5 Commits (cd59fcff256d68e028bf8a181d4e166e81b6474b)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Tomas Vondra	2c7ea57e56	Revert "Logical decoding of sequences" ... This reverts a sequence of commits, implementing features related to logical decoding and replication of sequences: - 0da92dc530 - 80901b3291 - b779d7d8fd - d5ed9da41d - a180c2b34d - 75b1521dae - 2d2232933b - 002c9dd97a - 05843b1aa4 The implementation has issues, mostly due to combining transactional and non-transactional behavior of sequences. It's not clear how this could be fixed, but it'll require reworking significant part of the patch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/95345a19-d508-63d1-860a-f5c2f41e8d40@enterprisedb.com	3 years ago
Tomas Vondra	80901b3291	Add decoding of sequences to test_decoding ... Commit 0da92dc530 improved the logical decoding infrastructure to handle sequences, and did various changes to related parts (WAL logging etc.). But it did not include any implementation of the new callbacks added to OutputPluginCallbacks. This extends test_decoding with two callbacks to decode sequences. The decoding of sequences may be disabled using 'include-sequences', a new option of the output plugin. Author: Tomas Vondra, Cary Huang Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Hannu Krosing, Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d045f3c2-6cfb-06d3-5540-e63c320df8bc@enterprisedb.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1710ed7e13b.cd7177461430746.3372264562543607781@highgo.ca	4 years ago
Tom Lane	1518d07842	Fix crash when logical decoding is invoked from a PL function. ... The logical decoding functions do BeginInternalSubTransaction and RollbackAndReleaseCurrentSubTransaction to clean up after themselves. It turns out that AtEOSubXact_SPI has an unrecognized assumption that we always need to cancel the active SPI operation in the SPI context that surrounds the subtransaction (if there is one). That's true when the RollbackAndReleaseCurrentSubTransaction call is coming from the SPI-using function itself, but not when it's happening inside some unrelated function invoked by a SPI query. In practice the affected callers are the various PLs. To fix, record the current subtransaction ID when we begin a SPI operation, and clean up only if that ID is the subtransaction being canceled. Also, remove AtEOSubXact_SPI's assertion that it must have cleaned up the surrounding SPI context's active tuptable. That's proven wrong by the same test case. Also clarify (or, if you prefer, reinterpret) the calling conventions for _SPI_begin_call and _SPI_end_call. The memory context cleanup in the latter means that these have always had the flavor of a matched resource-management pair, but they weren't documented that way before. Per report from Ben Chobot. Back-patch to 9.4 where logical decoding came in. In principle, the SPI changes should go all the way back, since the problem dates back to commit 7ec1c5a86. But given the lack of field complaints it seems few people are using internal subtransactions in this way. So I don't feel a need to take any risks in 9.2/9.3. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/73FBA179-C68C-4540-9473-71E865408B15@silentmedia.com	8 years ago
Andres Freund	0fd38e1370	Don't skip SQL backends in logical decoding for visibility computation. ... The logical decoding patchset introduced PROC_IN_LOGICAL_DECODING flag PGXACT flag, that allows such backends to be skipped when computing the xmin horizon/snapshots. That's fine and sensible for walsenders streaming out logical changes, but not at all fine for SQL backends doing logical decoding. If the latter set that flag any change they have performed outside of logical decoding will not be regarded as visible - which e.g. can lead to that change being vacuumed away. Note that not setting the flag for SQL backends isn't particularly bothersome - the SQL backend doesn't do streaming, so it only runs for a limited amount of time. Per buildfarm member 'tick' and Alvaro. Backpatch to 9.4, where logical decoding was introduced.	11 years ago
Andres Freund	89fd41b390	Fix and improve cache invalidation logic for logical decoding. ... There are basically three situations in which logical decoding needs to perform cache invalidation. During/After replaying a transaction with catalog changes, when skipping a uninteresting transaction that performed catalog changes and when erroring out while replaying a transaction. Unfortunately these three cases were all done slightly differently - partially because 8de3e410fa, which greatly simplifies matters, got committed in the midst of the development of logical decoding. The actually problematic case was when logical decoding skipped transaction commits (and thus processed invalidations). When used via the SQL interface cache invalidation could access the catalog - bad, because we didn't set up enough state to allow that correctly. It'd not be hard to setup sufficient state, but the simpler solution is to always perform cache invalidation outside a valid transaction. Also make the different cache invalidation cases look as similar as possible, to ease code review. This fixes the assertion failure reported by Antonin Houska in 53EE02D9.7040702@gmail.com. The presented testcase has been expanded into a regression test. Backpatch to 9.4, where logical decoding was introduced.	11 years ago