Previously, when considering LIMIT pushdown, postgres_fdw failed to
check whether the query has this clause, which led to pushing false
LIMIT clauses, causing incorrect results.
This clause has been supported since v13, so we need to do a
remote-version check before deciding that it will be safe to push such a
clause, but we do not currently have a way to do the check (without
accessing the remote server); disable pushing such a clause for now.
Oversight in commit 357889eb1. Back-patch to v13, where that commit
added the support.
Per bug #18467 from Onder Kalaci.
Patch by Japin Li, per a suggestion from Tom Lane, with some changes to
the comments by me. Review by Onder Kalaci, Alvaro Herrera, and me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18467-7bb89084ff03a08d%40postgresql.org
ReorderBufferImmediateInvalidation() executes invalidation messages in
an aborted transaction. However, RelationFlushRelation sometimes
required a valid resource owner, to temporarily increment the refcount
of the relache entry. Commit b8bff07daa worked around that in the main
subtransaction abort function, AbortSubTransaction(), but missed this
similar case in ReorderBufferImmediateInvalidation().
To fix, introduce a separate function to invalidate a relcache
entry. It does the same thing as RelationClearRelation(rebuild==true)
does when outside a transaction, but can be called without
incrementing the refcount.
Add regression test. Before this fix, it failed with:
ERROR: ResourceOwnerEnlarge called after release started
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e56be7d9-14b1-664d-0bfc-00ce9772721c@gmail.com
* Don't forget to pfree() the right page when it's to be ignored.
* Report error on unexpected non-leaf right page even if this page is not
to be ignored. This restores the logic which was unintendedly changed
in 97e5b0026f.
Reported-by: Pavel Borisov
This is a very unlikely condition during checking a B-tree unique constraint,
meaning that the index structure is violated badly, and we shouldn't continue
checking to avoid endless loops, etc. So it's worth immediately throwing an
error.
Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzk%2B2116uOXdOViA27SHcr31WKPgmjsxXLBs_aTxAeThzg%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Pavel Borisov
5ae2087202 implemented a cross-page unique constraint check by loading
the right sibling to the BtreeCheckState.target variable. This is wrong,
because bt_target_page_check() shouldn't change the target page. Also,
BtreeCheckState.target shouldn't be changed alone without
BtreeCheckState.targetblock.
However, the above didn't cause any visible bugs for the following reasons.
1. We do a cross-page unique constraint check only for leaf index pages.
2. The only way target page get accessed after a cross-page unique constraint
check is loading of the lowkey.
3. The only place lowkey is used is bt_child_highkey_check(), and that applies
only to non-leafs.
The reasons above don't diminish the fact that changing BtreeCheckState.target
for a cross-page unique constraint check is wrong. This commit changes this
check to temporarily store the right sibling to the local variable.
Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzk%2B2116uOXdOViA27SHcr31WKPgmjsxXLBs_aTxAeThzg%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Pavel Borisov
This commit introduces a new data structure BtreeLastVisibleEntry comprising
information about the last visible heap entry with the current value of key.
Usage of this data structure allows us to avoid passing all this information
as individual function arguments.
Reported-by: Alexander Korotkov
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAPpHfdsVbB9ToriaB1UHuOKwjKxiZmTFQcEF%3DjuzzC_nby31uA%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Pavel Borisov, Alexander Korotkov
This reverts commit 7204f35919,
thus restoring 66c0185a3 (Allow planner to use Merge Append to
efficiently implement UNION) as well as the follow-on commits
d5d2205c8, 3b1a7eb28, 7487044d6.
Per further discussion on pgsql-release, we wish to ship beta1 with
this feature, and patch the bug that was found just before wrap,
rather than shipping beta1 with the feature reverted.
This reverts 66c0185a3 (Allow planner to use Merge Append to
efficiently implement UNION) as well as the follow-on commits
d5d2205c8, 3b1a7eb28, 7487044d6. In addition to those, 07746a8ef
had to be removed then re-applied in a different place, because
66c0185a3 moved the relevant code.
The reason for this last-minute thrashing is that depesz found a
case in which the patched code creates a completely wrong plan
that silently gives incorrect query results. It's unclear what
the cause is or how many cases are affected, but with beta1 wrap
staring us in the face, there's no time for closer investigation.
After we figure that out, we can decide whether to un-revert this
for beta2 or hold it for v18.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zktzf926vslR35Fv@depesz.com
(also some private discussion among pgsql-release)
After further review, we want to move in the direction of always
quoting GUC names in error messages, rather than the previous (PG16)
wildly mixed practice or the intermittent (mid-PG17) idea of doing
this depending on how possibly confusing the GUC name is.
This commit applies appropriate quotes to (almost?) all mentions of
GUC names in error messages. It partially supersedes a243569bf6 and
8d9978a717, which had moved things a bit in the opposite direction
but which then were abandoned in a partial state.
Author: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAHut%2BPv-kSN8SkxSdoHano_wPubqcg5789ejhCDZAcLFceBR-w%40mail.gmail.com
This enum was used to determine the first ID to use when assigning a
custom wait event for extensions, which is always 1. It was kept so
as it would be possible to add new in-core wait events in the category
"Extension". There is no such thing currently, so let's remove this
enum until a case justifying it pops up. This makes the code simpler
and easier to understand.
This has as effect to switch back autoprewarm.c to use PG_WAIT_EXTENSION
rather than WAIT_EVENT_EXTENSION, on par with v16 and older stable
branches.
Thinko in c9af054653.
Reported-by: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/195c6c45-abce-4331-be6a-e87724e1d060@eisentraut.org
This feature set did not handle empty ranges correctly, and it's now
too late for PostgreSQL 17 to fix it.
The following commits are reverted:
6db4598fcb Add stratnum GiST support function
46a0cd4cef Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints
86232a49a4 Fix comment on gist_stratnum_btree
030e10ff1a Rename pg_constraint.conwithoutoverlaps to conperiod
a88c800deb Use daterange and YMD in without_overlaps tests instead of tsrange.
5577a71fb0 Use half-open interval notation in without_overlaps tests
34768ee361 Add temporal FOREIGN KEY contraints
482e108cd3 Add test for REPLICA IDENTITY with a temporal key
c3db1f30cb doc: clarify PERIOD and WITHOUT OVERLAPS in CREATE TABLE
144c2ce0cc Fix ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE for temporal indexes
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d0b64a7a-dfe4-4b84-a906-c7dedfa40a3e@eisentraut.org
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.
The pgindent part of this is pretty small, consisting mainly of
fixing up self-inflicted formatting damage from patches that
hadn't bothered to add their new typedefs to typedefs.list.
In order to keep it from making anything worse, I manually added
a dozen or so typedefs that appeared in the existing typedefs.list
but not in the buildfarm's list. Perhaps we should formalize that,
or better find a way to get those typedefs into the automatic list.
pgperltidy is as opinionated as always, and reformat-dat-files too.
There are some problems with the new way to handle these constraints
that were detected at the last minute, and require fixes that appear too
invasive to be doing this late in the cycle. Revert this (again) for
now, we'll try again with these problems fixed.
The following commits are reverted:
b0e96f3119 Catalog not-null constraints
9b581c5341 Disallow changing NO INHERIT status of a not-null constraint
d0ec2ddbe0 Fix not-null constraint test
ac22a9545c Move privilege check to the right place
b0f7dd915b Check stack depth in new recursive functions
3af7217942 Update information_schema definition for not-null constraints
c3709100be Fix propagating attnotnull in multiple inheritance
d9f686a72e Fix restore of not-null constraints with inheritance
d72d32f52d Don't try to assign smart names to constraints
0cd711271d Better handle indirect constraint drops
13daa33fa5 Disallow NO INHERIT not-null constraints on partitioned tables
d45597f72f Disallow direct change of NO INHERIT of not-null constraints
21ac38f498 Fix inconsistencies in error messages
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202405110940.joxlqcx4dogd@alvherre.pgsql
On other Windows build farm animals it is already skipped because they
don't use UTF-8 encoding. On "hamerkop", UTF-8 is used, and then the
test fails.
It is not clear to me (a non-Windows person looking only at buildfarm
evidence) whether Windows is less sophisticated than other OSes and
doesn't know how to downcase Turkish İ with the standard Unicode
database, or if it is more sophisticated than other systems and uses
locale-specific behavior like ICU does.
Whichever the reason, the result is the same: we need to skip the test
on Windows, just as we already do for ICU, at least until a
Windows-savvy developer comes up with a better idea. The technique for
detecting the OS is borrowed from collate.windows.win1252.sql.
This was anticipated by commit c2e8bd27, but the problem only surfaced
when Windows build farm animals started using Meson.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJ1LeC3aE2qQYTK95rFVON3ZVoTQpTKJqxkHdtEyawH4A%40mail.gmail.com
This should have the same results for all practical purposes.
The advantage of selecting 'GMT' is that it's guaranteed to work
even when the remote system's timezone database is missing
entries, because pg_tzset() hard-wires handling of that,
at least in 9.2 and later.
(It seems like it would be a good idea to similarly hard-wire
correct handling of 'UTC', but that'll be a little more invasive
than I want to consider back-patching. Leave that for another
day when we're not in feature freeze.)
Per trouble report from Adnan Dautovic. Back-patch to all
supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/465248.1712211585@sss.pgh.pa.us
This fixes various typos, duplicated words, and tiny bits of whitespace
mainly in code comments but also in docs.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Author: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Author: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3F577953-A29E-4722-98AD-2DA9EFF2CBB8@yesql.se
As explained in 4d916dd876, the test instability is caused by delayed
cleanup of deleted rows. This commit removes the DELETE, stabilizing the
test without accidentally disabling parallel builds.
The intent of the delete however was to produce empty ranges, and test
that the parallel index build populates those correctly. But there's
another way to create empty ranges - partial indexes, which does not
rely on cleanup of deleted rows.
Idea to use partial indexes by Matthias van de Meent, patch by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/95d9cd43-5a92-407c-b7e4-54cd303630fe%40enterprisedb.com
The test for parallel create of BRIN indexes added by commit 8225c2fd40
happens to be unstable - a background transaction (e.g. auto-analyze)
may hold back global xmin for the initial VACUUM / CREATE INDEX. If the
cleanup happens before the next CREATE INDEX, the indexes will not be
exactly the same.
This is the same issue as e2933a6e11, so fix it the same way by making
the table TEMPORARY, which uses an up-to-date cutoff xmin that is not
held back by other processes.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin, who also suggested the fix.
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b58901cd-a7cc-29c6-e2b1-e3d7317c3c69@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2892135.1668976646@sss.pgh.pa.us
Adds a regression test for parallel CREATE INDEX for BRIN indexes, to
improve coverage for BRIN code, particularly code to allow parallel
index builds introduced by b437571714.
The test is added to pageinspect, as that allows comparing the index to
one built without parallelism. Another option would be to just build the
index with parallelism and then check it produces correct results. But
checking the index is exactly as if built without parallelism makes
these query checks unnecessary.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1df00a66-db5a-4e66-809a-99b386a06d86%40enterprisedb.com
This adjusts various appendStringInfo* function calls to use a more
appropriate and efficient function with the same behavior. For example,
use appendStringInfoChar() when appending a single character rather than
appendStringInfo() and appendStringInfoString() when no formatting is
required rather than using appendStringInfo().
All adjustments made here are in code that's new to v17, so it makes
sense to fix these now rather than wait a few years and make
backpatching harder.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvojY2UvMiO+9_55ArTj10P1LBNJyyoGB+C65BLDNT0GsQ@mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart, Tom Lane
When testing buffer pool logic, it is useful to be able to evict
arbitrary blocks. This function can be used in SQL queries over the
pg_buffercache view to set up a wide range of buffer pool states. Of
course, buffer mappings might change concurrently so you might evict a
block other than the one you had in mind, and another session might
bring it back in at any time. That's OK for the intended purpose of
setting up developer testing scenarios, and more complicated interlocking
schemes to give stronger guararantees about that would likely be less
flexible for actual testing work anyway. Superuser-only.
Author: Palak Chaturvedi <chaturvedipalak1911@gmail.com>
Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> (docs, small tweaks)
Reviewed-by: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Cary Huang <cary.huang@highgo.ca>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain+pgsql@abcsql.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Nasby <jim.nasby@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALfch19pW48ZwWzUoRSpsaV9hqt0UPyaBPC4bOZ4W+c7FF566A@mail.gmail.com
Presently, the archiver process restarts when an archive callback
ERRORs. To avoid this, archive module authors can use sigsetjmp(),
manage a memory context, etc., but that requires a lot of extra
code that will likely look roughly the same between modules. This
commit adds basic archive callback ERROR handling to pgarch.c so
that module authors won't ordinarily need to worry about this.
While this built-in handler attempts to clean up anything that an
archive module could conceivably have left behind, it is possible
that some modules are doing unexpected things that require
additional cleanup. Module authors should be sure to do any extra
required cleanup in a PG_CATCH block within the archiving callback.
The archiving callback is now called in a short-lived memory
context that the archiver process resets between invocations. If a
module requires longer-lived storage, it must maintain its own
memory context.
Thanks to these changes, the basic_archive module can be greatly
simplified.
Suggested-by: Andres Freund
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Yong Li
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230217215624.GA3131134%40nathanxps13
The test fails when RESET statement_timeout takes longer than 10ms.
Avoid the problem by using SET LOCAL instead.
Overall, this test is not ideal: 10ms could be shorter than the time to
have sent the query to the "remote" server, so it's possible that on
some machines this test doesn't actually witness a remote query being
cancelled. We may want to improve on this someday by using some other
testing technique, but for now it's better than nothing. I verified
manually that one round of remote cancellation occurs when this runs on
my machine.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQRsdWnj=YaaPCnA8d7E1AdbxRPBYmyBQRMPUijR2MpM_w@mail.gmail.com
Commit 61461a300c introduced new functions to libpq for cancelling
queries. This commit introduces a helper function that backend-side
libraries and extensions can use to invoke those. This function takes a
timeout and can itself be interrupted while it is waiting for a cancel
request to be sent and processed, instead of being blocked.
This replaces the usage of the old functions in postgres_fdw and dblink.
Finally, it also adds some test coverage for the cancel support in
postgres_fdw.
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQT_VgOWWENUqvUV9xQmbaCyXjtRRAYO8W07oqashk_N+g@mail.gmail.com
Since 82a4edabd2 we can bulk extend relations. The bulk relation extension
logic has a heuristic component. Normally the heurstic does not trigger in the
occasionally-failing test case, as the relation is only extended once. But
with very small shared_buffers the limits for the number of buffers pinned at
once prevent the extension from happening at once. With the second "bulk"
extension, the heuristic kicks in, and the relation ends up one block bigger.
That's ok from a correctness perspective, but changes the results of the test
query due to one additional block.
We discussed a few more expansive fixes, but for now have decided to avoid
this by making the table a bit smaller.
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Reported-by:
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/29c74104-210b-ef39-2522-27a6aa7a704f@iki.fi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230916000011.2ugpkkkp7bpp4cfh@awork3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 16-, where the new relation extension logic was added
Until now, UNION queries have often been suboptimal as the planner has
only ever considered using an Append node and making the results unique
by either using a Hash Aggregate, or by Sorting the entire Append result
and running it through the Unique operator. Both of these methods
always require reading all rows from the union subqueries.
Here we adjust the union planner so that it can request that each subquery
produce results in target list order so that these can be Merge Appended
together and made unique with a Unique node. This can improve performance
significantly as the union child can make use of the likes of btree
indexes and/or Merge Joins to provide the top-level UNION with presorted
input. This is especially good if the top-level UNION contains a LIMIT
node that limits the output rows to a small subset of the unioned rows as
cheap startup plans can be used.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, Andy Fan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpb_63XQodmxKUF8vb9M7CxyUyT4sWvEgqeQU-GB7QFoQ@mail.gmail.com
Add PERIOD clause to foreign key constraint definitions. This is
supported for range and multirange types. Temporal foreign keys check
for range containment instead of equality.
This feature matches the behavior of the SQL standard temporal foreign
keys, but it works on PostgreSQL's native ranges instead of SQL's
"periods", which don't exist in PostgreSQL (yet).
Reference actions ON {UPDATE,DELETE} {CASCADE,SET NULL,SET DEFAULT}
are not supported yet.
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+renyUApHgSZF9-nd-a0+OPGharLQLO=mDHcY4_qQ0+noCUVg@mail.gmail.com
It might happen that the varlena value wasn't compressed by index_form_tuple()
due to current storage parameters. If compression is currently enabled, we
need to compress such values to match index tuple coming from the heap.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/7bdbe559-d61a-4ae4-a6e1-48abdf3024cc%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Andrey Borodin
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin, Michael Zhilin, Jian He, Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 12
In the heap, tuples may contain short varlena datum with both 1B header and 4B
headers. But the corresponding index tuple should always have such varlena's
with 1B headers. So, for fingerprinting, we need to convert.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/7bdbe559-d61a-4ae4-a6e1-48abdf3024cc%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Michael Zhilin
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin, Andrey Borodin, Jian He, Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 12
This adds the X509 attributes notBefore and notAfter to sslinfo
as well as pg_stat_ssl to allow verifying and identifying the
validity period of the current client certificate. OpenSSL has
APIs for extracting notAfter and notBefore, but they are only
supported in recent versions so we have to calculate the dates
by hand in order to make this work for the older versions of
OpenSSL that we still support.
Original patch by Cary Huang with additional hacking by Jacob
and myself.
Author: Cary Huang <cary.huang@highgo.ca>
Co-author: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Co-author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/182b8565486.10af1a86f158715.2387262617218380588@highgo.ca
Historically we've printed SubPlan expression nodes as "(SubPlan N)",
which is pretty uninformative. Trying to reproduce the original SQL
for the subquery is still as impractical as before, and would be
mighty verbose as well. However, we can still do better than that.
Displaying the "testexpr" when present, and adding a keyword to
indicate the SubLinkType, goes a long way toward showing what's
really going on.
In addition, this patch gets rid of EXPLAIN's use of "$n" to represent
subplan and initplan output Params. Instead we now print "(SubPlan
N).colX" or "(InitPlan N).colX" to represent the X'th output column
of that subplan. This eliminates confusion with the use of "$n" to
represent PARAM_EXTERN Params, and it's useful for the first part of
this change because it eliminates needing some other indication of
which subplan is referenced by a SubPlan that has a testexpr.
In passing, this adds simple regression test coverage of the
ROWCOMPARE_SUBLINK code paths, which were entirely unburdened
by testing before.
Tom Lane and Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Aleksander Alekseev.
Thanks to Chantal Keller for raising the question of whether
this area couldn't be improved.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2838538.1705692747@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit 61461a300c introduced new functions to libpq for cancelling
queries. This replaces the usage of the old ones in parts of the
codebase with these newer ones. This specifically leaves out changes to
psql and pgbench, as those would need a much larger refactor to be able
to call them due to the new functions not being signal-safe; and also
postgres_fdw, because the original code there is not clear to me
(Álvaro) and not fully tested.
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQT_VgOWWENUqvUV9xQmbaCyXjtRRAYO8W07oqashk_N+g@mail.gmail.com
Currently, pg_visibility computes its xid horizon using the
GetOldestNonRemovableTransactionId(). The problem is that this horizon can
sometimes go backward. That can lead to reporting false errors.
In order to fix that, this commit implements a new function
GetStrictOldestNonRemovableTransactionId(). This function computes the xid
horizon, which would be guaranteed to be newer or equal to any xid horizon
computed before.
We have to do the following to achieve this.
1. Ignore processes xmin's, because they consider connection to other databases
that were ignored before.
2. Ignore KnownAssignedXids, because they are not database-aware. At the same
time, the primary could compute its horizons database-aware.
3. Ignore walsender xmin, because it could go backward if some replication
connections don't use replication slots.
As a result, we're using only currently running xids to compute the horizon.
Surely these would significantly sacrifice accuracy. But we have to do so to
avoid reporting false errors.
Inspired by earlier patch by Daniel Shelepanov and the following discussion
with Robert Haas and Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1649062270.289865713%40f403.i.mail.ru
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin, Dmitry Koval
For UNION ALL queries where a union child query contained a foreign
table, if the targetlist of that query contained a constant, and the
top-level query performed an ORDER BY which contained the column for the
constant value, then postgres_fdw would find the EquivalenceMember with
the Const and then try to produce an ORDER BY containing that Const.
This caused problems with INT typed Consts as these could appear to be
requests to order by an ordinal column position rather than the constant
value. This could lead to either an error such as:
ERROR: ORDER BY position <int const> is not in select list
or worse, if the constant value is a valid column, then we could just
sort by the wrong column altogether.
Here we fix this issue by just not including these Consts in the ORDER
BY clause.
In passing, add a new section for testing ORDER BY in the postgres_fdw
tests and move two existing tests which were misplaced in the WHERE
clause testing section into it.
Reported-by: Michał Kłeczek
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Richard Guo
Bug: #18381
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0714C8B8-8D82-4ABB-9F8D-A0C3657E7B6E%40kleczek.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18381-137456acd168bf93%40postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
contrib/tablefunc connectby() checks both type OID and typmod for
its output columns while crosstab() only checks type OID. Fix that
by makeing the crosstab() check look more like the connectby() check.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/18937.1709676295%40sss.pgh.pa.us
These messages were fairly confusing, and didn't match the
column names used in the SGML docs. Try to improve that.
Also use error codes more specific than ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR.
Patch by me, reviewed by Joe Conway
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18937.1709676295@sss.pgh.pa.us
Use GUC_ACTION_SAVE rather than GUC_ACTION_SET, necessary for working
with parallel query.
Now that the call requires more arguments, wrap the call in a new
function to avoid code duplication and offer a place for a comment.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1rhJpO-0027Wf-9L@gemulon.postgresql.org
Peter Eisentraut