145 Commits (404e667580fec0ab9a89a38eaa8643ee7227fdb8)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Tom Lane	da1c91631e	Speed up planner's scanning for parallel-query hazards. ... We need to scan the whole parse tree for parallel-unsafe functions. If there are none, we'll later need to determine whether particular subtrees contain any parallel-restricted functions. The previous coding retained no knowledge from the first scan, even though this is very wasteful in the common case where the query contains only parallel-safe functions. We can bypass all of the later scans by remembering that fact. This provides a small but measurable speed improvement when the case applies, and shouldn't cost anything when it doesn't. Patch by me, reviewed by Robert Haas Discussion: <3740.1471538387@sss.pgh.pa.us>	9 years ago
Tom Lane	45639a0525	Avoid invalidating all foreign-join cached plans when user mappings change. ... We must not push down a foreign join when the foreign tables involved should be accessed under different user mappings. Previously we tried to enforce that rule literally during planning, but that meant that the resulting plans were dependent on the current contents of the pg_user_mapping catalog, and we had to blow away all cached plans containing any remote join when anything at all changed in pg_user_mapping. This could have been improved somewhat, but the fact that a syscache inval callback has very limited info about what changed made it hard to do better within that design. Instead, let's change the planner to not consider user mappings per se, but to allow a foreign join if both RTEs have the same checkAsUser value. If they do, then they necessarily will use the same user mapping at runtime, and we don't need to know specifically which one that is. Post-plan-time changes in pg_user_mapping no longer require any plan invalidation. This rule does give up some optimization ability, to wit where two foreign table references come from views with different owners or one's from a view and one's directly in the query, but nonetheless the same user mapping would have applied. We'll sacrifice the first case, but to not regress more than we have to in the second case, allow a foreign join involving both zero and nonzero checkAsUser values if the nonzero one is the same as the prevailing effective userID. In that case, mark the plan as only runnable by that userID. The plancache code already had a notion of plans being userID-specific, in order to support RLS. It was a little confused though, in particular lacking clarity of thought as to whether it was the rewritten query or just the finished plan that's dependent on the userID. Rearrange that code so that it's clearer what depends on which, and so that the same logic applies to both RLS-injected role dependency and foreign-join-injected role dependency. Note that this patch doesn't remove the other issue mentioned in the original complaint, which is that while we'll reliably stop using a foreign join if it's disallowed in a new context, we might fail to start using a foreign join if it's now allowed, but we previously created a generic cached plan that didn't use one. It was agreed that the chance of winning that way was not high enough to justify the much larger number of plan invalidations that would have to occur if we tried to cause it to happen. In passing, clean up randomly-varying spelling of EXPLAIN commands in postgres_fdw.sql, and fix a COSTS ON example that had been allowed to leak into the committed tests. This reverts most of commits fbe5a3fb7 and 5d4171d1c, which were the previous attempt at ensuring we wouldn't push down foreign joins that span permissions contexts. Etsuro Fujita and Tom Lane Discussion: <d49c1e5b-f059-20f4-c132-e9752ee0113e@lab.ntt.co.jp>	10 years ago
Tom Lane	100340e2dc	Restore foreign-key-aware estimation of join relation sizes. ... This patch provides a new implementation of the logic added by commit 137805f89 and later removed by 77ba61080. It differs from the original primarily in expending much less effort per joinrel in large queries, which it accomplishes by doing most of the matching work once per query not once per joinrel. Hopefully, it's also less buggy and better commented. The never-documented enable_fkey_estimates GUC remains gone. There remains work to be done to make the selectivity estimates account for nulls in FK referencing columns; but that was true of the original patch as well. We may be able to address this point later in beta. In the meantime, any error should be in the direction of overestimating rather than underestimating joinrel sizes, which seems like the direction we want to err in. Tomas Vondra and Tom Lane Discussion: <31041.1465069446@sss.pgh.pa.us>	10 years ago
Tom Lane	3303ea1a32	Remove reltarget_has_non_vars flag. ... Commit b12fd41c6 added a "reltarget_has_non_vars" field to RelOptInfo, but failed to maintain it accurately. Since its only purpose was to skip calls to has_parallel_hazard() in the simple case where a rel's targetlist is all Vars, and that call is really pretty cheap in that case anyway, it seems like this is just a case of premature optimization. Let's drop the flag and do the calls unconditionally until it's proven that we need more smarts here.	10 years ago
Robert Haas	4bc424b968	pgindent run for 9.6	10 years ago
Robert Haas	b12fd41c69	Don't generate parallel paths for rels with parallel-restricted outputs. ... Such paths are unsafe. To make it cheaper to detect when this case applies, track whether a relation's default PathTarget contains any non-Vars. In most cases, the answer will be no, which enables us to determine cheaply that the target list for a proposed path is parallel-safe. However, subquery pull-up can create cases that require us to inspect the target list more carefully. Amit Kapila, reviewed by me.	10 years ago
Robert Haas	c9ce4a1c61	Eliminate "parallel degree" terminology. ... This terminology provoked widespread complaints. So, instead, rename the GUC max_parallel_degree to max_parallel_workers_per_gather (leaving room for a possible future GUC max_parallel_workers that acts as a system-wide limit), and rename the parallel_degree reloption to parallel_workers. Rename structure members to match. These changes create a dump/restore hazard for users of PostgreSQL 9.6beta1 who have set the reloption (or applied the GUC using ALTER USER or ALTER DATABASE).	10 years ago
Tom Lane	207d5a656e	Fix mishandling of equivalence-class tests in parameterized plans. ... Given a three-or-more-way equivalence class, such as X.Y = Y.Y = Z.Z, it was possible for the planner to omit one of the quals needed to enforce that all members of the equivalence class are actually equal. This only happened in the case of a parameterized join node for two of the relations, that is a plan tree like Nested Loop -> Scan X -> Nested Loop -> Scan Y -> Scan Z Filter: Z.Z = X.X The eclass machinery normally expects to apply X.X = Y.Y when those two relations are joined, but in this shape of plan tree they aren't joined until the top node --- and, if the lower nested loop is marked as parameterized by X, the top node will assume that the relevant eclass condition(s) got pushed down into the lower node. On the other hand, the scan of Z assumes that it's only responsible for constraining Z.Z to match any one of the other eclass members. So one or another of the required quals sometimes fell between the cracks, depending on whether consideration of the eclass in get_joinrel_parampathinfo() for the lower nested loop chanced to generate X.X = Y.Y or X.X = Z.Z as the appropriate constraint there. If it generated the latter, it'd erroneously suppose that the Z scan would take care of matters. To fix, force X.X = Y.Y to be generated and applied at that join node when this case occurs. This is *extremely* hard to hit in practice, because various planner behaviors conspire to mask the problem; starting with the fact that the planner doesn't really like to generate a parameterized plan of the above shape. (It might have been impossible to hit it before we tweaked things to allow this plan shape for star-schema cases.) Many thanks to Alexander Kirkouski for submitting a reproducible test case. The bug can be demonstrated in all branches back to 9.2 where parameterized paths were introduced, so back-patch that far.	10 years ago
Robert Haas	25fe8b5f1a	Add a 'parallel_degree' reloption. ... The code that estimates what parallel degree should be uesd for the scan of a relation is currently rather stupid, so add a parallel_degree reloption that can be used to override the planner's rather limited judgement. Julien Rouhaud, reviewed by David Rowley, James Sewell, Amit Kapila, and me. Some further hacking by me.	10 years ago
Tom Lane	de94e2af18	Run pgindent on a batch of (mostly-planner-related) source files. ... Getting annoyed at the amount of unrelated chatter I get from pgindent'ing Rowley's unique-joins patch. Re-indent all the files it touches.	10 years ago
Robert Haas	5d4171d1c7	Don't require a user mapping for FDWs to work. ... Commit fbe5a3fb73 accidentally changed this behavior; put things back the way they were, and add some regression tests. Report by Andres Freund; patch by Ashutosh Bapat, with a bit of kibitzing by me.	10 years ago
Robert Haas	3aff33aa68	Fix typos. ... Oskari Saarenmaa	10 years ago
Tom Lane	307c78852f	Rethink representation of PathTargets. ... In commit 19a541143a I did not make PathTarget a subtype of Node, and embedded a RelOptInfo's reltarget directly into it rather than having a separately-allocated Node. In hindsight that was misguided micro-optimization, enabled by the fact that at that point we didn't have any Paths with custom PathTargets. Now that PathTarget processing has been fleshed out some more, it's easier to see that it's better to have PathTarget as an indepedent Node type, even if it does cost us one more palloc to create a RelOptInfo. So change it while we still can. This commit just changes the representation, without doing anything more interesting than that.	10 years ago
Tom Lane	3fc6e2d7f5	Make the upper part of the planner work by generating and comparing Paths. ... I've been saying we needed to do this for more than five years, and here it finally is. This patch removes the ever-growing tangle of spaghetti logic that grouping_planner() used to use to try to identify the best plan for post-scan/join query steps. Now, there is (nearly) independent consideration of each execution step, and entirely separate construction of Paths to represent each of the possible ways to do that step. We choose the best Path or set of Paths using the same add_path() logic that's been used inside query_planner() for years. In addition, this patch removes the old restriction that subquery_planner() could return only a single Plan. It now returns a RelOptInfo containing a set of Paths, just as query_planner() does, and the parent query level can use each of those Paths as the basis of a SubqueryScanPath at its level. This allows finding some optimizations that we missed before, wherein a subquery was capable of returning presorted data and thereby avoiding a sort in the parent level, making the overall cost cheaper even though delivering sorted output was not the cheapest plan for the subquery in isolation. (A couple of regression test outputs change in consequence of that. However, there is very little change in visible planner behavior overall, because the point of this patch is not to get immediate planning benefits but to create the infrastructure for future improvements.) There is a great deal left to do here. This patch unblocks a lot of planner work that was basically impractical in the old code structure, such as allowing FDWs to implement remote aggregation, or rewriting plan_set_operations() to allow consideration of multiple implementation orders for set operations. (The latter will likely require a full rewrite of plan_set_operations(); what I've done here is only to fix it to return Paths not Plans.) I have also left unfinished some localized refactoring in createplan.c and planner.c, because it was not necessary to get this patch to a working state. Thanks to Robert Haas, David Rowley, and Amit Kapila for review.	10 years ago
Tom Lane	19a541143a	Add an explicit representation of the output targetlist to Paths. ... Up to now, there's been an assumption that all Paths for a given relation compute the same output column set (targetlist). However, there are good reasons to remove that assumption. For example, an indexscan on an expression index might be able to return the value of an expensive function "for free". While we have the ability to generate such a plan today in simple cases, we don't have a way to model that it's cheaper than a plan that computes the function from scratch, nor a way to create such a plan in join cases (where the function computation would normally happen at the topmost join node). Also, we need this so that we can have Paths representing post-scan/join steps, where the targetlist may well change from one step to the next. Therefore, invent a "struct PathTarget" representing the columns we expect a plan step to emit. It's convenient to include the output tuple width and tlist evaluation cost in this struct, and there will likely be additional fields in future. While Path nodes that actually do have custom outputs will need their own PathTargets, it will still be true that most Paths for a given relation will compute the same tlist. To reduce the overhead added by this patch, keep a "default PathTarget" in RelOptInfo, and allow Paths that compute that column set to just point to their parent RelOptInfo's reltarget. (In the patch as committed, actually every Path is like that, since we do not yet have any cases of custom PathTargets.) I took this opportunity to provide some more-honest costing of PlaceHolderVar evaluation. Up to now, the assumption that "scan/join reltargetlists have cost zero" was applied not only to Vars, where it's reasonable, but also PlaceHolderVars where it isn't. Now, we add the eval cost of a PlaceHolderVar's expression to the first plan level where it can be computed, by including it in the PathTarget cost field and adding that to the cost estimates for Paths. This isn't perfect yet but it's much better than before, and there is a way forward to improve it more. This costing change affects the join order chosen for a couple of the regression tests, changing expected row ordering.	10 years ago
Robert Haas	fbe5a3fb73	Only try to push down foreign joins if the user mapping OIDs match. ... Previously, the foreign join pushdown infrastructure left the question of security entirely up to individual FDWs, but it would be easy for a foreign data wrapper to inadvertently open up subtle security holes that way. So, make it the core code's job to determine which user mapping OID is relevant, and don't attempt join pushdown unless it's the same for all relevant relations. Per a suggestion from Tom Lane. Shigeru Hanada and Ashutosh Bapat, reviewed by Etsuro Fujita and KaiGai Kohei, with some further changes by me.	10 years ago
Robert Haas	45be99f8cd	Support parallel joins, and make related improvements. ... The core innovation of this patch is the introduction of the concept of a partial path; that is, a path which if executed in parallel will generate a subset of the output rows in each process. Gathering a partial path produces an ordinary (complete) path. This allows us to generate paths for parallel joins by joining a partial path for one side (which at the baserel level is currently always a Partial Seq Scan) to an ordinary path on the other side. This is subject to various restrictions at present, especially that this strategy seems unlikely to be sensible for merge joins, so only nested loops and hash joins paths are generated. This also allows an Append node to be pushed below a Gather node in the case of a partitioned table. Testing revealed that early versions of this patch made poor decisions in some cases, which turned out to be caused by the fact that the original cost model for Parallel Seq Scan wasn't very good. So this patch tries to make some modest improvements in that area. There is much more to be done in the area of generating good parallel plans in all cases, but this seems like a useful step forward. Patch by me, reviewed by Dilip Kumar and Amit Kapila.	10 years ago
Bruce Momjian	ee94300446	Update copyright for 2016 ... Backpatch certain files through 9.1	10 years ago
Tom Lane	4fcf48450d	Get rid of the planner's LateralJoinInfo data structure. ... I originally modeled this data structure on SpecialJoinInfo, but after commit acfcd45cac that looks like a pretty poor decision. All we really need is relid sets identifying laterally-referenced rels; and most of the time, what we want to know about includes indirect lateral references, a case the LateralJoinInfo data was unsuited to compute with any efficiency. The previous commit redefined RelOptInfo.lateral_relids as the transitive closure of lateral references, so that it easily supports checking indirect references. For the places where we really do want just direct references, add a new RelOptInfo field direct_lateral_relids, which is easily set up as a copy of lateral_relids before we perform the transitive closure calculation. Then we can just drop lateral_info_list and LateralJoinInfo and the supporting code. This makes the planner's handling of lateral references noticeably more efficient, and shorter too. Such a change can't be back-patched into stable branches for fear of breaking extensions that might be looking at the planner's data structures; but it seems not too late to push it into 9.5, so I've done so.	10 years ago
Tom Lane	acfcd45cac	Still more fixes for planner's handling of LATERAL references. ... More fuzz testing by Andreas Seltenreich exposed that the planner did not cope well with chains of lateral references. If relation X references Y laterally, and Y references Z laterally, then we will have to scan X on the inside of a nestloop with Z, so for all intents and purposes X is laterally dependent on Z too. The planner did not understand this and would generate intermediate joins that could not be used. While that was usually harmless except for wasting some planning cycles, under the right circumstances it would lead to "failed to build any N-way joins" or "could not devise a query plan" planner failures. To fix that, convert the existing per-relation lateral_relids and lateral_referencers relid sets into their transitive closures; that is, they now show all relations on which a rel is directly or indirectly laterally dependent. This not only fixes the chained-reference problem but allows some of the relevant tests to be made substantially simpler and faster, since they can be reduced to simple bitmap manipulations instead of searches of the LateralJoinInfo list. Also, when a PlaceHolderVar that is due to be evaluated at a join contains lateral references, we should treat those references as indirect lateral dependencies of each of the join's base relations. This prevents us from trying to join any individual base relations to the lateral reference source before the join is formed, which again cannot work. Andreas' testing also exposed another oversight in the "dangerous PlaceHolderVar" test added in commit 85e5e222b1. Simply rejecting unsafe join paths in joinpath.c is insufficient, because in some cases we will end up rejecting *all* possible paths for a particular join, again leading to "could not devise a query plan" failures. The restriction has to be known also to join_is_legal and its cohort functions, so that they will not select a join for which that will happen. I chose to move the supporting logic into joinrels.c where the latter functions are. Back-patch to 9.3 where LATERAL support was introduced.	10 years ago
Tom Lane	edca44b152	Simplify LATERAL-related calculations within add_paths_to_joinrel(). ... While convincing myself that commit 7e19db0c09 would solve both of the problems recently reported by Andreas Seltenreich, I realized that add_paths_to_joinrel's handling of LATERAL restrictions could be made noticeably simpler and faster if we were to retain the minimum possible parameterization for each joinrel (that is, the set of relids supplying unsatisfied lateral references in it). We already retain that for baserels, in RelOptInfo.lateral_relids, so we can use that field for joinrels too. I re-pgindent'd the files touched here, which affects some unrelated comments. This is, I believe, just a minor optimization not a bug fix, so no back-patch.	10 years ago
Tom Lane	7e19db0c09	Fix another oversight in checking if a join with LATERAL refs is legal. ... It was possible for the planner to decide to join a LATERAL subquery to the outer side of an outer join before the outer join itself is completed. Normally that's fine because of the associativity rules, but it doesn't work if the subquery contains a lateral reference to the inner side of the outer join. In such a situation the outer join *must* be done first. join_is_legal() missed this consideration and would allow the join to be attempted, but the actual path-building code correctly decided that no valid join path could be made, sometimes leading to planner errors such as "failed to build any N-way joins". Per report from Andreas Seltenreich. Back-patch to 9.3 where LATERAL support was added.	10 years ago
Robert Haas	80558c1f5a	Generate parallel sequential scan plans in simple cases. ... Add a new flag, consider_parallel, to each RelOptInfo, indicating whether a plan for that relation could conceivably be run inside of a parallel worker. Right now, we're pretty conservative: for example, it might be possible to defer applying a parallel-restricted qual in a worker, and later do it in the leader, but right now we just don't try to parallelize access to that relation. That's probably the right decision in most cases, anyway. Using the new flag, generate parallel sequential scan plans for plain baserels, meaning that we now have parallel sequential scan in PostgreSQL. The logic here is pretty unsophisticated right now: the costing model probably isn't right in detail, and we can't push joins beneath Gather nodes, so the number of plans that can actually benefit from this is pretty limited right now. Lots more work is needed. Nevertheless, it seems time to enable this functionality so that all this code can actually be tested easily by users and developers. Note that, if you wish to test this functionality, it will be necessary to set max_parallel_degree to a value greater than the default of 0. Once a few more loose ends have been tidied up here, we might want to consider changing the default value of this GUC, but I'm leaving it alone for now. Along the way, fix a bug in cost_gather: the previous coding thought that a Gather node's transfer overhead should be costed on the basis of the relation size rather than the number of tuples that actually need to be passed off to the leader. Patch by me, reviewed in earlier versions by Amit Kapila.	10 years ago
Tom Lane	95f4e59c32	Remove an unsafe Assert, and explain join_clause_is_movable_into() better. ... join_clause_is_movable_into() is approximate, in the sense that it might sometimes return "false" when actually it would be valid to push the given join clause down to the specified level. This is okay ... but there was an Assert in get_joinrel_parampathinfo() that's only safe if the answers are always exact. Comment out the Assert, and add a bunch of commentary to clarify what's going on. Per fuzz testing by Andreas Seltenreich. The added regression test is a pretty silly query, but it's based on his crasher example. Back-patch to 9.2 where the faulty logic was introduced.	11 years ago
Tom Lane	3f59be836c	Fix planner's cost estimation for SEMI/ANTI joins with inner indexscans. ... When the inner side of a nestloop SEMI or ANTI join is an indexscan that uses all the join clauses as indexquals, it can be presumed that both matched and unmatched outer rows will be processed very quickly: for matched rows, we'll stop after fetching one row from the indexscan, while for unmatched rows we'll have an indexscan that finds no matching index entries, which should also be quick. The planner already knew about this, but it was nonetheless charging for at least one full run of the inner indexscan, as a consequence of concerns about the behavior of materialized inner scans --- but those concerns don't apply in the fast case. If the inner side has low cardinality (many matching rows) this could make an indexscan plan look far more expensive than it actually is. To fix, rearrange the work in initial_cost_nestloop/final_cost_nestloop so that we don't add the inner scan cost until we've inspected the indexquals, and then we can add either the full-run cost or just the first tuple's cost as appropriate. Experimentation with this fix uncovered another problem: add_path and friends were coded to disregard cheap startup cost when considering parameterized paths. That's usually okay (and desirable, because it thins the path herd faster); but in this fast case for SEMI/ANTI joins, it could result in throwing away the desired plain indexscan path in favor of a bitmap scan path before we ever get to the join costing logic. In the many-matching-rows cases of interest here, a bitmap scan will do a lot more work than required, so this is a problem. To fix, add a per-relation flag consider_param_startup that works like the existing consider_startup flag, but applies to parameterized paths, and set it for relations that are the inside of a SEMI or ANTI join. To make this patch reasonably safe to back-patch, care has been taken to avoid changing the planner's behavior except in the very narrow case of SEMI/ANTI joins with inner indexscans. There are places in compare_path_costs_fuzzily and add_path_precheck that are not terribly consistent with the new approach, but changing them will affect planner decisions at the margins in other cases, so we'll leave that for a HEAD-only fix. Back-patch to 9.3; before that, the consider_startup flag didn't exist, meaning that the second aspect of the patch would be too invasive. Per a complaint from Peter Holzer and analysis by Tomas Vondra.	11 years ago
Tom Lane	1a8a4e5cde	Code review for foreign/custom join pushdown patch. ... Commit e7cb7ee145 included some design decisions that seem pretty questionable to me, and there was quite a lot of stuff not to like about the documentation and comments. Clean up as follows: * Consider foreign joins only between foreign tables on the same server, rather than between any two foreign tables with the same underlying FDW handler function. In most if not all cases, the FDW would simply have had to apply the same-server restriction itself (far more expensively, both for lack of caching and because it would be repeated for each combination of input sub-joins), or else risk nasty bugs. Anyone who's really intent on doing something outside this restriction can always use the set_join_pathlist_hook. * Rename fdw_ps_tlist/custom_ps_tlist to fdw_scan_tlist/custom_scan_tlist to better reflect what they're for, and allow these custom scan tlists to be used even for base relations. * Change make_foreignscan() API to include passing the fdw_scan_tlist value, since the FDW is required to set that. Backwards compatibility doesn't seem like an adequate reason to expect FDWs to set it in some ad-hoc extra step, and anyway existing FDWs can just pass NIL. * Change the API of path-generating subroutines of add_paths_to_joinrel, and in particular that of GetForeignJoinPaths and set_join_pathlist_hook, so that various less-used parameters are passed in a struct rather than as separate parameter-list entries. The objective here is to reduce the probability that future additions to those parameter lists will result in source-level API breaks for users of these hooks. It's possible that this is even a small win for the core code, since most CPU architectures can't pass more than half a dozen parameters efficiently anyway. I kept root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, and jointype as separate parameters to reduce code churn in joinpath.c --- in particular, putting jointype into the struct would have been problematic because of the subroutines' habit of changing their local copies of that variable. * Avoid ad-hocery in ExecAssignScanProjectionInfo. It was probably all right for it to know about IndexOnlyScan, but if the list is to grow we should refactor the knowledge out to the callers. * Restore nodeForeignscan.c's previous use of the relcache to avoid extra GetFdwRoutine lookups for base-relation scans. * Lots of cleanup of documentation and missed comments. Re-order some code additions into more logical places.	11 years ago
Robert Haas	e7cb7ee145	Allow FDWs and custom scan providers to replace joins with scans. ... Foreign data wrappers can use this capability for so-called "join pushdown"; that is, instead of executing two separate foreign scans and then joining the results locally, they can generate a path which performs the join on the remote server and then is scanned locally. This commit does not extend postgres_fdw to take advantage of this capability; it just provides the infrastructure. Custom scan providers can use this in a similar way. Previously, it was only possible for a custom scan provider to scan a single relation. Now, it can scan an entire join tree, provided of course that it knows how to produce the same results that the join would have produced if executed normally. KaiGai Kohei, reviewed by Shigeru Hanada, Ashutosh Bapat, and me.	11 years ago
Bruce Momjian	4baaf863ec	Update copyright for 2015 ... Backpatch certain files through 9.0	11 years ago
Tom Lane	5a6c168c78	Fix some more problems with nested append relations. ... As of commit a87c72915 (which later got backpatched as far as 9.1), we're explicitly supporting the notion that append relations can be nested; this can occur when UNION ALL constructs are nested, or when a UNION ALL contains a table with inheritance children. Bug #11457 from Nelson Page, as well as an earlier report from Elvis Pranskevichus, showed that there were still nasty bugs associated with such cases: in particular the EquivalenceClass mechanism could try to generate "join" clauses connecting an appendrel child to some grandparent appendrel, which would result in assertion failures or bogus plans. Upon investigation I concluded that all current callers of find_childrel_appendrelinfo() need to be fixed to explicitly consider multiple levels of parent appendrels. The most complex fix was in processing of "broken" EquivalenceClasses, which are ECs for which we have been unable to generate all the derived equality clauses we would like to because of missing cross-type equality operators in the underlying btree operator family. That code path is more or less entirely untested by the regression tests to date, because no standard opfamilies have such holes in them. So I wrote a new regression test script to try to exercise it a bit, which turned out to be quite a worthwhile activity as it exposed existing bugs in all supported branches. The present patch is essentially the same as far back as 9.2, which is where parameterized paths were introduced. In 9.0 and 9.1, we only need to back-patch a small fragment of commit 5b7b5518d, which fixes failure to propagate out the original WHERE clauses when a broken EC contains constant members. (The regression test case results show that these older branches are noticeably stupider than 9.2+ in terms of the quality of the plans generated; but we don't really care about plan quality in such cases, only that the plan not be outright wrong. A more invasive fix in the older branches would not be a good idea anyway from a plan-stability standpoint.)	11 years ago
Bruce Momjian	0a78320057	pgindent run for 9.4 ... This includes removing tabs after periods in C comments, which was applied to back branches, so this change should not effect backpatching.	12 years ago
Bruce Momjian	7e04792a1c	Update copyright for 2014 ... Update all files in head, and files COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml in all back branches.	12 years ago
Tom Lane	9e7e29c75a	Fix planner problems with LATERAL references in PlaceHolderVars. ... The planner largely failed to consider the possibility that a PlaceHolderVar's expression might contain a lateral reference to a Var coming from somewhere outside the PHV's syntactic scope. We had a previous report of a problem in this area, which I tried to fix in a quick-hack way in commit 4da6439bd8, but Antonin Houska pointed out that there were still some problems, and investigation turned up other issues. This patch largely reverts that commit in favor of a more thoroughly thought-through solution. The new theory is that a PHV's ph_eval_at level cannot be higher than its original syntactic level. If it contains lateral references, those don't change the ph_eval_at level, but rather they create a lateral-reference requirement for the ph_eval_at join relation. The code in joinpath.c needs to handle that. Another issue is that createplan.c wasn't handling nested PlaceHolderVars properly. In passing, push knowledge of lateral-reference checks for join clauses into join_clause_is_movable_to. This is mainly so that FDWs don't need to deal with it. This patch doesn't fix the original join-qual-placement problem reported by Jeremy Evans (and indeed, one of the new regression test cases shows the wrong answer because of that). But the PlaceHolderVar problems need to be fixed before that issue can be addressed, so committing this separately seems reasonable.	13 years ago
Tom Lane	3ced8837db	Simplify query_planner's API by having it return the top-level RelOptInfo. ... Formerly, query_planner returned one or possibly two Paths for the topmost join relation, so that grouping_planner didn't see the join RelOptInfo (at least not directly; it didn't have any hesitation about examining cheapest_path->parent, though). However, correct selection of the Paths involved a significant amount of coupling between query_planner and grouping_planner, a problem which has gotten worse over time. It seems best to give up on this API choice and instead return the topmost RelOptInfo explicitly. Then grouping_planner can pull out the Paths it wants from the rel's path list. In this way we can remove all knowledge of grouping behaviors from query_planner. The only real benefit of the old way is that in the case of an empty FROM clause, we never made any RelOptInfos at all, just a Path. Now we have to gin up a dummy RelOptInfo to represent the empty FROM clause. That's not a very big deal though. While at it, simplify query_planner's API a bit more by having the caller set up root->tuple_fraction and root->limit_tuples, rather than passing those values as separate parameters. Since query_planner no longer does anything with either value, requiring it to fill the PlannerInfo fields seemed pretty arbitrary. This patch just rearranges code; it doesn't (intentionally) change any behaviors. Followup patches will do more interesting things.	13 years ago
Bruce Momjian	bd61a623ac	Update copyrights for 2013 ... Fully update git head, and update back branches in ./COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml files.	13 years ago
Tom Lane	46c508fbcf	Fix PARAM_EXEC assignment mechanism to be safe in the presence of WITH. ... The planner previously assumed that parameter Vars having the same absolute query level, varno, and varattno could safely be assigned the same runtime PARAM_EXEC slot, even though they might be different Vars appearing in different subqueries. This was (probably) safe before the introduction of CTEs, but the lazy-evalution mechanism used for CTEs means that a CTE can be executed during execution of some other subquery, causing the lifespan of Params at the same syntactic nesting level as the CTE to overlap with use of the same slots inside the CTE. In 9.1 we created additional hazards by using the same parameter-assignment technology for nestloop inner scan parameters, but it was broken before that, as illustrated by the added regression test. To fix, restructure the planner's management of PlannerParamItems so that items having different semantic lifespans are kept rigorously separated. This will probably result in complex queries using more runtime PARAM_EXEC slots than before, but the slots are cheap enough that this hardly matters. Also, stop generating PlannerParamItems containing Params for subquery outputs: all we really need to do is reserve the PARAM_EXEC slot number, and that now only takes incrementing a counter. The planning code is simpler and probably faster than before, as well as being more correct. Per report from Vik Reykja. These changes will mostly also need to be made in the back branches, but I'm going to hold off on that until after 9.2.0 wraps.	13 years ago
Tom Lane	6d2c8c0e2a	Drop cheap-startup-cost paths during add_path() if we don't need them. ... We can detect whether the planner top level is going to care at all about cheap startup cost (it will only do so if query_planner's tuple_fraction argument is greater than zero). If it isn't, we might as well discard paths immediately whose only advantage over others is cheap startup cost. This turns out to get rid of quite a lot of paths in complex queries --- I saw planner runtime reduction of more than a third on one large query. Since add_path isn't currently passed the PlannerInfo "root", the easiest way to tell it whether to do this was to add a bool flag to RelOptInfo. That's a bit redundant, since all relations in a given query level will have the same setting. But in the future it's possible that we'd refine the control decision to work on a per-relation basis, so this seems like a good arrangement anyway. Per my suggestion of a few months ago.	13 years ago
Tom Lane	9ff79b9d4e	Fix up planner infrastructure to support LATERAL properly. ... This patch takes care of a number of problems having to do with failure to choose valid join orders and incorrect handling of lateral references pulled up from subqueries. Notable changes: * Add a LateralJoinInfo data structure similar to SpecialJoinInfo, to represent join ordering constraints created by lateral references. (I first considered extending the SpecialJoinInfo structure, but the semantics are different enough that a separate data structure seems better.) Extend join_is_legal() and related functions to prevent trying to form unworkable joins, and to ensure that we will consider joins that satisfy lateral references even if the joins would be clauseless. * Fill in the infrastructure needed for the last few types of relation scan paths to support parameterization. We'd have wanted this eventually anyway, but it is necessary now because a relation that gets pulled up out of a UNION ALL subquery may acquire a reltargetlist containing lateral references, meaning that its paths *have* to be parameterized whether or not we have any code that can push join quals down into the scan. * Compute data about lateral references early in query_planner(), and save in RelOptInfo nodes, to avoid repetitive calculations later. * Assorted corner-case bug fixes. There's probably still some bugs left, but this is a lot closer to being real than it was before.	14 years ago
Bruce Momjian	927d61eeff	Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3 ... commit-fest.	14 years ago
Tom Lane	5b7b5518d0	Revise parameterized-path mechanism to fix assorted issues. ... This patch adjusts the treatment of parameterized paths so that all paths with the same parameterization (same set of required outer rels) for the same relation will have the same rowcount estimate. We cache the rowcount estimates to ensure that property, and hopefully save a few cycles too. Doing this makes it practical for add_path_precheck to operate without a rowcount estimate: it need only assume that paths with different parameterizations never dominate each other, which is close enough to true anyway for coarse filtering, because normally a more-parameterized path should yield fewer rows thanks to having more join clauses to apply. In add_path, we do the full nine yards of comparing rowcount estimates along with everything else, so that we can discard parameterized paths that don't actually have an advantage. This fixes some issues I'd found with add_path rejecting parameterized paths on the grounds that they were more expensive than not-parameterized ones, even though they yielded many fewer rows and hence would be cheaper once subsequent joining was considered. To make the same-rowcounts assumption valid, we have to require that any parameterized path enforce *all* join clauses that could be obtained from the particular set of outer rels, even if not all of them are useful for indexing. This is required at both base scans and joins. It's a good thing anyway since the net impact is that join quals are checked at the lowest practical level in the join tree. Hence, discard the original rather ad-hoc mechanism for choosing parameterization joinquals, and build a better one that has a more principled rule for when clauses can be moved. The original rule was actually buggy anyway for lack of knowledge about which relations are part of an outer join's outer side; getting this right requires adding an outer_relids field to RestrictInfo.	14 years ago
Tom Lane	b14953932d	Revise FDW planning API, again. ... Further reflection shows that a single callback isn't very workable if we desire to let FDWs generate multiple Paths, because that forces the FDW to do all work necessary to generate a valid Plan node for each Path. Instead split the former PlanForeignScan API into three steps: GetForeignRelSize, GetForeignPaths, GetForeignPlan. We had already bit the bullet of breaking the 9.1 FDW API for 9.2, so this shouldn't cause very much additional pain, and it's substantially more flexible for complex FDWs. Add an fdw_private field to RelOptInfo so that the new functions can save state there rather than possibly having to recalculate information two or three times. In addition, we'd not thought through what would be needed to allow an FDW to set up subexpressions of its choice for runtime execution. We could treat ForeignScan.fdw_private as an executable expression but that seems likely to break existing FDWs unnecessarily (in particular, it would restrict the set of node types allowable in fdw_private to those supported by expression_tree_walker). Instead, invent a separate field fdw_exprs which will receive the postprocessing appropriate for expression trees. (One field is enough since it can be a list of expressions; also, we assume the corresponding expression state tree(s) will be held within fdw_state, so we don't need to add anything to ForeignScanState.) Per review of Hanada Shigeru's pgsql_fdw patch. We may need to tweak this further as we continue to work on that patch, but to me it feels a lot closer to being right now.	14 years ago
Tom Lane	e2fa76d80b	Use parameterized paths to generate inner indexscans more flexibly. ... This patch fixes the planner so that it can generate nestloop-with- inner-indexscan plans even with one or more levels of joining between the indexscan and the nestloop join that is supplying the parameter. The executor was fixed to handle such cases some time ago, but the planner was not ready. This should improve our plans in many situations where join ordering restrictions formerly forced complete table scans. There is probably a fair amount of tuning work yet to be done, because of various heuristics that have been added to limit the number of parameterized paths considered. However, we are not going to find out what needs to be adjusted until the code gets some real-world use, so it's time to get it in there where it can be tested easily. Note API change for index AM amcostestimate functions. I'm not aware of any non-core index AMs, but if there are any, they will need minor adjustments.	14 years ago
Bruce Momjian	e126958c2e	Update copyright notices for year 2012.	14 years ago
Tom Lane	e6858e6657	Measure the number of all-visible pages for use in index-only scan costing. ... Add a column pg_class.relallvisible to remember the number of pages that were all-visible according to the visibility map as of the last VACUUM (or ANALYZE, or some other operations that update pg_class.relpages). Use relallvisible/relpages, instead of an arbitrary constant, to estimate how many heap page fetches can be avoided during an index-only scan. This is pretty primitive and will no doubt see refinements once we've acquired more field experience with the index-only scan mechanism, but it's way better than using a constant. Note: I had to adjust an underspecified query in the window.sql regression test, because it was changing answers when the plan changed to use an index-only scan. Some of the adjacent tests perhaps should be adjusted as well, but I didn't do that here.	14 years ago
Tom Lane	b3aaf9081a	Rearrange planner to save the whole PlannerInfo (subroot) for a subquery. ... Formerly, set_subquery_pathlist and other creators of plans for subqueries saved only the rangetable and rowMarks lists from the lower-level PlannerInfo. But there's no reason not to remember the whole PlannerInfo, and indeed this turns out to simplify matters in a number of places. The immediate reason for doing this was so that the subroot will still be accessible when we're trying to extract column statistics out of an already-planned subquery. But now that I've done it, it seems like a good code-beautification effort in its own right. I also chose to get rid of the transient subrtable and subrowmark fields in SubqueryScan nodes, in favor of having setrefs.c look up the subquery's RelOptInfo. That required changing all the APIs in setrefs.c to pass PlannerInfo not PlannerGlobal, which was a large but quite mechanical transformation. One side-effect not foreseen at the beginning is that this finally broke inheritance_planner's assumption that replanning the same subquery RTE N times would necessarily give interchangeable results each time. That assumption was always pretty risky, but now we really have to make a separate RTE for each instance so that there's a place to carry the separate subroots.	15 years ago
Bruce Momjian	6416a82a62	Remove unnecessary #include references, per pgrminclude script.	15 years ago
Bruce Momjian	5d950e3b0c	Stamp copyrights for year 2011.	15 years ago
Magnus Hagander	9f2e211386	Remove cvs keywords from all files.	15 years ago
Bruce Momjian	65e806cba1	pgindent run for 9.0	16 years ago
Bruce Momjian	0239800893	Update copyright for the year 2010.	16 years ago
Tom Lane	1a95f12702	Eliminate a lot of list-management overhead within join_search_one_level ... by adding a requirement that build_join_rel add new join RelOptInfos to the appropriate list immediately at creation. Per report from Robert Haas, the list_concat_unique_ptr() calls that this change eliminates were taking the lion's share of the runtime in larger join problems. This doesn't do anything to fix the fundamental combinatorial explosion in large join problems, but it should push out the threshold of pain a bit further. Note: because this changes the order in which joinrel lists are built, it might result in changes in selected plans in cases where different alternatives have exactly the same costs. There is one example in the regression tests.	16 years ago