postgres

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Bruce Momjian	29275b1d17	Update copyright for 2024 Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 12	2 years ago
Bruce Momjian	c8e1ba736b	Update copyright for 2023 Backpatch-through: 11	3 years ago
Bruce Momjian	27b77ecf9f	Update copyright for 2022 Backpatch-through: 10	4 years ago
Bruce Momjian	ca3b37487b	Update copyright for 2021 Backpatch-through: 9.5	5 years ago
Bruce Momjian	7559d8ebfa	Update copyrights for 2020 Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4	6 years ago
Tom Lane	8255c7a5ee	Phase 2 pgindent run for v12. Switch to 2.1 version of pg_bsd_indent. This formats multiline function declarations "correctly", that is with additional lines of parameter declarations indented to match where the first line's left parenthesis is. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0P3FeTXRcU5B2W3jv3PgRVZ-kGUXLGfd42FFhUROO3ug@mail.gmail.com	7 years ago
Bruce Momjian	97c39498e5	Update copyright for 2019 Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.4	7 years ago
Bruce Momjian	9d4649ca49	Update copyright for 2018 Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.3	8 years ago
Tom Lane	4bd1994650	Make DatumGetFoo/PG_GETARG_FOO/PG_RETURN_FOO macro names more consistent. By project convention, these names should include "P" when dealing with a pointer type; that is, if the result of a GETARG macro is of type FOO , it should be called PG_GETARG_FOO_P not just PG_GETARG_FOO. Some newer types such as JSONB and ranges had not followed the convention, and a number of contrib modules hadn't gotten that memo either. Rename the offending macros to improve consistency. In passing, fix a few places that thought PG_DETOAST_DATUM() returns a Datum; it does not, it returns "struct varlena ". Applying DatumGetPointer to that happens not to cause any bad effects today, but it's formally wrong. Also, adjust an ltree macro that was designed without any thought for what pgindent would do with it. This is all cosmetic and shouldn't have any impact on generated code. Mark Dilger, some further tweaks by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/EA5676F4-766F-4F38-8348-ECC7DB427C6A@gmail.com	8 years ago
Bruce Momjian	1d25779284	Update copyright via script for 2017	9 years ago
Tom Lane	ea268cdc9a	Add macros to make AllocSetContextCreate() calls simpler and safer. I found that half a dozen (nearly 5%) of our AllocSetContextCreate calls had typos in the context-sizing parameters. While none of these led to especially significant problems, they did create minor inefficiencies, and it's now clear that expecting people to copy-and-paste those calls accurately is not a great idea. Let's reduce the risk of future errors by introducing single macros that encapsulate the common use-cases. Three such macros are enough to cover all but two special-purpose contexts; those two calls can be left as-is, I think. While this patch doesn't in itself improve matters for third-party extensions, it doesn't break anything for them either, and they can gradually adopt the simplified notation over time. In passing, change TopMemoryContext to use the default allocation parameters. Formerly it could only be extended 8K at a time. That was probably reasonable when this code was written; but nowadays we create many more contexts than we did then, so that it's not unusual to have a couple hundred K in TopMemoryContext, even without considering various dubious code that sticks other things there. There seems no good reason not to let it use growing blocks like most other contexts. Back-patch to 9.6, mostly because that's still close enough to HEAD that it's easy to do so, and keeping the branches in sync can be expected to avoid some future back-patching pain. The bugs fixed by these changes don't seem to be significant enough to justify fixing them further back. Discussion: <21072.1472321324@sss.pgh.pa.us>	9 years ago
Bruce Momjian	ee94300446	Update copyright for 2016 Backpatch certain files through 9.1	10 years ago
Tom Lane	1dc5ebc907	Support "expanded" objects, particularly arrays, for better performance. This patch introduces the ability for complex datatypes to have an in-memory representation that is different from their on-disk format. On-disk formats are typically optimized for minimal size, and in any case they can't contain pointers, so they are often not well-suited for computation. Now a datatype can invent an "expanded" in-memory format that is better suited for its operations, and then pass that around among the C functions that operate on the datatype. There are also provisions (rudimentary as yet) to allow an expanded object to be modified in-place under suitable conditions, so that operations like assignment to an element of an array need not involve copying the entire array. The initial application for this feature is arrays, but it is not hard to foresee using it for other container types like JSON, XML and hstore. I have hopes that it will be useful to PostGIS as well. In this initial implementation, a few heuristics have been hard-wired into plpgsql to improve performance for arrays that are stored in plpgsql variables. We would like to generalize those hacks so that other datatypes can obtain similar improvements, but figuring out some appropriate APIs is left as a task for future work. (The heuristics themselves are probably not optimal yet, either, as they sometimes force expansion of arrays that would be better left alone.) Preliminary performance testing shows impressive speed gains for plpgsql functions that do element-by-element access or update of large arrays. There are other cases that get a little slower, as a result of added array format conversions; but we can hope to improve anything that's annoyingly bad. In any case most applications should see a net win. Tom Lane, reviewed by Andres Freund	11 years ago

13 Commits (f80b09bac87d6b49f5dbb6131da5fbd9b9773c5c)