Currently, information about the permissions to be checked on relations
mentioned in a query is stored in their range table entries. So the
executor must scan the entire range table looking for relations that
need to have permissions checked. This can make the permission checking
part of the executor initialization needlessly expensive when many
inheritance children are present in the range range. While the
permissions need not be checked on the individual child relations, the
executor still must visit every range table entry to filter them out.
This commit moves the permission checking information out of the range
table entries into a new plan node called RTEPermissionInfo. Every
top-level (inheritance "root") RTE_RELATION entry in the range table
gets one and a list of those is maintained alongside the range table.
This new list is initialized by the parser when initializing the range
table. The rewriter can add more entries to it as rules/views are
expanded. Finally, the planner combines the lists of the individual
subqueries into one flat list that is passed to the executor for
checking.
To make it quick to find the RTEPermissionInfo entry belonging to a
given relation, RangeTblEntry gets a new Index field 'perminfoindex'
that stores the corresponding RTEPermissionInfo's index in the query's
list of the latter.
ExecutorCheckPerms_hook has gained another List * argument; the
signature is now:
typedef bool (*ExecutorCheckPerms_hook_type) (List *rangeTable,
List *rtePermInfos,
bool ereport_on_violation);
The first argument is no longer used by any in-core uses of the hook,
but we leave it in place because there may be other implementations that
do. Implementations should likely scan the rtePermInfos list to
determine which operations to allow or deny.
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGjJDmUhDSfv-U2qhKJjt9ST7Xh9JXC_irsAQ1TAUsJYg@mail.gmail.com
9d9c02ccd added window "run conditions", which allows the evaluation of
monotonic window functions to be skipped when the run condition is no
longer true. Prior to this commit, once the run condition was no longer
true and we stopped evaluating the window functions, we simply just left
the ecxt_aggvalues[] and ecxt_aggnulls[] arrays alone to store whatever
value was stored there the last time the window function was evaluated.
Leaving a stale value in there isn't really a problem on 64-bit builds as
all of the window functions which we recognize as monotonic all return
int8, which is passed by value on 64-bit builds. However, on 32-bit
builds, this was a problem as the value stored in the ecxt_values[]
element would be a by-ref value and it would be pointing to some memory
which would get reset once the tuple context is destroyed. Since the
WindowAgg node will output these values in the resulting tupleslot, this
could be problematic for the top-level WindowAgg node which must look at
these values to filter out the rows that don't meet its filter condition.
Here we fix this by just zeroing the ecxt_aggvalues[] and setting the
ecxt_aggnulls[] array to true when the run condition first becomes false.
This results in the WindowAgg's output having NULLs for the WindowFunc's
columns rather than the stale or pointer pointing to possibly freed
memory. These tuples with the NULLs can only make it as far as the
top-level WindowAgg node before they're filtered out. To ensure that
these tuples *are* always filtered out, we now insist that OpExprs making
up the run condition are strict OpExprs. Currently, all the window
functions which the planner recognizes as monotonic return INT8 and the
operator which is used for the run condition must be a member of a btree
opclass. In reality, these restrictions exclude nothing that's built-in
to Postgres and are unlikely to exclude anyone's custom operators due to
the requirement that the operator is part of a btree opclass. It would be
unusual if those were not strict.
Reported-by: Sergey Shinderuk, using valgrind
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, Sergey Shinderuk
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/29184c50-429a-ebd7-f1fb-0589c6723a35@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 15, where 9d9c02ccd was added
The same code pattern is repeated 17 times for int64 counters (0 for
missing entry) and 5 times for timestamps (NULL for missing entry) on
table entries. This code is switched to use a macro for the basic code
instead, shaving a few hundred lines of originally-duplicated code. The
function names remain the same, but some fields of PgStat_StatTabEntry
have to be renamed to cope with the new style.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https:/postgr.es/m/20221204173207.GA2669116@nathanxps13
Passing a NULL snapshot (InvalidSnapshot) is going to work but only as long
as the index can't find any matching rows. This can be confusing for
the extension authors, so add an explicit check for this argument. The check
is implemented with Assert() in order to avoid overhead in release builds.
Reported-by: Sven Klemm
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TPxitD4vbKyP-mpmC1XwyHdPPqvjLzm%2BVpB88h8LGgneQ%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Aleksander Alekseev
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov
By default, the contents generated by the custom and directory dump
formats are compressed. However, with the existing test facility, the
restore program will succeed regardless of whether the dumped output was
compressed or not without checking if anything has been compressed.
This commit implements a portable way to check the contents of the
custom and directory dump formats:
- glob_patterns, that can be defined for each test as an array of
glob()-compilable strings, tracking the contents that should or should
not be compressed. While this is useful to make sure that the table
data is compressed, this also checks that blobs.toc and toc.dat are
never compressed.
- command_like, to execute a command on a dump and check its generated
output. This is used here in correlation with pg_restore -l to check if
the dumps have been compressed or not, depending on if the build
supports gzip, or not.
This hole in the tests has come up when working on 5e73a60, where
compression has to be applied by default, if available, for both dump
formats.
The idea of glob_patterns comes from me, and Georgios has come up with
the design for command_like.
Author: Georgios Kokolatos, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DQn4czCWR1rcbGPLL7p3LfEr5-kGmlySm-H05VgroINdikvhtS5r9EdI6b8D8sjnbKdJ09k-cxs2AqijBeHAWk9Q8gvEAxPRHuLRhwONcGc=@pm.me
Keeping the SQL commands that initdb runs in string arrays before
feeding them to PG_CMD_PUTS() seems unnecessarily verbose and
inflexible. In some cases, the array only has one member. In other
cases, one might want to use PG_CMD_PRINTF() instead, to parametrize a
command, but that would require breaking up the loop or using
workarounds like replace_token(). Unwind all that; it's much simpler
that way.
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2c50823b-f453-bb97-e38b-34751c51dcdf%40enterprisedb.com
A couple of places weren't up to speed for this. By sheer good
luck, we didn't fail but just selected a non-memoized join plan,
at least in the test case we have. Nonetheless, it's a bug,
and I'm not quite sure that it couldn't have worse consequences
in other examples. So back-patch to v14 where Memoize came in.
Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48GkNom272sfp0-WeD6_0HSR19BJ4H1c9ZKSfbVnJsvRg@mail.gmail.com
For historical reasons, pg_dump refers to large objects as "BLOBs".
This term is not used anywhere else in PostgreSQL, and it also means
something different in the SQL standard and other SQL systems.
This patch renames internal functions, code comments, documentation,
etc. to use the "large object" or "LO" terminology instead. There is
no functionality change, so the archive format still uses the name
"BLOB" for the archive entry. Additional long command-line options
are added with the new naming.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/868a381f-4650-9460-1726-1ffd39a270b4%40enterprisedb.com
The error messages reported during any failures while reading or
validating the header of a WAL currently includes only the offset of the
page but not the compiled LSN referring to the page, requiring an extra
step to compile it if looking at the surroundings with pg_waldump or
similar. Adding this information costs a bit in translation, but also
eases debugging.
Author: Bharath Rupireddy
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Maxim Orlov, Michael
Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACWV=FCddsxcGbVOA=cvPyMr75YCFbSQT6g4KDj=gcJK4g@mail.gmail.com
As pointed out by Dean Rasheed, we really should be using tmp >
-(PG_INTNN_MIN / 10) rather than tmp > (PG_INTNN_MAX / 10) for checking
for overflows in the accumulation in the pg_strtointNN functions. This
does happen to be the same number when dividing by 10, but there is a
pending patch which adds other bases and this is not the same number if we
were to divide by 2 rather than 10, for example. If the base 2 parsing
was to follow this example then we could accidentally think a string
containing the value of PG_INT32_MIN was an overflow in pg_strtoint32.
Clearly that shouldn't overflow.
This does not fix any actual live bugs, only some bad examples of overflow
checks for future bases.
Reported-by: Dean Rasheed
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCVEtwfhdm-K-etZYFB0=qsR0nT6qXta_W+GQx4RYph1dg@mail.gmail.com
Just because I'm a neatnik, and I'm currently working on
code in this area. It annoys me to not be able to pgindent
my patches without working around unrelated changes.
It neglected to recurse to the subpath, meaning you'd get back
a path identical to the input. This could produce wrong query
results if the omission meant that the subpath fails to enforce
some join clause it should be enforcing. We don't have a test
case for this at the moment, but the code is obviously broken
and the fix is equally obvious. Back-patch to v14 where
Memoize was introduced.
Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4_R=ORpz=Lkn2q3ebPC5EuWyfZF+tmfCPVLBVK5W39mHA@mail.gmail.com
These two functions failed to cover MaterialPath. That's not a
fatal problem, but we can generate better plans in some cases
if we support it.
Tom Lane and Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1854233.1669949723@sss.pgh.pa.us
We might fail to generate a partitionwise join, because
reparameterize_path_by_child() does not support all path types.
This should not be a hard failure condition: we should just fall back
to a non-partitioned join. However, generate_partitionwise_join_paths
did not consider this possibility and would emit the (misleading)
error "could not devise a query plan for the given query" if we'd
failed to make any paths for a child join. Fix it to give up on
partitionwise joining if so. (The accepted technique for giving up
appears to be to set rel->nparts = 0, which I find pretty bizarre,
but there you have it.)
I have not added a test case because there'd be little point:
any omissions of this sort that we identify would soon get fixed
by extending reparameterize_path_by_child(), so the test would stop
proving anything. However, right now there is a known test case based
on failure to cover MaterialPath, and with that I've found that this
is broken in all supported versions. Hence, patch all the way back.
Original report and patch by me; thanks to Richard Guo for
identifying a test case that works against committed versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1854233.1669949723@sss.pgh.pa.us
Experiments have shown that modern versions of both gcc and clang are
unable to fully optimize the multiplication by 10 that we're doing in the
pg_strtointNN functions. Both compilers seem to be making use of "imul",
which is not the most efficient way to multiply by 10. This seems to be
due to the overflow checking that we're doing. Without the overflow
checks, both those compilers switch to a more efficient method of
multiplying by 10. In absence of overflow concern, integer multiplication
by 10 can be done by bit-shifting left 3 places to multiply by 8 and then
adding the original value twice.
To allow compilers this flexibility, here we adjust the code so that we
accumulate the number as an unsigned version of the type and remove the
use of pg_mul_sNN_overflow() and pg_sub_sNN_overflow(). The overflow
checking can be done simply by checking if the accumulated value has gone
beyond a 10th of the maximum *signed* value for the given type. If it has
then the accumulation of the next digit will cause an overflow. After
this is done, we do a final overflow check before converting the unsigned
version of the number back to its signed counterpart.
Testing has shown about an 8% speedup of a COPY into a table containing 2
INT columns.
Author: David Rowley, Dean Rasheed
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrL6_+wKgPqRHr7gH_6xy3hXM6a3QCsZ5ForurjDFfenA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrdYByjfj-=WbmVNFgmVZg88-dE7heukw8p55aJ+W=qxQ@mail.gmail.com
I wrote this to provide a home for a planned discussion of error
return conventions for non-error-throwing functions. But it seems
useful as documentation of existing code no matter what becomes of
that proposal, so commit separately.
When updating a relation with a rule whose action performed an INSERT
from a multi-row VALUES list, the rewriter might skip processing the
VALUES list, and therefore fail to replace any DEFAULTs in it. This
would lead to an "unrecognized node type" error.
The reason was that RewriteQuery() assumed that a query doing an
INSERT from a multi-row VALUES list would necessarily only have one
item in its fromlist, pointing to the VALUES RTE to read from. That
assumption is correct for the original query, but not for product
queries produced for rule actions. In such cases, there may be
multiple items in the fromlist, possibly including multiple VALUES
RTEs.
What is required instead is for RewriteQuery() to skip any RTEs from
the product query's originating query, which might include one or more
already-processed VALUES RTEs. What's left should then include at most
one VALUES RTE (from the rule action) to be processed.
Patch by me. Thanks to Tom Lane for reviewing.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCV39OOW7LAR_Xq4i%2BLc1Byux%3DeK3Q%3DHD_pF1o9LBt%3DphA%40mail.gmail.com
This is present in the declaration for ReadDataFromArchive, so we'd better
have it in the definition too in order to avoid compilers from complaining
about the mismatch of function signatures.
When the relkind of a relache entry changes, because a table is converted into
a view, pgstats can get confused in 15+, leading to crashes or assertion
failures.
For HEAD, Tom fixed this in b23cd185fd, by removing support for converting a
table to a view, removing the source of the inconsistency. This commit just
adds an assertion that a relcache entry's relkind does not change, just in
case we end up with another case of that in the future. As there's no cases of
changing relkind anymore, we can't add a test that that's handled correctly.
For 15, fix the problem by not maintaining the association with the old pgstat
entry when the relkind changes during a relcache invalidation processing. In
that case the pgstat entry needs to be unlinked first, to avoid
PgStat_TableStatus->relation getting out of sync. Also add a test reproducing
the issues.
No known problem exists in 11-14, so just add the test there.
Reported-by: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2yXz+zOtv7y5zBd5WKT8O0Ld3YxikuU3dcyCvxF7gypA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm3oZA-8Wbps2Jd1g5_Gjrr-x3YWrJPek-mF5Asrrvz2Dg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 15-
Ignore trailing spaces for non-deterministic collations when
hashing.
The previous behavior could lead to tuples falling into the wrong
partitions when hash partitioning is combined with the BPCHAR type and
a non-deterministic collation. Fortunately, it did not affect hash
indexes, because hash indexes do not use extended hash functions.
Decline to backpatch, per discussion.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/eb83d0ac7b299eb08f9b900dd08a5a0c5d90e517.camel@j-davis.com
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, Tom Lane
It seems better to deal with this by explicit annotations on the
fields in question, instead of magic knowledge embedded in the
script. While that creates a risk-of-omission from failing to
annotate fields, the preceding commit should catch any such
oversights.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/263413.1669513145@sss.pgh.pa.us
Check that if we generate a call to copy, compare, write, or read
a specific node type, that node type does have the appropriate
support function. (This doesn't protect against trying to invoke
nonexistent code when considering generic field types such as
"Node *", but it seems like a useful check anyway.)
Check that array_size() refers to a field appearing earlier in
the struct. Aside from catching obvious errors like a misspelled
field name, this protects against a more subtle mistake: if the
size field appears later in the struct than the array field, then
compare and read functions would misbehave. There is actually
exactly that situation in PlannerInfo, but it's okay since we
do not need compare or read functionality for that (today anyway).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/263413.1669513145@sss.pgh.pa.us
Some options of these commands need to be able to identify the start
of the function body within the output of pg_get_functiondef().
It used to be that that always began with "AS", but since the
introduction of new-style SQL functions, it might also start with
"BEGIN" or "RETURN". Fix that on the psql side, and add some
regression tests.
Noted by me awhile ago, but I didn't do anything about it.
Thanks to David Johnston for a nag.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AM9PR01MB8268D5CDABDF044EE9F42173FE8C9@AM9PR01MB8268.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com
Up to now we have allowed manual creation of an ON SELECT rule on
a table to convert it into a view. That was never anything but a
horrid, error-prone hack though. pg_dump used to rely on that
behavior to deal with cases involving circular dependencies,
where a dependency loop could be broken by separating the creation
of a view from installation of its ON SELECT rule. However, we
changed pg_dump to use CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW for that in commit
d8c05aff5 (which was later back-patched as far as 9.4), so there's
not a good argument anymore for continuing to support the behavior.
The proximate reason for axing it now is that we found that the
new statistics code has failure modes associated with the relkind
change caused by this behavior. We'll patch around that in v15,
but going forward it seems like a better idea to get rid of the
need to support relkind changes.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2yXz+zOtv7y5zBd5WKT8O0Ld3YxikuU3dcyCvxF7gypA@mail.gmail.com
This rewrites the few places where first-person form was used, and
replaces with wording more in line with the rest of the documentation.
While there, the section on editing PO files is split between what
to edit with, and how to edit, as well as add a missing colon.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reported-by: wolakk@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/166692508416.630.9910522387468316027@wrigleys.postgresql.org
When checking for roles with a pg_ prefix in <= 9.5 servers, report
all found roles in a text file as how other checks are done instead
of just reporting that they exist. Rolenames are printed with their
Oids to match other reports.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4BB2735C-C347-4CF7-AFB1-8573BE930066@yesql.se
Datatypes in CREATE TABLE statements in the examples were vertically
aligned in most cases, a few examples were unaligned with a single
space. This makes sure all examples on the same page are consistently
aligned.
Patch by Laurenz Albe with some additional fixups by me.
Author: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Reported-by: lemes.marcelo26@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/166870885664.635.16667004450401573487@wrigleys.postgresql.org
ri_RootToPartitionMap is currently only initialized for tuple routing
target partitions, though a future commit will need the ability to use
it even for the non-partition child tables, so make adjustments to the
decouple it from the partitioning code.
Also, make it lazily initialized via ExecGetRootToChildMap(), making
that function its preferred access path. Existing third-party code
accessing it directly should no longer do so; consequently, it's been
renamed to ri_RootToChildMap, which also makes it consistent with
ri_ChildToRootMap.
ExecGetRootToChildMap() houses the logic of setting the map appropriately
depending on whether a given child relation is partition or not.
To support this, also add a separate entry point for TupleConversionMap
creation that receives an AttrMap. No new code here, just split an
existing function in two.
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqEYUhDXSK5BTvG_xk=eaAEJCD4GS3C6uH7ybBvv+Z_Tmg@mail.gmail.com
For Updates and Deletes, we were not honoring the columns list for old
tuple values while sending tuple data via pgoutput. This results in
pgoutput emitting more columns than expected.
This is not a problem for built-in logical replication as we simply ignore
additional columns based on the relation information sent previously which
didn't have those columns. However, some other users of pgoutput plugin
may expect the columns as per the column list. Also, sending extra columns
unnecessarily consumes network bandwidth defeating the purpose of the
column list feature.
Reported-by: Gunnar Morling
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 15
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADGJaX9kiRZ-OH0EpWF5Fkyh1ZZYofoNRCrhapBfdk02tj5EKg@mail.gmail.com
The only use of $(LD) in Makefiles is for AIX, to generate the export file for
the backend. We only support the system linker on AIX and we already hardcode
the path to a number of other binaries. Removing LD substitution will simplify
the upcoming meson PGXS compatibility.
While at it, add a comment why -r is used.
A subsequent commit will remove the determination of LD from configure as
well.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221005200710.luvw5evhwf6clig6@awork3.anarazel.de
Until now we emitted the cflags to build the CRC objects into architecture
specific variables. That doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me - we're never
going to target x86 and arm at the same time, so they don't need to be
separate variables.
It might be better to instead continue to have CFLAGS_SSE42 /
CFLAGS_ARMV8_CRC32C be computed by PGAC_ARMV8_CRC32C_INTRINSICS /
PGAC_SSE42_CRC32_INTRINSICS and then set CFLAGS_CRC based on those. But it
seems unlikely that we'd need other sets of CRC specific flags for those two
architectures at the same time.
This simplifies the upcoming meson PGXS compatibility.
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221005200710.luvw5evhwf6clig6@awork3.anarazel.de
Compression specifications are currently used by pg_basebackup and
pg_receivewal, and are able to let the user control in an extended way
the method and level of compression used. As an effect of this commit,
pg_dump's -Z/--compress is now able to use more than just an integer, as
of the grammar "method[:detail]".
The method can be either "none" or "gzip", and can optionally take a
detail string. If the detail string is only an integer, it defines the
compression level. A comma-separated list of keywords can also be used
method allows for more options, the only keyword supported now is
"level".
The change is backward-compatible, hence specifying only an integer
leads to no compression for a level of 0 and gzip compression when the
level is greater than 0.
Most of the code changes are straight-forward, as pg_dump was relying on
an integer tracking the compression level to check for gzip or no
compression. These are changed to use a compression specification and
the algorithm stored in it.
As of this change, note that the dump format is not bumped because there
is no need yet to track the compression algorithm in the TOC entries.
Hence, we still rely on the compression level to make the difference
when reading them. This will be mandatory once a new compression method
is added, though.
In order to keep the code simpler when parsing the compression
specification, the code is changed so as pg_dump now fails hard when
using gzip on -Z/--compress without its support compiled, rather than
enforcing no compression without the user knowing about it except
through a warning. Like before this commit, archive and custom formats
are compressed by default when the code is compiled with gzip, and left
uncompressed without gzip.
Author: Georgios Kokolatos
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/O4mutIrCES8ZhlXJiMvzsivT7ztAMja2lkdL1LJx6O5f22I2W8PBIeLKz7mDLwxHoibcnRAYJXm1pH4tyUNC4a8eDzLn22a6Pb1S74Niexg=@pm.me
This has always worked, but you'd be unlikely to guess it
from the documentation. Add an example showing it.
Lack of docs noted by David Johnston. Back-patch to v13;
the documentation layout we used before that was not very
amenable to squeezing in multiple examples.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwZ4Vy1Xty0G5Ok+ot=NDrU3C6hzF1JwUk-FEkwe3V9_RA@mail.gmail.com
Rearrange the discussion of user-private schemas so that details
applying only to upgraded-from-pre-v15 databases are in a follow-on
paragraph, not in the main description of how to set up this pattern.
This seems a little clearer even today, and it'll get more so as
pre-v15 systems fade into the sunset.
Wording contributions from Robert Haas, Tom Lane, Noah Misch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYUHsfp90inEMAP0yNr7Y_L6EphPH1YOon1JKtBztXHyQ@mail.gmail.com
In commit 40c24bfef, I forgot to use get_rule_expr_paren() for the
arguments of AT TIME ZONE, resulting in possibly not printing parens
for expressions that need it. But get_rule_expr_paren() wouldn't have
gotten it right anyway, because isSimpleNode() hadn't been taught that
COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX parent nodes don't guarantee sufficient parentheses.
Improve all that. Also use this methodology for F_IS_NORMALIZED, so
that we don't print useless parens for that.
In passing, remove a comment that was obsoleted later.
Per report from Duncan Sands. Back-patch to v14 where this code
came in. (Before that, we didn't try to print AT TIME ZONE that way,
so there was no bug just ugliness.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f41566aa-a057-6628-4b7c-b48770ecb84a@deepbluecap.com
The planner will now add a given PartitioPruneInfo to
PlannedStmt.partPruneInfos instead of directly to the
Append/MergeAppend plan node. What gets set instead in the
latter is an index field which points to the list element
of PlannedStmt.partPruneInfos containing the PartitioPruneInfo
belonging to the plan node.
A later commit will make AcquireExecutorLocks() do the initial
partition pruning to determine a minimal set of partitions to be
locked when validating a plan tree and it will need to consult the
PartitioPruneInfos referenced therein to do so. It would be better
for the PartitioPruneInfos to be accessible directly than requiring
a walk of the plan tree to find them, which is easier when it can be
done by simply iterating over PlannedStmt.partPruneInfos.
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFGkMSge6TgC9KQzde0ohpAycLQuV7ooitEEpbKB0O_mg@mail.gmail.com
Matviews have been discarded from needing predicate locks since 3bf3ab8
and their introduction. At this point, there was no concurrent flavor
of REFRESH yet, hence there was no meaning in having materialized views
look at read/write conflicts with concurrent transactions using
themselves the serializable isolation level because they could only be
refreshed with an access exclusive lock. CONCURRENTLY, on the contrary,
allows reads and writes during a refresh as it holds a share update
exclusive lock.
Some isolation tests are added to show the effect of the change, with a
combination of one table and a matview based on it, using a mix of
REFRESH CONCURRENTLY and read/write queries.
This could arguably be considered as a bug, but as it is a subtle
behavior change potentially impacting applications no backpatch is
done.
Author: Yugo Nagata
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, Dilip Kumar, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220726164434.42d4e33911b4b4fcf751c4e7@sraoss.co.jp
Writing "pg_regress --dbname= ..." led to a crash, because
we weren't expecting there to be no database name supplied.
It doesn't seem like a great idea to run regression tests
in whatever is the user's default database; so rather than
supporting this case let's explicitly reject it.
Per report from Xing Guo. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACpMh+A8cRvtvtOWVAZsCM1DU81GK4DL26R83y6ugZ1osV=ifA@mail.gmail.com
A future commit will move the checkAsUser field from RangeTblEntry
to a new node that, unlike RTEs, will only be created for tables
mentioned in the query but not for the inheritance child relations
added to the query by the planner. So, checkAsUser value for a
given child relation will have to be obtained by referring to that
for its ancestor mentioned in the query.
In preparation, it seems better to expand the use of RelOptInfo.userid
during planning in place of rte->checkAsUser so that there will be
fewer places to adjust for the above change.
Given that the child-to-ancestor mapping is not available during the
execution of a given "child" ForeignScan node, add a checkAsUser
field to ForeignScan to carry the child relation's RelOptInfo.userid.
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGFCs2uq7VRKi7g+FFKbP6Ea_2_HkgZb2HPhUfaAKT3ng@mail.gmail.com
This adds coverage for a few scenarios not checked yet in psql, with
multiple query combined across files defined by \o, \g or both at the
same time. The results are saved in the output files defined, then
reloaded back to check what has been written to them.
Author: Daniel Verite
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/25c2bb5b-9012-40f8-8088-774cb764046d@manitou-mail.org
This also adds references to this new chapter at relevant sections of
our documentation. Previously much of these internal details were
exposed to users, but not explained. This also updates RELEASE
SAVEPOINT.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANbhV-E_iy9fmrErxrCh8TZTyenpfo72Hf_XD2HLDppva4dUNA@mail.gmail.com
Author: Simon Riggs, Laurenz Albe
Reviewed-by: Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: 11
Alvaro Herrera