postgres

Author SHA1 Message Date

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Michael Paquier	9cd365f28f	Propagate query IDs of utility statements in functions For utility statements defined within a function, the query tree is copied to a PlannedStmt as utility commands do not require planning. However, the query ID was missing from the information passed down. This leads to plugins relying on the query ID like pg_stat_statements to not be able to track utility statements within function calls. Tests are added to check this behavior, depending on pg_stat_statements.track. This is an old bug. Now, query IDs for utilities are compiled using their parsed trees rather than the query string since v16 (`3db72ebcbe`), leading to less bloat with utilities, so backpatch down only to this version. Author: Anthonin Bonnefoy Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAO6_XqrGp-uwBqi3vBPLuRULKkddjC7R5QZCgsFren=8E+m2Sg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 16	2 years ago
Michael Paquier	9a714b9d6e	Improve cleanup phases in regression tests of pg_stat_statements As shaped, two DROP ROLE queries included in "user_activity" were showing in the reports for "wal". The intention is to keep each test isolated and independent, so this is incorrect. This commit adds some calls to pg_stat_statements_reset() to clean up the statistics once each test finishes, so as there are no risks of overlap in the reports for individial scenarios. The addition in "user_activity" fixes the output of "wal". The new resets done in "level_tracking" and "utility" are added for consistency with the rest, though they do not affect the stats generated in the other tests. Oversight in `d0028e3`. Reported-by: Andrei Zubkov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7beb722dd016bf54f1c78bfd6d44a684e28da624.camel@moonset.ru	3 years ago
Michael Paquier	e8dbdb15db	Refactor tests of pg_stat_statements for planning, utility and level tracking pg_stat_statements.sql acts as the main file for all the core tests of the module, but things have become complicated to follow over the years as some of the sub-scenarios tested in this file rely on assumptions that come from completely different areas of it, like a GUC setup or a relation created previously. For example, row tracking for CTAS/COPY was looking at the number of plans, which was not necessary, or level tracking was mixed with checks on planner counts. This commit refactors the tests of pg_stat_statements, by moving test cases out of pg_stat_statements.sql into their own file, as of: - Planning-related tests in planning.sql, for [re]plan counts and top-level handling. These depend on pg_stat_statements.track_planning. - Utilities in utility.sql (pg_stat_statements.track_utility), that includes now the tests for: -- Row tracking for CTAS, CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW, COPY. -- Basic utility statements. -- SET statements. - Tracking level, depending on pg_stat_statements.track. This part has been looking at scenarios with DO blocks, PL functions and SQL functions. pg_stat_statements.sql (still named the same for now) still includes some checks for role-level tracking and WAL generation metrics, that ought to become independent in the long term for clarity. While on it, this switches the order of the attributes when querying pg_stat_statements, the query field becoming last. This makes much easier the tracking of changes related to normalization, as queries are the only variable-length attributes queried (unaligned mode would be one extra choice, but that reduces the checks on the other fields). Test scenarios and their results match exactly with what was happening before this commit in terms of calls, number of plans, number of rows, cached data or level tracking, so this has no effect on the coverage in terms of what is produced by the reports in the table pg_stat_statements. A follow-up patch will extend more the tests of pg_stat_statements around utilities, so this split creates a foundation for this purpose, without complicating more pg_stat_statements.sql. Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Y+MRdEq9W9XVa2AB@paquier.xyz	3 years ago

Michael Paquier

Propagate query IDs of utility statements in functions

For utility statements defined within a function, the query tree is
copied to a PlannedStmt as utility commands do not require planning.
However, the query ID was missing from the information passed down.

This leads to plugins relying on the query ID like pg_stat_statements to
not be able to track utility statements within function calls.  Tests
are added to check this behavior, depending on pg_stat_statements.track.

This is an old bug.  Now, query IDs for utilities are compiled using
their parsed trees rather than the query string since v16
(3db72ebcbe), leading to less bloat with utilities, so backpatch down
only to this version.

Author: Anthonin Bonnefoy
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAO6_XqrGp-uwBqi3vBPLuRULKkddjC7R5QZCgsFren=8E+m2Sg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 16

2 years ago

Michael Paquier

9a714b9d6e

Improve cleanup phases in regression tests of pg_stat_statements

As shaped, two DROP ROLE queries included in "user_activity" were
showing in the reports for "wal".  The intention is to keep each test
isolated and independent, so this is incorrect.  This commit adds some
calls to pg_stat_statements_reset() to clean up the statistics once each
test finishes, so as there are no risks of overlap in the reports for
individial scenarios.

The addition in "user_activity" fixes the output of "wal".  The new
resets done in "level_tracking" and "utility" are added for consistency
with the rest, though they do not affect the stats generated in the
other tests.

Oversight in d0028e3.

Reported-by: Andrei Zubkov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7beb722dd016bf54f1c78bfd6d44a684e28da624.camel@moonset.ru

3 years ago

Michael Paquier

e8dbdb15db

Refactor tests of pg_stat_statements for planning, utility and level tracking

pg_stat_statements.sql acts as the main file for all the core tests of
the module, but things have become complicated to follow over the years
as some of the sub-scenarios tested in this file rely on assumptions
that come from completely different areas of it, like a GUC setup or a
relation created previously.  For example, row tracking for CTAS/COPY
was looking at the number of plans, which was not necessary, or level
tracking was mixed with checks on planner counts.

This commit refactors the tests of pg_stat_statements, by moving test
cases out of pg_stat_statements.sql into their own file, as of:
- Planning-related tests in planning.sql, for [re]plan counts and
top-level handling.  These depend on pg_stat_statements.track_planning.
- Utilities in utility.sql (pg_stat_statements.track_utility), that
includes now the tests for:
-- Row tracking for CTAS, CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW, COPY.
-- Basic utility statements.
-- SET statements.
- Tracking level, depending on pg_stat_statements.track.  This part has
been looking at scenarios with DO blocks, PL functions and SQL
functions.

pg_stat_statements.sql (still named the same for now) still includes
some checks for role-level tracking and WAL generation metrics, that
ought to become independent in the long term for clarity.

While on it, this switches the order of the attributes when querying
pg_stat_statements, the query field becoming last.  This makes much
easier the tracking of changes related to normalization, as queries are
the only variable-length attributes queried (unaligned mode would be one
extra choice, but that reduces the checks on the other fields).

Test scenarios and their results match exactly with what was happening
before this commit in terms of calls, number of plans, number of rows,
cached data or level tracking, so this has no effect on the coverage in
terms of what is produced by the reports in the table
pg_stat_statements.  A follow-up patch will extend more the tests of
pg_stat_statements around utilities, so this split creates a foundation
for this purpose, without complicating more pg_stat_statements.sql.

Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Y+MRdEq9W9XVa2AB@paquier.xyz

3 years ago

3 Commits (a0c8d600bb74e4e8914eceed219bfb069b7908cb)