Add new style of memory allocator, known as Generational
appropriate for use in cases where memory is allocated
and then freed in roughly oldest first order (FIFO).
Use new allocator for logical decoding’s reorderbuffer
to significantly reduce memory usage and improve performance.
Author: Tomas Vondra
Reviewed-by: Simon Riggs
The lower case spellings are C and C++ standard and are used in most
parts of the PostgreSQL sources. The upper case spellings are only used
in some files/modules. So standardize on the standard spellings.
The APIs for ICU, Perl, and Windows define their own TRUE and FALSE, so
those are left as is when using those APIs.
In code comments, we use the lower-case spelling for the C concepts and
keep the upper-case spelling for the SQL concepts.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Add docs to explain this for other backup mechanisms
Author: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndQuadrant.com> et al
When a publisher table has fewer columns than a subscriber, the update
of a row on the publisher should result in updating of only the columns
in common. The previous coding mistakenly reset the values of
additional columns on the subscriber to NULL because it failed to skip
updates of columns not found in the attribute map.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Flex generates a lot of functions that are not actually used. In order
to avoid coverage figures being ruined by that, mark up the part of the
.l files where the generated code appears by lcov exclusion markers.
That way, lcov will typically only reported on coverage for the .l file,
which is under our control, but not for the .c file.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Commit 597a87ccc introduced a latch pointer variable to replace use
of a long-lived shared latch in the shared WalRcvData structure.
This was not well thought out, because there are now hazards of the
pointer variable changing while it's being inspected by another
process. This could obviously lead to a core dump in code like
if (WalRcv->latch)
SetLatch(WalRcv->latch);
and there's a more remote risk of a torn read, if we have any
platforms where reading/writing a pointer is not atomic.
An actual problem would occur only if the walreceiver process
exits (gracefully) while the startup process is trying to
signal it, but that seems well within the realm of possibility.
To fix, treat the pointer variable (not the referenced latch)
as being protected by the WalRcv->mutex spinlock. There
remains a race condition that we could apply SetLatch to a
process latch that no longer belongs to the walreceiver, but
I believe that's harmless: at worst it'd cause an extra wakeup
of the next process to use that PGPROC structure.
Back-patch to v10 where the faulty code was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22735.1507048202@sss.pgh.pa.us
1. Since commit b1a9bad9e7 we had pstrdup() inside a
spinlock-protected critical section; reported by Andreas Seltenreich.
Turn those into strlcpy() to stack-allocated variables instead.
Backpatch to 9.6.
2. Since commit 9ed551e0a4 we had a pfree() uselessly inside a
spinlock-protected critical section. Tom Lane noticed in code review.
Move down. Backpatch to 9.6.
3. Since commit 64233902d2 we had GetCurrentTimestamp() (a kernel
call) inside a spinlock-protected critical section. Tom Lane noticed in
code review. Move it up. Backpatch to 9.2.
4. Since commit 1bb2558046 we did elog(PANIC) while holding spinlock.
Tom Lane noticed in code review. Release spinlock before dying.
Backpatch to 9.2.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87h8vhtgj2.fsf@ansel.ydns.eu
Add bgw_type field to background worker structure. It is intended to be
set to the same value for all workers of the same type, so they can be
grouped in pg_stat_activity, for example.
The backend_type column in pg_stat_activity now shows bgw_type for a
background worker. The ps listing also no longer calls out that a
process is a background worker but just show the bgw_type. That way,
being a background worker is more of an implementation detail now that
is not shown to the user. However, most log messages still refer to
'background worker "%s"'; otherwise constructing sensible and
translatable log messages would become tricky.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
A FOR ALL TABLES publication naturally considers all base tables to be a
candidate for replication. This includes transient heaps that are
created during a table rewrite during DDL. This causes failures on the
subscriber side because it will not have a table like pg_temp_16386 to
receive data (and if it did, it would be the wrong table).
The prevent this problem, we filter out any tables that match this
naming pattern and match an actual table from FOR ALL TABLES
publications. This is only a heuristic, meaning that user tables that
match that naming could accidentally be omitted. A more robust solution
might require an explicit marking of such tables in pg_class somehow.
Reported-by: yxq <yxq@o2.pl>
Bug: #14785
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
The file handling functions from fd.c were called with a diverse mix of
notations for the file permissions when they were opening new files.
Almost all files created by the server should have the same permissions
set. So change the API so that e.g. OpenTransientFile() automatically
uses the standard permissions set, and OpenTransientFilePerm() is a new
function that takes an explicit permissions set for the few cases where
it is needed. This also saves an unnecessary argument for call sites
that are just opening an existing file.
While we're reviewing these APIs, get rid of the FileName typedef and
use the standard const char * for the file name and mode_t for the file
mode. This makes these functions match other file handling functions
and removes an unnecessary layer of mysteriousness. We can also get rid
of a few casts that way.
Author: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
For performance reasons a larger segment size than the default 16MB
can be useful. A larger segment size has two main benefits: Firstly,
in setups using archiving, it makes it easier to write scripts that
can keep up with higher amounts of WAL, secondly, the WAL has to be
written and synced to disk less frequently.
But at the same time large segment size are disadvantageous for
smaller databases. So far the segment size had to be configured at
compile time, often making it unrealistic to choose one fitting to a
particularly load. Therefore change it to a initdb time setting.
This includes a breaking changes to the xlogreader.h API, which now
requires the current segment size to be configured. For that and
similar reasons a number of binaries had to be taught how to recognize
the current segment size.
Author: Beena Emerson, editorialized by Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund, David Steele, Kuntal Ghosh, Michael
Paquier, Peter Eisentraut, Robert Hass, Tushar Ahuja
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOG9ApEAcQ--1ieKbhFzXSQPw_YLmepaa4hNdnY5+ZULpt81Mw@mail.gmail.com
If we failed to get a background worker slot, the code just walked
away from the logicalrep-worker slot it already had, leaving that
looking like the worker is still starting up. This led to an indefinite
hang in subscription startup, as reported by Thomas Munro. We must
release the slot on failure.
Also fix a thinko: we must capture the worker slot's generation before
releasing LogicalRepWorkerLock the first time, else testing to see if
it's changed is pretty meaningless.
BTW, the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in WaitForReplicationWorkerAttach is a
ticking time bomb, even without considering the possibility of elog(ERROR)
in one of the other functions it calls. Really, this entire business needs
a redesign with some actual thought about error recovery. But for now
I'm just band-aiding the case observed in testing.
Back-patch to v10 where this code was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=2bP3TBMFBArP6o20AZaRduWjMnjCjt22hSdnA-EvrtCw@mail.gmail.com
The previous error message when attempting to run a general SQL command
in a physical replication WAL sender was a bit sloppy.
Reported-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Throttling for sending a base backup in walsender is broken for the case
where there is a lot of WAL traffic, because the latch used to put the
walsender to sleep is also signalled by regular WAL traffic (and each
signal causes an additional batch of data to be sent); the net effect is
that there is no or little actual throttling. This is undesirable, so
rewrite the sleep into a loop to achieve the desired effeect.
Author: Jeff Janes, small tweaks by me
Reviewed-by: Antonin Houska
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1xH6mde-yL-Eo1TKBGNd0PB1-TMxvrNvqcAkN-qr2E9mw@mail.gmail.com
Do for replication origins what the previous commit did for replication
slots: restore the original behavior of replication origin drop to raise
an error rather than blocking, because users might be depending on the
original behavior. Maintain the blocking behavior when invoked
internally from logical replication subscription handling.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170830133922.tlpo3lgfejm4n2cs@alvherre.pgsql
Commit 9915de6c1c changed the default behavior of
DROP_REPLICATION_SLOT so that it would wait until any session holding
the slot active would release it, instead of raising an error. But
users are already depending on the original behavior, so revert to it by
default and add a WAIT option to invoke the new behavior.
Per complaint from Simone Gotti, in
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEvsy6Wgdf90O6pUvg2wSVXL2omH5OPC-38OD4Zzgk-FXavj3Q@mail.gmail.com
This is a mechanical change in preparation for a later commit that
will change the layout of TupleDesc. Introducing a macro to abstract
the details of where attributes are stored will allow us to change
that in separate step and revise it in future.
Author: Thomas Munro, editorialized by Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0ZtQ-SpsgCyzzYpsXS6e=kZWqk3g5Ygn3MDV7A8dabUA@mail.gmail.com
Change to appendStringInfoChar() or appendStringInfoString() where those
can be used.
Author: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Since we currently only have one protocol, this doesn't make much of a
difference other than the error message.
Author: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
The API for WaitLatch and friends followed the Unix convention in which
waiting for a socket connection to complete is identical to waiting for
the socket to accept a write. While Windows provides a select(2)
emulation that agrees with that, the native WaitForMultipleObjects API
treats them as quite different --- and for some bizarre reason, it will
report a not-yet-connected socket as write-ready. libpq itself has so
far escaped dealing with this because it waits with select(), but in
libpqwalreceiver.c we want to wait using WaitLatchOrSocket. The semantics
mismatch resulted in replication connection failures on Windows, but only
for remote connections (apparently, localhost connections complete
immediately, or at least too fast for anyone to have noticed the problem
in single-machine testing).
To fix, introduce an additional WL_SOCKET_CONNECTED wait flag for
WaitLatchOrSocket, which is identical to WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE on
non-Windows, but results in waiting for FD_CONNECT events on Windows.
Ideally, we would also distinguish the two conditions in the API for
PQconnectPoll(), but changing that API at this point seems infeasible.
Instead, cheat by checking for PQstatus() == CONNECTION_STARTED to
determine that we're still waiting for the connection to complete.
(This is a cheat mainly because CONNECTION_STARTED is documented as an
internal state rather than something callers should rely on. Perhaps
we ought to change the documentation ... but this patch doesn't.)
Per reports from Jobin Augustine and Igor Neyman. Back-patch to v10
where commit 1e8a85009 exposed this longstanding shortcoming.
Andres Freund, minor fix and some code review/beautification by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHBggj8g2T+ZDcACZ2FmzX9CTxkWjKBsHd6NkYB4i9Ojf6K1Fw@mail.gmail.com
Similar to what was fixed in commit 9915de6c1c for replication slots,
but this time it's related to replication origins: DROP SUBSCRIPTION
attempts to drop the replication origin, but that fails if the
replication worker process hasn't yet marked it unused. This causes
failures in the buildfarm:
ERROR: could not drop replication origin with OID 1, in use by PID 34069
Like the aforementioned commit, fix by having the process running DROP
SUBSCRIPTION sleep until the worker marks the the replication origin
struct as free. This uses a condition variable on each replication
origin shmem state struct, so that the session trying to drop can sleep
and expect to be awakened by the process keeping the origin open.
Also fix a SGML markup in the previous commit.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170808001433.rozlseaf4m2wkw3n@alvherre.pgsql
In commit 9915de6c1c, we introduced a new wait point for replication
slots and incorrectly labelled it as wait event PG_WAIT_LOCK. That's
wrong, so invent an appropriate new wait event instead, and document it
properly.
While at it, fix numerous other problems in the vicinity:
- two different walreceiver wait events were being mixed up in a single
wait event (which wasn't documented either); split it out so that they
can be distinguished, and document the new events properly.
- ParallelBitmapPopulate was documented but didn't exist.
- ParallelBitmapScan was not documented (I think this should be called
"ParallelBitmapScanInit" instead.)
- Logical replication wait events weren't documented
- various symbols had been added in dartboard order in various places.
Put them in alphabetical order instead, as was originally intended.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170808181131.mu4fjepuh5m75cyq@alvherre.pgsql
This would lead to failures if local and remote tables have a different
column order. The tests previously didn't catch that because they only
tested the initial data copy. So add another test that exercises the
apply worker.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
The relation attribute map was not initialized for dropped columns,
leading to errors later on.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Scott Milliken <scott@deltaex.com>
Bug: #14769
The callers for GetOldestSafeDecodingTransactionId() all inverted the
argument for the argument introduced in 2bef06d516. Luckily this
appears to be inconsequential for the moment, as we wait for
concurrent in-progress transaction when assembling a
snapshot. Additionally this could only make a difference when adding a
second logical slot, because only a pre-existing slot could cause an
issue by lowering the returned xid dangerously much.
Reported-By: Antonin Houska
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/32704.1496993134@localhost
Backport: 9.4-, where 2bef06d516 was backpatched to.
This fixes a crash if the local table has a function index and the
function makes non-immutable calls.
Reported-by: Scott Milliken <scott@deltaex.com>
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
It is relatively easy to get a replication slot to look as still active
while one process is in the process of getting rid of it; when some
other process tries to "acquire" the slot, it would fail with an error
message of "replication slot XYZ is active for PID N".
The error message in itself is fine, except that when the intention is
to drop the slot, it is unhelpful: the useful behavior would be to wait
until the slot is no longer acquired, so that the drop can proceed. To
implement this, we use a condition variable so that slot acquisition can
be told to wait on that condition variable if the slot is already
acquired, and we make any change in active_pid broadcast a signal on the
condition variable. Thus, as soon as the slot is released, the drop
will proceed properly.
Reported by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11904.1499039688@sss.pgh.pa.us
Authors: Petr Jelínek, Álvaro Herrera
Commit 14e8803f1 removed the locking in SyncRepWaitForLSN, but that
introduced a race condition, where SyncRepWaitForLSN might see
syncRepState already set to SYNC_REP_WAIT_COMPLETE, but the process was
not yet removed from the queue. That tripped the assertion, that the
process should no longer be in the uqeue. Reorder the operations in
SyncRepWakeQueue to remove the process from the queue first, and update
syncRepState only after that, and add a memory barrier in between to make
sure the operations are made visible to other processes in that order.
Fixes bug #14721 reported by Const Zhang. Analysis and fix by Thomas Munro.
Backpatch down to 9.5, where the locking was removed.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170629023623.1480.26508%40wrigleys.postgresql.org
The regression tests contain numerous cases where we do some activity on a
master server and then wait till the slave has ack'd flushing its copy of
that transaction. Because WAL flush on the slave is asynchronous to the
logicalrep worker process, the worker cannot send such a feedback message
during the LogicalRepApplyLoop iteration where it processes the last data
from the master. In the previous coding, the feedback message would come
out only when the loop's WaitLatchOrSocket call returned WL_TIMEOUT. That
requires one full second of delay (NAPTIME_PER_CYCLE); and to add insult
to injury, it could take more than that if the WaitLatchOrSocket was
interrupted a few times by latch-setting events.
In reality we can expect the slave's walwriter process to have flushed the
WAL data after, more or less, WalWriterDelay (typically 200ms). Hence,
if there are unacked transactions pending, make the wait delay only that
long rather than the full NAPTIME_PER_CYCLE. Also, move one of the
send_feedback() calls into the loop main line, so that we'll check for the
need to send feedback even if we were woken by a latch event and not either
socket data or timeout.
It's not clear how much this matters for production purposes, but
it's definitely helpful for testing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30864.1498861103@sss.pgh.pa.us
When waiting for a logical replication worker process to start or stop,
we have to busy-wait until we see it add or remove itself from the
LogicalRepWorker slot in shared memory. Those loops were using a
one-second delay between checks, but on any reasonably modern machine, it
doesn't take more than a couple of msec for a worker to spawn or shut down.
Reduce the loop delays to 10ms to avoid wasting quite so much time in the
related regression tests.
In principle, a better solution would be to fix things so that the waiting
process can be awakened via its latch at the right time. But that seems
considerably more invasive, which is undesirable for a post-beta fix.
Worker start/stop performance likely isn't of huge interest anyway for
production purposes, so we might not ever get around to it.
In passing, rearrange the second wait loop in logicalrep_worker_stop()
so that the lock is held at the top of the loop, thus saving one lock
acquisition/release per call, and making it look more like the other loop.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30864.1498861103@sss.pgh.pa.us
In WAL receiver and WAL server, some accesses to their corresponding
shared memory control structs were done without holding any kind of
lock, which could lead to inconsistent and possibly insecure results.
In walsender, fix by clarifying the locking rules and following them
correctly, as documented in the new comment in walsender_private.h;
namely that some members can be read in walsender itself without a lock,
because the only writes occur in the same process. The rest of the
struct requires spinlock for accesses, as usual.
In walreceiver, fix by always holding spinlock while accessing the
struct.
While there is potentially a problem in all branches, it is minor in
stable ones. This only became a real problem in pg10 because of quorum
commit in synchronous replication (commit 3901fd70cc), and a potential
security problem in walreceiver because a superuser() check was removed
by default monitoring roles (commit 25fff40798). Thus, no backpatch.
In passing, clean up some leftover braces which were used to create
unconditional blocks. Once upon a time these were used for
volatile-izing accesses to those shmem structs, which is no longer
required. Many other occurrences of this pattern remain.
Author: Michaël Paquier
Reported-by: Michaël Paquier
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Thomas Munro,
Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB7nPqTWYqtzD=LN_oDaf9r-hAjUEPAy0B9yRkhcsLdRN8fzrw@mail.gmail.com
When a sync worker is waiting for the associated apply worker to notice
that it's in SYNCWAIT state, wait_for_worker_state_change() would just
patiently wait for that to happen. This generally required waiting for
the 1-second timeout in LogicalRepApplyLoop to elapse. Kicking the worker
via its latch makes things significantly snappier.
While at it, fix race conditions that could potentially result in crashes:
we can *not* call logicalrep_worker_wakeup_ptr() once we've released the
LogicalRepWorkerLock, because worker->proc might've been reset to NULL
after we do that (indeed, there's no really solid reason to believe that
the LogicalRepWorker slot even belongs to the same worker anymore).
In logicalrep_worker_wakeup(), we can just move the wakeup inside the
lock scope. In process_syncing_tables_for_apply(), a bit more code
rearrangement is needed.
Also improve some nearby comments.
It's possible for WalSndWaitForWal to be asked to wait for WAL that doesn't
exist yet. That's fine, in fact it's the normal situation if we're caught
up; but when the client requests shutdown we should not keep waiting.
The previous coding could wait indefinitely if the source server was idle.
In passing, improve the rather weak comments in this area, and slightly
rearrange some related code for better readability.
Back-patch to 9.4 where this code was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14154.1498781234@sss.pgh.pa.us
After sitting idle and fully replayed for a while and then encountering
a new burst of WAL activity, we interpolate between an ancient sample and the
not-yet-reached one for the new traffic. That produced a corner case report
of lag after receiving first new reply from standby, which might sometimes
be a large spike.
Correct this by resetting last_read time and handle that new case.
Author: Thomas Munro
Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they
flow past the right margin.
By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are
within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding
left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the
continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin,
then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin,
if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of
the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations
unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column
limit.
This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers.
Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized
lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren.
This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments
to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments
following #endif to not obey the general rule.
Commit e3860ffa4d wasn't actually using
the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that
tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of
code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be
moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's
code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops
in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working
in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the
net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed
one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves
more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such
cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after
the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after.
Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same
as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else.
That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage
from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent.
This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
The new indent version includes numerous fixes thanks to Piotr Stefaniak.
The main changes visible in this commit are:
* Nicer formatting of function-pointer declarations.
* No longer unexpectedly removes spaces in expressions using casts,
sizeof, or offsetof.
* No longer wants to add a space in "struct structname *varname", as
well as some similar cases for const- or volatile-qualified pointers.
* Declarations using PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY are formatted more nicely.
* Fixes bug where comments following declarations were sometimes placed
with no space separating them from the code.
* Fixes some odd decisions for comments following case labels.
* Fixes some cases where comments following code were indented to less
than the expected column 33.
On the less good side, it now tends to put more whitespace around typedef
names that are not listed in typedefs.list. This might encourage us to
put more effort into typedef name collection; it's not really a bug in
indent itself.
There are more changes coming after this round, having to do with comment
indentation and alignment of lines appearing within parentheses. I wanted
to limit the size of the diffs to something that could be reviewed without
one's eyes completely glazing over, so it seemed better to split up the
changes as much as practical.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
Robert Haas