7 Commits (4b21acf522d751ba5b6679df391d5121b6c4a35f)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Peter Eisentraut	2eb4a831e5	Change TRUE/FALSE to true/false ... The lower case spellings are C and C++ standard and are used in most parts of the PostgreSQL sources. The upper case spellings are only used in some files/modules. So standardize on the standard spellings. The APIs for ICU, Perl, and Windows define their own TRUE and FALSE, so those are left as is when using those APIs. In code comments, we use the lower-case spelling for the C concepts and keep the upper-case spelling for the SQL concepts. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>	8 years ago
Andres Freund	510b8cbff1	Extend & revamp pg_bswap.h infrastructure. ... Upcoming patches are going to address performance issues that involve slow system provided ntohs/htons etc. To address that expand pg_bswap.h to provide pg_ntoh{16,32,64}, pg_hton{16,32,64} and optimize their respective implementations by using compiler intrinsics for gcc compatible compilers and msvc. Fall back to manual implementations using shifts etc otherwise. Additionally remove multiple evaluation hazards from the existing BSWAP32/64 macros, by replacing them with inline functions when necessary. In the course of that the naming scheme is changed to pg_bswap16/32/64. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170927172019.gheidqy6xvlxb325@alap3.anarazel.de	8 years ago
Tom Lane	382ceffdf7	Phase 3 of pgindent updates. ... Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they flow past the right margin. By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin, then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin, if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column limit. This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers. Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us	8 years ago
Tom Lane	c7b8998ebb	Phase 2 of pgindent updates. ... Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4d wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us	8 years ago
Bruce Momjian	a6fd7b7a5f	Post-PG 10 beta1 pgindent run ... perltidy run not included.	8 years ago
Andrew Dunstan	4b1c68d63e	Use CallerFInfoFunctionCall with btree_gist for numeric types ... None of the existing types actually need to use this mechanism, but this will allow support for enum types which will need it. A separate patch will adjust the varlena types support for consistency. Reviewed by Tom Lane and Anastasia Lubennikova Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/27220.1478360811@sss.pgh.pa.us	9 years ago
Tom Lane	11da83a0e7	Add uuid to the set of types supported by contrib/btree_gist. ... Paul Jungwirth, reviewed and hacked on by Teodor Sigaev, Ildus Kurbangaliev, Adam Brusselback, Chris Bandy, and myself. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyUEE29=X01JXdz8_TQvo6n9=2XoEBBRnQ8rkLyr+kjPxQ@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/55F6EE82.8080209@sigaev.ru	9 years ago