In final_cost_hashjoin(), commit 9c7f5229a allowed inner_unique cases
to follow a code path previously used only for SEMI/ANTI joins; but it
neglected to fix an if-test within that path that assumed SEMI and ANTI
were the only possible cases. This resulted in a wrong value for
hashjointuples, and an ensuing bad cost estimate, for inner_unique normal
joins. Fortunately, for inner_unique normal joins we can assume the number
of joined tuples is the same as for a SEMI join; so there's no need for
more code, we just have to invert the test to check for ANTI not SEMI.
It turns out that in two contrib tests in which commit 9c7f5229a
changed the plan expected for a query, the change was actually wrong
and induced by this estimation error, not by any real improvement.
Hence this patch also reverts those changes.
Per report from RK Korlapati. Backpatch to v10 where the error was
introduced.
David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+SNy03bhq0fodsfOkeWDCreNjJVjsdHwUsb7AG=jpe0PtZc_g@mail.gmail.com
If a view references a foreign table, and the foreign table has a
BEFORE INSERT trigger, then it's possible for a tuple inserted or
updated through the view to be changed such that it violates the
view's WITH CHECK OPTION constraint.
Before this commit, postgres_fdw handled this case inconsistently. A
RETURNING clause on the INSERT or UPDATE statement targeting the view
would cause the finally-inserted tuple to be read back, and the WITH
CHECK OPTION violation would throw an error. But without a RETURNING
clause, postgres_fdw would not read the final tuple back, and WITH
CHECK OPTION would not throw an error for the violation (or may throw
an error when there is no real violation). AFTER ROW triggers on the
foreign table had a similar effect as a RETURNING clause on the INSERT
or UPDATE statement.
To fix, this commit retrieves the attributes needed to enforce the
WITH CHECK OPTION constraint along with the attributes needed for the
RETURNING clause (if any) from the remote side. Thus, the WITH CHECK
OPTION constraint is always evaluated against the final tuple after
any triggers on the remote side.
This fix may be considered inconsistent with CHECK constraints
declared on foreign tables, which are not enforced locally at all
(because the constraint is on a remote object). The discussion
concluded that this difference is reasonable, because the WITH CHECK
OPTION is a constraint on the local view (not any remote object);
therefore it only makes sense to enforce its WITH CHECK OPTION
constraint locally.
Author: Etsuro Fujita
Reviewed-by: Arthur Zakirov, Stephen Frost
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7eb58fab-fd3b-781b-ac33-f7cfec96021f%40lab.ntt.co.jp
Deparsing logic in postgres_fdw for locking, FROM clause (alias) and Var
(column qualification) does not need to know the exact number of members
involved, which can be calculated with bms_num_members(), but just if
there is more than one relation involved, which is what bms_membership()
does. The latter is more performant than the former so this shaves a
couple of cycles.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/C73594E0-2B67-4E10-BB35-CDE0E41CC384@yesql.se
Print columns as "column C of <relation>" rather than "<relation> column
C". This seems to read noticeably better in English, as evidenced by the
regression test output changes, and the code change also makes it possible
for translators to adjust the phrase order in other languages.
Also change the output for OCLASS_DEFAULT from "default for %s" to
"default value for %s". This seems to read better and is also more
consistent with the output of, for instance, getObjectTypeDescription().
Kyotaro Horiguchi, per a complaint from me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180522.182020.114074746.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Previously, we passed the toplevel PlannerInfo, but we actually want
to pass the relevant subroot. One problem with passing the toplevel
PlannerInfo is that the FDW which wants to push down an UPDATE or
DELETE against a join won't find the relevant joinrel there.
As of commit 1bc0100d27, postgres_fdw
tries to do exactly this and can be made to fail an assertion as a
result.
It's possible that this should be regarded as a bug fix and
back-patched to earlier releases, but for lack of a test case that
fails in earlier releases, no back-patch for now.
Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Amit Langote.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5AF43E02.30000@lab.ntt.co.jp
Without these fixes, changes to the inserted tuple made by remote
triggers are ignored when building local RETURNING tuples.
In the core code, call ExecInitRoutingInfo at a later point from
within ExecInitPartitionInfo so that the FDW callback gets invoked
after the returning list has been built. But move CheckValidResultRel
out of ExecInitRoutingInfo so that it can happen at an earlier stage.
In postgres_fdw, refactor assorted deparsing functions to work with
the RTE rather than the PlannerInfo, which saves us having to
construct a fake PlannerInfo in cases where we don't have a real one.
Then, we can pass down a constructed RTE that yields the correct
deparse result when no real one exists. Unfortunately, this
necessitates a hack that understands how the core code manages RT
indexes for update tuple routing, which is ugly, but we don't have a
better idea right now.
Original report, analysis, and patch by Etsuro Fujita. Heavily
refactored by me. Then worked over some more by Amit Langote.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5AD4882B.10002@lab.ntt.co.jp
On further reflection, commit e5d83995e didn't go far enough: pretty much
everywhere in the planner that examines a clause's is_pushed_down flag
ought to be changed to use the more complicated behavior where we also
check the clause's required_relids. Otherwise we could make incorrect
decisions about whether, say, a clause is safe to use as a hash clause.
Some (many?) of these places are safe as-is, either because they are
never reached while considering a parameterized path, or because there
are additional checks that would reject a pushed-down clause anyway.
However, it seems smarter to just code them all the same way rather
than rely on easily-broken reasoning of that sort.
In support of that, invent a new macro RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN that should
be used in place of direct tests on the is_pushed_down flag.
Like the previous patch, back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f8128b11-c5bf-3539-48cd-234178b2314d@proxel.se
We've made multiple attempts to stabilize the plans shown by commit
1bc0100d2, with little success so far. The reason for the remaining
instability seems to be that if a transaction (such as auto-analyze)
is running concurrently with the test, then get_actual_variable_range may
return a maximum value for "T 1"."C 1" that's far away from the actual max,
as a result of our having transiently inserted such a value earlier in
the test. Because we use a non-MVCC snapshot to fetch the value (for
performance reasons), the presence of other transactions can cause that
function to return entries that are actually dead.
To fix, use a less extreme value in the earlier transient insertion, so
that whether it is visible or not won't affect the selectivity estimate.
The use of 9999 there seems to have been picked with the aid of a
dartboard anyway, rather than having a specific reason.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16962.1523551784@sss.pgh.pa.us
Also enable this for postgres_fdw.
Etsuro Fujita, based on an earlier patch by Amit Langote. The larger
patch series of which this is a part has been reviewed by Amit
Langote, David Fetter, Maksim Milyutin, Álvaro Herrera, Stephen Frost,
and me. Minor documentation changes to the final version by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/29906a26-da12-8c86-4fb9-d8f88442f2b9@lab.ntt.co.jp
Etsuro Fujita. The larger patch series of which this is a part has
been reviewed by Amit Langote, David Fetter, Maksim Milyutin,
Álvaro Herrera, Stephen Frost, and me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5A95487E.9050808@lab.ntt.co.jp
We were being careless in some places about the order of -L switches in
link command lines, such that -L switches referring to external directories
could come before those referring to directories within the build tree.
This made it possible to accidentally link a system-supplied library, for
example /usr/lib/libpq.so, in place of the one built in the build tree.
Hilarity ensued, the more so the older the system-supplied library is.
To fix, break LDFLAGS into two parts, a sub-variable LDFLAGS_INTERNAL
and the main LDFLAGS variable, both of which are "recursively expanded"
so that they can be incrementally adjusted by different makefiles.
Establish a policy that -L switches for directories in the build tree
must always be added to LDFLAGS_INTERNAL, while -L switches for external
directories must always be added to LDFLAGS. This is sufficient to
ensure a safe search order. For simplicity, we typically also put -l
switches for the respective libraries into those same variables.
(Traditional make usage would have us put -l switches into LIBS, but
cleaning that up is a project for another day, as there's no clear
need for it.)
This turns out to also require separating SHLIB_LINK into two variables,
SHLIB_LINK and SHLIB_LINK_INTERNAL, with a similar rule about which
switches go into which variable. And likewise for PG_LIBS.
Although this change might appear to affect external users of pgxs.mk,
I think it doesn't; they shouldn't have any need to touch the _INTERNAL
variables.
In passing, tweak src/common/Makefile so that the value of CPPFLAGS
recorded in pg_config lacks "-DFRONTEND" and the recorded value of
LDFLAGS lacks "-L../../../src/common". Both of those things are
mistakes, apparently introduced during prior code rearrangements,
as old versions of pg_config don't print them. In general we don't
want anything that's specific to the src/common subdirectory to
appear in those outputs.
This is certainly a bug fix, but in view of the lack of field
complaints, I'm unsure whether it's worth the risk of back-patching.
In any case it seems wise to see what the buildfarm makes of it first.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/25214.1522604295@sss.pgh.pa.us
Since commit 7012b132d0, postgres_fdw
has been able to push down the toplevel aggregation operation to the
remote server. Commit e2f1eb0ee3 made
it possible to break down the toplevel aggregation into one
aggregate per partition. This commit lets postgres_fdw push down
aggregation in that case just as it does at the top level.
In order to make this work, this commit adds an additional argument
to the GetForeignUpperPaths FDW API. A matching argument is added
to the signature for create_upper_paths_hook. Third-party code using
either of these will need to be updated.
Also adjust create_foreignscan_plan() so that it picks up the correct
set of relids in this case.
Jeevan Chalke, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat and by me and with some
adjustments by me. The larger patch series of which this patch is a
part was also reviewed and tested by Antonin Houska, Rajkumar
Raghuwanshi, David Rowley, Dilip Kumar, Konstantin Knizhnik, Pascal
Legrand, and Rafia Sabih.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAM2+6=V64_xhstVHie0Rz=KPEQnLJMZt_e314P0jaT_oJ9MR8A@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAM2+6=XPWujjmj5zUaBTGDoB38CemwcPmjkRy0qOcsQj_V+2sQ@mail.gmail.com
If the toplevel scan/join target list is parallel-safe, postpone
generating Gather (or Gather Merge) paths until after the toplevel has
been adjusted to return it. This (correctly) makes queries with
expensive functions in the target list more likely to choose a
parallel plan, since the cost of the plan now reflects the fact that
the evaluation will happen in the workers rather than the leader.
The original complaint about this problem was from Jeff Janes.
If the toplevel scan/join relation is partitioned, recursively apply
the changes to all partitions. This sometimes allows us to get rid of
Result nodes, because Append is not projection-capable but its
children may be. It also cleans up what appears to be incorrect SRF
handling from commit e2f1eb0ee30d144628ab523432320f174a2c8966: the old
code had no knowledge of SRFs for child scan/join rels.
Because we now use create_projection_path() in some cases where we
formerly used apply_projection_to_path(), this changes the ordering
of columns in some queries generated by postgres_fdw. Update
regression outputs accordingly.
Patch by me, reviewed by Amit Kapila and by Ashutosh Bapat. Other
fixes for this problem (substantially different from this version)
were reviewed by Dilip Kumar, Amit Khandekar, and Marina Polyakova.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1ycXNipvhWuweUVpKuyu6SpNjF=yHWu4c4US5JgVGxtZQ@mail.gmail.com
Per the project style guide, details and hints should have leading
capitalization and end with a period. On the other hand, errcontext should
not be capitalized and should not end with a period. To support well
formatted error contexts in dblink, extend dblink_res_error() to take a
format+arguments rather than a hardcoded string.
Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B3C002C8-21A0-4F53-A06E-8CAB29FCF295@yesql.se
This reverts commit c2c537c56d.
It's now clear that whatever is going on there, it can't be blamed
on unexpected ANALYZE runs, because the statistics are the same
just before the failing query as they were at the start of the test.
It seems fairly hard to explain recent buildfarm failures without the
theory that something is doing an ANALYZE behind our backs. Probe
for this directly to see if it's true.
In principle the outputs of these queries should be stable, since the table
in question is small enough that ANALYZE's sample will include all rows.
But even if that turns out to be wrong, we can put up with some failures
for a bit. I don't intend to leave this here indefinitely.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/25502.1520277552@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit 1bc0100d27 added this test, and
commits 882ea509fe,
958e20e42d,
4fa396464e tried to stabilize it. It's
still not stable, so keep trying.
The latest comment from Tom Lane is that disabling autovacuum seems
like a good strategy, but we might need to do it on more tables, hence
this patch.
Etsuro Fujita
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5A9928F1.2010206@lab.ntt.co.jp
Commit a26116c6c accidentally changed the behavior of the SQL format_type()
function while refactoring. For the reasons explained in that function's
comment, a NULL typemod argument should behave differently from a -1
argument. Since we've managed to break this, add a regression test
memorializing the intended behavior.
In passing, be consistent about the type of the "flags" parameter.
Noted by Rushabh Lathia, though I revised the patch some more.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGPqQf3RB2q-d2Awp_-x-Ur6aOxTUwnApt-vm-iTtceZxYnePg@mail.gmail.com
Commit 1bc0100d27 added this test,
and commit 882ea509fe tried to
stabilize it. There were still failures, so commit
958e20e42d tried again to stabilize
it. That approach is still failing on jaguarundi, though, so
back it out and try something else. Specifically, instead of
disabling remote estimates for the table in question, let's tell
autovacuum to leave it alone.
Etsuro Fujita
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5A82DCCE.3060107@lab.ntt.co.jp
Introduce a new format_type_extended, with a flags bitmask argument that
can modify the default behavior. A few compatibility and readability
wrappers remain:
format_type_be
format_type_be_qualified
format_type_with_typemod
while format_type_with_typemod_qualified, which had a single caller, is
removed.
Author: Michael Paquier, some revisions by me
Discussion: 20180213035107.GA2915@paquier.xyz
The modern way is to use a missing_ok argument instead of two separate
almost-identical routines, so do that.
Author: Michaël Paquier
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180201063212.GE6398@paquier.xyz
Even after commit 882ea509fe, some
buildfarm members are still failing in the postgres_fdw tests.
Try to fix that by disabling use of remote statistics for some
test cases.
Etsuro Fujita
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5A7D76CF.8080601@lab.ntt.co.jp
Commit 1bc0100d27 added these tests,
but they're not stable enough to survive in the buildfarm. Remove
CTIDs from the output in the hopes of fixing that.
Commit 0bf3ae88af allowed direct
foreign table modification; instead of fetching each row, updating
it locally, and then pushing the modification back to the remote
side, we would instead do all the work on the remote server via a
single remote UPDATE or DELETE command. However, that commit only
enabled this optimization when join tree consisted only of the
target table.
This change allows the same optimization when an UPDATE statement
has a FROM clause or a DELETE statement has a USING clause. This
works much like ordinary foreign join pushdown, in that the tables
must be on the same remote server, relevant parts of the query
must be pushdown-safe, and so forth.
Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat, Rushabh Lathia, and me.
Some formatting corrections by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5A57193A.2080003@lab.ntt.co.jp
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/b9cee735-62f8-6c07-7528-6364ce9347d0@lab.ntt.co.jp
Commit 4bbf6edfbd added a test case,
but it turns out that the test case doesn't reliably test for the
bug, and in the context of the regression test suite did not because
ANALYZE had not been run.
Report and patch by Etsuro Fujita. I added a comment along lines
previously suggested by Tom Lane.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5A6195D8.8060206@lab.ntt.co.jp
When pushing down a join to a foreign server, postgres_fdw constructs
an alternative plan to be used for any EvalPlanQual rechecks that
prove to be necessary. This plan is stored as the outer subplan of
the Foreign Scan implementing the pushed-down join. Previously, this
alternative plan could have a different nominal sort ordering than its
parent, which seemed OK since there will only be one tuple per base
table anyway in the case of an EvalPlanQual recheck. Actually,
though, it caused a problem if that path was used as a building block
for the EvalPlanQual recheck plan of a higher-level foreign join,
because we could end up with a merge join one of whose inputs was not
labelled with the correct sort order. Repair by injecting an extra
Sort node into the EvalPlanQual recheck plan whenever it would
otherwise fail to be sorted at least as well as its parent Foreign
Scan.
Report by Jeff Janes. Patch by me, reviewed by Tom Lane, who also
provided the test case and comment text.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1y2G8VOVBHv3iXU2TMAj7-RyBFFW1uhkr5sm9LQ2=X35g@mail.gmail.com
Commit 7012b132d, which added the ability to push down aggregates and
grouping to the remote server, wasn't careful to ensure that the remote
server would have the same idea we do about which columns are the grouping
columns, in cases where there are textually identical GROUP BY expressions.
Such cases typically led to "targetlist item has multiple sortgroupref
labels" errors.
To fix this reliably, switch over to using "GROUP BY column-number" syntax
rather than "GROUP BY expression" in transmitted queries, and adjust
foreign_grouping_ok() to be more careful about duplicating the sortgroupref
labeling of the local pathtarget.
Per bug #14890 from Sean Johnston. Back-patch to v10 where the buggy code
was introduced.
Jeevan Chalke, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171107134948.1508.94783@wrigleys.postgresql.org
This is a backward incompatibility which should be noted in the
release notes for PostgreSQL 11.
For security reasons, we require that a postgres_fdw foreign table use
password authentication when accessing a remote server, so that an
unprivileged user cannot usurp the server's credentials. Superusers
are exempt from this requirement, because we assume they are entitled
to usurp the server's credentials or, at least, can find some other
way to do it.
But what should happen when the foreign table is accessed by a view
owned by a user different from the session user? Is it the view owner
that must be a superuser in order to avoid the requirement of using a
password, or the session user? Historically it was the latter, but
this requirement makes it the former instead. This allows superusers
to delegate to other users the right to select from a foreign table
that doesn't use password authentication by creating a view over the
foreign table and handing out rights to the view. It is also more
consistent with the idea that access to a view should use the view
owner's privileges rather than the session user's privileges.
The upshot of this change is that a superuser selecting from a view
created by a non-superuser may now get an error complaining that no
password was used, while a non-superuser selecting from a view
created by a superuser will no longer receive such an error.
No documentation changes are present in this patch because the
wording of the documentation already suggests that it works this
way. We should perhaps adjust the documentation in the back-branches,
but that's a task for another patch.
Originally proposed by Jeff Janes, but with different semantics;
adjusted to work like this by me per discussion.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaY4HsVZJv5SqEjCKLDwtCTSwXzKpRftgj50wmMMBwciA@mail.gmail.com
Antonin Houska reported that the planner does consider pushing
postgres_fdw_abs() to the remote side, which happens because we make
it shippable earlier in the test case file.
Jeevan Chalke provided this patch, which changes the join
condition to use random(), which is not shippable, instead.
Antonin reviewed the patch.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/15265.1511985971@localhost
rewriteTargetListUD's processing is dependent on the relkind of the query's
target table. That was fine at the time it was made to act that way, even
for queries on inheritance trees, because all tables in an inheritance tree
would necessarily be plain tables. However, the 9.5 feature addition
allowing some members of an inheritance tree to be foreign tables broke the
assumption that rewriteTargetListUD's output tlist could be applied to all
child tables with nothing more than column-number mapping. This led to
visible failures if foreign child tables had row-level triggers, and would
also break in cases where child tables belonged to FDWs that used methods
other than CTID for row identification.
To fix, delay running rewriteTargetListUD until after the planner has
expanded inheritance, so that it is applied separately to the (already
mapped) tlist for each child table. We can conveniently call it from
preprocess_targetlist. Refactor associated code slightly to avoid the
need to heap_open the target relation multiple times during
preprocess_targetlist. (The APIs remain a bit ugly, particularly around
the point of which steps scribble on parse->targetList and which don't.
But avoiding such scribbling would require a change in FDW callback APIs,
which is more pain than it's worth.)
Also fix ExecModifyTable to ensure that "tupleid" is reset to NULL when
we transition from rows providing a CTID to rows that don't. (That's
really an independent bug, but it manifests in much the same cases.)
Add a regression test checking one manifestation of this problem, which
was that row-level triggers on a foreign child table did not work right.
Back-patch to 9.5 where the problem was introduced.
Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Ildus Kurbangaliev and Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170514150525.0346ba72@postgrespro.ru
Instead of joining two partitioned tables in their entirety we can, if
it is an equi-join on the partition keys, join the matching partitions
individually. This involves teaching the planner about "other join"
rels, which are related to regular join rels in the same way that
other member rels are related to baserels. This can use significantly
more CPU time and memory than regular join planning, because there may
now be a set of "other" rels not only for every base relation but also
for every join relation. In most practical cases, this probably
shouldn't be a problem, because (1) it's probably unusual to join many
tables each with many partitions using the partition keys for all
joins and (2) if you do that scenario then you probably have a big
enough machine to handle the increased memory cost of planning and (3)
the resulting plan is highly likely to be better, so what you spend in
planning you'll make up on the execution side. All the same, for now,
turn this feature off by default.
Currently, we can only perform joins between two tables whose
partitioning schemes are absolutely identical. It would be nice to
cope with other scenarios, such as extra partitions on one side or the
other with no match on the other side, but that will have to wait for
a future patch.
Ashutosh Bapat, reviewed and tested by Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Amit
Langote, Rafia Sabih, Thomas Munro, Dilip Kumar, Antonin Houska, Amit
Khandekar, and by me. A few final adjustments by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFjFpRfQ8GrQvzp3jA2wnLqrHmaXna-urjm_UY9BqXj=EaDTSA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFjFpRcitjfrULr5jfuKWRPsGUX0LQ0k8-yG0Qw2+1LBGNpMdw@mail.gmail.com
This is a mechanical change in preparation for a later commit that
will change the layout of TupleDesc. Introducing a macro to abstract
the details of where attributes are stored will allow us to change
that in separate step and revise it in future.
Author: Thomas Munro, editorialized by Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0ZtQ-SpsgCyzzYpsXS6e=kZWqk3g5Ygn3MDV7A8dabUA@mail.gmail.com
Change to appendStringInfoChar() or appendStringInfoString() where those
can be used.
Author: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
If the user modifies a view that has CHECK OPTIONs and this gets
translated into a modification to an underlying relation which happens
to be a foreign table, the check options should be enforced. In the
normal code path, that was happening properly, but it was not working
properly for "direct" modification because the whole operation gets
pushed to the remote side in that case and we never have an option to
enforce the constraint against individual tuples. Fix by disabling
direct modification when there is a need to enforce CHECK OPTIONs.
Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Kyotaro Horiguchi and by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/f8a48f54-6f02-9c8a-5250-9791603171ee@lab.ntt.co.jp
The new test cases added in commit 8bf58c0d9 turn out to have output
that can vary depending on the lc_messages setting prevailing on the
test server. Hide the remote end's error messages to ensure stable
output. This isn't a terribly desirable solution; we'd rather know
that the connection failed for the expected reason and not some other
one. But there seems little choice for the moment.
Per buildfarm.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18419.1500658570@sss.pgh.pa.us
Previously, postgres_fdw would keep on using an existing connection even
if the user did ALTER SERVER or ALTER USER MAPPING commands that should
affect connection parameters. Teach it to watch for catcache invals
on these catalogs and re-establish connections when the relevant catalog
entries change. Per bug #14738 from Michal Lis.
In passing, clean up some rather crufty decisions in commit ae9bfc5d6
about where fields of ConnCacheEntry should be reset. We now reset
all the fields whenever we open a new connection.
Kyotaro Horiguchi, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat and myself.
Back-patch to 9.3 where postgres_fdw appeared.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170710113917.7727.10247@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Tom Lane