731 Commits (dd13ad9d39a1ba41cf329b6fe408b49be57c7b88)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Peter Eisentraut	dd13ad9d39	Fix use of cursor sensitivity terminology ... Documentation and comments in code and tests have been using the terms sensitive/insensitive cursor incorrectly relative to the SQL standard. (Cursor sensitivity is only relevant for changes made in the same transaction as the cursor, not for concurrent changes in other sessions.) Moreover, some of the behavior of PostgreSQL is incorrect according to the SQL standard, confusing the issue further. (WHERE CURRENT OF changes are not visible in insensitive cursors, but they should be.) This change corrects the terminology and removes the claim that sensitive cursors are supported. It also adds a test case that checks the insensitive behavior in a "correct" way, using a change command not using WHERE CURRENT OF. Finally, it adds the ASENSITIVE cursor option to select the default asensitive behavior, per SQL standard. There are no changes to cursor behavior in this patch. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/96ee8b30-9889-9e1b-b053-90e10c050e85%40enterprisedb.com	5 years ago
Peter Eisentraut	82ed7748b7	ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... ADD/DROP PUBLICATION ... At present, if we want to update publications in a subscription, we can use SET PUBLICATION. However, it requires supplying all publications that exists and the new publications. If we want to add new publications, it's inconvenient. The new syntax only supplies the new publications. When the refresh is true, it only refreshes the new publications. Author: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> Author: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/MEYP282MB166939D0D6C480B7FBE7EFFBB6BC0@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM	5 years ago
Peter Eisentraut	a63dd8afe2	Renumber cursor option flags ... Move the planner-control flags up so that there is more room for parse options. Some pending patches need some room there, so do this renumbering separately so that there is less potential for conflicts.	5 years ago
Peter Eisentraut	055fee7eb4	Allow an alias to be attached to a JOIN ... USING ... This allows something like SELECT ... FROM t1 JOIN t2 USING (a, b, c) AS x where x has the columns a, b, c and unlike a regular alias it does not hide the range variables of the tables being joined t1 and t2. Per SQL:2016 feature F404 "Range variable for common column names". Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/454638cf-d563-ab76-a585-2564428062af@2ndquadrant.com	5 years ago
Michael Paquier	7ef64e7e72	Fix comment in parsenodes.h ... CreateStmt->inhRelations is a list of RangeVars, but a comment was incorrect about that. Author: Julien Rouhaud Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210330123015.yzekhz5sweqbgxdr@nol	5 years ago
Tomas Vondra	a4d75c86bf	Extended statistics on expressions ... Allow defining extended statistics on expressions, not just just on simple column references. With this commit, expressions are supported by all existing extended statistics kinds, improving the same types of estimates. A simple example may look like this: CREATE TABLE t (a int); CREATE STATISTICS s ON mod(a,10), mod(a,20) FROM t; ANALYZE t; The collected statistics are useful e.g. to estimate queries with those expressions in WHERE or GROUP BY clauses: SELECT * FROM t WHERE mod(a,10) = 0 AND mod(a,20) = 0; SELECT 1 FROM t GROUP BY mod(a,10), mod(a,20); This introduces new internal statistics kind 'e' (expressions) which is built automatically when the statistics object definition includes any expressions. This represents single-expression statistics, as if there was an expression index (but without the index maintenance overhead). The statistics is stored in pg_statistics_ext_data as an array of composite types, which is possible thanks to 79f6a942bd. CREATE STATISTICS allows building statistics on a single expression, in which case in which case it's not possible to specify statistics kinds. A new system view pg_stats_ext_exprs can be used to display expression statistics, similarly to pg_stats and pg_stats_ext views. ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... TYPE now treats indexes the same way it treats indexes, i.e. it drops and recreates the statistics. This means all statistics are reset, and we no longer try to preserve at least the functional dependencies. This should not be a major issue in practice, as the functional dependencies actually rely on per-column statistics, which were always reset anyway. Author: Tomas Vondra Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby, Dean Rasheed, Zhihong Yu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ad7891d2-e90c-b446-9fe2-7419143847d7%40enterprisedb.com	5 years ago
Alvaro Herrera	71f4c8c6f7	ALTER TABLE ... DETACH PARTITION ... CONCURRENTLY ... Allow a partition be detached from its partitioned table without blocking concurrent queries, by running in two transactions and only requiring ShareUpdateExclusive in the partitioned table. Because it runs in two transactions, it cannot be used in a transaction block. This is the main reason to use dedicated syntax: so that users can choose to use the original mode if they need it. But also, it doesn't work when a default partition exists (because an exclusive lock would still need to be obtained on it, in order to change its partition constraint.) In case the second transaction is cancelled or a crash occurs, there's ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION .. FINALIZE, which executes the final steps. The main trick to make this work is the addition of column pg_inherits.inhdetachpending, initially false; can only be set true in the first part of this command. Once that is committed, concurrent transactions that use a PartitionDirectory will include or ignore partitions so marked: in optimizer they are ignored if the row is marked committed for the snapshot; in executor they are always included. As a result, and because of the way PartitionDirectory caches partition descriptors, queries that were planned before the detach will see the rows in the detached partition and queries that are planned after the detach, won't. A CHECK constraint is created that duplicates the partition constraint. This is probably not strictly necessary, and some users will prefer to remove it afterwards, but if the partition is re-attached to a partitioned table, the constraint needn't be rechecked. Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200803234854.GA24158@alvherre.pgsql	5 years ago
Robert Haas	bbe0a81db6	Allow configurable LZ4 TOAST compression. ... There is now a per-column COMPRESSION option which can be set to pglz (the default, and the only option in up until now) or lz4. Or, if you like, you can set the new default_toast_compression GUC to lz4, and then that will be the default for new table columns for which no value is specified. We don't have lz4 support in the PostgreSQL code, so to use lz4 compression, PostgreSQL must be built --with-lz4. In general, TOAST compression means compression of individual column values, not the whole tuple, and those values can either be compressed inline within the tuple or compressed and then stored externally in the TOAST table, so those properties also apply to this feature. Prior to this commit, a TOAST pointer has two unused bits as part of the va_extsize field, and a compessed datum has two unused bits as part of the va_rawsize field. These bits are unused because the length of a varlena is limited to 1GB; we now use them to indicate the compression type that was used. This means we only have bit space for 2 more built-in compresison types, but we could work around that problem, if necessary, by introducing a new vartag_external value for any further types we end up wanting to add. Hopefully, it won't be too important to offer a wide selection of algorithms here, since each one we add not only takes more coding but also adds a build dependency for every packager. Nevertheless, it seems worth doing at least this much, because LZ4 gets better compression than PGLZ with less CPU usage. It's possible for LZ4-compressed datums to leak into composite type values stored on disk, just as it is for PGLZ. It's also possible for LZ4-compressed attributes to be copied into a different table via SQL commands such as CREATE TABLE AS or INSERT .. SELECT. It would be expensive to force such values to be decompressed, so PostgreSQL has never done so. For the same reasons, we also don't force recompression of already-compressed values even if the target table prefers a different compression method than was used for the source data. These architectural decisions are perhaps arguable but revisiting them is well beyond the scope of what seemed possible to do as part of this project. However, it's relatively cheap to recompress as part of VACUUM FULL or CLUSTER, so this commit adjusts those commands to do so, if the configured compression method of the table happens not to match what was used for some column value stored therein. Dilip Kumar. The original patches on which this work was based were written by Ildus Kurbangaliev, and those were patches were based on even earlier work by Nikita Glukhov, but the design has since changed very substantially, since allow a potentially large number of compression methods that could be added and dropped on a running system proved too problematic given some of the architectural issues mentioned above; the choice of which specific compression method to add first is now different; and a lot of the code has been heavily refactored. More recently, Justin Przyby helped quite a bit with testing and reviewing and this version also includes some code contributions from him. Other design input and review from Tomas Vondra, Álvaro Herrera, Andres Freund, Oleg Bartunov, Alexander Korotkov, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20170907194236.4cefce96%40wp.localdomain Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-uUpX3ck%3DK0mLEk-G_kUQY%3DSNOTeqdaNRR9FMdQrHKebw%40mail.gmail.com	5 years ago
Tomas Vondra	be45be9c33	Implement GROUP BY DISTINCT ... With grouping sets, it's possible that some of the grouping sets are duplicate. This is especially common with CUBE and ROLLUP clauses. For example GROUP BY CUBE (a,b), CUBE (b,c) is equivalent to GROUP BY GROUPING SETS ( (a, b, c), (a, b, c), (a, b, c), (a, b), (a, b), (a, b), (a), (a), (a), (c, a), (c, a), (c, a), (c), (b, c), (b), () ) Some of the grouping sets are calculated multiple times, which is mostly unnecessary. This commit implements a new GROUP BY DISTINCT feature, as defined in the SQL standard, which eliminates the duplicate sets. Author: Vik Fearing Reviewed-by: Erik Rijkers, Georgios Kokolatos, Tomas Vondra Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/bf3805a8-d7d1-ae61-fece-761b7ff41ecc@postgresfriends.org	5 years ago
Peter Eisentraut	3696a600e2	SEARCH and CYCLE clauses ... This adds the SQL standard feature that adds the SEARCH and CYCLE clauses to recursive queries to be able to do produce breadth- or depth-first search orders and detect cycles. These clauses can be rewritten into queries using existing syntax, and that is what this patch does in the rewriter. Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/db80ceee-6f97-9b4a-8ee8-3ba0c58e5be2@2ndquadrant.com	5 years ago
Peter Eisentraut	6aaaa76bb4	Allow GRANTED BY clause in normal GRANT and REVOKE statements ... The SQL standard allows a GRANTED BY clause on GRANT and REVOKE (privilege) statements that can specify CURRENT_USER or CURRENT_ROLE. In PostgreSQL, both of these are the default behavior. Since we already have all the parsing support for this for the GRANT (role) statement, we might as well add basic support for this for the privilege variant as well. This allows us to check off SQL feature T332. In the future, perhaps more interesting things could be done with this, too. Reviewed-by: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/f2feac44-b4c5-f38f-3699-2851d6a76dc9@2ndquadrant.com	5 years ago
Tom Lane	c9d5298485	Re-implement pl/pgsql's expression and assignment parsing. ... Invent new RawParseModes that allow the core grammar to handle pl/pgsql expressions and assignments directly, and thereby get rid of a lot of hackery in pl/pgsql's parser. This moves a good deal of knowledge about pl/pgsql into the core code: notably, we have to invent a CoercionContext that matches pl/pgsql's (rather dubious) historical behavior for assignment coercions. That's getting away from the original idea of pl/pgsql as an arm's-length extension of the core, but really we crossed that bridge a long time ago. The main advantage of doing this is that we can now use the core parser to generate FieldStore and/or SubscriptingRef nodes to handle assignments to pl/pgsql variables that are records or arrays. That fixes a number of cases that had never been implemented in pl/pgsql assignment, such as nested records and array slicing, and it allows pl/pgsql assignment to support the datatype-specific subscripting behaviors introduced in commit c7aba7c14. There are cosmetic benefits too: when a syntax error occurs in a pl/pgsql expression, the error report no longer includes the confusing "SELECT" keyword that used to get prefixed to the expression text. Also, there seem to be some small speed gains. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4165684.1607707277@sss.pgh.pa.us	5 years ago
Bruce Momjian	ca3b37487b	Update copyright for 2021 ... Backpatch-through: 9.5	5 years ago
Tom Lane	a676386b58	Remove operator_precedence_warning. ... This GUC was always intended as a temporary solution to help with finding 9.4-to-9.5 migration issues. Now that all pre-9.5 branches are out of support, and 9.5 will be too before v14 is released, it seems like it's okay to drop it. Doing so allows removal of several hundred lines of poorly-tested code in parse_expr.c, which have been a fertile source of bugs when people did use this. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2234320.1607117945@sss.pgh.pa.us	5 years ago
Michael Paquier	b5913f6120	Refactor CLUSTER and REINDEX grammar to use DefElem for option lists ... This changes CLUSTER and REINDEX so as a parenthesized grammar becomes possible for options, while unifying the grammar parsing rules for option lists with the existing ones. This is a follow-up of the work done in 873ea9e for VACUUM, ANALYZE and EXPLAIN. This benefits REINDEX for a potential backend-side filtering for collatable-sensitive indexes and TABLESPACE, while CLUSTER would benefit from the latter. Author: Alexey Kondratov, Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8a8f5f73-00d3-55f8-7583-1375ca8f6a91@postgrespro.ru	5 years ago
Tom Lane	f7f83a55bf	Ensure that expandTableLikeClause() re-examines the same table. ... As it stood, expandTableLikeClause() re-did the same relation_openrv call that transformTableLikeClause() had done. However there are scenarios where this would not find the same table as expected. We hold lock on the LIKE source table, so it can't be renamed or dropped, but another table could appear before it in the search path. This explains the odd behavior reported in bug #16758 when cloning a table as a temp table of the same name. This case worked as expected before commit 502898192 introduced the need to open the source table twice, so we should fix it. To make really sure we get the same table, let's re-open it by OID not name. That requires adding an OID field to struct TableLikeClause, which is a little nervous-making from an ABI standpoint, but as long as it's at the end I don't think there's any serious risk. Per bug #16758 from Marc Boeren. Like the previous patch, back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16758-840e84a6cfab276d@postgresql.org	5 years ago
Tom Lane	926fa801ac	Remove undocumented IS [NOT] OF syntax. ... This feature was added a long time ago, in 7c1e67bd5 and eb121ba2c, but never documented in any user-facing way. (Documentation added in 6126d3e70 was commented out almost immediately, in 8272fc3f7.) That's because, while this syntax is defined by SQL:99, our implementation is only vaguely related to the standard's semantics. The standard appears to intend a run-time not parse-time test, and it definitely intends that the test should understand subtype relationships. No one has stepped up to fix that in the intervening years, but people keep coming across the code and asking why it's not documented. Let's just get rid of it: if anyone ever wants to make it work per spec, they can easily recover whatever parts of this code are still of value from our git history. If there's anyone out there who's actually using this despite its undocumented status, they can switch to using pg_typeof() instead, eg. "pg_typeof(something) = 'mytype'::regtype". That gives essentially the same semantics as what our IS OF code did. (We didn't have that function last time this was discussed, or we would have ripped out IS OF then.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwZ2pTc-DSkOiTfjauqLYkNREeNZvWmeg12Q-_69D+sYZA@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/BAY20-F23E9F2B4DAB3E4E88D3623F99B0@phx.gbl Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3E7CF81D.1000203@joeconway.com	5 years ago
Tom Lane	92bf7e2d02	Provide the OR REPLACE option for CREATE TRIGGER. ... This is mostly straightforward. However, we disallow replacing constraint triggers or changing the is-constraint property; perhaps that can be added later, but the complexity versus benefit tradeoff doesn't look very good. Also, no special thought is taken here for whether replacing an existing trigger should result in changes to queued-but-not-fired trigger actions. We just document that if you're surprised by the results, too bad, don't do that. (Note that any such pending trigger activity would have to be within the current session.) Takamichi Osumi, reviewed at various times by Surafel Temesgen, Peter Smith, and myself Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0DDF369B45A1B44B8A687ED43F06557C010BC362@G01JPEXMBYT03	5 years ago
Tom Lane	40c24bfef9	Improve our ability to regurgitate SQL-syntax function calls. ... The SQL spec calls out nonstandard syntax for certain function calls, for example substring() with numeric position info is supposed to be spelled "SUBSTRING(string FROM start FOR count)". We accept many of these things, but up to now would not print them in the same format, instead simplifying down to "substring"(string, start, count). That's long annoyed me because it creates an interoperability problem: we're gratuitously injecting Postgres-specific syntax into what might otherwise be a perfectly spec-compliant view definition. However, the real reason for addressing it right now is to support a planned change in the semantics of EXTRACT() a/k/a date_part(). When we switch that to returning numeric, we'll have the parser translate EXTRACT() to some new function name (might as well be "extract" if you ask me) and then teach ruleutils.c to reverse-list that per SQL spec. In this way existing calls to date_part() will continue to have the old semantics. To implement this, invent a new CoercionForm value COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX, and make the parser insert that rather than COERCE_EXPLICIT_CALL when the input has SQL-spec decoration. (But if the input has the form of a plain function call, continue to mark it COERCE_EXPLICIT_CALL, even if it's calling one of these functions.) Then ruleutils.c recognizes COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX as a cue to emit SQL call syntax. It can know which decoration to emit using hard-wired knowledge about the functions that could be called this way. (While this solution isn't extensible without manual additions, neither is the grammar, so this doesn't seem unmaintainable.) Notice that this solution will reverse-list a function call with SQL decoration only if it was entered that way; so dump-and-reload will not by itself produce any changes in the appearance of views. This requires adding a CoercionForm field to struct FuncCall. (I couldn't resist the temptation to rearrange that struct's field order a tad while I was at it.) FuncCall doesn't appear in stored rules, so that change isn't a reason for a catversion bump, but I did one anyway because the new enum value for CoercionForm fields could confuse old backend code. Possible future work: * Perhaps CoercionForm should now be renamed to DisplayForm, or something like that, to reflect its more general meaning. This'd require touching a couple hundred places, so it's not clear it's worth the code churn. * The SQLValueFunction node type, which was invented partly for the same goal of improving SQL-compatibility of view output, could perhaps be replaced with regular function calls marked with COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX. It's unclear if this would be a net code savings, however. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu	5 years ago
Thomas Munro	257836a755	Track collation versions for indexes. ... Record the current version of dependent collations in pg_depend when creating or rebuilding an index. When accessing the index later, warn that the index may be corrupted if the current version doesn't match. Thanks to Douglas Doole, Peter Eisentraut, Christoph Berg, Laurenz Albe, Michael Paquier, Robert Haas, Tom Lane and others for very helpful discussion. Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> Author: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> (earlier versions) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D0uEQCpfq_%2BLYFBdArCe4Ot98t1aR4eYiYTe%3DyavQygiQ%40mail.gmail.com	5 years ago
Thomas Munro	7d1297df08	Remove pg_collation.collversion. ... This model couldn't be extended to cover the default collation, and didn't have any information about the affected database objects when the version changed. Remove, in preparation for a follow-up commit that will add a new mechanism. Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D0uEQCpfq_%2BLYFBdArCe4Ot98t1aR4eYiYTe%3DyavQygiQ%40mail.gmail.com	5 years ago
Tom Lane	ad77039fad	Calculate extraUpdatedCols in query rewriter, not parser. ... It's unsafe to do this at parse time because addition of generated columns to a table would not invalidate stored rules containing UPDATEs on the table ... but there might now be dependent generated columns that were not there when the rule was made. This also fixes an oversight that rewriteTargetView failed to update extraUpdatedCols when transforming an UPDATE on an updatable view. (Since the new calculation is downstream of that, rewriteTargetView doesn't actually need to do anything; but before, there was a demonstrable bug there.) In v13 and HEAD, this leads to easily-visible bugs because (since commit c6679e4fc) we won't recalculate generated columns that aren't listed in extraUpdatedCols. In v12 this bitmap is mostly just used for trigger-firing decisions, so you'd only notice a problem if a trigger cared whether a generated column had been updated. I'd complained about this back in May, but then forgot about it until bug #16671 from Michael Paul Killian revived the issue. Back-patch to v12 where this field was introduced. If existing stored rules contain any extraUpdatedCols values, they'll be ignored because the rewriter will overwrite them, so the bug will be fixed even for existing rules. (But note that if someone were to update to 13.1 or 12.5, store some rules with UPDATEs on tables having generated columns, and then downgrade to a prior minor version, they might observe issues similar to what this patch fixes. That seems unlikely enough to not be worth going to a lot of effort to fix.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10206.1588964727@sss.pgh.pa.us Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16671-2fa55851859fb166@postgresql.org	5 years ago
Peter Eisentraut	45b9805706	Allow CURRENT_ROLE where CURRENT_USER is accepted ... In the particular case of GRANTED BY, this is specified in the SQL standard. Since in PostgreSQL, CURRENT_ROLE is equivalent to CURRENT_USER, and CURRENT_USER is already supported here, adding CURRENT_ROLE is trivial. The other cases are PostgreSQL extensions, but for the same reason it also makes sense there. Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org> Reviewed-by: Asif Rehman <asifr.rehman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/f2feac44-b4c5-f38f-3699-2851d6a76dc9%402ndquadrant.com	5 years ago
Michael Paquier	844c05abc3	Remove variable "concurrent" from ReindexStmt ... This node already handles multiple options using a bitmask, so having a separate boolean flag is not necessary. This simplifies the code a bit with less arguments to give to the reindex routines, by replacing the boolean with an equivalent bitmask value. Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200902110326.GA14963@paquier.xyz	5 years ago
Michael Paquier	01767533e3	Fix thinko with definition of REINDEXOPT_MISSING_OK ... This had no direct consequences, but let's be consistent and it would be confusing when adding new flags. Oversight in 1d65416. Reported-by: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200902024148.GB20149@telsasoft.com	5 years ago
Michael Paquier	1d65416661	Improve handling of dropped relations for REINDEX DATABASE/SCHEMA/SYSTEM ... When multiple relations are reindexed, a scan of pg_class is done first to build the list of relations to work on. However the REINDEX logic has never checked if a relation listed still exists when beginning the work on it, causing for example sudden cache lookup failures. This commit adds safeguards against dropped relations for REINDEX, similarly to VACUUM or CLUSTER where we try to open the relation, ignoring it if it is missing. A new option is added to the REINDEX routines to control if a missed relation is OK to ignore or not. An isolation test, based on REINDEX SCHEMA, is added for the concurrent and non-concurrent cases. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200813043805.GE11663@paquier.xyz	5 years ago
Tom Lane	5028981923	Fix handling of CREATE TABLE LIKE with inheritance. ... If a CREATE TABLE command uses both LIKE and traditional inheritance, Vars in CHECK constraints and expression indexes that are absorbed from a LIKE parent table tended to get mis-numbered, resulting in wrong answers and/or bizarre error messages (though probably not any actual crashes, thanks to validation occurring in the executor). In v12 and up, the same could happen to Vars in GENERATED expressions, even in cases with no LIKE clause but multiple traditional-inheritance parents. The cause of the problem for LIKE is that parse_utilcmd.c supposed it could renumber such Vars correctly during transformCreateStmt(), which it cannot since we have not yet accounted for columns added via inheritance. Fix that by postponing processing of LIKE INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS, DEFAULTS, GENERATED, INDEXES till after we've performed DefineRelation(). The error with GENERATED and multiple inheritance is a simple oversight in MergeAttributes(); it knows it has to renumber Vars in inherited CHECK constraints, but forgot to apply the same processing to inherited GENERATED expressions (a/k/a defaults). Per bug #16272 from Tom Gottfried. The non-GENERATED variants of the issue are ancient, presumably dating right back to the addition of CREATE TABLE LIKE; hence back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16272-6e32da020e9a9381@postgresql.org	5 years ago
Michael Paquier	cc35d8933a	Rename field "relkind" to "objtype" for CTAS and ALTER TABLE nodes ... "relkind" normally refers to the char field from pg_class. However, in the parse nodes AlterTableStmt and CreateTableAsStmt, "relkind" was used for a field of type enum ObjectType, that could refer to other object types than those possible for a relkind. Such fields being usually named "objtype", switch the name in both structures to make things more consistent. Note that this led to some confusion in functions that also operate on a RangeTableEntry object, which also has a field named "relkind". This naming goes back to commit 09d4e96, where only OBJECT_TABLE and OBJECT_INDEX were used. This got extended later to use as well OBJECT_TYPE with e440e12, not really a relation kind. Author: Mark Dilger Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson, Álvaro Herrera, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/609181AE-E399-47C7-9221-856E0F96BF93@enterprisedb.com	5 years ago
Alvaro Herrera	5fc703946b	Add ALTER .. NO DEPENDS ON ... Commit f2fcad27d5 (9.6 era) added the ability to mark objects as dependent an extension, but forgot to add a way for such dependencies to be removed. This commit fixes that oversight. Strictly speaking this should be backpatched to 9.6, but due to lack of demand we're not doing so at this time. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200217225333.GA30974@alvherre.pgsql Reviewed-by: ahsan hadi <ahsan.hadi@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>	5 years ago
Alexander Korotkov	1aac32df89	Revert 0f5ca02f53 ... 0f5ca02f53 introduces 3 new keywords. It appears to be too much for relatively small feature. Given now we past feature freeze, it's already late for discussion of the new syntax. So, revert. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28209.1586294824%40sss.pgh.pa.us	6 years ago
Alexander Korotkov	0f5ca02f53	Implement waiting for given lsn at transaction start ... This commit adds following optional clause to BEGIN and START TRANSACTION commands. WAIT FOR LSN lsn [ TIMEOUT timeout ] New clause pospones transaction start till given lsn is applied on standby. This clause allows user be sure, that changes previously made on primary would be visible on standby. New shared memory struct is used to track awaited lsn per backend. Recovery process wakes up backend once required lsn is applied. Author: Ivan Kartyshov, Anna Akenteva Reviewed-by: Craig Ringer, Thomas Munro, Robert Haas, Kyotaro Horiguchi Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada, Ants Aasma, Dmitry Ivanov, Simon Riggs Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Alexander Korotkov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0240c26c-9f84-30ea-fca9-93ab2df5f305%40postgrespro.ru	6 years ago
Alvaro Herrera	357889eb17	Support FETCH FIRST WITH TIES ... WITH TIES is an option to the FETCH FIRST N ROWS clause (the SQL standard's spelling of LIMIT), where you additionally get rows that compare equal to the last of those N rows by the columns in the mandatory ORDER BY clause. There was a proposal by Andrew Gierth to implement this functionality in a more powerful way that would yield more features, but the other patch had not been finished at this time, so we decided to use this one for now in the spirit of incremental development. Author: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALAY4q9ky7rD_A4vf=FVQvCGngm3LOes-ky0J6euMrg=_Se+ag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87o8wvz253.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk	6 years ago
Noah Misch	c6b92041d3	Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal. ... Until now, only selected bulk operations (e.g. COPY) did this. If a given relfilenode received both a WAL-skipping COPY and a WAL-logged operation (e.g. INSERT), recovery could lose tuples from the COPY. See src/backend/access/transam/README section "Skipping WAL for New RelFileNode" for the new coding rules. Maintainers of table access methods should examine that section. To maintain data durability, just before commit, we choose between an fsync of the relfilenode and copying its contents to WAL. A new GUC, wal_skip_threshold, guides that choice. If this change slows a workload that creates small, permanent relfilenodes under wal_level=minimal, try adjusting wal_skip_threshold. Users setting a timeout on COMMIT may need to adjust that timeout, and log_min_duration_statement analysis will reflect time consumption moving to COMMIT from commands like COPY. Internally, this requires a reliable determination of whether RollbackAndReleaseCurrentSubTransaction() would unlink a relation's current relfilenode. Introduce rd_firstRelfilenodeSubid. Amend the specification of rd_createSubid such that the field is zero when a new rel has an old rd_node. Make relcache.c retain entries for certain dropped relations until end of transaction. Bump XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC, since this introduces XLOG_GIST_ASSIGN_LSN. Future servers accept older WAL, so this bump is discretionary. Kyotaro Horiguchi, reviewed (in earlier, similar versions) by Robert Haas. Heikki Linnakangas and Michael Paquier implemented earlier designs that materially clarified the problem. Reviewed, in earlier designs, by Andrew Dunstan, Andres Freund, Alvaro Herrera, Tom Lane, Fujii Masao, and Simon Riggs. Reported by Martijn van Oosterhout. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20150702220524.GA9392@svana.org	6 years ago
Alexander Korotkov	911e702077	Implement operator class parameters ... PostgreSQL provides set of template index access methods, where opclasses have much freedom in the semantics of indexing. These index AMs are GiST, GIN, SP-GiST and BRIN. There opclasses define representation of keys, operations on them and supported search strategies. So, it's natural that opclasses may be faced some tradeoffs, which require user-side decision. This commit implements opclass parameters allowing users to set some values, which tell opclass how to index the particular dataset. This commit doesn't introduce new storage in system catalog. Instead it uses pg_attribute.attoptions, which is used for table column storage options but unused for index attributes. In order to evade changing signature of each opclass support function, we implement unified way to pass options to opclass support functions. Options are set to fn_expr as the constant bytea expression. It's possible due to the fact that opclass support functions are executed outside of expressions, so fn_expr is unused for them. This commit comes with some examples of opclass options usage. We parametrize signature length in GiST. That applies to multiple opclasses: tsvector_ops, gist__intbig_ops, gist_ltree_ops, gist__ltree_ops, gist_trgm_ops and gist_hstore_ops. Also we parametrize maximum number of integer ranges for gist__int_ops. However, the main future usage of this feature is expected to be json, where users would be able to specify which way to index particular json parts. Catversion is bumped. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d22c3a18-31c7-1879-fc11-4c1ce2f5e5af%40postgrespro.ru Author: Nikita Glukhov, revised by me Reviwed-by: Nikolay Shaplov, Robert Haas, Tom Lane, Tomas Vondra, Alvaro Herrera	6 years ago
Noah Misch	de9396326e	Revert "Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal." ... This reverts commit cb2fd7eac2. Per numerous buildfarm members, it was incompatible with parallel query, and a test case assumed LP64. Back-patch to 9.5 (all supported versions). Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200321224920.GB1763544@rfd.leadboat.com	6 years ago
Noah Misch	cb2fd7eac2	Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal. ... Until now, only selected bulk operations (e.g. COPY) did this. If a given relfilenode received both a WAL-skipping COPY and a WAL-logged operation (e.g. INSERT), recovery could lose tuples from the COPY. See src/backend/access/transam/README section "Skipping WAL for New RelFileNode" for the new coding rules. Maintainers of table access methods should examine that section. To maintain data durability, just before commit, we choose between an fsync of the relfilenode and copying its contents to WAL. A new GUC, wal_skip_threshold, guides that choice. If this change slows a workload that creates small, permanent relfilenodes under wal_level=minimal, try adjusting wal_skip_threshold. Users setting a timeout on COMMIT may need to adjust that timeout, and log_min_duration_statement analysis will reflect time consumption moving to COMMIT from commands like COPY. Internally, this requires a reliable determination of whether RollbackAndReleaseCurrentSubTransaction() would unlink a relation's current relfilenode. Introduce rd_firstRelfilenodeSubid. Amend the specification of rd_createSubid such that the field is zero when a new rel has an old rd_node. Make relcache.c retain entries for certain dropped relations until end of transaction. Back-patch to 9.5 (all supported versions). This introduces a new WAL record type, XLOG_GIST_ASSIGN_LSN, without bumping XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC. As always, update standby systems before master systems. This changes sizeof(RelationData) and sizeof(IndexStmt), breaking binary compatibility for affected extensions. (The most recent commit to affect the same class of extensions was 089e4d405d0f3b94c74a2c6a54357a84a681754b.) Kyotaro Horiguchi, reviewed (in earlier, similar versions) by Robert Haas. Heikki Linnakangas and Michael Paquier implemented earlier designs that materially clarified the problem. Reviewed, in earlier designs, by Andrew Dunstan, Andres Freund, Alvaro Herrera, Tom Lane, Fujii Masao, and Simon Riggs. Reported by Martijn van Oosterhout. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20150702220524.GA9392@svana.org	6 years ago
Tom Lane	fe30e7ebfa	Allow ALTER TYPE to change some properties of a base type. ... Specifically, this patch allows ALTER TYPE to: * Change the default TOAST strategy for a toastable base type; * Promote a non-toastable type to toastable; * Add/remove binary I/O functions for a type; * Add/remove typmod I/O functions for a type; * Add/remove a custom ANALYZE statistics functions for a type. The first of these can be done by the type's owner; all the others require superuser privilege since misuse could cause problems. The main motivation for this patch is to allow extensions to upgrade the feature sets of their data types, so the set of alterable properties is biased towards that use-case. However it's also true that changing some other properties would be a lot harder, as they get baked into physical storage and/or stored expressions that depend on the type. Along the way, refactor GenerateTypeDependencies() to make it easier to call, refactor DefineType's volatility checks so they can be shared by AlterType, and teach typcache.c that it might have to reload data from the type's pg_type row, a scenario it never handled before. Also rearrange alter_type.sgml a bit for clarity (put the composite-type operations together). Tomas Vondra and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200228004440.b23ein4qvmxnlpht@development	6 years ago
Tom Lane	1281a5c907	Restructure ALTER TABLE execution to fix assorted bugs. ... We've had numerous bug reports about how (1) IF NOT EXISTS clauses in ALTER TABLE don't behave as-expected, and (2) combining certain actions into one ALTER TABLE doesn't work, though executing the same actions as separate statements does. This patch cleans up all of the cases so far reported from the field, though there are still some oddities associated with identity columns. The core problem behind all of these bugs is that we do parse analysis of ALTER TABLE subcommands too soon, before starting execution of the statement. The root of the bugs in group (1) is that parse analysis schedules derived commands (such as a CREATE SEQUENCE for a serial column) before it's known whether the IF NOT EXISTS clause should cause a subcommand to be skipped. The root of the bugs in group (2) is that earlier subcommands may change the catalog state that later subcommands need to be parsed against. Hence, postpone parse analysis of ALTER TABLE's subcommands, and do that one subcommand at a time, during "phase 2" of ALTER TABLE which is the phase that does catalog rewrites. Thus the catalog effects of earlier subcommands are already visible when we analyze later ones. (The sole exception is that we do parse analysis for ALTER COLUMN TYPE subcommands during phase 1, so that their USING expressions can be parsed against the table's original state, which is what we need. Arguably, these bugs stem from falsely concluding that because ALTER COLUMN TYPE must do early parse analysis, every other command subtype can too.) This means that ALTER TABLE itself must deal with execution of any non-ALTER-TABLE derived statements that are generated by parse analysis. Add a suitable entry point to utility.c to accept those recursive calls, and create a struct to pass through the information needed by the recursive call, rather than making the argument lists of AlterTable() and friends even longer. Getting this to work correctly required a little bit of fiddling with the subcommand pass structure, in particular breaking up AT_PASS_ADD_CONSTR into multiple passes. But otherwise it's mostly a pretty straightforward application of the above ideas. Fixing the residual issues for identity columns requires refactoring of where the dependency link from an identity column to its sequence gets set up. So that seems like suitable material for a separate patch, especially since this one is pretty big already. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10365.1558909428@sss.pgh.pa.us	6 years ago
Peter Eisentraut	f595117e24	ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... DROP EXPRESSION ... Add an ALTER TABLE subcommand for dropping the generated property from a column, per SQL standard. Reviewed-by: Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2f7f1d9c-946e-0453-d841-4f38eb9d69b6%402ndquadrant.com	6 years ago
Tom Lane	9ce77d75c5	Reconsider the representation of join alias Vars. ... The core idea of this patch is to make the parser generate join alias Vars (that is, ones with varno pointing to a JOIN RTE) only when the alias Var is actually different from any raw join input, that is a type coercion and/or COALESCE is necessary to generate the join output value. Otherwise just generate varno/varattno pointing to the relevant join input column. In effect, this means that the planner's flatten_join_alias_vars() transformation is already done in the parser, for all cases except (a) columns that are merged by JOIN USING and are transformed in the process, and (b) whole-row join Vars. In principle that would allow us to skip doing flatten_join_alias_vars() in many more queries than we do now, but we don't have quite enough infrastructure to know that we can do so --- in particular there's no cheap way to know whether there are any whole-row join Vars. I'm not sure if it's worth the trouble to add a Query-level flag for that, and in any case it seems like fit material for a separate patch. But even without skipping the work entirely, this should make flatten_join_alias_vars() faster, particularly where there are nested joins that it previously had to flatten recursively. An essential part of this change is to replace Var nodes' varnoold/varoattno fields with varnosyn/varattnosyn, which have considerably more tightly-defined meanings than the old fields: when they differ from varno/varattno, they identify the Var's position in an aliased JOIN RTE, and the join alias is what ruleutils.c should print for the Var. This is necessary because the varno change destroyed ruleutils.c's ability to find the JOIN RTE from the Var's varno. Another way in which this change broke ruleutils.c is that it's no longer feasible to determine, from a JOIN RTE's joinaliasvars list, which join columns correspond to which columns of the join's immediate input relations. (If those are sub-joins, the joinaliasvars entries may point to columns of their base relations, not the sub-joins.) But that was a horrid mess requiring a lot of fragile assumptions already, so let's just bite the bullet and add some more JOIN RTE fields to make it more straightforward to figure that out. I added two integer-List fields containing the relevant column numbers from the left and right input rels, plus a count of how many merged columns there are. This patch depends on the ParseNamespaceColumn infrastructure that I added in commit 5815696bc. The biggest bit of code change is restructuring transformFromClauseItem's handling of JOINs so that the ParseNamespaceColumn data is propagated upward correctly. Other than that and the ruleutils fixes, everything pretty much just works, though some processing is now inessential. I grabbed two pieces of low-hanging fruit in that line: 1. In find_expr_references, we don't need to recurse into join alias Vars anymore. There aren't any except for references to merged USING columns, which are more properly handled when we scan the join's RTE. This change actually fixes an edge-case issue: we will now record a dependency on any type-coercion function present in a USING column's joinaliasvar, even if that join column has no references in the query text. The odds of the missing dependency causing a problem seem quite small: you'd have to posit somebody dropping an implicit cast between two data types, without removing the types themselves, and then having a stored rule containing a whole-row Var for a join whose USING merge depends on that cast. So I don't feel a great need to change this in the back branches. But in theory this way is more correct. 2. markRTEForSelectPriv and markTargetListOrigin don't need to recurse into join alias Vars either, because the cases they care about don't apply to alias Vars for USING columns that are semantically distinct from the underlying columns. This removes the only case in which markVarForSelectPriv could be called with NULL for the RTE, so adjust the comments to describe that hack as being strictly internal to markRTEForSelectPriv. catversion bump required due to changes in stored rules. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7115.1577986646@sss.pgh.pa.us	6 years ago
Bruce Momjian	7559d8ebfa	Update copyrights for 2020 ... Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4	6 years ago
Amit Kapila	1379fd537f	Introduce the 'force' option for the Drop Database command. ... This new option terminates the other sessions connected to the target database and then drop it. To terminate other sessions, the current user must have desired permissions (same as pg_terminate_backend()). We don't allow to terminate the sessions if prepared transactions, active logical replication slots or subscriptions are present in the target database. Author: Pavel Stehule with changes by me Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Vignesh C, Ibrar Ahmed, Anthony Nowocien, Ryan Lambert and Amit Kapila Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAP_rwwmLJJbn70vLOZFpxGw3XD7nLB_7+NKz46H5EOO2k5H7OQ@mail.gmail.com	6 years ago
Alvaro Herrera	ce5d04b646	Fix under-parenthesized macro definitions ... Lack of parens in the definitions could cause a statement using these macros to have unexpected semantics. In current code no bug is apparent, but best to fix the definitions to avoid problems down the line. Reported-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19795.1568400476@sss.pgh.pa.us	6 years ago
Alvaro Herrera	6212276e43	Fix progress reporting of CLUSTER / VACUUM FULL ... The progress state was being clobbered once the first index completed being rebuilt, causing the final phases of the operation not show anything in the progress view. This was inadvertently broken in 03f9e5cba0, which added progress tracking for REINDEX. (The reason this bugfix is this small is that I had already noticed this problem when writing monitoring for CREATE INDEX, and had already worked around it, as can be seen in discussion starting at https://postgr.es/m/20190329150218.GA25010@alvherre.pgsql Fixing the problem is just a matter of fixing one place touched by the REINDEX monitoring.) Reported by: Álvaro Herrera Author: Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190801184333.GA21369@alvherre.pgsql	6 years ago
Tomas Vondra	d06215d03b	Allow setting statistics target for extended statistics ... When building statistics, we need to decide how many rows to sample and how accurate the resulting statistics should be. Until now, it was not possible to explicitly define statistics target for extended statistics objects, the value was always computed from the per-attribute targets with a fallback to the system-wide default statistics target. That's a bit inconvenient, as it ties together the statistics target set for per-column and extended statistics. In some cases it may be useful to require larger sample / higher accuracy for extended statics (or the other way around), but with this approach that's not possible. So this commit introduces a new command, allowing to specify statistics target for individual extended statistics objects, overriding the value derived from per-attribute targets (and the system default). ALTER STATISTICS stat_name SET STATISTICS target_value; When determining statistics target for an extended statistics object we first look at this explicitly set value. When this value is -1, we fall back to the old formula, looking at the per-attribute targets first and then the system default. This means the behavior is backwards compatible with older PostgreSQL releases. Author: Tomas Vondra Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190618213357.vli3i23vpkset2xd@development Reviewed-by: Kirk Jamison, Dean Rasheed	6 years ago
Noah Misch	44982e7d09	Reconcile nodes/*funcs.c with PostgreSQL 12 work. ... One would have needed out-of-tree code to observe the defects. Remove unreferenced fields instead of completing their support functions. Since in-tree code can't reach _readIntoClause(), no catversion bump.	6 years ago
Tom Lane	be76af171c	Initial pgindent run for v12. ... This is still using the 2.0 version of pg_bsd_indent. I thought it would be good to commit this separately, so as to document the differences between 2.0 and 2.1 behavior. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16296.1558103386@sss.pgh.pa.us	6 years ago
Alvaro Herrera	87259588d0	Fix tablespace inheritance for partitioned rels ... Commit ca4103025d left a few loose ends. The most important one (broken pg_dump output) is already fixed by virtue of commit 3b23552ad8, but some things remained: * When ALTER TABLE rewrites tables, the indexes must remain in the tablespace they were originally in. This didn't work because index recreation during ALTER TABLE runs manufactured SQL (yuck), which runs afoul of default_tablespace in competition with the parent relation tablespace. To fix, reset default_tablespace to the empty string temporarily, and add the TABLESPACE clause as appropriate. * Setting a partitioned rel's tablespace to the database default is confusing; if it worked, it would direct the partitions to that tablespace regardless of default_tablespace. But in reality it does not work, and making it work is a larger project. Therefore, throw an error when this condition is detected, to alert the unwary. Add some docs and tests, too. Author: Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f_1c260nOt_vBJ067AZ3JXptXVRohDVMLEBmudX1YEx-A@mail.gmail.com	6 years ago
Tom Lane	e0fb4c9d01	Remove useless comment. ... Commit e439c6f0c removed IndexStmt.relationId, but not the comment that had been added to explain it. Said comment was therefore very confusing.	6 years ago
Tom Lane	f4a3fdfbdc	Avoid order-of-execution problems with ALTER TABLE ADD PRIMARY KEY. ... Up to now, DefineIndex() was responsible for adding attnotnull constraints to the columns of a primary key, in any case where it hadn't been convenient for transformIndexConstraint() to mark those columns as is_not_null. It (or rather its minion index_check_primary_key) did this by executing an ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL command for the target table. The trouble with this solution is that if we're creating the index due to ALTER TABLE ADD PRIMARY KEY, and the outer ALTER TABLE has additional sub-commands, the inner ALTER TABLE's operations executed at the wrong time with respect to the outer ALTER TABLE's operations. In particular, the inner ALTER would perform a validation scan at a point where the table's storage might be inconsistent with its catalog entries. (This is on the hairy edge of being a security problem, but AFAICS it isn't one because the inner scan would only be interested in the tuples' null bitmaps.) This can result in unexpected failures, such as the one seen in bug #15580 from Allison Kaptur. To fix, let's remove the attempt to do SET NOT NULL from DefineIndex(), reducing index_check_primary_key's role to verifying that the columns are already not null. (It shouldn't ever see such a case, but it seems wise to keep the check for safety.) Instead, make transformIndexConstraint() generate ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL subcommands to be executed ahead of the ADD PRIMARY KEY operation in every case where it can't force the column to be created already-not-null. This requires only minor surgery in parse_utilcmd.c, and it makes for a much more satisfying spec for transformIndexConstraint(): it's no longer having to take it on faith that someone else will handle addition of NOT NULL constraints. To make that work, we have to move the execution of AT_SetNotNull into an ALTER pass that executes ahead of AT_PASS_ADD_INDEX. I moved it to AT_PASS_COL_ATTRS, and put that after AT_PASS_ADD_COL to avoid failure when the column is being added in the same command. This incidentally fixes a bug in the only previous usage of AT_PASS_COL_ATTRS, for AT_SetIdentity: it didn't work either for a newly-added column. Playing around with this exposed a separate bug in ALTER TABLE ONLY ... ADD PRIMARY KEY for partitioned tables. The intent of the ONLY modifier in that context is to prevent doing anything that would require holding lock for a long time --- but the implied SET NOT NULL would recurse to the child partitions, and do an expensive validation scan for any child where the column(s) were not already NOT NULL. To fix that, invent a new ALTER subcommand AT_CheckNotNull that just insists that a child column be already NOT NULL, and apply that, not AT_SetNotNull, when recursing to children in this scenario. This results in a slightly laxer definition of ALTER TABLE ONLY ... SET NOT NULL for partitioned tables, too: that command will now work as long as all children are already NOT NULL, whereas before it just threw up its hands if there were any partitions. In passing, clean up the API of generateClonedIndexStmt(): remove a useless argument, ensure that the output argument is not left undefined, update the header comment. A small side effect of this change is that no-such-column errors in ALTER TABLE ADD PRIMARY KEY now produce a different message that includes the table name, because they are now detected by the SET NOT NULL step which has historically worded its error that way. That seems fine to me, so I didn't make any effort to avoid the wording change. The basic bug #15580 is of very long standing, and these other bugs aren't new in v12 either. However, this is a pretty significant change in the way ALTER TABLE ADD PRIMARY KEY works. On balance it seems best not to back-patch, at least not till we get some more confidence that this patch has no new bugs. Patch by me, but thanks to Jie Zhang for a preliminary version. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15580-d1a6de5a3d65da51@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1396E95157071C4EBBA51892C5368521017F2E6E63@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local	6 years ago