HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT was really a test for GCC statement expressions,
as needed for StaticAssertExpr() now that _Static_assert could be
assumed to be available through our C11 requirement. This
artificially prevented Visual Studio from being able to use
static_assert() in other contexts.
Instead, make a new test for HAVE_STATEMENT_EXPRESSIONS, and use that
to control only whether StaticAssertExpr() uses fallback code, not the
other variants. This improves the quality of failure messages in the
(much more common) other variants under Visual Studio.
Also get rid of the two separate implementations for C++, since the C
implementation is also also valid as C++11. While it is a stretch to
apply HAVE_STATEMENT_EXPRESSIONS tested with $CC to a C++ compiler,
the previous C++ coding assumed that the C++ compiler had them
unconditionally, so it isn't a new stretch. In practice, the C and
C++ compilers are very likely to agree, and if a combination is ever
reported that falsifies this assumption we can always reconsider that.
Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGKvr0x_oGmQTUkx%3DODgSksT2EtgCA6LmGx_jQFG%3DsDUpg%40mail.gmail.com
Although clang claims to be compatible with gcc's printf format
archetypes, this appears to be a falsehood: it likes __syslog__
(which gcc does not, on most platforms) and doesn't accept
gnu_printf. This means that if you try to use gcc with clang++
or clang with g++, you get compiler warnings when compiling
printf-like calls in our C++ code. This has been true for quite
awhile, but it's gotten more annoying with the recent appearance
of several buildfarm members that are configured like this.
To fix, run separate probes for the format archetype to use with the
C and C++ compilers, and conditionally define PG_PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE
depending on __cplusplus.
(We could alternatively insist that you not mix-and-match C and
C++ compilers; but if the case works otherwise, this is a poor
reason to insist on that.)
No back-patch for now, but we may want to do that if this
patch survives buildfarm testing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/986485.1764825548@sss.pgh.pa.us
Per discussion, this compiler suite is no longer maintained, and
it has not been able to compile PostgreSQL since at least PostgreSQL
17.
This removes all the remaining support code for this compiler.
Note that the Solaris operating system continues to be supported, but
using GCC as the compiler.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a0f817ee-fb86-483a-8a14-b6f7f5991b6e%40eisentraut.org
Commit 43da39430 added a dependency on this intrinsic to our
AVX-512 CRC code. It turns out this intrinsic was added to
gcc later than the other ones we were using, so that there
are platforms where the new code fails to compile. Since only
relatively old (pre-gcc-10) compilers are affected, it doesn't
seem worth trying to make the AVX-512 CRC code actually work
on these platforms. Just add the new intrinsic to the configure
probe, so that we'll conclude the code can't be built.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3350336.1750690281@sss.pgh.pa.us
The previous implementation of CRC32C on x86 relied on the native
CRC32 instruction from the SSE 4.2 extension, which operates on
up to 8 bytes at a time. We can get a substantial speedup by using
carryless multiplication on SIMD registers, processing 64 bytes per
loop iteration. Shorter inputs fall back to ordinary CRC instructions.
On Intel Tiger Lake hardware (2020), CRC is now 50% faster for inputs
between 64 and 112 bytes, and 3x faster for 256 bytes.
The VPCLMULQDQ instruction on 512-bit registers has been available
on Intel hardware since 2019 and AMD since 2022. There is an older
variant for 128-bit registers, but at least on Zen 2 it performs worse
than normal CRC instructions for short inputs.
We must now do a runtime check, even for builds that target SSE
4.2. This doesn't matter in practice for WAL (arguably the most
critical case), because since commit e2809e3a1 the final computation
with the 20-byte WAL header is inlined and unrolled when targeting
that extension. Compared with two direct function calls, testing
showed equal or slightly faster performance in performing an indirect
function call on several dozen bytes followed by inlined instructions
on constant input of 20 bytes.
The MIT-licensed implementation was generated with the "generate"
program from
https://github.com/corsix/fast-crc32/
Based on: "Fast CRC Computation for Generic Polynomials Using PCLMULQDQ
Instruction" V. Gopal, E. Ozturk, et al., 2009
Co-authored-by: Raghuveer Devulapalli <raghuveer.devulapalli@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Amonson <paul.d.amonson@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> (earlier version)
Reviewed-by: Matthew Sterrett <matthewsterrett2@gmail.com> (earlier version)
Tested-by: Raghuveer Devulapalli <raghuveer.devulapalli@intel.com>
Tested-by: David Rowley <<dgrowleyml@gmail.com>> (earlier version)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/BL1PR11MB530401FA7E9B1CA432CF9DC3DC192@BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/PH8PR11MB82869FF741DFA4E9A029FF13FBF72@PH8PR11MB8286.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
This commit introduces SVE implementations of pg_popcount{32,64}.
Unlike the Neon versions, we need an additional configure-time
check to determine if the compiler supports SVE intrinsics, and we
need a runtime check to determine if the current CPU supports SVE
instructions. Our testing showed that the SVE implementations are
much faster for larger inputs and are comparable to the status
quo for smaller inputs.
Author: "Devanga.Susmitha@fujitsu.com" <Devanga.Susmitha@fujitsu.com>
Co-authored-by: "Chiranmoy.Bhattacharya@fujitsu.com" <Chiranmoy.Bhattacharya@fujitsu.com>
Co-authored-by: "Malladi, Rama" <ramamalladi@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/010101936e4aaa70-b474ab9e-b9ce-474d-a3ba-a3dc223d295c-000000%40us-west-2.amazonses.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSZPR01MB84990A9A02A3515C6E85A65B8B2A2%40OSZPR01MB8499.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
In these tests, we need to verify not only that the compiler has heard
of these intrinsics, but that lower-level tools cope with them too.
(For example, the assembler must also know the instructions, and on
some platforms there might be library support involved.) The hazard
is that the compiler might optimize away the calls altogether,
allowing the configure check to succeed only to have the build fail
later if lower-level support is missing. The existing code tried to
prevent that by ensuring that the result of the intrinsic is used
for something, but that's really insufficient because we were feeding
constant input to it. So the compiler would be perfectly entitled to
optimize away the calls anyway. Fix by making the inputs into global
variables. (Hypothetically, LTO optimization could still remove the
code --- but that's well past where we'd be likely to hit trouble.)
It is not known that any current compiler would actually optimize
away these calls, and even if that happened it would be unlikely
that any problem would manifest. Our concern for this stems from
largely-bygone days when it was common to install gcc on platforms
with some other native compiler, so that a compiler-vs-library
support discrepancy was more probable. Still, there's little
point in defending against such cases in a way that is visibly
incomplete.
I'm content to fix this in master for now; we can back-patch if
any indication appears that it's a live problem for someone.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3368102.1741993462@sss.pgh.pa.us
Redefine our exact width types with standard C99 types and macros,
including int64_t, INT64_MAX, INT64_C(), PRId64 etc. We were already
using <stdint.h> types in a few places.
One complication is that Windows' <inttypes.h> uses format strings like
"%I64d", "%I32", "%I" for PRI*64, PRI*32, PTR*PTR, instead of mapping to
other standardized format strings like "%lld" etc as seen on other known
systems. Teach our snprintf.c to understand them.
This removes a lot of configure clutter, and should also allow 64-bit
numbers and other standard types to be used in localized messages
without casting.
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ME3P282MB3166F9D1F71F787929C0C7E7B6312%40ME3P282MB3166.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Presently, we check for compiler support for the required
intrinsics both with and without the -msse4.2 compiler flag, and
then depending on the results of those checks, we pick which files
to compile with which flags. This is tedious and complicated, and
it results in unsustainable coding patterns such as separate files
for each portion of code that may need to be built with different
compiler flags.
This commit makes use of the newly-added support for
__attribute__((target(...))) in the SSE4.2 CRC-32C code. This
simplifies both the configure-time checks and the build scripts,
and it allows us to place the functions that use the intrinsics in
files that we otherwise do not want to build with special CPU
instructions (although this commit refrains from doing so). This
is also preparatory work for a proposed follow-up commit that will
further optimize the CRC-32C code with AVX-512 instructions.
While at it, this commit modifies meson's checks for SSE4.2 CRC
support to be the same as autoconf's. meson was choosing whether
to use a runtime check based purely on whether -msse4.2 is
required, while autoconf has long checked for the __SSE4_2__
preprocessor symbol to decide. meson's previous approach seems to
work just fine, but this change avoids needing to build multiple
test programs and to keep track of whether to actually use
pg_attribute_target().
Ideally we'd use __attribute__((target(...))) for ARMv8 CRC
support, too, but there's little point in doing so because until
clang 16, using the ARM intrinsics still requires special compiler
flags. Perhaps we can re-evaluate this decision after some time
has passed.
Author: Raghuveer Devulapalli
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/PH8PR11MB8286BE735A463468415D46B5FB5C2%40PH8PR11MB8286.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
The commonly supported way to specify multiple target options is to
surround the entire list with quotes and to use a comma (with no
extra spaces) as the delimiter.
Oversight in commit f78667bd91.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zy0jya8nF8CPpv3B%40nathan
Presently, we check for compiler support for the required
intrinsics both with and without extra compiler flags (e.g.,
-mxsave), and then depending on the results of those checks, we
pick which files to compile with which flags. This is tedious and
complicated, and it results in unsustainable coding patterns such
as separate files for each portion of code may need to be built
with different compiler flags.
This commit introduces support for __attribute__((target(...))) and
uses it for the AVX-512 code. This simplifies both the
configure-time checks and the build scripts, and it allows us to
place the functions that use the intrinsics in files that we
otherwise do not want to build with special CPU instructions. We
are careful to avoid using __attribute__((target(...))) on
compilers that do not understand it, but we still perform the
configure-time checks in case the compiler allows using the
intrinsics without it (e.g., MSVC).
A similar change could likely be made for some of the CRC-32C code,
but that is left as a future exercise.
Suggested-by: Andres Freund
Reviewed-by: Raghuveer Devulapalli, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240731205254.vfpap7uxwmebqeaf%40awork3.anarazel.de
Presently, pg_popcount() processes data in 32-bit or 64-bit chunks
when possible. Newer hardware that supports AVX-512 instructions
can use 512-bit chunks, which provides a nice speedup, especially
for larger buffers. This commit introduces the infrastructure
required to detect compiler and CPU support for the required
AVX-512 intrinsic functions, and it adds a new pg_popcount()
implementation that uses these functions. If CPU support for this
optimized implementation is detected at runtime, a function pointer
is updated so that it is used by subsequent calls to pg_popcount().
Most of the existing in-tree calls to pg_popcount() should benefit
from these instructions, and calls with smaller buffers should at
least not regress compared to v16. The new infrastructure
introduced by this commit can also be used to optimize
visibilitymap_count(), but that is left for a follow-up commit.
Co-authored-by: Paul Amonson, Ants Aasma
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent, Tom Lane, Noah Misch, Akash Shankaran, Alvaro Herrera, Andres Freund, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/BL1PR11MB5304097DF7EA81D04C33F3D1DCA6A%40BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
There isn't a lot of user demand for AIX support, we have a bunch of
hacks to work around AIX-specific compiler bugs and idiosyncrasies,
and no one has stepped up to the plate to properly maintain it.
Remove support for AIX to get rid of that maintenance overhead. It's
still supported for stable versions.
The acute issue that triggered this decision was that after commit
8af2565248, the AIX buildfarm members have been hitting this
assertion:
TRAP: failed Assert("(uintptr_t) buffer == TYPEALIGN(PG_IO_ALIGN_SIZE, buffer)"), File: "md.c", Line: 472, PID: 2949728
Apperently the "pg_attribute_aligned(a)" attribute doesn't work on AIX
for values larger than PG_IO_ALIGN_SIZE, for a static const variable.
That could be worked around, but we decided to just drop the AIX support
instead.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20240224172345.32@rfd.leadboat.com
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Noah Misch, Thomas Munro
As with the Intel and Arm CRC instructions, compiler intrinsics for
them must be supported by the compiler. In contrast, no runtime check
is needed. Aligned memory access is faster, so use the Arm coding as
a model.
YANG Xudong
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b522a0c5-e3b2-99cc-6387-58134fb88cbe%40ymatrix.cn
Previously export_dynamic was set in src/makefiles/Makefile.$port. For solaris
this required exporting with_gnu_ld. The determination of with_gnu_ld would be
nontrivial to copy for meson PGXS compatibility. It's also nice to delete
libtool.m4.
This uses -Wl,--export-dynamic on all platforms, previously all platforms but
FreeBSD used -Wl,-E. The likelihood of a name conflict seems lower with the
longer spelling.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221005200710.luvw5evhwf6clig6@awork3.anarazel.de
Until now we emitted the cflags to build the CRC objects into architecture
specific variables. That doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me - we're never
going to target x86 and arm at the same time, so they don't need to be
separate variables.
It might be better to instead continue to have CFLAGS_SSE42 /
CFLAGS_ARMV8_CRC32C be computed by PGAC_ARMV8_CRC32C_INTRINSICS /
PGAC_SSE42_CRC32_INTRINSICS and then set CFLAGS_CRC based on those. But it
seems unlikely that we'd need other sets of CRC specific flags for those two
architectures at the same time.
This simplifies the upcoming meson PGXS compatibility.
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221005200710.luvw5evhwf6clig6@awork3.anarazel.de
Visual Studio 2015+ has support for a macro to control the alignement of
structures as of __declspec(align(#)), and this commit adds a definition
of pg_attribute_aligned() based on that. It happens that this was
already used in the implementation of atomics for MSVC. Note that there
is still no definition fo pg_attribute_packed(), so this does not impact
itemptr.h.
Author: James Coleman
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe-HbtZvR3msoMtk+hYW2S0e0OapzMW8icSMYTMA+mN8Aw@mail.gmail.com
Previously we fell back to __FUNCTION__ and then NULL. As __func__ is in C99
that shouldn't be necessary anymore.
Solution.pm defined HAVE_FUNCNAME__FUNCTION instead of
HAVE_FUNCNAME__FUNC (originating in 4164e6636e), as at some point in the past
MSVC only supported __FUNCTION__. Our minimum version supports __func__.
Reviewed-By: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220807012914.ydz73yte6j3coulo@awork3.anarazel.de
GCC 12 complains that set_stack_base is storing the address of
a local variable in a long-lived pointer. This is an entirely
reasonable warning (indeed, it just helped us find a bug);
but that behavior is intentional here. We can work around it
by using __builtin_frame_address(0) instead of a specific local
variable; that produces an address a dozen or so bytes different,
in my testing, but we don't care about such a small difference.
Maybe someday a compiler lacking that function will start to issue
a similar warning, but we'll worry about that when it happens.
Patch by me, per a suggestion from Andres Freund. Back-patch to
v12, which is as far back as the patch will go without some pain.
(Recently-established project policy would permit a back-patch as
far as 9.2, but I'm disinclined to expend the work until GCC 12
is much more widespread.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3773792.1645141467@sss.pgh.pa.us
Make header/trailer comments agree with the actual names of some macros.
These seem like legit names in earlier iterations of respective patches
(commit b779168ff "Detect PG_PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE automatically." and
commit 6869b4f25 "Add C++ support to configure.") but the macro had
been renamed out of sync with the header / trailer comment in the final
committed patch.
Even more nitpickily, make the dashed underlines agree with the lengths
of the macro names everyplace. There doesn't seem to have been any
meeting of the minds previously on whether those should match or not,
but at least some people have been trying to make 'em match.
Jesse Zhang, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGf+fX7DDyq6WfCy6X_KtD28MkbNBE6NkRi26fSf25dfUwX0zw@mail.gmail.com
These compiler features are required by C99, so remove the configure
probes for them.
This is part of a series of commits to get rid of no-longer-relevant
configure checks and dead src/port/ code. I'm committing them separately
to make it easier to back out individual changes if they prove less
portable than I expect.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15379.1582221614@sss.pgh.pa.us
Test for the compiler builtins __builtin_clz, __builtin_ctz, and
__builtin_popcount, and make use of these in preference to
handwritten C code if they're available. Create src/port
infrastructure for "leftmost one", "rightmost one", and "popcount"
so as to centralize these decisions.
On x86_64, __builtin_popcount generally won't make use of the POPCNT
opcode because that's not universally supported yet. Provide code
that checks CPUID and then calls POPCNT via asm() if available.
This requires indirecting through a function pointer, which is
an annoying amount of overhead for a one-instruction operation,
but it's probably not worth working harder than this for our
current use-cases.
I'm not sure we've found all the existing places that could profit
from this new infrastructure; but we at least touched all the
ones that used copied-and-pasted versions of the bitmapset.c code,
and got rid of multiple copies of the associated constant arrays.
While at it, replace c-compiler.m4's one-per-builtin-function
macros with a single one that can handle all the cases we need
to worry about so far. Also, because I'm paranoid, make those
checks into AC_LINK checks rather than just AC_COMPILE; the
former coding failed to verify that libgcc has support for the
builtin, in cases where it's not inline code.
David Rowley, Thomas Munro, Alvaro Herrera, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9WTAGG1tPeJnD18hiQW5gAk59fQ6WK-vfdAKEHyRg2RA@mail.gmail.com
This reverts commits fc6c72747a, 109de05cbb, d0b4663c23 and
711bab1e4d.
Somebody will have to try harder before submitting this patch again.
I've spent entirely too much time on it already, and the #ifdef maze yet
to be written in order for it to build at all got on my nerves. The
amount of work needed to get a platform-specific performance improvement
that's barely above the noise level is not worth it.
Split out these new functions in three parts: one in a new file that
uses the compiler builtin and gets compiled with the -mpopcnt compiler
option if it exists; another one that uses the compiler builtin but not
the compiler option; and finally the fallback with open-coded
algorithms.
Split out the configure logic: in the original commit, it was selecting
to use the -mpopcnt compiler switch together with deciding whether to
use the compiler builtin, but those two things are really separate.
Split them out. Also, expose whether the builtin exists to
Makefile.global, so that src/port's Makefile can decide whether to
compile the hw-optimized file.
Remove CPUID test for CTZ/CLZ. Make pg_{right,left}most_ones use either
the compiler intrinsic or open-coded algo; trying to use the
HW-optimized version is a waste of time. Make them static inline
functions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190213221719.GA15976@alvherre.pgsql
We were using uint64 function arguments as "long int" arguments to
compiler builtins, which fails on machines where long ints are 32 bits:
the upper half of the uint64 was being ignored. Fix by using the "ll"
builtin variants instead, which on those machines take 64 bit arguments.
Also, remove configure tests for __builtin_popcountl() (as well as
"long" variants for ctz and clz): the theory here is that any compiler
version will provide all widths or none, so one test suffices. Were
this theory to be wrong, we'd have to add tests for
__builtin_popcountll() and friends, which would be tedious.
Per failures in buildfarm member lapwing and ensuing discussion.
These opcodes have been around in the AMD world since 2007, and 2008 in
the case of intel. They're supported in GCC and Clang via some __builtin
macros. The opcodes may be unavailable during runtime, in which case we
fall back on a C-based implementation of the code. In order to get the
POPCNT instruction we must pass the -mpopcnt option to the compiler. We
do this only for the pg_bitutils.c file.
David Rowley (with fragments taken from a patch by Thomas Munro)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9WTAGG1tPeJnD18hiQW5gAk59fQ6WK-vfdAKEHyRg2RA@mail.gmail.com
NetBSD-current generates a large number of warnings about "%m" not
being appropriate to use with *printf functions. While that's true
for their native printf, it's surely not true for snprintf.c, so I
think they have misunderstood gcc's definition of the "gnu_printf"
archetype. Nonetheless, choosing "__syslog__" instead silences the
warnings; so teach configure about that.
Since this is only a cosmetic warning issue (and anyway it depends
on previous hacking to be self-consistent), no back-patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16785.1539046036@sss.pgh.pa.us
We've spent an awful lot of effort over the years in coping with
platform-specific vagaries of the *printf family of functions. Let's just
forget all that mess and standardize on always using src/port/snprintf.c.
This gets rid of a lot of configure logic, and it will allow a saner
approach to dealing with %m (though actually changing that is left for
a follow-on patch).
Preliminary performance testing suggests that as it stands, snprintf.c is
faster than the native printf functions for some tasks on some platforms,
and slower for other cases. A pending patch will improve that, though
cases with floating-point conversions will doubtless remain slower unless
we want to put a *lot* of effort into that. Still, we've not observed
that *printf is really a performance bottleneck for most workloads, so
I doubt this matters much.
Patch by me, reviewed by Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2975.1526862605@sss.pgh.pa.us
This reverts commit 3a60c8ff89. Buildfarm
results show that that caused a whole bunch of new warnings on platforms
where gcc believes the local printf to be non-POSIX-compliant. This
problem outweighs the hypothetical-anyway possibility of getting warnings
for misuse of %m. We could use gnu_printf archetype when we've substituted
src/port/snprintf.c, but that brings us right back to the problem of not
getting warnings for %m.
A possible answer is to attack it in the other direction by insisting
that %m support be included in printf's feature set, but that will take
more investigation. In the meantime, revert the previous change, and
update the comment for PGAC_C_PRINTF_ARCHETYPE to more fully explain
what's going on.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2975.1526862605@sss.pgh.pa.us
The elog/ereport family of functions certainly support the %m format spec,
because they implement it "by hand". But elsewhere we have printf wrappers
that might or might not allow it depending on whether the platform's printf
does. (Most non-glibc versions don't, and notably, src/port/snprintf.c
doesn't.) Hence, rather than using the gnu_printf format archetype
interchangeably for all these functions, use it only for elog/ereport.
This will allow us to get compiler warnings for mistakes like the ones
fixed in commit a13b47a59, at least on platforms where printf doesn't
take %m and gcc is correctly configured to know it. (Unfortunately,
that won't happen on Linux, nor on macOS according to my testing.
It remains to be seen what the buildfarm's gcc-on-Windows animals will
think of this, but we may well have to rely on less-popular platforms
to warn us about unportable code of this kind.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2975.1526862605@sss.pgh.pa.us
ARMv8 introduced special CPU instructions for calculating CRC-32C. Use
them, when available, for speed.
Like with the similar Intel CRC instructions, several factors affect
whether the instructions can be used. The compiler intrinsics for them must
be supported by the compiler, and the instructions must be supported by the
target architecture. If the compilation target architecture does not
support the instructions, but adding "-march=armv8-a+crc" makes them
available, then we compile the code with a runtime check to determine if
the host we're running on supports them or not.
For the runtime check, use glibc getauxval() function. Unfortunately,
that's not very portable, but I couldn't find any more portable way to do
it. If getauxval() is not available, the CRC instructions will still be
used if the target architecture supports them without any additional
compiler flags, but the runtime check will not be available.
Original patch by Yuqi Gu, heavily modified by me. Reviewed by Andres
Freund, Thomas Munro.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/HE1PR0801MB1323D171938EABC04FFE7FA9E3110%40HE1PR0801MB1323.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com
This is an optional dependency. It'll be used for the upcoming LLVM
based just in time compilation support, which needs to wrap a few LLVM
C++ APIs so they're accessible from C..
For now test for C++ compilers unconditionally, without failing if not
present, to ensure wide buildfarm coverage. If we're bothered by the
additional test times (which are quite short) or verbosity, we can
later make the tests conditional on --with-llvm.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
The new macro allows to test flags for different compilers and to
store them in different CFLAG like variables. The existing
PGAC_PROG_CC_CFLAGS_OPT and PGAC_PROG_CC_VAR_OPT are changed to be
just wrappers around the new function.
This'll be used by the upcoming LLVM support, to separately detect
capabilities used by clang, when generating bitcode.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
On Sparc64, use of __attribute__(aligned(8)) with __int128 causes faulty
code generation in gcc versions at least through 5.5.0. We can work around
that by disabling use of __int128, so teach configure to test for the bug.
This solution doesn't fix things for the case of cross-compiling with a
buggy compiler; to support that nicely, we'd need to add a manual disable
switch. Unless more such cases turn up, it doesn't seem worth the work.
Affected users could always edit pg_config.h manually.
In passing, fix some typos in the existing configure test for __int128.
They're harmless because we only compile that code not run it, but
they're still confusing for anyone looking at it closely.
This is needed in support of commit 751804998, so back-patch to 9.5
as that was.
Marina Polyakova, Victor Wagner, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0d3a9fa264cebe1cb9966f37b7c06e86@postgrespro.ru
On some systems the results of 64 bit __builtin_mul_overflow()
operations can be computed at compile time, but not at runtime. The
known cases are arm buildfar animals using clang where the runtime
operation is implemented in a unavailable function.
Try to avoid compile-time computation by using volatile arguments to
__builtin_mul_overflow(). In that case we hopefully will get a link
error when unavailable, similar to what buildfarm animals dangomushi
and gull are reporting.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171213213754.pydkyjs6bt2hvsdb@alap3.anarazel.de
Commit 9fa6f00b1 assumed that __builtin_constant_p("string literal")
is TRUE, if the compiler has that function at all. Buildfarm results
show that Sun Studio 12, at least, breaks that assumption. Removing
that usage would leave us with no mechanical check for a very fragile
coding requirement, so instead teach configure to ignore
__builtin_constant_p() if it doesn't behave that way. We could
complicate matters by distinguishing three cases (no such function,
vs does, vs doesn't work for string literals); but for now, that seems
unnecessary because our other existing uses of this function are just
fairly minor optimizations of non-returning elog/ereport. We can live
without that on the small population of compilers that act this way.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22997.1513264066@sss.pgh.pa.us
It's not easy to get signed integer overflow checks correct and
fast. Therefore abstract the necessary infrastructure into a common
header providing addition, subtraction and multiplication for 16, 32,
64 bit signed integers.
The new macros aren't yet used, but a followup commit will convert
several open coded overflow checks.
Author: Andres Freund, with some code stolen from Greg Stark
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171024103954.ztmatprlglz3rwke@alap3.anarazel.de
Our initial work with int128 neglected alignment considerations, an
oversight that came back to bite us in bug #14897 from Vincent Lachenal.
It is unsurprising that int128 might have a 16-byte alignment requirement;
what's slightly more surprising is that even notoriously lax Intel chips
sometimes enforce that.
Raising MAXALIGN seems out of the question: the costs in wasted disk and
memory space would be significant, and there would also be an on-disk
compatibility break. Nor does it seem very practical to try to allow some
data structures to have more-than-MAXALIGN alignment requirement, as we'd
have to push knowledge of that throughout various code that copies data
structures around.
The only way out of the box is to make type int128 conform to the system's
alignment assumptions. Fortunately, gcc supports that via its
__attribute__(aligned()) pragma; and since we don't currently support
int128 on non-gcc-workalike compilers, we shouldn't be losing any platform
support this way.
Although we could have just done pg_attribute_aligned(MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF) and
called it a day, I did a little bit of extra work to make the code more
portable than that: it will also support int128 on compilers without
__attribute__(aligned()), if the native alignment of their 128-bit-int
type is no more than that of int64.
Add a regression test case that exercises the one known instance of the
problem, in parallel aggregation over a bigint column.
This will need to be back-patched, along with the preparatory commit
91aec93e6. But let's see what the buildfarm makes of it first.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171110185747.31519.28038@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Upcoming patches are going to address performance issues that involve
slow system provided ntohs/htons etc. To address that expand
pg_bswap.h to provide pg_ntoh{16,32,64}, pg_hton{16,32,64} and
optimize their respective implementations by using compiler intrinsics
for gcc compatible compilers and msvc. Fall back to manual
implementations using shifts etc otherwise.
Additionally remove multiple evaluation hazards from the existing
BSWAP32/64 macros, by replacing them with inline functions when
necessary. In the course of that the naming scheme is changed to
pg_bswap16/32/64.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170927172019.gheidqy6xvlxb325@alap3.anarazel.de
copyObject() is declared to return void *, which allows easily assigning
the result independent of the input, but it loses all type checking.
If the compiler supports typeof or something similar, cast the result to
the input type. This creates a greater amount of type safety. In some
cases, where the result is assigned to a generic type such as Node * or
Expr *, new casts are now necessary, but in general casts are now
unnecessary in the normal case and indicate that something unusual is
happening.
Reviewed-by: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>
Using exit() requires stdlib.h, which is not included. Use return
instead. Also add return type for main().
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Peter Eisentraut