF4WMiMb-KT2NRcib5W0C8TQF6URMb+HK9a_=rnZnY8Q42w@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
There was some confusion around how to adjust the n_distinct estimates
for partitioned tables. Here we try and clarify that
n_distinct_inherited needs to be adjusted rather than n_distinct.
Also fix some slightly misleading text which was talking about table
size rather than table rows, fix a grammatical error, and adjust some
text which indicated that ANALYZE was performing calculations based on
the n_distinct settings. Really it's the query planner that does this
and ANALYZE only stores the overridden n_distinct estimate value in
pg_statistic.
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrL7a-ZytM1SP8Uk9nEw9bR2CPzVb+uP+bcNj=_q-ZmVw@mail.gmail.com
Since protocol version 3.2 the CancelRequest does not have a fixed size
length anymore. The protocol docs still listed the length field to be a
constant number though. This fixes that.
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Reported-by: Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 18
Remove stray whitespace in xref tag.
This was found due to a regression in xmllint 2.15.0 which flagged
this as an error, and at the time of this commit no fix for xmllint
has shipped.
Author: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f4c4661b-4e60-4c10-9336-768b7b55c084@ewie.name
Backpatch-through: 17
Remove stray whitespace in xref tag.
This was found due to a regression in xmllint 2.15.0 which flagged
this as an error, and at the time of this commit no fix for xmllint
has shipped.
Author: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f4c4661b-4e60-4c10-9336-768b7b55c084@ewie.name
Backpatch-through: 17
This reverts commit 98fc31d649.
That change allowed DROP OWNED BY to drop grants of the target
role to other roles, arguing that nobody would need those
privileges anymore. But that's not so: if you're not superuser,
you still need admin privilege on the target role so you can
drop it.
It's not clear whether or how the dependency-based approach
to solving the original problem can be adapted to keep these
grants. Since v18 release is fast approaching, the sanest
thing to do seems to be to revert this patch for now. The
race-condition problem is low severity and not worth taking
risks for.
I didn't force a catversion bump in 98fc31d64, so I won't do
so here either.
Reported-by: Dipesh Dhameliya <dipeshdhameliya125@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABgZEgczOFicCJoqtrH9gbYMe_BV3Hq8zzCBRcMgmU6LRsihUA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
If extensions of equal names were installed in different directories
in the path, the views pg_available_extensions and
pg_available_extension_versions would show all of them, even though
only the first one was actually reachable by CREATE EXTENSION. To
fix, have those views skip extensions found later in the path if they
have names already found earlier.
Also add a bit of documentation that only the first extension in the
path can be used.
Reported-by: Pierrick <pierrick.chovelon@dalibo.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8f5a0517-1cb8-4085-ae89-77e7454e27ba%40dalibo.com
This section claims that each backend executes the
shmem_startup_hook shortly after attaching to shared memory, which
is true for EXEC_BACKEND builds, but not for others. This commit
adds this important detail.
Oversight in commit 964152c476.
Reported-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0vEGT1eigGbVt604LkXP6mUPMwPMxQoRCbFny44w%2B9EUQ%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
When vacuumdb's --missing-stats-only option is used, the catalog
query for retrieving the list of relations to process must read
pg_statistic and pg_statistic_ext_data. However, those catalogs
can only be read by superusers by default, so --missing-stats-only
is effectively superuser-only. This is unfortunate, but since the
option is primarily intended for use by administrators after
running pg_upgrade, let's just live with it for v18. This commit
adds a note about the aforementioned privilege requirements to the
documentation for --missing-stats-only.
We first tried to improve matters by modifying the query to read
the pg_stats and pg_stats_ext system views instead. While that is
indeed more lenient from a privilege standpoint, it is also
borderline incomprehensible. pg_stats shows rows for which the
user has the SELECT privilege on the corresponding column, and
pg_stats_ext shows rows for tables the user owns. Meanwhile,
ANALYZE requires either MAINTAIN on the table or, for non-shared
relations, ownership of the database. But even if the privilege
discrepancies were tolerable, the performance impact was not.
Ultimately, the modified query was substantially more expensive, so
we abandoned the idea.
For v19, perhaps we could introduce a simple, inexpensive way to
discover which relations are missing statistics, such as a system
function or view with similar privilege requirements to ANALYZE.
Unfortunately, it is far too late for anything like that in v18.
Reviewed-by: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwHh43suEfss1wvBsk7vqiou%3DUY0zcy8HGyE5hBp%2BHZ7SQ%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
The protocol documentation states that the maximum length of a cancel
key is 256 bytes. This starts checking for that limit in libpq.
Otherwise third party backend implementations will probably start
using more bytes anyway. We also start requiring that a protocol 3.0
connection does not send a longer cancel key, to make sure that
servers don't start breaking old 3.0-only clients by accident. Finally
this also restricts the minimum key length to 4 bytes (both in the
protocol spec and in the libpq implementation).
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jchampion@postgresql.org>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/df892f9f-5923-4046-9d6f-8c48d8980b50@iki.fi
Backpatch-through: 18
Temporary relations may share the same RelFileNumber with a permanent
relation, or other temporary relations associated with other sessions.
Being able to uniquely identify a temporary relation would require
RelidByRelfilenumber() to know about the proc number of the temporary
relation it wants to identify, something it is not designed for since
its introduction in f01d1ae3a1.
There are currently three callers of RelidByRelfilenumber():
- autoprewarm.
- Logical decoding, reorder buffer.
- pg_filenode_relation(), that attempts to find a relation OID based on
a tablespace OID and a RelFileNumber.
This makes the situation problematic particularly for the first two
cases, leading to the possibility of random ERRORs due to
inconsistencies that temporary relations can create in the cache
maintained by RelidByRelfilenumber(). The third case should be less of
an issue, as I suspect that there are few direct callers of
pg_filenode_relation().
The window where the ERRORs are happen is very narrow, requiring an OID
wraparound to create a lookup conflict in RelidByRelfilenumber() with a
temporary table reusing the same OID as another relation already cached.
The problem is easier to reach in workloads with a high OID consumption
rate, especially with a higher number of temporary relations created.
We could get pg_filenode_relation() and RelidByRelfilenumber() to work
with temporary relations if provided the means to identify them with an
optional proc number given in input, but the years have also shown that
we do not have a use case for it, yet. Note that this could not be
backpatched if pg_filenode_relation() needs changes. It is simpler to
ignore temporary relations.
Reported-by: Shenhao Wang <wangsh.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Takamichi Osumi <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-By: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reported-By: Shenhao Wang <wangsh.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/bbaaf9f9-ebb2-645f-54bb-34d6efc7ac42@fujitsu.com
Backpatch-through: 13
The description of this GUC provides a list of the situations where
full-page writes are generated. However, it is not completely exact,
mentioning only the cases where full_page_writes=on or base backups. It
is possible to generate full-page writes in more situations than these
two, making the description confusing as it implies that no other cases
exist.
The description is slightly reworded to take into account that other
cases are possible, without mentioning them directly to minimize the
maintenance burden should FPWs be generated in more contexts in the
future.
Author: Jingtang Zhang <mrdrivingduck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPsk3_CtAYa_fy4p6=x7qtoutrdKvg1kGk46D5fsE=sMt2546g@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
A malicious server could inject psql meta-commands into plain-text
dump output (i.e., scripts created with pg_dump --format=plain,
pg_dumpall, or pg_restore --file) that are run at restore time on
the machine running psql. To fix, introduce a new "restricted"
mode in psql that blocks all meta-commands (except for \unrestrict
to exit the mode), and teach pg_dump, pg_dumpall, and pg_restore to
use this mode in plain-text dumps.
While at it, encourage users to only restore dumps generated from
trusted servers or to inspect it beforehand, since restoring causes
the destination to execute arbitrary code of the source superusers'
choice. However, the client running the dump and restore needn't
trust the source or destination superusers.
Reported-by: Martin Rakhmanov
Reported-by: Matthieu Denais <litezeraw@gmail.com>
Reported-by: RyotaK <ryotak.mail@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Security: CVE-2025-8714
Backpatch-through: 13
Although the "Floating-Point Types" section says that "float" data
type is taken to mean "double precision", this information was not
reflected in the data type table that lists all data type aliases.
Reported-by: alexander.kjall@hafslund.no
Author: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/175456294638.800.12038559679827947313@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Nathan Bossart