While registering for postmaster exit events, we have to handle a couple
of edge cases where the postmaster is already gone. Commit 815c2f09
missed one: EACCES must surely imply that PostmasterPid no longer
belongs to our postmaster process (or alternatively an unexpected
permissions model has been imposed on us). Like ESRCH, this should be
treated as a WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH event, rather than being raised with
ereport().
No known problems reported in the wild. Per code review from Tom Lane.
Back-patch to 13.
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3624029.1602701929%40sss.pgh.pa.us
during logical decoding.
Prior to commit c55040ccd0 we have no way of knowing the invalidations
before commit. So, while decoding we use to execute all the invalidations
at each command end as we had no way of knowing which invalidations
happened before that command. Due to this, transactions involving large
amounts of DDLs use to take more time and also lead to high CPU usage. But
now we know specific invalidations at each command end so we execute only
required invalidations.
It has been observed that decoding of a transaction containing truncation
of a table with 1000 partitions would be finished in 1s whereas before
this patch it used to take 4-5 minutes.
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Keisuke Kuroda
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANDwggKYveEtXjXjqHA6RL3AKSHMsQyfRY6bK+NqhAWJyw8psQ@mail.gmail.com
Previously it was documented that toast_tuple_target affected column
marked as only External or Extended. But this description is not correct
and toast_tuple_target affects also column marked as Main.
Back-patch to v11 where toast_tuple_target reloption was introduced.
Author: Shinya Okano
Reviewed-by: Tatsuhito Kasahara, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/93f46e311a67422e89e770d236059817@oss.nttdata.com
I removed the duplicate command tags for START_REPLICATION inadvertently
in commit 07082b08cc, but the replication protocol requires them. The
fact that the replication protocol was broken was not noticed because
all our test cases use an optimized code path that exits early, failing
to verify that the behavior is correct for non-optimized cases. Put
them back.
Also document this protocol quirk.
Add a test case that shows the failure. It might still succeed even
without the patch when run on a fast enough server, but it suffices to
show the bug in enough cases that it would be noticed in buildfarm.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reported-by: Henry Hinze <henry.hinze@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelínek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16643-eaadeb2a1a58d28c@postgresql.org
If WaitEventSetWait() reports that the postmaster has gone away, later
calls to WaitEventSetWait() should continue to report that. Otherwise
further waits that occur in the proc_exit() path after we already
noticed the postmaster's demise could block forever.
Back-patch to 13, where the kqueue support landed.
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3624029.1602701929%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Maintaining 'es_result_relation_info' correctly at all times has become
cumbersome, especially with partitioning where each partition gets its
own result relation info. Having to set and reset it across arbitrary
operations has caused bugs in the past.
This changes all the places that used 'es_result_relation_info', to
receive the currently active ResultRelInfo via function parameters
instead.
Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqGEmiib8FLiHMhKB%2BCH5dRgHSLc5N5wnvc4kym%2BZYpQEQ%40mail.gmail.com
FDWs that can perform an UPDATE/DELETE remotely using the "direct modify"
set of APIs need to access the ResultRelInfo of the target table. That's
currently available in EState.es_result_relation_info, but the next
commit will remove that field.
This commit adds a new resultRelation field in ForeignScan, to store the
target relation's RT index, and the corresponding ResultRelInfo in
ForeignScanState. The FDW's PlanDirectModify callback is expected to set
'resultRelation' along with 'operation'. The core code doesn't need them
for anything, they are for the convenience of FDW's Begin- and
IterateDirectModify callbacks.
Authors: Amit Langote, Etsuro Fujita
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqGEmiib8FLiHMhKB%2BCH5dRgHSLc5N5wnvc4kym%2BZYpQEQ%40mail.gmail.com
Our infinite_recurse() test to verify sane stack-overrun behavior
is affected by a bug of the Linux kernel on PPC64: it will get SIGSEGV
if it receives a signal when the stack depth is (a) over 1MB and
(b) within a few kB of filling the current physical stack allocation.
See https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205183.
Since this test is a bit time-consuming and we run it in parallel with
test scripts that do a lot of DDL, it can be expected to get an sinval
catchup interrupt at some point, leading to failure if the timing is
wrong. This has caused more than 100 buildfarm failures over the
past year or so.
While a fix exists for the kernel bug, it might be years before that
propagates into all production kernels, particularly in some of the
older distros we have in the buildfarm. For now, let's just back off
and not run this test on Linux PPC64; that loses nothing in test
coverage so far as our own code is concerned.
To do that, split this test into a new script infinite_recurse.sql
and skip the test when the platform name is powerpc64...-linux-gnu.
Back-patch to v12. Branches before that have not been seen to get
this failure. No doubt that's because the "errors" test was not
run in parallel with other tests before commit 798070ec0, greatly
reducing the odds of an sinval catchup being necessary.
I also back-patched 3c8553547 into v12, just so the new regression
script would look the same in all branches having it.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3479046.1602607848@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190723162703.GM22387%40telsasoft.com
Instead of allocating all the ResultRelInfos upfront in one big array,
allocate them in ExecInitModifyTable(). es_result_relations is now an
array of ResultRelInfo pointers, rather than an array of structs, and it
is indexed by the RT index.
This simplifies things: we get rid of the separate concept of a "result
rel index", and don't need to set it in setrefs.c anymore. This also
allows follow-up optimizations (not included in this commit yet) to skip
initializing ResultRelInfos for target relations that were not needed at
runtime, and removal of the es_result_relation_info pointer.
The EState arrays of regular result rels and root result rels are merged
into one array. Similarly, the resultRelations and rootResultRelations
lists in PlannedStmt are merged into one. It's not actually clear to me
why they were kept separate in the first place, but now that the
es_result_relations array is indexed by RT index, it certainly seems
pointless.
The PlannedStmt->resultRelations list is now only needed for
ExecRelationIsTargetRelation(). One visible effect of this change is that
ExecRelationIsTargetRelation() will now return 'true' also for the
partition root, if a partitioned table is updated. That seems like a good
thing, although the function isn't used in core code, and I don't see any
reason for an FDW to call it on a partition root.
Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqGEmiib8FLiHMhKB%2BCH5dRgHSLc5N5wnvc4kym%2BZYpQEQ%40mail.gmail.com
The test cases added by that commit were trying to test the exact number of
times a particular transaction has spilled. However, that number can vary if
any background transaction (say by autovacuum) happens in parallel to the main
transaction. So let's not try to verify the exact count.
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k5_pPAYRTDrO2PbtTOe0eHQpBvuqmCr8ic39uTNmR49Eg@mail.gmail.com
gistRelocateBuildBuffersOnSplit did not get the memo about which
attribute count to use. This could lead to a crash if there were
included columns and buffering build was chosen. (Because there
are random page-split decisions elsewhere in GiST index build,
the crashes are not entirely deterministic.)
Back-patch to v12 where GiST gained support for included columns.
Pavel Borisov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALT9ZEECCV5m7wvxg46PC-7x-EybUmnpupBGhSFMoAAay+r6HQ@mail.gmail.com
Commit 16fa9b2b3 broke the ability to reliably test GiST buffered builds,
because it caused sorted builds to be done instead if sortsupport is
available, regardless of any attempt to override that. While a would-be
test case could try to work around that by choosing an opclass that has
no sortsupport function, coverage would be silently lost the moment
someone decides it'd be a good idea to add a sortsupport function.
Hence, rearrange the logic in gistbuild() so that if "buffering = on"
is specified in CREATE INDEX, we will use that method, sortsupport or no.
Also document the interaction between sorting and the buffering
parameter, as 16fa9b2b3 failed to do.
(Note that in fact we still lack any test coverage of buffered builds,
but this is a prerequisite to adding a non-fragile test.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3249980.1602532990@sss.pgh.pa.us
The prohibitValueChange code paths in set_config_option(), which
are executed whenever we re-read a PGC_POSTMASTER variable from
postgresql.conf, neglected to free anything before exiting. Thus
we'd leak the proposed new value of a PGC_STRING variable, as noted
by BoChen in bug #16666. For all variable types, if the check hook
creates an "extra" chunk, we'd also leak that.
These are malloc not palloc chunks, so there is no mechanism for
recovering the leaks before process exit. Fortunately, the values
are typically not very large, meaning you'd have to go through an
awful lot of SIGHUP configuration-reload cycles to make the leakage
amount to anything. Still, for a long-lived postmaster process it
could potentially be a problem.
Oversight in commit 2594cf0e8. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16666-2c41a4eec61b03e1@postgresql.org
80f8eb7 has introduced in unicode_norm.c some new code that uses
htonl(). On at least some FreeBSD environments, it is possible to find
that this function is undeclared, causing a compilation warning. It is
worth noting that no buildfarm members have reported this issue.
Instead of adding a new inclusion to arpa/inet.h, switch to use
the equivalent defined in pg_bswap.h, to benefit from any built-in
function if the compiler has one.
Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k7D4b12ShywWj=AbcHZzV1-OqMjNe7RZAu+tgz5rd_11A@mail.gmail.com
In the past, we always estimated that a ModifyTable node would emit the
same number of rows as its subpaths. Without a RETURNING clause, the
correct estimate is zero. Fix, in preparation for a proposed parallel
write patch that is sensitive to that number.
A remaining problem is that for RETURNING queries, the estimated width
is based on subpath output rather than the RETURNING tlist.
Reviewed-by: Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJcOf-cXnB5cnMKqWEp2E2z7Mvcd04iLVmV%3DqpFJrR3AcrTS3g%40mail.gmail.com
Adjust the existing cycle detection example and test queries to put
the cycle column before the path column. This is mainly because the
SQL-standard CYCLE clause puts them in that order, and so if we added
that feature that would make the sequence of examples more consistent
and easier to follow.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c5603982-0088-7f14-0caa-fdcd0c837b57@2ndquadrant.com
The implementation uses smaller code when the "expected" operand is a
small constant, but the implementation needlessly defined the set of
acceptable constants more narrowly than the ABI does. Core PostgreSQL
and PGXN don't use the constant path at all, so this is future-proofing.
Back-patch to v13, where commit 30ee5d17c2
introduced this code.
Reviewed by Tom Lane. Reported by Christoph Berg.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201009092825.GD889580@msg.df7cb.de
While xlc defines __64BIT__, gcc does not. Due to this oversight in
commit 30ee5d17c2, gcc builds continued
implementing 64-bit atomics by way of intrinsics. Back-patch to v13,
where that commit first appeared.
Reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201011051043.GA1724101@rfd.leadboat.com
This makes the normalization quick check about 30% faster for NFC and
50% faster for NFKC than the binary search used previously. The hash
lookup reuses the existing array of bit fields used for the binary
search to get the quick check property and is generated as part of "make
update-unicode" in src/common/unicode/.
Author: John Naylor
Reviewed-by: Mark Dilger, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACPNZCt4fbJ0_bGrN5QPt34N4whv=mszM0LMVQdoa2rC9UMRXA@mail.gmail.com
Buildfarm member lorikeet is still failing the test from commit
32a9c0bdf, but now it's down to the should-have-foreseen-it problem
that the error message isn't what the expected-output file expects.
Let's see if we can get stable results by printing just the SQLSTATE.
I believe we'll reliably see ERRCODE_CONNECTION_FAILURE, since
pgfdw_report_error() will report that for any libpq-originated error.
There may be a better way to do this, but I'd like to get the
buildfarm back to green before we discuss further improvements.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1kPc9v-0005L4-2l@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2621622.1602184554@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit fe27009cb tried to make parallel.c's Windows implementation of
piperead() translate Windows socket errors to Unix, but that didn't
actually work because TranslateSocketError() is backend-internal code
(and not even public there). But on closer inspection, the sole
caller of this function doesn't actually care whether the result is
zero or negative, much less inspect the errno. So the whole exercise
is totally useless, and has been since this code was introduced.
Rip it out and just call recv() directly.
Per buildfarm.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2621622.1602184554@sss.pgh.pa.us
Up to now, only ECONNRESET (and EPIPE, in most but not quite all places)
received special treatment in our error handling logic. This patch
changes things so that related error codes such as ECONNABORTED are
also recognized as indicating that the connection's dead and unlikely
to come back.
We continue to think, however, that only ECONNRESET and EPIPE should be
reported as probable server crashes; the other cases indicate network
connectivity problems but prove little about the server's state. Thus,
there's no change in the error message texts that are output for such
cases. The key practical effect is that errcode_for_socket_access()
will report ERRCODE_CONNECTION_FAILURE rather than
ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR for a network failure. It's expected that this
will fix buildfarm member lorikeet's failures since commit 32a9c0bdf,
as that seems to be due to not treating ECONNABORTED equivalently to
ECONNRESET.
The set of errnos treated this way now includes ECONNABORTED, EHOSTDOWN,
EHOSTUNREACH, ENETDOWN, ENETRESET, and ENETUNREACH. Several of these
were second-class citizens in terms of their handling in places like
get_errno_symbol(), so upgrade the infrastructure where necessary.
As committed, this patch assumes that all these symbols are defined
everywhere. POSIX specifies all of them except EHOSTDOWN, but that
seems to exist on all platforms of interest; we'll see what the
buildfarm says about that.
Probably this should be back-patched, but let's see what the buildfarm
thinks of it first.
Fujii Masao and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2621622.1602184554@sss.pgh.pa.us
Hack things so that our idea of "struct stat" is equivalent to Windows'
struct __stat64, allowing it to have a wide enough st_size field.
Instead of relying on native stat(), use GetFileInformationByHandle().
This avoids a number of issues with Microsoft's multiple and rather
slipshod emulations of stat(). We still need to jump through hoops
to deal with ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, though :-(
Pull the relevant support code out of dirmod.c and put it into
its own file, win32stat.c.
Still TODO: do we need to do something different with lstat(),
rather than treating it identically to stat()?
Juan José Santamaría Flecha, reviewed by Emil Iggland;
based on prior work by Michael Paquier, Sergey Zubkovsky, and others
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1803D792815FC24D871C00D17AE95905CF5099@g01jpexmbkw24
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15858-9572469fd3b73263@postgresql.org
Multiply before dividing, not the reverse, so that cases that should
produce exact results do produce exact results. (width_bucket_float8
got this right already.) Even when the result is inexact, this avoids
making it more inexact, since only the division step introduces any
imprecision.
While at it, fix compute_bucket() to not uselessly repeat the sign
check already done by its caller, and avoid duplicating the
multiply/divide steps by adjusting variable usage.
Per complaint from Martin Visser. Although this seems like a bug fix,
I'm hesitant to risk changing width_bucket()'s results in stable
branches, so no back-patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6FA5117D-6AED-4656-8FEF-B74AC18FAD85@brytlyt.com
While the calculation is not well-defined if the bounds arguments are
infinite, there is a perfectly sane outcome if the test operand is
infinite: it's just like any other value that's before the first bucket
or after the last one. width_bucket_float8() got this right, but
I was too hasty about the case when adding infinities to numerics
(commit a57d312a7), so that width_bucket_numeric() just rejected it.
Fix that, and sync the relevant error message strings.
No back-patch needed, since infinities-in-numeric haven't shipped yet.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2465409.1602170063@sss.pgh.pa.us
The previous set of multipliers was not adapted for large sets of short
keys, and this new set of multipliers allows to generate perfect hash
functions for larger sets without having an impact for existing callers
of those functions, as experimentation has showed. A future commit will
make use of that to improve the performance of unicode normalization.
All multipliers compile to shift-and-add instructions on most platforms.
This has been tested as far back as gcc 4.1 and clang 3.8.
Author: John Naylor
Reviewed-by: Mark Dilger, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACPNZCt4fbJ0_bGrN5QPt34N4whv=mszM0LMVQdoa2rC9UMRXA@mail.gmail.com
This adds the statistics about transactions spilled to disk from
ReorderBuffer. Users can query the pg_stat_replication_slots view to check
these stats and call pg_stat_reset_replication_slot to reset the stats of
a particular slot. Users can pass NULL in pg_stat_reset_replication_slot
to reset stats of all the slots.
This commit extends the statistics collector to track this information
about slots.
Author: Sawada Masahiko and Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Dilip Kumar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k5_pPAYRTDrO2PbtTOe0eHQpBvuqmCr8ic39uTNmR49Eg@mail.gmail.com
It appears that commit cf63c641c, which intended to prevent
misoptimization of the result-building step in makeOrderedSetArgs,
didn't go far enough: buildfarm member hornet's version of xlc
is now optimizing back to the old, broken behavior in which
list_length(directargs) is fetched only after list_concat() has
changed that value. I'm not entirely convinced whether that's
an undeniable compiler bug or whether it can be justified by a
sufficiently aggressive interpretation of C sequence points.
So let's just change the code to make it harder to misinterpret.
Back-patch to all supported versions, just in case.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1830491.1601944935@sss.pgh.pa.us
The date-vs-timestamp, date-vs-timestamptz, and timestamp-vs-timestamptz
comparators all worked by promoting the first type to the second and
then doing a simple same-type comparison. This works fine, except
when the conversion result is out of range, in which case we throw an
entirely avoidable error. The sources of such failures are
(a) type date can represent dates much farther in the future than
the timestamp types can;
(b) timezone rotation might cause a just-in-range timestamp value to
become a just-out-of-range timestamptz value.
Up to now we just ignored these corner-case issues, but now we have
an actual user complaint (bug #16657 from Huss EL-Sheikh), so let's
do something about it.
It turns out that commit 52ad1e659 already built all the necessary
infrastructure to support error-free comparisons, but neglected to
actually use it in the main-line code paths. Fix that, do a little
bit of code style review, and remove the now-duplicate logic in
jsonpath_exec.c.
Back-patch to v13 where 52ad1e659 came in. We could take this back
further by back-patching said infrastructure, but given the small
number of complaints so far, I don't feel a great need to.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16657-cde2f876d8cc7971@postgresql.org
Commit 3eb3d3e78 was a few bricks shy of a load: while it correctly
set the table's "interesting" flag when deciding to dump the data of
an extension config table, it was not correct to clear that flag
if we concluded we shouldn't dump the data. This led to the crash
reported in bug #16655, because in fact we'll traverse dumpTableSchema
anyway for all extension tables (to see if they have user-added
seclabels or RLS policies).
The right thing to do is to force "interesting" true in makeTableDataInfo,
and otherwise leave the flag alone. (Doing it there is more future-proof
in case additional calls are added, and it also avoids setting the flag
unnecessarily if that function decides the table is non-dumpable.)
This investigation also showed that while only the --inserts code path
had an obvious failure in the case considered by 3eb3d3e78, the COPY
code path also has a problem with not having loaded table subsidiary
data. That causes fmtCopyColumnList to silently return an empty string
instead of the correct column list. That accidentally mostly works,
which perhaps is why we didn't notice this before. It would only fail
if the restore column order is different from the dump column order,
which only happens in weird inheritance cases, so it's not surprising
nobody had hit the case with an extension config table. Nonetheless,
it's a bug, and it goes a long way back, not just to v12 where the
--inserts code path started to have a problem with this.
In hopes of catching such cases a bit sooner in future, add some
Asserts that "interesting" has been set in both dumpTableData and
dumpTableSchema. Adjust the test case added by 3eb3d3e78 so that it
checks the COPY rather than INSERT form of that bug, allowing it to
detect the longer-standing symptom.
Per bug #16655 from Cameron Daniel. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16655-5c92d6b3a9438137@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18048b44-3414-b983-8c7c-9165b177900d@2ndQuadrant.com
In logical replication when a subscriber is missing some columns, it
currently emits an error message that says "some" columns are missing, but
it doesn't specify the missing column names. Change that to display
missing column names which makes an error to be more informative to the
user.
We have decided not to backpatch this commit as this is a minor usability
improvement and no user has reported this.
Reported-by: Bharath Rupireddy
Author: Bharath Rupireddy
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACVkW-EXH_4pmBK8tNeHRz5ksUC4WddGactuCjPiBch-cg@mail.gmail.com
This patch prevents crashes or wrong plans when partition-wise joins
are considered during GEQO planning, as a consequence of the
EquivalenceClass data structures becoming corrupt after a GEQO
context reset.
A remaining problem is that successive GEQO cycles will make multiple
copies of the required EC members, since add_child_join_rel_equivalences
has no idea that such members might exist already. For now we'll just
live with that. The lack of field complaints of crashes suggests that
this is a mighty little-used situation.
Back-patch to v12 where this code was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1683100.1601860653@sss.pgh.pa.us
Thanks to Andrew for proposing and testing this fix.
It's possible that we should address this on a more fundamental basis,
e.g. by configuring PerlIO to to CR/LF conversion for us, but this
approach already exists in other places. And it's nice to unbreak the
BF.
Proposed-By: Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2355d1f0-0244-da9c-ef0c-7542b944e1ac@2ndQuadrant.com
Thomas Munro