We were accepting creation of extended statistics only for regular
tables, but they can usefully be created for foreign tables, partitioned
tables, and materialized views, too. Allow those cases.
While at it, make sure all the rejected cases throw a consistent error
message, and add regression tests for the whole thing.
Author: David Rowley, Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f-BmGo410bh5RSPZUvOO0LhmHL2NYmdrC_Jm8pk_FfyCA@mail.gmail.com
We were applying the use_physical_tlist optimization to all relation
scan plans, even those implemented by custom scan providers. However,
that's a bad idea for a couple of reasons. The custom provider might
be unable to provide columns that it hadn't expected to be asked for
(for example, the custom scan might depend on an index-only scan).
Even more to the point, there's no good reason to suppose that this
"optimization" is a win for a custom scan; whatever the custom provider
is doing is likely not based on simply returning physical heap tuples.
(As a counterexample, if the custom scan is an interface to a column store,
demanding all columns would be a huge loss.) If it is a win, the custom
provider could make that decision for itself and insert a suitable
pathtarget into the path, anyway.
Per discussion with Dmitry Ivanov. Back-patch to 9.5 where custom scan
support was introduced. The argument that the custom provider can adjust
the behavior by changing the pathtarget only applies to 9.6+, but on
balance it seems more likely that use_physical_tlist will hurt custom
scans than help them.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e29ddd30-8ef9-4da5-a50b-2bb7b8c7198d@postgrespro.ru
Either because of a previous ALTER TABLE .. SET STATISTICS 0 or because
of being invoked with a partial column list, ANALYZE could fail to
acquire sufficient data to build extended statistics. Previously, this
would draw an ERROR and fail to collect any statistics at all (extended
and regular). Change things so that we raise a WARNING instead, and
remove a hint that was wrong in half the cases.
Reported by: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9Kk0NF6Fg7TA=JUXsjpS9kX6NVu27pb5QDCpOYAvb-Og@mail.gmail.com
This is necessary to be able to reproduce publication membership
correctly if tables are involved in inheritance.
Author: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Coverity complained because bgw.bgw_extra wasn't being filled in by
ApplyLauncherRegister(). The most future-proof fix is to memset the
whole BackgroundWorker struct to zeroes. While at it, let's apply the
same coding rule to other places that set up BackgroundWorker structs;
four out of five had the same or related issues.
addRangeTableEntryForENR had a check for pstate != NULL, which Coverity
pointed out was rather useless since it'd already dereferenced pstate
before that. More to the point, we'd established policy in commit
bc93ac12c that we'd require non-NULL pstate for all addRangeTableEntryFor*
functions; this test was evidently copied-and-pasted from some older
version of one of those functions. Make it look more like the others.
In passing, make an elog message look more like the rest of the code,
too.
Michael Paquier
That way we make sure that initdb's time zone setting code is exercised.
This doesn't add an extra test, it just alters an existing test.
Discussion: <https://postgr.es/m/5807.1492229253@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In standard non-Windows builds, there's no particular reason to care what
address the kernel chooses to map the shared memory segment at. However,
when building with EXEC_BACKEND, there's a risk that the chosen address
won't be available in all child processes. Linux with ASLR enabled (which
it is by default) seems particularly at risk because it puts shmem segments
into the same area where it maps shared libraries. We can work around
that by specifying a mapping address that's outside the range where
shared libraries could get mapped. On x86_64 Linux, 0x7e0000000000
seems to work well.
This is only meant for testing/debugging purposes, so it doesn't seem
necessary to go as far as providing a GUC (or any user-visible
documentation, though we might change that later). Instead, it's just
controlled by setting an environment variable PG_SHMEM_ADDR to the
desired attach address.
Back-patch to all supported branches, since the point here is to
remove intermittent buildfarm failures on EXEC_BACKEND animals.
Owners of affected animals will need to add a suitable setting of
PG_SHMEM_ADDR to their build_env configuration.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7036.1492231361@sss.pgh.pa.us
Seems to have been introduced in commit c219d9b0a. I think there indeed
was a "tupbasics.h" in some early drafts of that refactoring, but it
didn't survive into the committed version.
Amit Kapila
This is consistent with how we refer to other Windows include files, and
prevents a failure when cross-compiling on a system with case sensitive
file names.
We'd already recognized that we can't pass function pointers across process
boundaries for functions in loadable modules, since a shared library could
get loaded at different addresses in different processes. But actually the
practice doesn't work for functions in the core backend either, if we're
using EXEC_BACKEND. This is the cause of recent failures on buildfarm
member culicidae. Switch to passing a string function name in all cases.
Something like this needs to be back-patched into 9.6, but let's see
if the buildfarm likes it first.
Petr Jelinek, with a bunch of basically-cosmetic adjustments by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/548f9c1d-eafa-e3fa-9da8-f0cc2f654e60@2ndquadrant.com
AFAICT, the only actual benefit of closing a bootstrap transaction
is to reclaim transient memory. We can do that a lot more cheaply
by just doing a MemoryContextReset on a suitable context. This
gets the runtime of the "bootstrap" phase of initdb down to the
point where, at least by eyeball, it's quite negligible compared
to the rest of the phases. Per discussion with Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9244.1492106743@sss.pgh.pa.us
Standardize on testing a hash index page's type by doing
(opaque->hasho_flag & LH_PAGE_TYPE) == LH_xxx_PAGE
Various places were taking shortcuts like
opaque->hasho_flag & LH_BUCKET_PAGE
which while not actually wrong, is still bad practice because
it encourages use of
opaque->hasho_flag & LH_UNUSED_PAGE
which *is* wrong (LH_UNUSED_PAGE == 0, so the above is constant false).
hash_xlog.c's hash_mask() contained such an incorrect test.
This also ensures that we mask out the additional flag bits that
hasho_flag has accreted since 9.6. pgstattuple's pgstat_hash_page(),
for one, was failing to do that and was thus actively broken.
Also fix assorted comments that hadn't been updated to reflect the
extended usage of hasho_flag, and fix some macros that were testing
just "(hasho_flag & bit)" to use the less dangerous, project-approved
form "((hasho_flag & bit) != 0)".
Coverity found the bug in hash_mask(); I noted the one in
pgstat_hash_page() through code reading.
Commit 9e43e8714 turns out to have been insufficient: not only is it
necessary to track tentative parent links while considering a set of
arc removals, but it's necessary to track tentative flag additions
as well. This is because we always merge arc target states into
arc source states; therefore, when considering a merge of the final
state with some other, it is the other state that will acquire a new
TSTATE_FIN bit. If there's another arc for the same color trigram
that would cause merging of that state with the initial state, we
failed to recognize the problem. The test cases for the prior commit
evidently only exercised situations where a tentative merge with the
initial state occurs before one with the final state. If it goes the
other way around, we'll happily merge the initial and final states,
either producing a broken final graph that would never match anything,
or triggering the Assert added by the prior commit.
It's tempting to consider switching the merge direction when the merge
involves the final state, but I lack the time to analyze that idea in
detail. Instead just keep track of the flag changes that would result
from proposed merges, in the same way that the prior commit tracked
proposed parent links.
Along the way, add some more debugging support, because I'm not entirely
confident that this is the last bug here. And tweak matters so that
the transformed.dot file uses small integers rather than pointer values
to identify states; that makes it more readable if you're just eyeballing
it rather than fooling with Graphviz. And rename a couple of identically
named struct fields to reduce confusion.
Per report from Corey Csuhta. Add a test case based on his example.
(Note: this case does not trigger the bug under 9.3, apparently because
its different measurement of costs causes it to stop merging states before
it hits the failure. I spent some time trying to find a variant that would
fail in 9.3, without success; but I'm sure such cases exist.)
Like the previous patch, back-patch to 9.3 where this code was added.
Report: https://postgr.es/m/E2B01A4B-4530-406B-8D17-2F67CF9A16BA@csuhta.com
regexport.c thought it could just ignore LACON arcs, but the correct
behavior is to treat them as satisfiable while consuming zero input
(rather reminiscently of commit 9f1e642d5). Otherwise, the emitted
simplified-NFA representation may contain no paths leading from initial
to final state, which unsurprisingly confuses pg_trgm, as seen in
bug #14623 from Jeff Janes.
Since regexport's output representation has no concept of an arc that
consumes zero input, recurse internally to find the next normal arc(s)
after any LACON transitions. We'd be forced into changing that
representation if a LACON could be the last arc reaching the final
state, but fortunately the regex library never builds NFAs with such
a configuration, so there always is a next normal arc.
Back-patch to 9.3 where this logic was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170413180503.25948.94871@wrigleys.postgresql.org
This contains some protocol changes to SASL authentiation (which is new
in v10):
* For future-proofing, in the AuthenticationSASL message that begins SASL
authentication, provide a list of SASL mechanisms that the server
supports, for the client to choose from. Currently, it's always just
SCRAM-SHA-256.
* Add a separate authentication message type for the final server->client
SASL message, which the client doesn't need to respond to. This makes
it unambiguous whether the client is supposed to send a response or not.
The SASL mechanism should know that anyway, but better to be explicit.
Also, in the server, support clients that don't send an Initial Client
response in the first SASLInitialResponse message. The server is supposed
to first send an empty request in that case, to which the client will
respond with the data that usually comes in the Initial Client Response.
libpq uses the Initial Client Response field and doesn't need this, and I
would assume any other sensible implementation to use Initial Client
Response, too, but let's follow the SASL spec.
Improve the documentation on SASL authentication in protocol. Add a
section describing the SASL message flow, and some details on our
SCRAM-SHA-256 implementation.
Document the different kinds of PasswordMessages that the frontend sends
in different phases of SASL authentication, as well as GSS/SSPI
authentication as separate message formats. Even though they're all 'p'
messages, and the exact format depends on the context, describing them as
separate message formats makes the documentation more clear.
Reviewed by Michael Paquier and Álvaro Hernández Tortosa.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqS-aFg0iM3AQOJwKDv_0WkAedRjs1W2X8EixSz+sKBXCQ@mail.gmail.com
Move the responsibility of reading the data from the authentication request
message from PQconnectPoll() to pg_fe_sendauth(). This way, PQconnectPoll()
doesn't need to know about all the different authentication request types,
and we don't need the extra fields in the pg_conn struct to pass the data
from PQconnectPoll() to pg_fe_sendauth() anymore.
Reviewed by Michael Paquier.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6490b975-5ee1-6280-ac1d-af975b19fb9a%40iki.fi
Formerly, the bootstrap backend looked up the OIDs corresponding to
names in regproc catalog entries using brute-force searches of pg_proc.
It was somewhat remarkable that that worked at all, since it was used
while populating other pretty-fundamental catalogs like pg_operator.
And it was also quite slow, and getting slower as pg_proc gets bigger.
This patch moves the lookup work into genbki.pl, so that the values in
postgres.bki for regproc columns are always numeric OIDs, an option
that regprocin() already supported. Perl isn't the world's speediest
language, so this about doubles the time needed to run genbki.pl (from
0.3 to 0.6 sec on my machine). But we only do that at most once per
build. The time needed to run initdb drops significantly --- on my
machine, initdb --no-sync goes from 1.8 to 1.3 seconds. So this is
a small net win even for just one initdb per build, and it becomes
quite a nice win for test sequences requiring many initdb runs.
Strip out the now-dead code for brute-force catalog searching in
regprocin. We'd also cargo-culted similar logic into regoperin
and some (not all) of the other reg*in functions. That is all
dead code too since we currently have no need to load such values
during bootstrap. I removed it all, reasoning that if we ever
need such functionality it'd be much better to do it in a similar
way to this patch.
There might be some simplifications possible in the backend now that
regprocin doesn't require doing catalog reads so early in bootstrap.
I've not looked into that, though.
Andreas Karlsson, with some small adjustments by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30896.1492006367@sss.pgh.pa.us
Add a missing comma in the synopsis after the XMLNAMESPACES clause.
Also, add an example illustrating the use of that clause.
Author: Arjen Nienhuis and Pavel Stěhule
Free each SASL message after sending it. It's not a lot of wasted memory,
and it's short-lived, but the authentication code in general tries to
pfree() stuff, so let's follow the example.
Adding the pfree() revealed a little bug in build_server_first_message().
It attempts to keeps a copy of the sent message, but it was missing a
pstrdup(), so the pointer started to dangle, after adding the pfree()
into CheckSCRAMAuth().
Reword comments and debug messages slightly, while we're at it.
Reviewed by Michael Paquier.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6490b975-5ee1-6280-ac1d-af975b19fb9a@iki.fi
Previously the description about pg_stat_progress_vacuum was in the table
of "Collected Statistics Views" in the doc. But since it repors dynamic
information, i.e., the current progress of VACUUM, its description should be
in the table of "Dynamic Statistics Views".
Back-patch to 9.6 where pg_stat_progress_vacuum was added.
Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/7ab51b59-8d4d-6193-c60a-b75f222efb12@lab.ntt.co.jp
Commit 5e6d8d2bb allowed parallel workers to execute parallel-safe
subplans, but it transmitted the query's entire list of subplans to
the worker(s). Since execMain.c blindly does ExecInitNode and later
ExecEndNode on every list element, this resulted in parallel-unsafe plan
nodes nonetheless getting started up and shut down in parallel workers.
That seems mostly harmless as far as core plan node types go (but
maybe not so much for Gather?). But it resulted in postgres_fdw
opening and then closing extra remote connections, and it's likely
that other non-parallel-safe FDWs or custom scan providers would have
worse reactions.
To fix, just make ExecSerializePlan replace parallel-unsafe subplans
with NULLs in the cut-down plan tree that it transmits to workers.
This relies on ExecInitNode and ExecEndNode to do nothing on NULL
input, but they do anyway. If anything else is touching the dropped
subplans in a parallel worker, that would be a bug to be fixed.
(This thus provides a strong guarantee that we won't try to do
something with a parallel-unsafe subplan in a worker.)
This is, I think, the last fix directly occasioned by Andreas Seltenreich's
bug report of a few days ago.
Tom Lane and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87tw5x4vcu.fsf@credativ.de
Alvaro Herrera