This commit changes some functions related to the data type numeric to
use the soft error reporting rather than a custom boolean flag (called
"have_error") that callers of these functions could rely on to bypass
the generation of ERROR reports, letting the callers do their own error
handling (timestamp, jsonpath and numeric_to_char() require them).
This results in the removal of some boilerplate code that was required
to handle both the ereport() and the "have_error" code paths bypassing
ereport(), unifying everything under the soft error reporting facility.
While on it, some duplicated error messages are removed. The function
upgraded in this commit were suffixed with "_opt_error" in their names.
They are renamed to "_safe" instead.
This change relies on d9f7f5d32f, that has introduced the soft error
reporting infrastructure.
Author: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b96No5h5tRuR+KhcC44YcYUCw8WAHuLoqqyyop8_k3+JDQ@mail.gmail.com
Remove conditionally-compiled code for smaller Datum widths,
and simplify comments that describe cases no longer of interest.
I also fixed up a few more places that were not using
DatumGetIntXX where they should, and made some cosmetic
adjustments such as using sizeof(int64) not sizeof(Datum)
in places where that fit better with the surrounding code.
One thing I remembered while preparing this part is that SP-GiST
stores pass-by-value prefix keys as Datums, so that the on-disk
representation depends on sizeof(Datum). That's even more
unfortunate than the existing commentary makes it out to be,
because now there is a hazard that the change of sizeof(Datum)
will break SP-GiST indexes on 32-bit machines. It appears that
there are no existing SP-GiST opclasses that are actually
affected; and if there are some that I didn't find, the number
of installations that are using them on 32-bit machines is
doubtless tiny. So I'm proceeding on the assumption that we
can get away with this, but it's something to worry about.
(gininsert.c looks like it has a similar problem, but it's okay
because the "tuples" it's constructing are just transient data
within the tuplesort step. That's pretty poorly documented
though, so I added some comments.)
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1749799.1752797397@sss.pgh.pa.us
The code used a PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMPTZ() where the return type is
TimestampTz and not a Datum.
On 64-bit systems, there is no effect since this just ends up casting
64-bit integers back and forth. On 32-bit systems, timestamptz is
pass-by-reference. PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMPTZ() allocates new memory and
returns the address, meaning that the caller could interpret this as a
timestamp value.
The effect is using "date_trunc(..., 'infinity'::timestamptz) will
return random values (instead of the correct return value 'infinity').
Bug introduced in commit d85ce012f9.
Author: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2d320b6f-b4af-4fbc-9eec-5d0fa15d187b@eisentraut.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4bf60a84-2862-4a53-acd5-8eddf134a60e@eisentraut.org
Backpatch-through: 18
The values of the "result" variables in these functions are
always integers; using a float8 variable accomplishes nothing
except to incur useless conversions to and from float. While
that wastes a few nanoseconds, these functions aren't all that
time-critical. But it seems worth fixing to remove possible
reader confusion.
Also, in the case of date2isoyear(), "result" is a very poorly
chosen variable name because it is *not* the function's result.
Rename it to "week", and do the same in date2isoweek() for
consistency.
Since this is mostly cosmetic, there seems little need
for back-patch.
Author: Sergey Fukanchik <s.fukanchik@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6323a-68726500-1-7def9d00@137821581
Previous commits invented timestamp2timestamptz_opt_overflow,
date2timestamp_opt_overflow, and date2timestamptz_opt_overflow
functions to perform non-error-throwing conversions between
datetime types. This patch completes the set by adding
timestamp2date_opt_overflow, timestamptz2date_opt_overflow,
and timestamptz2timestamp_opt_overflow.
In addition, adjust timestamp2timestamptz_opt_overflow so that it
doesn't throw error if timestamp2tm fails, but treats that as an
overflow case. The situation probably can't arise except with an
invalid timestamp value, and I can't think of a way that that would
happen except data corruption. However, it's pretty silly to have a
function whose entire reason for existence is to not throw errors for
out-of-range inputs nonetheless throw an error for out-of-range input.
The new APIs are not used in this patch, but will be needed in
upcoming btree_gin changes.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Arseniy Mukhin <arseniy.mukhin.dev@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/262624.1738460652@sss.pgh.pa.us
Teach nbtree multi-column index scans to opportunistically skip over
irrelevant sections of the index given a query with no "=" conditions on
one or more prefix index columns. When nbtree is passed input scan keys
derived from a predicate "WHERE b = 5", new nbtree preprocessing steps
output "WHERE a = ANY(<every possible 'a' value>) AND b = 5" scan keys.
That is, preprocessing generates a "skip array" (and an output scan key)
for the omitted prefix column "a", which makes it safe to mark the scan
key on "b" as required to continue the scan. The scan is therefore able
to repeatedly reposition itself by applying both the "a" and "b" keys.
A skip array has "elements" that are generated procedurally and on
demand, but otherwise works just like a regular ScalarArrayOp array.
Preprocessing can freely add a skip array before or after any input
ScalarArrayOp arrays. Index scans with a skip array decide when and
where to reposition the scan using the same approach as any other scan
with array keys. This design builds on the design for array advancement
and primitive scan scheduling added to Postgres 17 by commit 5bf748b8.
Testing has shown that skip scans of an index with a low cardinality
skipped prefix column can be multiple orders of magnitude faster than an
equivalent full index scan (or sequential scan). In general, the
cardinality of the scan's skipped column(s) limits the number of leaf
pages that can be skipped over.
The core B-Tree operator classes on most discrete types generate their
array elements with the help of their own custom skip support routine.
This infrastructure gives nbtree a way to generate the next required
array element by incrementing (or decrementing) the current array value.
It can reduce the number of index descents in cases where the next
possible indexable value frequently turns out to be the next value
stored in the index. Opclasses that lack a skip support routine fall
back on having nbtree "increment" (or "decrement") a skip array's
current element by setting the NEXT (or PRIOR) scan key flag, without
directly changing the scan key's sk_argument. These sentinel values
behave just like any other value from an array -- though they can never
locate equal index tuples (they can only locate the next group of index
tuples containing the next set of non-sentinel values that the scan's
arrays need to advance to).
A skip array's range is constrained by "contradictory" inequality keys.
For example, a skip array on "x" will only generate the values 1 and 2
given a qual such as "WHERE x BETWEEN 1 AND 2 AND y = 66". Such a skip
array qual usually has near-identical performance characteristics to a
comparable SAOP qual "WHERE x = ANY('{1, 2}') AND y = 66". However,
improved performance isn't guaranteed. Much depends on physical index
characteristics.
B-Tree preprocessing is optimistic about skipping working out: it
applies static, generic rules when determining where to generate skip
arrays, which assumes that the runtime overhead of maintaining skip
arrays will pay for itself -- or lead to only a modest performance loss.
As things stand, these assumptions are much too optimistic: skip array
maintenance will lead to unacceptable regressions with unsympathetic
queries (queries whose scan can't skip over many irrelevant leaf pages).
An upcoming commit will address the problems in this area by enhancing
_bt_readpage's approach to saving cycles on scan key evaluation, making
it work in a way that directly considers the needs of = array keys
(particularly = skip array keys).
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Masahiro Ikeda <masahiro.ikeda@nttdata.com>
Reviewed-By: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@iki.fi>
Reviewed-By: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Reviewed-By: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Reviewed-By: Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzmn1YsLzOGgjAQZdn1STSG_y8qP__vggTaPAYXJP+G4bw@mail.gmail.com
This commit introduces idle_replication_slot_timeout GUC that allows
inactive slots to be invalidated at the time of checkpoint. Because
checkpoints happen checkpoint_timeout intervals, there can be some lag
between when the idle_replication_slot_timeout was exceeded and when the
slot invalidation is triggered at the next checkpoint. To avoid such lags,
users can force a checkpoint to promptly invalidate inactive slots.
Note that the idle timeout invalidation mechanism is not applicable for
slots that do not reserve WAL or for slots on the standby server that are
synced from the primary server (i.e., standby slots having 'synced' field
'true'). Synced slots are always considered to be inactive because they
don't perform logical decoding to produce changes.
The slots can become inactive for a long period if a subscriber is down
due to a system error or inaccessible because of network issues. If such a
situation persists, it might be more practical to recreate the subscriber
rather than attempt to recover the node and wait for it to catch up which
could be time-consuming.
Then, external tools could create replication slots (e.g., for migrations
or upgrades) that may fail to remove them if an error occurs, leaving
behind unused slots that take up space and resources. Manually cleaning
them up can be tedious and error-prone, and without intervention, these
lingering slots can cause unnecessary WAL retention and system bloat.
As the duration of idle_replication_slot_timeout is in minutes, any test
using that would be time-consuming. We are planning to commit a follow up
patch for tests by using the injection point framework.
Author: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Author: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACW4aUe-_uFQOjdWCEN-xXoLGhmvRFnL8SNw_TZ5nJe+aw@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716C131A7D80DAE8CB9E88794FC2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Previously, if an infinite value was passed to date_trunc(), then the
same infinite value would always be returned regardless of the field
unit given by the caller. This commit updates the function so that an
error is returned when an invalid unit is passed to date_trunc() with an
infinite value.
This matches the behavior of date_trunc() with a finite value and
date_part() with an infinite value, making the handling of interval,
timestamp and timestamptz more consistent across the board for these two
functions.
Some tests are added to cover all these new failure cases, with an
unsupported unit and infinite values for the three data types. There
were no test cases in core that checked all these patterns up to now.
Author: Joseph Koshakow
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHc4084dGzEJR0_pBZkDuqbPGc5wn7gK_M0XR_kRiCdUJQ@mail.gmail.com
This commit makes use of the overflow-aware routines in int.h to
fix a variety of reported overflow bugs in the date and timestamp
code. It seems unlikely that this fixes all such bugs in this
area, but since the problems seem limited to cases that are far
beyond any realistic usage, I'm not going to worry too much. Note
that for one bug, I've chosen to simply add a comment about the
overflow hazard because fixing it would require quite a bit of code
restructuring that doesn't seem worth the risk.
Since this is a bug fix, it could be back-patched, but given the
risk of conflicts with the new routines in int.h and the overall
risk/reward ratio of this patch, I've opted not to do so for now.
Fixes bug #18585 (except for the one case that's just commented).
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Matthew Kim, Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-by: Joseph Koshakow, Jian He
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31ad2cd1-db94-bdb3-f91a-65ffdb4bef95%40gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18585-db646741dd649abd%40postgresql.org
hashvalidate(), which validates the signatures of support functions
for the hash AM, contained several hardcoded exceptions. For example,
hash/date_ops support function 1 was hashint4(), which would
ordinarily fail validation because the function argument is int4, not
date. But this works internally because int4 and date are of the same
size. There are several more exceptions like this that happen to work
and were allowed historically but would now fail the function
signature validation.
This patch removes those exceptions by providing new support functions
that have the proper declared signatures. They internally share most
of the code with the "wrong" functions they replace, so the behavior
is still the same.
With the exceptions gone, hashvalidate() is now simplified and relies
fully on check_amproc_signature().
hashvarlena() and hashvarlenaextended() are kept in pg_proc.dat
because some extensions currently use them to build hash functions for
their own types, and we need to keep exposing these functions as
"LANGUAGE internal" functions for that to continue to work.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/29c3b746-69e7-482a-b37c-dbbf7e5b009b@eisentraut.org
"EXTRACT(WEEK FROM interval_value)" formerly threw an error.
Define it as "tm->tm_mday / 7". (With C99 division semantics,
this gives consistent results for negative intervals.)
"EXTRACT(QUARTER FROM interval_value)" has been implemented
all along, but it formerly gave extremely strange results for
negative intervals. Fix it so that the output for -N months
is the negative of the output for N months.
Per bug #18348 from Michael Bondarenko and subsequent discussion.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18348-b097a3587dfde8a4@postgresql.org
This commit attempts to update a few places, such as the money,
numeric, and timestamp types, to no longer rely on signed integer
wrapping for correctness. This is intended to move us closer
towards removing -fwrapv, which may enable some compiler
optimizations. However, there is presently no plan to actually
remove that compiler option in the near future.
Besides using some of the existing overflow-aware routines in
int.h, this commit introduces and makes use of some new ones.
Specifically, it adds functions that accept a signed integer and
return its absolute value as an unsigned integer with the same
width (e.g., pg_abs_s64()). It also adds functions that accept an
unsigned integer, store the result of negating that integer in a
signed integer with the same width, and return whether the negation
overflowed (e.g., pg_neg_u64_overflow()).
Finally, this commit adds a couple of tests for timestamps near
POSTGRES_EPOCH_JDATE.
Author: Joseph Koshakow
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Heikki Linnakangas, Jian He
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHdBPOyEGS7s%2Bxf4iaW0-cgiq25jpYdWBqQqvLtLe_t6tw%40mail.gmail.com
This provides the planner with row estimates for
generate_series(TIMESTAMP, TIMESTAMP, INTERVAL),
generate_series(TIMESTAMPTZ, TIMESTAMPTZ, INTERVAL) and
generate_series(TIMESTAMPTZ, TIMESTAMPTZ, INTERVAL, TEXT) when the input
parameter values can be estimated during planning.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrBE%3D%2BASo_sGYmQJ3GvO8GPvX5yxXhRS%3Dt_ybd4odFkhQ%40mail.gmail.com
In commit 25cd2d640 I (tgl) opined that "The additions of the months
and microseconds fields could also overflow, of course. However,
I believe we need no additional checks there; the existing range
checks should catch such cases". This is demonstrably wrong however
for the microseconds field, and given that discovery it seems prudent
to be paranoid about the months addition as well.
Report and patch by Joseph Koshakow. As before, back-patch to all
supported branches. (However, the test case doesn't work before
v15 because we didn't allow wider-than-int32 numbers in interval
literals. A variant test could probably be built that fits within
that restriction, but it didn't seem worth the trouble.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHf77sRHKoEzUw9_cMYSpbpNS2C+J_+8Dq4+0oi8iKopeA@mail.gmail.com
as determined by include-what-you-use (IWYU)
While IWYU also suggests to *add* a bunch of #include's (which is its
main purpose), this patch does not do that. In some cases, a more
specific #include replaces another less specific one.
Some manual adjustments of the automatic result:
- IWYU currently doesn't know about includes that provide global
variable declarations (like -Wmissing-variable-declarations), so
those includes are being kept manually.
- All includes for port(ability) headers are being kept for now, to
play it safe.
- No changes of catalog/pg_foo.h to catalog/pg_foo_d.h, to keep the
patch from exploding in size.
Note that this patch touches just *.c files, so nothing declared in
header files changes in hidden ways.
As a small example, in src/backend/access/transam/rmgr.c, some IWYU
pragma annotations are added to handle a special case there.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/af837490-6b2f-46df-ba05-37ea6a6653fc%40eisentraut.org
In the case where the target timestamp is before the origin timestamp
and their difference is already an exact multiple of the stride, the
code incorrectly subtracted the stride anyway.
Also detect several integer-overflow cases that previously produced
bogus results. (The submitted patch tried to avoid overflow, but
I'm not convinced it's right, and problematic cases are so far out of
the plausibly-useful range that they don't seem worth sweating over.
Let's just use overflow-detecting arithmetic and throw errors.)
timestamp_bin() and timestamptz_bin() are basically identical and
so had identical bugs. Fix both.
Report and patch by Moaaz Assali, adjusted some by me. Back-patch
to v14 where date_bin() was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALkF+nvtuas-2kydG-WfofbRSJpyODAJWun==W-yO5j2R4meqA@mail.gmail.com
Previously, an interval microseconds field close to INT64_MAX or
INT64_MIN could overflow, producing a result with not even the
correct sign, while being rounded to match a precision specification.
This seems worth fixing, but not worth back-patching, in part
because the ereturn() notation doesn't exist very far back.
Report and patch by Joseph Koshakow (some cosmetic mods by me)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHfpuLgqJYzkUcher466Z1LpmE+5Sm+zc8L6zKCOQ+6TDQ@mail.gmail.com
We perform addition of the days field of an interval via
arithmetic on the Julian-date representation of the timestamp's date.
This step is subject to int32 overflow, and we also should not let
the Julian date become very negative, for fear of weird results from
j2date. (In the timestamptz case, allow a Julian date of -1 to pass,
since it might convert back to zero after timezone rotation.)
The additions of the months and microseconds fields could also
overflow, of course. However, I believe we need no additional
checks there; the existing range checks should catch such cases.
The difficulty here is that j2date's magic modular arithmetic could
produce something that looks like it's in-range.
Per bug #18313 from Christian Maurer. This has been wrong for
a long time, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18313-64d2c8952d81e84b@postgresql.org
Commits 146604ec43 and a898b409f6 added overflow checks to
interval_mul(), but not to interval_div(), which contains almost
identical code, and so is susceptible to the same kinds of
overflows. In addition, those checks did not catch all possible
overflow conditions.
Add additional checks to the "cascade down" code in interval_mul(),
and copy all the overflow checks over to the corresponding code in
interval_div(), so that they both generate "interval out of range"
errors, rather than returning bogus results.
Given that these errors are relatively easy to hit, back-patch to all
supported branches.
Per bug #18200 from Alexander Lakhin, and subsequent investigation.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18200-5ea288c7b2d504b1%40postgresql.org
This adds support for infinity to the interval data type, using the
same input/output representation as the other date/time data types
that support infinity. This allows various arithmetic operations on
infinite dates, timestamps and intervals.
The new values are represented by setting all fields of the interval
to INT32/64_MIN for -infinity, and INT32/64_MAX for +infinity. This
ensures that they compare as less/greater than all other interval
values, without the need for any special-case comparison code.
Note that, since those 2 values were formerly accepted as legal finite
intervals, pg_upgrade and dump/restore from an old database will turn
them from finite to infinite intervals. That seems OK, since those
exact values should be extremely rare in practice, and they are
outside the documented range supported by the interval type, which
gives us a certain amount of leeway.
Bump catalog version.
Joseph Koshakow, Jian He, and Ashutosh Bapat, reviewed by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHea4%2BsPybKK7agDYOMo9N-Z3J6ZXf3BOM79pFsFNcRjwA%40mail.gmail.com
The original code did very little to guard against integer or floating
point overflow when computing the interval's fields. Detect any such
overflows and error out, rather than silently returning bogus results.
Joseph Koshakow, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat and me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHcm1TPwH_zaGWuFoL8pZBestbRZTU6Z%3D-RvAdSXTPbKfg%40mail.gmail.com
When converting a timestamp to/from with/without time zone, the SQL
Standard specifies an AT LOCAL variant of AT TIME ZONE which uses the
session's time zone. This includes three system functions able to do
the work in the same way as the existing flavors for AT TIME ZONE,
except that these need to be marked as stable as they depend on the
session's TimeZone GUC.
Bump catalog version.
Author: Vik Fearing
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe, Cary Huang, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8e25dec4-5667-c1a5-6581-167d710c2182@postgresfriends.org
This is equivalent to a revert of f193883 and fb32748, with the addition
that the declaration of the SQLValueFunction node needs to gain a couple
of node_attr for query jumbling. The performance impact of removing the
function call inlining is proving to be too huge for some workloads
where these are used. A worst-case test case of involving only simple
SELECT queries with a SQL keyword is proving to lead to a reduction of
10% in TPS via pgbench and prepared queries on a high-end machine.
None of the tests I ran back for this set of changes saw such a huge
gap, but Alexander Lakhin and Andres Freund have found that this can be
noticeable. Keeping the older performance would mean to do more
inlining in the executor when using COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX for a function
expression, similarly to what SQLValueFunction does. This requires more
redesign work and there is little time until 16beta1 is released, so for
now reverting the change is the best way forward, bringing back the
previous performance.
Bump catalog version.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b32bed1b-0746-9b20-1472-4bdc9ca66d52@gmail.com
Add versions of timestamptz + interval, timestamptz - interval, and
generate_series(timestamptz, ...) in which a timezone can be specified
explicitly instead of defaulting to the TimeZone GUC setting.
The new functions for the first two are named date_add and
date_subtract. This might seem too generic, but we could use
overloading to add additional variants if that seems useful.
Along the way, improve the docs' pretty inadequate explanation
of how timestamptz +- interval works.
Przemysław Sztoch and Gurjeet Singh; cosmetic changes and most of
the docs work by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/01a84551-48dd-1359-bf7e-f6b0203a6bd0@sztoch.pl
We already had five copies of essentially the same logic, and an
upcoming patch introduces yet another use-case. That's past my
threshold of pain, so introduce a common subroutine. There's not
that much net code savings, but the chance of typos should go down.
Inspired by a patch from Przemysław Sztoch, but different in detail.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/01a84551-48dd-1359-bf7e-f6b0203a6bd0@sztoch.pl
We'd like to use TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds with the stop_time
possibly being TIMESTAMP_INFINITY, but up to now it's disclaimed
responsibility for overflow cases. Define it to clamp its output to
the range [0, INT_MAX], handling overflow correctly. (INT_MAX rather
than LONG_MAX seems appropriate, because the function is already
described as being intended for calculating wait times for WaitLatch
et al, and that infrastructure only handles waits up to INT_MAX.
Also, this choice gets rid of cross-platform behavioral differences.)
Having done that, we can replace some ad-hoc code in walreceiver.c
with a simple call to TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds.
While at it, fix some buglets in existing callers of
TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds: basebackup_copy.c had not read the
memo about TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds never returning a negative
value, and postmaster.c had not read the memo about Min() and Max()
being macros with multiple-evaluation hazards. Neither of these
quite seem worth back-patching.
Patch by me; thanks to Nathan Bossart for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3126727.1674759248@sss.pgh.pa.us
f193883 has been incorrectly setting up the precision used in the
timestamp compilations returned by the following functions:
- LOCALTIME
- LOCALTIMESTAMP
- CURRENT_TIME
- CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
Specifying an out-of-range precision for CURRENT_TIMESTAMP and
LOCALTIMESTAMP was raising a WARNING without adjusting the precision,
leading to a subsequent error. LOCALTIME and CURRENT_TIME raised a
WARNING without an error, still the precision given to the internal
routines was not correct, so let's be clean.
Ian has reported the problems in timestamp.c, while I have noticed the
ones in date.c. Regression tests are added for all of them with
precisions high enough to provide coverage for the warnings, something
that went missing up to this commit.
Author: Ian Lawrence Barwick, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB8KJ=jQEnn9sYG+N752spt68wMrhmT-ocHCh4oeNmHF82QMWA@mail.gmail.com
This patch converts the input functions for date, time, timetz,
timestamp, timestamptz, and interval to the new soft-error style.
There's some related stuff in formatting.c that remains to be
cleaned up, but that seems like a separable project.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3bbbb0df-7382-bf87-9737-340ba096e034@postgrespro.ru
Pay down some ancient technical debt (dating to commit 022fd9966):
fix a couple of places in datetime parsing that were throwing
ereport's immediately instead of returning a DTERR code that could be
interpreted by DateTimeParseError. The reason for that was that there
was no mechanism for passing any auxiliary data (such as a zone name)
to DateTimeParseError, and these errors seemed to really need it.
Up to now it didn't matter that much just where the error got thrown,
but now we'd like to have a hard policy that datetime parse errors
get thrown from just the one place.
Hence, invent a "DateTimeErrorExtra" struct that can be used to
carry any extra values needed for specific DTERR codes. Perhaps
in the future somebody will be motivated to use this to improve
the specificity of other DateTimeParseError messages, but for now
just deal with the timezone-error cases.
This is on the way to making the datetime input functions report
parse errors softly; but it's really an independent change, so
commit separately.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3bbbb0df-7382-bf87-9737-340ba096e034@postgrespro.ru
This switch impacts 9 patterns related to a SQL-mandated special syntax
for function calls:
- LOCALTIME [ ( typmod ) ]
- LOCALTIMESTAMP [ ( typmod ) ]
- CURRENT_TIME [ ( typmod ) ]
- CURRENT_TIMESTAMP [ ( typmod ) ]
- CURRENT_DATE
Five new entries are added to pg_proc to compensate the removal of
SQLValueFunction to provide backward-compatibility and making this
change transparent for the end-user (for example for the attribute
generated when a keyword is specified in a SELECT or in a FROM clause
without an alias, or when specifying something else than an Iconst to
the parser).
The parser included a set of checks coming from the files in charge of
holding the C functions used for the SQLValueFunction calls (as of
transformSQLValueFunction()), which are now moved within each function's
execution path, so this reduces the dependencies between the execution
and the parsing steps. As of this change, all the SQL keywords use the
same paths for their work, relying only on COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX. Like
fb32748, no performance difference has been noticed, while the perf
profiles get reduced with ExecEvalSQLValueFunction() gone.
Bump catalog version.
Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker, Ted Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YzaG3MoryCguUOym@paquier.xyz
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in optimizer, parser,
utility, libpq, and "commands" code, as well as in remaining library
code. Do the same for all code related to frontend programs (with the
exception of pg_dump/pg_dumpall related code).
Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will handle
ecpg and pg_dump/pg_dumpall.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
In a similar effort to f736e188c and 110d81728, fixup various usages of
string functions where a more appropriate function is available and more
fit for purpose.
These changes include:
1. Use cstring_to_text_with_len() instead of cstring_to_text() when
working with a StringInfoData and the length can easily be obtained.
2. Use appendStringInfoString() instead of appendStringInfo() when no
formatting is required.
3. Use pstrdup(...) instead of psprintf("%s", ...)
4. Use pstrdup(...) instead of psprintf(...) (with no formatting)
5. Use appendPQExpBufferChar() instead of appendPQExpBufferStr() when the
length of the string being appended is 1.
6. appendStringInfoChar() instead of appendStringInfo() when no formatting
is required and string is 1 char long.
7. Use appendPQExpBufferStr(b, .) instead of appendPQExpBuffer(b, "%s", .)
8. Don't use pstrdup when it's fine to just point to the string constant.
I (David) did find other cases of #8 but opted to use #4 instead as I
wasn't certain enough that applying #8 was ok (e.g in hba.c)
Author: Ranier Vilela, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo2j2+RJBGhNtUz6BxabWWh2Jx16wMUMWKUjv70Ver1vg@mail.gmail.com
This replaces all MemSet() calls with struct initialization where that
is easily and obviously possible. (For example, some cases have to
worry about padding bits, so I left those.)
(The same could be done with appropriate memset() calls, but this
patch is part of an effort to phase out MemSet(), so it doesn't touch
memset() calls.)
Reviewed-by: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9847b13c-b785-f4e2-75c3-12ec77a3b05c@enterprisedb.com
697492434 added 3 new quicksort specialization functions for common
datatypes.
That commit was not very consistent in how it would determine if we're
compiling for 32-bit or 64-bit machines. It would sometimes use
USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL and at other times check if SIZEOF_DATUM == 8. This
could cause theoretical problems due to the way USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL is now
defined based on SIZEOF_VOID_P >= 8. If pointers for some reason were
ever larger than 8-bytes then we'd end up doing 32-bit comparisons
mistakenly. Let's just always check SIZEOF_DATUM >= 8.
It also seems that ssup_datum_signed_cmp is just never used on 32-bit
builds, so let's just ifdef that out to make sure we never accidentally
use that comparison function on such machines. This also allows us to
ifdef out 1 of the 3 new specialization quicksort functions in 32-bit
builds which seems to shrink down the binary by over 4KB on my machine.
In passing, also add the missing DatumGetInt32() / DatumGetInt64() macros
in the comparison functions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqcQExRhtRa9hJrJB_5egs3SUfOcutP3m+3HO8A+fZTPA@mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: John Naylor
This reverts commit eafdf9de06
and its back-branch counterparts. Corey Huinker pointed out that
we'd discussed this exact change back in 2016 and rejected it,
on the grounds that there's at least one usage pattern with LIMIT
where an infinite endpoint can usefully be used. Perhaps that
argument needs to be re-litigated, but there's no time left before
our back-branch releases. To keep our options open, restore the
status quo ante; if we do end up deciding to change things, waiting
one more quarter won't hurt anything.
Rather than just doing a straight revert, I added a new test case
demonstrating the usage with LIMIT. That'll at least remind us of
the issue if we forget again.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3603504.1652068977@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADkLM=dzw0Pvdqp5yWKxMd+VmNkAMhG=4ku7GnCZxebWnzmz3Q@mail.gmail.com
Such cases will lead to infinite loops, so they're of no practical
value. The numeric variant of generate_series() already threw error
for this, so borrow its message wording.
Per report from Richard Wesley. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/91B44E7B-68D5-448F-95C8-B4B3B0F5DEAF@duckdblabs.com
The new numeric code for extract epoch from interval accidentally
truncated the DAYS_PER_YEAR value to an integer, leading to results
that mismatched the floating-point interval_part calculations.
The commit a2da77cdb4 that introduced
this actually contains the regression test change that this reverts.
I suppose this was missed at the time.
Reported-by: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAvxfHd5n%3D13NYA2q_tUq%3D3%3DSuWU-CufmTf-Ozj%3DfrEgt7pXwQ%40mail.gmail.com
DecodeInterval (interval input) was careless about integer-overflow
hazards, allowing bogus results to be obtained for sufficiently
large input values. Also, since it initially converted the input
to a "struct tm", it was impossible to produce the full range of
representable interval values.
Meanwhile, EncodeInterval (interval output) and a few other
functions could suffer failures if asked to process sufficiently
large interval values, because they also relied on being able to
represent an interval in "struct tm" which is not designed to
handle that.
Fix all this stuff by introducing new struct types that are more
fit for purpose.
While this is clearly a bug fix, it's also an API break for any
code that's calling these functions directly. So back-patching
doesn't seem wise, especially in view of the lack of field
complaints.
Joe Koshakow, editorialized a bit by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHff0JLYHwyBrtMx_=6wr=k2Xp+D+-X3vEhHjJYMj+mQcg@mail.gmail.com
Previously, the specialized tuplesort routine inlined handling for
reverse-sort and NULLs-ordering but called the datum comparator via a
pointer in the SortSupport struct parameter. Testing has showed that we
can get a useful performance gain by specializing datum comparison for
the different representations of abbreviated keys -- signed and unsigned
64-bit integers and signed 32-bit integers. Almost all abbreviatable data
types will benefit -- the only exception for now is numeric, since the
datum comparison is more complex. The performance gain depends on data
type and input distribution, but often falls in the range of 10-20% faster.
Thomas Munro
Reviewed by Peter Geoghegan, review and performance testing by me
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKGKKYttZZk-JMRQSVak%3DCXSJ5fiwtirFf%3Dn%3DPAbumvn1Ww%40mail.gmail.com
justify_interval, justify_hours, and justify_days didn't check for
overflow when promoting hours to days or days to months; but that's
possible when the upper field's value is already large. Detect and
report any such overflow.
Also, we can avoid unnecessary overflow in some cases in justify_interval
by pre-justifying the days field. (Thanks to Nathan Bossart for this
idea.)
Joe Koshakow
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHeNqsJ2xYFbPUf_8nNQUiJqkag04NW6aBQQ0dbZsxfWHA@mail.gmail.com
Michael Paquier