313 Commits (ed7e686a031e5b9469e0813af2f513dfdd77560b)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Tom Lane	3c05284d83	Invent GENERIC_PLAN option for EXPLAIN. ... This provides a very simple way to see the generic plan for a parameterized query. Without this, it's necessary to define a prepared statement and temporarily change plan_cache_mode, which is a bit tedious. One thing that's a bit of a hack perhaps is that we disable execution-time partition pruning when the GENERIC_PLAN option is given. That's because the pruning code may attempt to fetch the value of one of the parameters, which would fail. Laurenz Albe, reviewed by Julien Rouhaud, Christoph Berg, Michel Pelletier, Jim Jones, and myself Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0a29b954b10b57f0d135fe12aa0909bd41883eb0.camel@cybertec.at	3 years ago
Tomas Vondra	19d8e2308b	Ignore BRIN indexes when checking for HOT updates ... When determining whether an index update may be skipped by using HOT, we can ignore attributes indexed by block summarizing indexes without references to individual tuples that need to be cleaned up. A new type TU_UpdateIndexes provides a signal to the executor to determine which indexes to update - no indexes, all indexes, or only the summarizing indexes. This also removes rd_indexattr list, and replaces it with rd_attrsvalid flag. The list was not used anywhere, and a simple flag is sufficient. This was originally committed as 5753d4ee32, but then got reverted by e3fcca0d0d because of correctness issues. Original patch by Josef Simanek, various fixes and improvements by Tomas Vondra and me. Authors: Matthias van de Meent, Josef Simanek, Tomas Vondra Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/05ebcb44-f383-86e3-4f31-0a97a55634cf@enterprisedb.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFp7QwpMRGcDAQumN7onN9HjrJ3u4X3ZRXdGFT0K5G2JWvnbWg%40mail.gmail.com	3 years ago
Tom Lane	b803b7d132	Fill EState.es_rteperminfos more systematically. ... While testing a fix for bug #17823, I discovered that EvalPlanQualStart failed to copy es_rteperminfos from the parent EState, resulting in failure if anything in EPQ execution wanted to consult that information. This led me to conclude that commit a61b1f748 had been too haphazard about where to fill es_rteperminfos, and that we need to be sure that that happens exactly where es_range_table gets filled. So I changed the signature of ExecInitRangeTable to help ensure that this new requirement doesn't get missed. (Indeed, pgoutput.c was also failing to fill it. Maybe we don't ever need it there, but I wouldn't bet on that.) No test case yet; one will arrive with the fix for #17823. But that needs to be back-patched, while this fix is HEAD-only. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17823-b64909cf7d63de84@postgresql.org	3 years ago
Bruce Momjian	c8e1ba736b	Update copyright for 2023 ... Backpatch-through: 11	3 years ago
Alvaro Herrera	a61b1f7482	Rework query relation permission checking ... Currently, information about the permissions to be checked on relations mentioned in a query is stored in their range table entries. So the executor must scan the entire range table looking for relations that need to have permissions checked. This can make the permission checking part of the executor initialization needlessly expensive when many inheritance children are present in the range range. While the permissions need not be checked on the individual child relations, the executor still must visit every range table entry to filter them out. This commit moves the permission checking information out of the range table entries into a new plan node called RTEPermissionInfo. Every top-level (inheritance "root") RTE_RELATION entry in the range table gets one and a list of those is maintained alongside the range table. This new list is initialized by the parser when initializing the range table. The rewriter can add more entries to it as rules/views are expanded. Finally, the planner combines the lists of the individual subqueries into one flat list that is passed to the executor for checking. To make it quick to find the RTEPermissionInfo entry belonging to a given relation, RangeTblEntry gets a new Index field 'perminfoindex' that stores the corresponding RTEPermissionInfo's index in the query's list of the latter. ExecutorCheckPerms_hook has gained another List * argument; the signature is now: typedef bool (*ExecutorCheckPerms_hook_type) (List *rangeTable, List *rtePermInfos, bool ereport_on_violation); The first argument is no longer used by any in-core uses of the hook, but we leave it in place because there may be other implementations that do. Implementations should likely scan the rtePermInfos list to determine which operations to allow or deny. Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGjJDmUhDSfv-U2qhKJjt9ST7Xh9JXC_irsAQ1TAUsJYg@mail.gmail.com	3 years ago
Alvaro Herrera	fb958b5da8	Generalize ri_RootToPartitionMap to use for non-partition children ... ri_RootToPartitionMap is currently only initialized for tuple routing target partitions, though a future commit will need the ability to use it even for the non-partition child tables, so make adjustments to the decouple it from the partitioning code. Also, make it lazily initialized via ExecGetRootToChildMap(), making that function its preferred access path. Existing third-party code accessing it directly should no longer do so; consequently, it's been renamed to ri_RootToChildMap, which also makes it consistent with ri_ChildToRootMap. ExecGetRootToChildMap() houses the logic of setting the map appropriately depending on whether a given child relation is partition or not. To support this, also add a separate entry point for TupleConversionMap creation that receives an AttrMap. No new code here, just split an existing function in two. Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqEYUhDXSK5BTvG_xk=eaAEJCD4GS3C6uH7ybBvv+Z_Tmg@mail.gmail.com	3 years ago
Peter Geoghegan	bfcf1b3480	Harmonize parameter names in storage and AM code. ... Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the corresponding names from function definitions in storage, catalog, access method, executor, and logical replication code, as well as in miscellaneous utility/library code. Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will do the same for other parts of the codebase. Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com	3 years ago
Tom Lane	c35ba141de	Future-proof the recursion inside ExecShutdownNode(). ... The API contract for planstate_tree_walker() callbacks is that they take a PlanState pointer and a context pointer. Somebody figured they could save a couple lines of code by ignoring that, and passing ExecShutdownNode itself as the walker even though it has but one argument. Somewhat remarkably, we've gotten away with that so far. However, it seems clear that the upcoming C2x standard means to forbid such cases, and compilers that actively break such code likely won't be far behind. So spend the extra few lines of code to do it honestly with a separate walker function. In HEAD, we might as well go further and remove ExecShutdownNode's useless return value. I left that as-is in back branches though, to forestall complaints about ABI breakage. Back-patch, with the thought that this might become of practical importance before our stable branches are all out of service. It doesn't seem to be fixing any live bug on any currently known platform, however. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/208054.1663534665@sss.pgh.pa.us	3 years ago
Andrew Dunstan	2f2b18bd3f	Revert SQL/JSON features ... The reverts the following and makes some associated cleanups: commit f79b803dc: Common SQL/JSON clauses commit f4fb45d15: SQL/JSON constructors commit 5f0adec25: Make STRING an unreserved_keyword. commit 33a377608: IS JSON predicate commit 1a36bc9db: SQL/JSON query functions commit 606948b05: SQL JSON functions commit 49082c2cc: RETURNING clause for JSON() and JSON_SCALAR() commit 4e34747c8: JSON_TABLE commit fadb48b00: PLAN clauses for JSON_TABLE commit 2ef6f11b0: Reduce running time of jsonb_sqljson test commit 14d3f24fa: Further improve jsonb_sqljson parallel test commit a6baa4bad: Documentation for SQL/JSON features commit b46bcf7a4: Improve readability of SQL/JSON documentation. commit 112fdb352: Fix finalization for json_objectagg and friends commit fcdb35c32: Fix transformJsonBehavior commit 4cd8717af: Improve a couple of sql/json error messages commit f7a605f63: Small cleanups in SQL/JSON code commit 9c3d25e17: Fix JSON_OBJECTAGG uniquefying bug commit a79153b7a: Claim SQL standard compliance for SQL/JSON features commit a1e7616d6: Rework SQL/JSON documentation commit 8d9f9634e: Fix errors in copyfuncs/equalfuncs support for JSON node types. commit 3c633f32b: Only allow returning string types or bytea from json_serialize commit 67b26703b: expression eval: Fix EEOP_JSON_CONSTRUCTOR and EEOP_JSONEXPR size. The release notes are also adjusted. Backpatch to release 15. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/40d2c882-bcac-19a9-754d-4299e1d87ac7@postgresql.org	3 years ago
Tom Lane	23e7b38bfe	Pre-beta mechanical code beautification. ... Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files. I manually fixed a couple of comments that pgindent uglified.	3 years ago
Alvaro Herrera	a90641eac2	Revert "Rewrite some RI code to avoid using SPI" ... This reverts commit 99392cdd78. We'd rather rewrite ri_triggers.c as a whole rather than piecemeal. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1ncXX2-000mFt-Pe@gemulon.postgresql.org	3 years ago
Alvaro Herrera	99392cdd78	Rewrite some RI code to avoid using SPI ... Modify the subroutines called by RI trigger functions that want to check if a given referenced value exists in the referenced relation to simply scan the foreign key constraint's unique index, instead of using SPI to execute SELECT 1 FROM referenced_relation WHERE ref_key = $1 This saves a lot of work, especially when inserting into or updating a referencing relation. This rewrite allows to fix a PK row visibility bug caused by a partition descriptor hack which requires ActiveSnapshot to be set to come up with the correct set of partitions for the RI query running under REPEATABLE READ isolation. We now set that snapshot indepedently of the snapshot to be used by the PK index scan, so the two no longer interfere. The buggy output in src/test/isolation/expected/fk-snapshot.out of the relevant test case added by commit 00cb86e75d has been corrected. (The bug still exists in branch 14, however, but this fix is too invasive to backpatch.) Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Li Japin <japinli@hotmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGkfJfYdeq5vHPh6eqPKjSbfpDDY+j-kXYFePQedtSLeg@mail.gmail.com	3 years ago
Andrew Dunstan	1a36bc9dba	SQL/JSON query functions ... This introduces the SQL/JSON functions for querying JSON data using jsonpath expressions. The functions are: JSON_EXISTS() JSON_QUERY() JSON_VALUE() All of these functions only operate on jsonb. The workaround for now is to cast the argument to jsonb. JSON_EXISTS() tests if the jsonpath expression applied to the jsonb value yields any values. JSON_VALUE() must return a single value, and an error occurs if it tries to return multiple values. JSON_QUERY() must return a json object or array, and there are various WRAPPER options for handling scalar or multi-value results. Both these functions have options for handling EMPTY and ERROR conditions. Nikita Glukhov Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru	4 years ago
Alvaro Herrera	ba9a7e3921	Enforce foreign key correctly during cross-partition updates ... When an update on a partitioned table referenced in foreign key constraints causes a row to move from one partition to another, the fact that the move is implemented as a delete followed by an insert on the target partition causes the foreign key triggers to have surprising behavior. For example, a given foreign key's delete trigger which implements the ON DELETE CASCADE clause of that key will delete any referencing rows when triggered for that internal DELETE, although it should not, because the referenced row is simply being moved from one partition of the referenced root partitioned table into another, not being deleted from it. This commit teaches trigger.c to skip queuing such delete trigger events on the leaf partitions in favor of an UPDATE event fired on the root target relation. Doing so is sensible because both the old and the new tuple "logically" belong to the root relation. The after trigger event queuing interface now allows passing the source and the target partitions of a particular cross-partition update when registering the update event for the root partitioned table. Along with the two ctids of the old and the new tuple, the after trigger event now also stores the OIDs of those partitions. The tuples fetched from the source and the target partitions are converted into the root table format, if necessary, before they are passed to the trigger function. The implementation currently has a limitation that only the foreign keys pointing into the query's target relation are considered, not those of its sub-partitioned partitions. That seems like a reasonable limitation, because it sounds rare to have distinct foreign keys pointing to sub-partitioned partitions instead of to the root table. This misbehavior stems from commit f56f8f8da6 (which added support for foreign keys to reference partitioned tables) not paying sufficient attention to commit 2f17844104 (which had introduced cross-partition updates a year earlier). Even though the former commit goes back to Postgres 12, we're not backpatching this fix at this time for fear of destabilizing things too much, and because there are a few ABI breaks in it that we'd have to work around in older branches. It also depends on commit f4566345cf, which had its own share of backpatchability issues as well. Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reported-by: Eduard Català <eduard.catala@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFvkBCmfwkQX_yBqv2Wz8ugUGiBDxum8=WvVbfU1TXaNg@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAL54xNZsLwEM1XCk5yW9EqaRzsZYHuWsHQkA2L5MOSKXAwviCQ@mail.gmail.com	4 years ago
Bruce Momjian	27b77ecf9f	Update copyright for 2022 ... Backpatch-through: 10	4 years ago
Tom Lane	e3ec3c00d8	Remove arbitrary 64K-or-so limit on rangetable size. ... Up to now the size of a query's rangetable has been limited by the constants INNER_VAR et al, which mustn't be equal to any real rangetable index. 65000 doubtless seemed like enough for anybody, and it still is orders of magnitude larger than the number of joins we can realistically handle. However, we need a rangetable entry for each child partition that is (or might be) processed by a query. Queries with a few thousand partitions are getting more realistic, so that the day when that limit becomes a problem is in sight, even if it's not here yet. Hence, let's raise the limit. Rather than just increase the values of INNER_VAR et al, this patch adopts the approach of making them small negative values, so that rangetables could theoretically become as long as INT_MAX. The bulk of the patch is concerned with changing Var.varno and some related variables from "Index" (unsigned int) to plain "int". This is basically cosmetic, with little actual effect other than to help debuggers print their values nicely. As such, I've only bothered with changing places that could actually see INNER_VAR et al, which the parser and most of the planner don't. We do have to be careful in places that are performing less/greater comparisons on varnos, but there are very few such places, other than the IS_SPECIAL_VARNO macro itself. A notable side effect of this patch is that while it used to be possible to add INNER_VAR et al to a Bitmapset, that will now draw an error. I don't see any likelihood that it wouldn't be a bug to include these fake varnos in a bitmapset of real varnos, so I think this is all to the good. Although this touches outfuncs/readfuncs, I don't think a catversion bump is required, since stored rules would never contain Vars with these fake varnos. Andrey Lepikhov and Tom Lane, after a suggestion by Peter Eisentraut Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/43c7f2f5-1e27-27aa-8c65-c91859d15190@postgrespro.ru	4 years ago
Tom Lane	049e1e2edb	Fix mishandling of resjunk columns in ON CONFLICT ... UPDATE tlists. ... It's unusual to have any resjunk columns in an ON CONFLICT ... UPDATE list, but it can happen when MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK SubPlans are present. If it happens, the ON CONFLICT UPDATE code path would end up storing tuples that include the values of the extra resjunk columns. That's fairly harmless in the short run, but if new columns are added to the table then the values would become accessible, possibly leading to malfunctions if they don't match the datatypes of the new columns. This had escaped notice through a confluence of missing sanity checks, including * There's no cross-check that a tuple presented to heap_insert or heap_update matches the table rowtype. While it's difficult to check that fully at reasonable cost, we can easily add assertions that there aren't too many columns. * The output-column-assignment cases in execExprInterp.c lacked any sanity checks on the output column numbers, which seems like an oversight considering there are plenty of assertion checks on input column numbers. Add assertions there too. * We failed to apply nodeModifyTable's ExecCheckPlanOutput() to the ON CONFLICT UPDATE tlist. That wouldn't have caught this specific error, since that function is chartered to ignore resjunk columns; but it sure seems like a bad omission now that we've seen this bug. In HEAD, the right way to fix this is to make the processing of ON CONFLICT UPDATE tlists work the same as regular UPDATE tlists now do, that is don't add "SET x = x" entries, and use ExecBuildUpdateProjection to evaluate the tlist and combine it with old values of the not-set columns. This adds a little complication to ExecBuildUpdateProjection, but allows removal of a comparable amount of now-dead code from the planner. In the back branches, the most expedient solution seems to be to (a) use an output slot for the ON CONFLICT UPDATE projection that actually matches the target table, and then (b) invent a variant of ExecBuildProjectionInfo that can be told to not store values resulting from resjunk columns, so it doesn't try to store into nonexistent columns of the output slot. (We can't simply ignore the resjunk columns altogether; they have to be evaluated for MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK to work.) This works back to v10. In 9.6, projections work much differently and we can't cheaply give them such an option. The 9.6 version of this patch works by inserting a JunkFilter when it's necessary to get rid of resjunk columns. In addition, v11 and up have the reverse problem when trying to perform ON CONFLICT UPDATE on a partitioned table. Through a further oversight, adjust_partition_tlist() discarded resjunk columns when re-ordering the ON CONFLICT UPDATE tlist to match a partition. This accidentally prevented the storing-bogus-tuples problem, but at the cost that MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK cases didn't work, typically crashing if more than one row has to be updated. Fix by preserving resjunk columns in that routine. (I failed to resist the temptation to add more assertions there too, and to do some minor code beautification.) Per report from Andres Freund. Back-patch to all supported branches. Security: CVE-2021-32028	4 years ago
Tom Lane	c5b7ba4e67	Postpone some stuff out of ExecInitModifyTable. ... Arrange to do some things on-demand, rather than immediately during executor startup, because there's a fair chance of never having to do them at all: * Don't open result relations' indexes until needed. * Don't initialize partition tuple routing, nor the child-to-root tuple conversion map, until needed. This wins in UPDATEs on partitioned tables when only some of the partitions will actually receive updates; with larger partition counts the savings is quite noticeable. Also, we can remove some sketchy heuristics in ExecInitModifyTable about whether to set up tuple routing. Also, remove execPartition.c's private hash table tracking which partitions were already opened by the ModifyTable node. Instead use the hash added to ModifyTable itself by commit 86dc90056. To allow lazy computation of the conversion maps, we now set ri_RootResultRelInfo in all child ResultRelInfos. We formerly set it only in some, not terribly well-defined, cases. This has user-visible side effects in that now more error messages refer to the root relation instead of some partition (and provide error data in the root's column order, too). It looks to me like this is a strict improvement in consistency, so I don't have a problem with the output changes visible in this commit. Extracted from a larger patch, which seemed to me to be too messy to push in one commit. Amit Langote, reviewed at different times by Heikki Linnakangas and myself Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqG7ZruBmmih3wPsBZ4s0H2EhywrnXEduckY5Hr3fWzPWA@mail.gmail.com	5 years ago
David Rowley	9eacee2e62	Add Result Cache executor node (take 2) ... Here we add a new executor node type named "Result Cache". The planner can include this node type in the plan to have the executor cache the results from the inner side of parameterized nested loop joins. This allows caching of tuples for sets of parameters so that in the event that the node sees the same parameter values again, it can just return the cached tuples instead of rescanning the inner side of the join all over again. Internally, result cache uses a hash table in order to quickly find tuples that have been previously cached. For certain data sets, this can significantly improve the performance of joins. The best cases for using this new node type are for join problems where a large portion of the tuples from the inner side of the join have no join partner on the outer side of the join. In such cases, hash join would have to hash values that are never looked up, thus bloating the hash table and possibly causing it to multi-batch. Merge joins would have to skip over all of the unmatched rows. If we use a nested loop join with a result cache, then we only cache tuples that have at least one join partner on the outer side of the join. The benefits of using a parameterized nested loop with a result cache increase when there are fewer distinct values being looked up and the number of lookups of each value is large. Also, hash probes to lookup the cache can be much faster than the hash probe in a hash join as it's common that the result cache's hash table is much smaller than the hash join's due to result cache only caching useful tuples rather than all tuples from the inner side of the join. This variation in hash probe performance is more significant when the hash join's hash table no longer fits into the CPU's L3 cache, but the result cache's hash table does. The apparent "random" access of hash buckets with each hash probe can cause a poor L3 cache hit ratio for large hash tables. Smaller hash tables generally perform better. The hash table used for the cache limits itself to not exceeding work_mem * hash_mem_multiplier in size. We maintain a dlist of keys for this cache and when we're adding new tuples and realize we've exceeded the memory budget, we evict cache entries starting with the least recently used ones until we have enough memory to add the new tuples to the cache. For parameterized nested loop joins, we now consider using one of these result cache nodes in between the nested loop node and its inner node. We determine when this might be useful based on cost, which is primarily driven off of what the expected cache hit ratio will be. Estimating the cache hit ratio relies on having good distinct estimates on the nested loop's parameters. For now, the planner will only consider using a result cache for parameterized nested loop joins. This works for both normal joins and also for LATERAL type joins to subqueries. It is possible to use this new node for other uses in the future. For example, to cache results from correlated subqueries. However, that's not done here due to some difficulties obtaining a distinct estimation on the outer plan to calculate the estimated cache hit ratio. Currently we plan the inner plan before planning the outer plan so there is no good way to know if a result cache would be useful or not since we can't estimate the number of times the subplan will be called until the outer plan is generated. The functionality being added here is newly introducing a dependency on the return value of estimate_num_groups() during the join search. Previously, during the join search, we only ever needed to perform selectivity estimations. With this commit, we need to use estimate_num_groups() in order to estimate what the hit ratio on the result cache will be. In simple terms, if we expect 10 distinct values and we expect 1000 outer rows, then we'll estimate the hit ratio to be 99%. Since cache hits are very cheap compared to scanning the underlying nodes on the inner side of the nested loop join, then this will significantly reduce the planner's cost for the join. However, it's fairly easy to see here that things will go bad when estimate_num_groups() incorrectly returns a value that's significantly lower than the actual number of distinct values. If this happens then that may cause us to make use of a nested loop join with a result cache instead of some other join type, such as a merge or hash join. Our distinct estimations have been known to be a source of trouble in the past, so the extra reliance on them here could cause the planner to choose slower plans than it did previous to having this feature. Distinct estimations are also fairly hard to estimate accurately when several tables have been joined already or when a WHERE clause filters out a set of values that are correlated to the expressions we're estimating the number of distinct value for. For now, the costing we perform during query planning for result caches does put quite a bit of faith in the distinct estimations being accurate. When these are accurate then we should generally see faster execution times for plans containing a result cache. However, in the real world, we may find that we need to either change the costings to put less trust in the distinct estimations being accurate or perhaps even disable this feature by default. There's always an element of risk when we teach the query planner to do new tricks that it decides to use that new trick at the wrong time and causes a regression. Users may opt to get the old behavior by turning the feature off using the enable_resultcache GUC. Currently, this is enabled by default. It remains to be seen if we'll maintain that setting for the release. Additionally, the name "Result Cache" is the best name I could think of for this new node at the time I started writing the patch. Nobody seems to strongly dislike the name. A few people did suggest other names but no other name seemed to dominate in the brief discussion that there was about names. Let's allow the beta period to see if the current name pleases enough people. If there's some consensus on a better name, then we can change it before the release. Please see the 2nd discussion link below for the discussion on the "Result Cache" name. Author: David Rowley Reviewed-by: Andy Fan, Justin Pryzby, Zhihong Yu, Hou Zhijie Tested-By: Konstantin Knizhnik Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrPcQyQdWERGYWx8J%2B2DLUNgXu%2BfOSbQ1UscxrunyXyrQ%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvq=yQXr5kqhRviT2RhNKwToaWr9JAN5t+5_PzhuRJ3wvg@mail.gmail.com	5 years ago
David Rowley	28b3e3905c	Revert b6002a796 ... This removes "Add Result Cache executor node". It seems that something weird is going on with the tracking of cache hits and misses as highlighted by many buildfarm animals. It's not yet clear what the problem is as other parts of the plan indicate that the cache did work correctly, it's just the hits and misses that were being reported as 0. This is especially a bad time to have the buildfarm so broken, so reverting before too many more animals go red. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvq_hydhfovm4=izgWs+C5HqEeRScjMbOgbpC-jRAeK3Yw@mail.gmail.com	5 years ago
David Rowley	b6002a796d	Add Result Cache executor node ... Here we add a new executor node type named "Result Cache". The planner can include this node type in the plan to have the executor cache the results from the inner side of parameterized nested loop joins. This allows caching of tuples for sets of parameters so that in the event that the node sees the same parameter values again, it can just return the cached tuples instead of rescanning the inner side of the join all over again. Internally, result cache uses a hash table in order to quickly find tuples that have been previously cached. For certain data sets, this can significantly improve the performance of joins. The best cases for using this new node type are for join problems where a large portion of the tuples from the inner side of the join have no join partner on the outer side of the join. In such cases, hash join would have to hash values that are never looked up, thus bloating the hash table and possibly causing it to multi-batch. Merge joins would have to skip over all of the unmatched rows. If we use a nested loop join with a result cache, then we only cache tuples that have at least one join partner on the outer side of the join. The benefits of using a parameterized nested loop with a result cache increase when there are fewer distinct values being looked up and the number of lookups of each value is large. Also, hash probes to lookup the cache can be much faster than the hash probe in a hash join as it's common that the result cache's hash table is much smaller than the hash join's due to result cache only caching useful tuples rather than all tuples from the inner side of the join. This variation in hash probe performance is more significant when the hash join's hash table no longer fits into the CPU's L3 cache, but the result cache's hash table does. The apparent "random" access of hash buckets with each hash probe can cause a poor L3 cache hit ratio for large hash tables. Smaller hash tables generally perform better. The hash table used for the cache limits itself to not exceeding work_mem * hash_mem_multiplier in size. We maintain a dlist of keys for this cache and when we're adding new tuples and realize we've exceeded the memory budget, we evict cache entries starting with the least recently used ones until we have enough memory to add the new tuples to the cache. For parameterized nested loop joins, we now consider using one of these result cache nodes in between the nested loop node and its inner node. We determine when this might be useful based on cost, which is primarily driven off of what the expected cache hit ratio will be. Estimating the cache hit ratio relies on having good distinct estimates on the nested loop's parameters. For now, the planner will only consider using a result cache for parameterized nested loop joins. This works for both normal joins and also for LATERAL type joins to subqueries. It is possible to use this new node for other uses in the future. For example, to cache results from correlated subqueries. However, that's not done here due to some difficulties obtaining a distinct estimation on the outer plan to calculate the estimated cache hit ratio. Currently we plan the inner plan before planning the outer plan so there is no good way to know if a result cache would be useful or not since we can't estimate the number of times the subplan will be called until the outer plan is generated. The functionality being added here is newly introducing a dependency on the return value of estimate_num_groups() during the join search. Previously, during the join search, we only ever needed to perform selectivity estimations. With this commit, we need to use estimate_num_groups() in order to estimate what the hit ratio on the result cache will be. In simple terms, if we expect 10 distinct values and we expect 1000 outer rows, then we'll estimate the hit ratio to be 99%. Since cache hits are very cheap compared to scanning the underlying nodes on the inner side of the nested loop join, then this will significantly reduce the planner's cost for the join. However, it's fairly easy to see here that things will go bad when estimate_num_groups() incorrectly returns a value that's significantly lower than the actual number of distinct values. If this happens then that may cause us to make use of a nested loop join with a result cache instead of some other join type, such as a merge or hash join. Our distinct estimations have been known to be a source of trouble in the past, so the extra reliance on them here could cause the planner to choose slower plans than it did previous to having this feature. Distinct estimations are also fairly hard to estimate accurately when several tables have been joined already or when a WHERE clause filters out a set of values that are correlated to the expressions we're estimating the number of distinct value for. For now, the costing we perform during query planning for result caches does put quite a bit of faith in the distinct estimations being accurate. When these are accurate then we should generally see faster execution times for plans containing a result cache. However, in the real world, we may find that we need to either change the costings to put less trust in the distinct estimations being accurate or perhaps even disable this feature by default. There's always an element of risk when we teach the query planner to do new tricks that it decides to use that new trick at the wrong time and causes a regression. Users may opt to get the old behavior by turning the feature off using the enable_resultcache GUC. Currently, this is enabled by default. It remains to be seen if we'll maintain that setting for the release. Additionally, the name "Result Cache" is the best name I could think of for this new node at the time I started writing the patch. Nobody seems to strongly dislike the name. A few people did suggest other names but no other name seemed to dominate in the brief discussion that there was about names. Let's allow the beta period to see if the current name pleases enough people. If there's some consensus on a better name, then we can change it before the release. Please see the 2nd discussion link below for the discussion on the "Result Cache" name. Author: David Rowley Reviewed-by: Andy Fan, Justin Pryzby, Zhihong Yu Tested-By: Konstantin Knizhnik Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrPcQyQdWERGYWx8J%2B2DLUNgXu%2BfOSbQ1UscxrunyXyrQ%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvq=yQXr5kqhRviT2RhNKwToaWr9JAN5t+5_PzhuRJ3wvg@mail.gmail.com	5 years ago
Tom Lane	86dc90056d	Rework planning and execution of UPDATE and DELETE. ... This patch makes two closely related sets of changes: 1. For UPDATE, the subplan of the ModifyTable node now only delivers the new values of the changed columns (i.e., the expressions computed in the query's SET clause) plus row identity information such as CTID. ModifyTable must re-fetch the original tuple to merge in the old values of any unchanged columns. The core advantage of this is that the changed columns are uniform across all tables of an inherited or partitioned target relation, whereas the other columns might not be. A secondary advantage, when the UPDATE involves joins, is that less data needs to pass through the plan tree. The disadvantage of course is an extra fetch of each tuple to be updated. However, that seems to be very nearly free in context; even worst-case tests don't show it to add more than a couple percent to the total query cost. At some point it might be interesting to combine the re-fetch with the tuple access that ModifyTable must do anyway to mark the old tuple dead; but that would require a good deal of refactoring and it seems it wouldn't buy all that much, so this patch doesn't attempt it. 2. For inherited UPDATE/DELETE, instead of generating a separate subplan for each target relation, we now generate a single subplan that is just exactly like a SELECT's plan, then stick ModifyTable on top of that. To let ModifyTable know which target relation a given incoming row refers to, a tableoid junk column is added to the row identity information. This gets rid of the horrid hack that was inheritance_planner(), eliminating O(N^2) planning cost and memory consumption in cases where there were many unprunable target relations. Point 2 of course requires point 1, so that there is a uniform definition of the non-junk columns to be returned by the subplan. We can't insist on uniform definition of the row identity junk columns however, if we want to keep the ability to have both plain and foreign tables in a partitioning hierarchy. Since it wouldn't scale very far to have every child table have its own row identity column, this patch includes provisions to merge similar row identity columns into one column of the subplan result. In particular, we can merge the whole-row Vars typically used as row identity by FDWs into one column by pretending they are type RECORD. (It's still okay for the actual composite Datums to be labeled with the table's rowtype OID, though.) There is more that can be done to file down residual inefficiencies in this patch, but it seems to be committable now. FDW authors should note several API changes: * The argument list for AddForeignUpdateTargets() has changed, and so has the method it must use for adding junk columns to the query. Call add_row_identity_var() instead of manipulating the parse tree directly. You might want to reconsider exactly what you're adding, too. * PlanDirectModify() must now work a little harder to find the ForeignScan plan node; if the foreign table is part of a partitioning hierarchy then the ForeignScan might not be the direct child of ModifyTable. See postgres_fdw for sample code. * To check whether a relation is a target relation, it's no longer sufficient to compare its relid to root->parse->resultRelation. Instead, check it against all_result_relids or leaf_result_relids, as appropriate. Amit Langote and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqHpHdqdDn48yCEhynnniahH78rwcrv1rEX65-fsZGBOLQ@mail.gmail.com	5 years ago
Heikki Linnakangas	6214e2b228	Fix permission checks on constraint violation errors on partitions. ... If a cross-partition UPDATE violates a constraint on the target partition, and the columns in the new partition are in different physical order than in the parent, the error message can reveal columns that the user does not have SELECT permission on. A similar bug was fixed earlier in commit 804b6b6db4. The cause of the bug is that the callers of the ExecBuildSlotValueDescription() function got confused when constructing the list of modified columns. If the tuple was routed from a parent, we converted the tuple to the parent's format, but the list of modified columns was grabbed directly from the child's RTE entry. ExecUpdateLockMode() had a similar issue. That lead to confusion on which columns are key columns, leading to wrong tuple lock being taken on tables referenced by foreign keys, when a row is updated with INSERT ON CONFLICT UPDATE. A new isolation test is added for that corner case. With this patch, the ri_RangeTableIndex field is no longer set for partitions that don't have an entry in the range table. Previously, it was set to the RTE entry of the parent relation, but that was confusing. NOTE: This modifies the ResultRelInfo struct, replacing the ri_PartitionRoot field with ri_RootResultRelInfo. That's a bit risky to backpatch, because it breaks any extensions accessing the field. The change that ri_RangeTableIndex is not set for partitions could potentially break extensions, too. The ResultRelInfos are visible to FDWs at least, and this patch required small changes to postgres_fdw. Nevertheless, this seem like the least bad option. I don't think these fields widely used in extensions; I don't think there are FDWs out there that uses the FDW "direct update" API, other than postgres_fdw. If there is, you will get a compilation error, so hopefully it is caught quickly. Backpatch to 11, where support for both cross-partition UPDATEs, and unique indexes on partitioned tables, were added. Reviewed-by: Amit Langote Security: CVE-2021-3393	5 years ago
Peter Geoghegan	9dc718bdf2	Pass down "logically unchanged index" hint. ... Add an executor aminsert() hint mechanism that informs index AMs that the incoming index tuple (the tuple that accompanies the hint) is not being inserted by execution of an SQL statement that logically modifies any of the index's key columns. The hint is received by indexes when an UPDATE takes place that does not apply an optimization like heapam's HOT (though only for indexes where all key columns are logically unchanged). Any index tuple that receives the hint on insert is expected to be a duplicate of at least one existing older version that is needed for the same logical row. Related versions will typically be stored on the same index page, at least within index AMs that apply the hint. Recognizing the difference between MVCC version churn duplicates and true logical row duplicates at the index AM level can help with cleanup of garbage index tuples. Cleanup can intelligently target tuples that are likely to be garbage, without wasting too many cycles on less promising tuples/pages (index pages with little or no version churn). This is infrastructure for an upcoming commit that will teach nbtree to perform bottom-up index deletion. No index AM actually applies the hint just yet. Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Reviewed-By: Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=CEKFa74EScx_hFVshCOn6AA5T-ajFASTdzipdkLTNQQ@mail.gmail.com	5 years ago
Bruce Momjian	ca3b37487b	Update copyright for 2021 ... Backpatch-through: 9.5	5 years ago
Tom Lane	20d3fe9009	In INSERT/UPDATE, use the table's real tuple descriptor as target. ... Previously, ExecInitModifyTable relied on ExecInitJunkFilter, and thence ExecCleanTypeFromTL, to build the target descriptor from the query tlist. While we just checked (in ExecCheckPlanOutput) that the tlist produces compatible output, this is not a great substitute for the relation's actual tuple descriptor that's available from the relcache. For one thing, dropped columns will not be correctly marked attisdropped; it's a bit surprising that we've gotten away with that this long. But the real reason for being concerned with this is that using the table's descriptor means that the slot will have correct attrmissing data, allowing us to revert the klugy fix of commit ba9f18abd. (This commit undoes that one's changes in trigger.c, but keeps the new test case.) Thus we can solve the bogus-trigger-tuple problem with fewer cycles rather than more. No back-patch, since this doesn't fix any additional bug, and it seems somewhat more likely to have unforeseen side effects than ba9f18abd's narrow fix. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16644-5da7ef98a7ac4545@postgresql.org	5 years ago
Heikki Linnakangas	a04daa97a4	Remove es_result_relation_info from EState. ... Maintaining 'es_result_relation_info' correctly at all times has become cumbersome, especially with partitioning where each partition gets its own result relation info. Having to set and reset it across arbitrary operations has caused bugs in the past. This changes all the places that used 'es_result_relation_info', to receive the currently active ResultRelInfo via function parameters instead. Author: Amit Langote Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqGEmiib8FLiHMhKB%2BCH5dRgHSLc5N5wnvc4kym%2BZYpQEQ%40mail.gmail.com	5 years ago
Heikki Linnakangas	1375422c78	Create ResultRelInfos later in InitPlan, index them by RT index. ... Instead of allocating all the ResultRelInfos upfront in one big array, allocate them in ExecInitModifyTable(). es_result_relations is now an array of ResultRelInfo pointers, rather than an array of structs, and it is indexed by the RT index. This simplifies things: we get rid of the separate concept of a "result rel index", and don't need to set it in setrefs.c anymore. This also allows follow-up optimizations (not included in this commit yet) to skip initializing ResultRelInfos for target relations that were not needed at runtime, and removal of the es_result_relation_info pointer. The EState arrays of regular result rels and root result rels are merged into one array. Similarly, the resultRelations and rootResultRelations lists in PlannedStmt are merged into one. It's not actually clear to me why they were kept separate in the first place, but now that the es_result_relations array is indexed by RT index, it certainly seems pointless. The PlannedStmt->resultRelations list is now only needed for ExecRelationIsTargetRelation(). One visible effect of this change is that ExecRelationIsTargetRelation() will now return 'true' also for the partition root, if a partitioned table is updated. That seems like a good thing, although the function isn't used in core code, and I don't see any reason for an FDW to call it on a partition root. Author: Amit Langote Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqGEmiib8FLiHMhKB%2BCH5dRgHSLc5N5wnvc4kym%2BZYpQEQ%40mail.gmail.com	5 years ago
Jeff Davis	200f6100a9	Fix LookupTupleHashEntryHash() pipeline-stall issue. ... Refactor hash lookups in nodeAgg.c to improve performance. Author: Andres Freund and Jeff Davis Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200612213715.op4ye4q7gktqvpuo%40alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch-through: 13	5 years ago
Jeff Davis	50a38f6517	Create memory context for HashAgg with a reasonable maxBlockSize. ... If the memory context's maxBlockSize is too big, a single block allocation can suddenly exceed work_mem. For Hash Aggregation, this can mean spilling to disk too early or reporting a confusing memory usage number for EXPLAN ANALYZE. Introduce CreateWorkExprContext(), which is like CreateExprContext(), except that it creates the AllocSet with a maxBlockSize that is reasonable in proportion to work_mem. Right now, CreateWorkExprContext() is only used by Hash Aggregation, but it may be generally useful in the future. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/412a3fbf306f84d8d78c4009e11791867e62b87c.camel@j-davis.com	6 years ago
Tom Lane	bda6dedbea	Go back to returning int from ereport auxiliary functions. ... This reverts the parts of commit 17a28b0364 that changed ereport's auxiliary functions from returning dummy integer values to returning void. It turns out that a minority of compilers complain (not entirely unreasonably) about constructs such as (condition) ? errdetail(...) : 0 if errdetail() returns void rather than int. We could update those call sites to say "(void) 0" perhaps, but the expectation for this patch set was that ereport callers would not have to change anything. And this aspect of the patch set was already the most invasive and least compelling part of it, so let's just drop it. Per buildfarm. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k6N8EjNvZpM8nme+y+05mz-SM8Z_BgkixzkA34R+ej0Kw@mail.gmail.com	6 years ago
Tom Lane	17a28b0364	Improve the internal implementation of ereport(). ... Change all the auxiliary error-reporting routines to return void, now that we no longer need to pretend they are passing something useful to errfinish(). While this probably doesn't save anything significant at the machine-code level, it allows detection of some additional types of mistakes. Pass the error location details (__FILE__, __LINE__, PG_FUNCNAME_MACRO) to errfinish not errstart. This shaves a few cycles off the case where errstart decides we're not going to emit anything. Re-implement elog() as a trivial wrapper around ereport(), removing the separate support infrastructure it used to have. Aside from getting rid of some now-surplus code, this means that elog() now really does have exactly the same semantics as ereport(), in particular that it can skip evaluation work if the message is not to be emitted. Andres Freund and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k6N8EjNvZpM8nme+y+05mz-SM8Z_BgkixzkA34R+ej0Kw@mail.gmail.com	6 years ago
Jeff Davis	c954d49046	Extend ExecBuildAggTrans() to support a NULL pointer check. ... Optionally push a step to check for a NULL pointer to the pergroup state. This will be important for disk-based hash aggregation in combination with grouping sets. When memory limits are reached, a given tuple may find its per-group state for some grouping sets but not others. For the former, it advances the per-group state as normal; for the latter, it skips evaluation and the calling code will have to spill the tuple and reprocess it in a later batch. Add the NULL check as a separate expression step because in some common cases it's not needed. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200221202212.ssb2qpmdgrnx52sj%40alap3.anarazel.de	6 years ago
Jeff Davis	11de6c903d	Change signature of TupleHashTableHash(). ... Commit 4eaea3db introduced TupleHashTableHash(), but the signature didn't match the other exposed functions. Separate it into internal and external versions. The external version hides the details behind an API more consistent with the other external functions, and the internal version is still suitable for simplehash.	6 years ago
Jeff Davis	4eaea3db15	Introduce TupleHashTableHash() and LookupTupleHashEntryHash(). ... Expose two new entry points: one for only calculating the hash value of a tuple, and another for looking up a hash entry when the hash value is already known. This will be useful for disk-based Hash Aggregation to avoid recomputing the hash value for the same tuple after saving and restoring it from disk. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/37091115219dd522fd9ed67333ee8ed1b7e09443.camel%40j-davis.com	6 years ago
Bruce Momjian	7559d8ebfa	Update copyrights for 2020 ... Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4	6 years ago
Andres Freund	27cc7cd2bc	Reorder EPQ work, to fix rowmark related bugs and improve efficiency. ... In ad0bda5d24 I changed the EvalPlanQual machinery to store substitution tuples in slot, instead of using plain HeapTuples. The main motivation for that was that using HeapTuples will be inefficient for future tableams. But it turns out that that conversion was buggy for non-locking rowmarks - the wrong tuple descriptor was used to create the slot. As a secondary issue 5db6df0c0 changed ExecLockRows() to begin EPQ earlier, to allow to fetch the locked rows directly into the EPQ slots, instead of having to copy tuples around. Unfortunately, as Tom complained, that forces some expensive initialization to happen earlier. As a third issue, the test coverage for EPQ was clearly insufficient. Fixing the first issue is unfortunately not trivial: Non-locked row marks were fetched at the start of EPQ, and we don't have the type information for the rowmarks available at that point. While we could change that, it's not easy. It might be worthwhile to change that at some point, but to fix this bug, it seems better to delay fetching non-locking rowmarks when they're actually needed, rather than eagerly. They're referenced at most once, and in cases where EPQ fails, might never be referenced. Fetching them when needed also increases locality a bit. To be able to fetch rowmarks during execution, rather than initialization, we need to be able to access the active EPQState, as that contains necessary data. To do so move EPQ related data from EState to EPQState, and, only for EStates creates as part of EPQ, reference the associated EPQState from EState. To fix the second issue, change EPQ initialization to allow use of EvalPlanQualSlot() to be used before EvalPlanQualBegin() (but obviously still requiring EvalPlanQualInit() to have been done). As these changes made struct EState harder to understand, e.g. by adding multiple EStates, significantly reorder the members, and add a lot more comments. Also add a few more EPQ tests, including one that fails for the first issue above. More is needed. Reported-By: yi huang Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHU7rYZo_C4ULsAx_LAj8az9zqgrD8WDd4hTegDTMM1LMqrBsg@mail.gmail.com https://postgr.es/m/24530.1562686693@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch: 12-, where the EPQ changes were introduced	6 years ago
Andres Freund	fb3b098fe8	Remove fmgr.h includes from headers that don't really need it. ... Most of the fmgr.h includes were obsoleted by 352a24a1f9. A few others can be obsoleted using the underlying struct type in an implementation detail. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190803193733.g3l3x3o42uv4qj7l@alap3.anarazel.de	6 years ago
Tom Lane	3c926587b5	Remove EState.es_range_table_array. ... Now that list_nth is O(1), there's no good reason to maintain a separate array of RTE pointers rather than indexing into estate->es_range_table. Deleting the array doesn't save all that much either; but just on cleanliness grounds, it's better not to have duplicate representations of the identical information. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14960.1565384592@sss.pgh.pa.us	6 years ago
Michael Paquier	6b8548964b	Fix inconsistencies in the code ... This addresses a couple of issues in the code: - Typos and inconsistencies in comments and function declarations. - Removal of unreferenced function declarations. - Removal of unnecessary compile flags. - A cleanup error in regressplans.sh. Author: Alexander Lakhin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0c991fdf-2670-1997-c027-772a420c4604@gmail.com	6 years ago
Amit Kapila	92c4abc736	Fix assorted inconsistencies. ... There were a number of issues in the recent commits which include typos, code and comments mismatch, leftover function declarations. Fix them. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin Author: Alexander Lakhin, Amit Kapila and Amit Langote Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ef0c0232-0c1d-3a35-63d4-0ebd06e31387@gmail.com	6 years ago
Tom Lane	8255c7a5ee	Phase 2 pgindent run for v12. ... Switch to 2.1 version of pg_bsd_indent. This formats multiline function declarations "correctly", that is with additional lines of parameter declarations indented to match where the first line's left parenthesis is. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0P3FeTXRcU5B2W3jv3PgRVZ-kGUXLGfd42FFhUROO3ug@mail.gmail.com	6 years ago
Tom Lane	be76af171c	Initial pgindent run for v12. ... This is still using the 2.0 version of pg_bsd_indent. I thought it would be good to commit this separately, so as to document the differences between 2.0 and 2.1 behavior. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16296.1558103386@sss.pgh.pa.us	6 years ago
Andres Freund	5db6df0c01	tableam: Add tuple_{insert, delete, update, lock} and use. ... This adds new, required, table AM callbacks for insert/delete/update and lock_tuple. To be able to reasonably use those, the EvalPlanQual mechanism had to be adapted, moving more logic into the AM. Previously both delete/update/lock call-sites and the EPQ mechanism had to have awareness of the specific tuple format to be able to fetch the latest version of a tuple. Obviously that needs to be abstracted away. To do so, move the logic that find the latest row version into the AM. lock_tuple has a new flag argument, TUPLE_LOCK_FLAG_FIND_LAST_VERSION, that forces it to lock the last version, rather than the current one. It'd have been possible to do so via a separate callback as well, but finding the last version usually also necessitates locking the newest version, making it sensible to combine the two. This replaces the previous use of EvalPlanQualFetch(). Additionally HeapTupleUpdated, which previously signaled either a concurrent update or delete, is now split into two, to avoid callers needing AM specific knowledge to differentiate. The move of finding the latest row version into tuple_lock means that encountering a row concurrently moved into another partition will now raise an error about "tuple to be locked" rather than "tuple to be updated/deleted" - which is accurate, as that always happens when locking rows. While possible slightly less helpful for users, it seems like an acceptable trade-off. As part of this commit HTSU_Result has been renamed to TM_Result, and its members been expanded to differentiated between updating and deleting. HeapUpdateFailureData has been renamed to TM_FailureData. The interface to speculative insertion is changed so nodeModifyTable.c does not have to set the speculative token itself anymore. Instead there's a version of tuple_insert, tuple_insert_speculative, that performs the speculative insertion (without requiring a flag to signal that fact), and the speculative insertion is either made permanent with table_complete_speculative(succeeded = true) or aborted with succeeded = false). Note that multi_insert is not yet routed through tableam, nor is COPY. Changing multi_insert requires changes to copy.c that are large enough to better be done separately. Similarly, although simpler, CREATE TABLE AS and CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW are also only going to be adjusted in a later commit. Author: Andres Freund and Haribabu Kommi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de https://postgr.es/m/20190313003903.nwvrxi7rw3ywhdel@alap3.anarazel.de https://postgr.es/m/20160812231527.GA690404@alvherre.pgsql	7 years ago
Peter Eisentraut	5e1963fb76	Collations with nondeterministic comparison ... This adds a flag "deterministic" to collations. If that is false, such a collation disables various optimizations that assume that strings are equal only if they are byte-wise equal. That then allows use cases such as case-insensitive or accent-insensitive comparisons or handling of strings with different Unicode normal forms. This functionality is only supported with the ICU provider. At least glibc doesn't appear to have any locales that work in a nondeterministic way, so it's not worth supporting this for the libc provider. The term "deterministic comparison" in this context is from Unicode Technical Standard #10 (https://unicode.org/reports/tr10/#Deterministic_Comparison). This patch makes changes in three areas: - CREATE COLLATION DDL changes and system catalog changes to support this new flag. - Many executor nodes and auxiliary code are extended to track collations. Previously, this code would just throw away collation information, because the eventually-called user-defined functions didn't use it since they only cared about equality, which didn't need collation information. - String data type functions that do equality comparisons and hashing are changed to take the (non-)deterministic flag into account. For comparison, this just means skipping various shortcuts and tie breakers that use byte-wise comparison. For hashing, we first need to convert the input string to a canonical "sort key" using the ICU analogue of strxfrm(). Reviewed-by: Daniel Verite <daniel@manitou-mail.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1ccc668f-4cbc-0bef-af67-450b47cdfee7@2ndquadrant.com	7 years ago
Andres Freund	ad0bda5d24	Store tuples for EvalPlanQual in slots, rather than as HeapTuples. ... For the upcoming pluggable table access methods it's quite inconvenient to store tuples as HeapTuples, as that'd require converting tuples from a their native format into HeapTuples. Instead use slots to manage epq tuples. To fit into that scheme, change the foreign data wrapper callback RefetchForeignRow, to store the tuple in a slot. Insist on using the caller provided slot, so it conveniently can be stored in the corresponding EPQ slot. As there is no in core user of RefetchForeignRow, that change was done blindly, but we plan to test that soon. To avoid duplicating that work for row locks, move row locks to just directly use the EPQ slots - it previously temporarily stored tuples in LockRowsState.lr_curtuples, but that doesn't seem beneficial, given we'd possibly end up with a significant number of additional slots. The behaviour of es_epqTupleSet[rti -1] is now checked by es_epqTupleSlot[rti -1] != NULL, as that is distinguishable from a slot containing an empty tuple. Author: Andres Freund, Haribabu Kommi, Ashutosh Bapat Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de	7 years ago
Andres Freund	ff11e7f4b9	Use slots in trigger infrastructure, except for the actual invocation. ... In preparation for abstracting table storage, convert trigger.c to track tuples in slots. Which also happens to make code calling triggers simpler. As the calling interface for triggers themselves is not changed in this patch, HeapTuples still are extracted from the slot at that time. But that's handled solely inside trigger.c, not visible to callers. It's quite likely that we'll want to revise the external trigger interface, but that's a separate large project. As part of this work the slots used for old/new/return tuples are moved from EState into ResultRelInfo, as different updated tables might need different slots. The slots are now also now created on-demand, which is good both from an efficiency POV, but also makes the modifying code simpler. Author: Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar and Ashutosh Bapat Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de	7 years ago
Andres Freund	317ffdfeaa	Allow to reset execGrouping.c style tuple hashtables. ... This has the advantage that the comparator expression, the table's slot, etc do not have to be rebuilt. Additionally the simplehash.h hashtable within the tuple hashtable now keeps its previous size and doesn't need to be reallocated. That both reduces allocator overhead, and improves performance in cases where the input estimation was off by a significant factor. To avoid an API/ABI break, the new parameter is exposed via the new BuildTupleHashTableExt(), and BuildTupleHashTable() now is a wrapper around the former, that continues to allocate the table itself in the tablecxt. Using this fixes performance issues discovered in the two bugs referenced. This commit however has not converted the callers, that's done in a separate commit. Bug: #15592 #15486 Reported-By: Jakub Janeček, Dmitry Marakasov Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15486-05850f065da42931@postgresql.org https://postgr.es/m/20190114180423.ywhdg2iagzvh43we@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 11, this is a prerequisite for other fixes	7 years ago
Tom Lane	fa2cf164aa	Rename nodes/relation.h to nodes/pathnodes.h. ... The old name of this file was never a very good indication of what it was for. Now that there's also access/relation.h, we have a potential confusion hazard as well, so let's rename it to something more apropos. Per discussion, "pathnodes.h" is reasonable, since a good fraction of the file is Path node definitions. While at it, tweak a couple of other headers that were gratuitously importing relation.h into modules that don't need it. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7719.1548688728@sss.pgh.pa.us	7 years ago
Andres Freund	4c850ecec6	Don't include heapam.h from others headers. ... heapam.h previously was included in a number of widely used headers (e.g. execnodes.h, indirectly in executor.h, ...). That's problematic on its own, as heapam.h contains a lot of low-level details that don't need to be exposed that widely, but becomes more problematic with the upcoming introduction of pluggable table storage - it seems inappropriate for heapam.h to be included that widely afterwards. heapam.h was largely only included in other headers to get the HeapScanDesc typedef (which was defined in heapam.h, even though HeapScanDescData is defined in relscan.h). The better solution here seems to be to just use the underlying struct (forward declared where necessary). Similar for BulkInsertState. Another problem was that LockTupleMode was used in executor.h - parts of the file tried to cope without heapam.h, but due to the fact that it indirectly included it, several subsequent violations of that goal were not not noticed. We could just reuse the approach of declaring parameters as int, but it seems nicer to move LockTupleMode to lockoptions.h - that's not a perfect location, but also doesn't seem bad. As a number of files relied on implicitly included heapam.h, a significant number of files grew an explicit include. It's quite probably that a few external projects will need to do the same. Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190114000701.y4ttcb74jpskkcfb@alap3.anarazel.de	7 years ago