17 Commits (e5603a2f35baa0bc9d61b16373383fdd37e49509)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Alvaro Herrera	301fcf33eb	Have CREATE TABLE AS and REFRESH return an OID ... Other DDL commands are already returning the OID, which is required for future additional event trigger work. This is merely making these commands in line with the rest of utility command support.	11 years ago
Bruce Momjian	0a78320057	pgindent run for 9.4 ... This includes removing tabs after periods in C comments, which was applied to back branches, so this change should not effect backpatching.	12 years ago
Simon Riggs	e5550d5fec	Reduce lock levels of some ALTER TABLE cmds ... VALIDATE CONSTRAINT CLUSTER ON SET WITHOUT CLUSTER ALTER COLUMN SET STATISTICS ALTER COLUMN SET () ALTER COLUMN RESET () All other sub-commands use AccessExclusiveLock Simon Riggs and Noah Misch Reviews by Robert Haas and Andres Freund	12 years ago
Bruce Momjian	7e04792a1c	Update copyright for 2014 ... Update all files in head, and files COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml in all back branches.	12 years ago
Tom Lane	784e762e88	Support multi-argument UNNEST(), and TABLE() syntax for multiple functions. ... This patch adds the ability to write TABLE( function1(), function2(), ...) as a single FROM-clause entry. The result is the concatenation of the first row from each function, followed by the second row from each function, etc; with NULLs inserted if any function produces fewer rows than others. This is believed to be a much more useful behavior than what Postgres currently does with multiple SRFs in a SELECT list. This syntax also provides a reasonable way to combine use of column definition lists with WITH ORDINALITY: put the column definition list inside TABLE(), where it's clear that it doesn't control the ordinality column as well. Also implement SQL-compliant multiple-argument UNNEST(), by turning UNNEST(a,b,c) into TABLE(unnest(a), unnest(b), unnest(c)). The SQL standard specifies TABLE() with only a single function, not multiple functions, and it seems to require an implicit UNNEST() which is not what this patch does. There may be something wrong with that reading of the spec, though, because if it's right then the spec's TABLE() is just a pointless alternative spelling of UNNEST(). After further review of that, we might choose to adopt a different syntax for what this patch does, but in any case this functionality seems clearly worthwhile. Andrew Gierth, reviewed by Zoltán Böszörményi and Heikki Linnakangas, and significantly revised by me	12 years ago
Noah Misch	f3ab5d4696	Switch user ID to the object owner when populating a materialized view. ... This makes superuser-issued REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW safe regardless of the object's provenance. REINDEX is an earlier example of this pattern. As a downside, functions called from materialized views must tolerate running in a security-restricted operation. CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW need not change user ID. Nonetheless, avoid creation of materialized views that will invariably fail REFRESH by making it, too, start a security-restricted operation. Back-patch to 9.3 so materialized views have this from the beginning. Reviewed by Kevin Grittner.	12 years ago
Bruce Momjian	9af4159fce	pgindent run for release 9.3 ... This is the first run of the Perl-based pgindent script. Also update pgindent instructions.	12 years ago
Tom Lane	1d6c72a55b	Move materialized views' is-populated status into their pg_class entries. ... Previously this state was represented by whether the view's disk file had zero or nonzero size, which is problematic for numerous reasons, since it's breaking a fundamental assumption about heap storage. This was done to allow unlogged matviews to revert to unpopulated status after a crash despite our lack of any ability to update catalog entries post-crash. However, this poses enough risk of future problems that it seems better to not support unlogged matviews until we can find another way. Accordingly, revert that choice as well as a number of existing kluges forced by it in favor of creating a pg_class.relispopulated flag column.	13 years ago
Tom Lane	5194024d72	Incidental cleanup of matviews code. ... Move checking for unscannable matviews into ExecOpenScanRelation, which is a better place for it first because the open relation is already available (saving a relcache lookup cycle), and second because this eliminates the problem of telling the difference between rangetable entries that will or will not be scanned by the query. In particular we can get rid of the not-terribly-well-thought-out-or-implemented isResultRel field that the initial matviews patch added to RangeTblEntry. Also get rid of entirely unnecessary scannability check in the rewriter, and a bogus decision about whether RefreshMatViewStmt requires a parse-time snapshot. catversion bump due to removal of a RangeTblEntry field, which changes stored rules.	13 years ago
Tom Lane	0b33790421	Clean up the mess around EXPLAIN and materialized views. ... Revert the matview-related changes in explain.c's API, as per recent complaint from Robert Haas. The reason for these appears to have been principally some ill-considered choices around having intorel_startup do what ought to be parse-time checking, plus a poor arrangement for passing it the view parsetree it needs to store into pg_rewrite when creating a materialized view. Do the latter by having parse analysis stick a copy into the IntoClause, instead of doing it at runtime. (On the whole, I seriously question the choice to represent CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW as a variant of SELECT INTO/CREATE TABLE AS, because that means injecting even more complexity into what was already a horrid legacy kluge. However, I didn't go so far as to rethink that choice ... yet.) I also moved several error checks into matview parse analysis, and made the check for external Params in a matview more accurate. In passing, clean things up a bit more around interpretOidsOption(), and fix things so that we can use that to force no-oids for views, sequences, etc, thereby eliminating the need to cons up "oids = false" options when creating them. catversion bump due to change in IntoClause. (I wonder though if we really need readfuncs/outfuncs support for IntoClause anymore.)	13 years ago
Kevin Grittner	52e6e33ab4	Create a distinction between a populated matview and a scannable one. ... The intent was that being populated would, long term, be just one of the conditions which could affect whether a matview was scannable; being populated should be necessary but not always sufficient to scan the relation. Since only CREATE and REFRESH currently determine the scannability, names and comments accidentally conflated these concepts, leading to confusion. Also add missing locking for the SQL function which allows a test for scannability, and fix a modularity violatiion. Per complaints from Tom Lane, although its not clear that these will satisfy his concerns. Hopefully this will at least better frame the discussion.	13 years ago
Kevin Grittner	549dae0352	Fix problems with incomplete attempt to prohibit OIDS with MVs. ... Problem with assertion failure in restoring from pg_dump output reported by Joachim Wieland. Review and suggestions by Tom Lane and Robert Haas.	13 years ago
Kevin Grittner	3bf3ab8c56	Add a materialized view relations. ... A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.	13 years ago
Bruce Momjian	bd61a623ac	Update copyrights for 2013 ... Fully update git head, and update back branches in ./COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml files.	13 years ago
Alvaro Herrera	c219d9b0a5	Split tuple struct defs from htup.h to htup_details.h ... This reduces unnecessary exposure of other headers through htup.h, which is very widely included by many files. I have chosen to move the function prototypes to the new file as well, because that means htup.h no longer needs to include tupdesc.h. In itself this doesn't have much effect in indirect inclusion of tupdesc.h throughout the tree, because it's also required by execnodes.h; but it's something to explore in the future, and it seemed best to do the htup.h change now while I'm busy with it.	13 years ago
Bruce Momjian	927d61eeff	Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3 ... commit-fest.	13 years ago
Tom Lane	9dbf2b7d75	Restructure SELECT INTO's parsetree representation into CreateTableAsStmt. ... Making this operation look like a utility statement seems generally a good idea, and particularly so in light of the desire to provide command triggers for utility statements. The original choice of representing it as SELECT with an IntoClause appendage had metastasized into rather a lot of places, unfortunately, so that this patch is a great deal more complicated than one might at first expect. In particular, keeping EXPLAIN working for SELECT INTO and CREATE TABLE AS subcommands required restructuring some EXPLAIN-related APIs. Add-on code that calls ExplainOnePlan or ExplainOneUtility, or uses ExplainOneQuery_hook, will need adjustment. Also, the cases PREPARE ... SELECT INTO and CREATE RULE ... SELECT INTO, which formerly were accepted though undocumented, are no longer accepted. The PREPARE case can be replaced with use of CREATE TABLE AS EXECUTE. The CREATE RULE case doesn't seem to have much real-world use (since the rule would work only once before failing with "table already exists"), so we'll not bother with that one. Both SELECT INTO and CREATE TABLE AS still return a command tag of "SELECT nnnn". There was some discussion of returning "CREATE TABLE nnnn", but for the moment backwards compatibility wins the day. Andres Freund and Tom Lane	14 years ago