Prefer to use _simple_*.

pull/4/merge
Erik Johnston 10 years ago
parent cd525c0f5a
commit b036596b75
  1. 85
      synapse/storage/push_rule.py

@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ from ._base import SQLBaseStore, Table
from twisted.internet import defer
import logging
import copy
import simplejson as json
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
@ -28,46 +27,45 @@ logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
class PushRuleStore(SQLBaseStore):
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def get_push_rules_for_user(self, user_name):
sql = (
"SELECT "+",".join(PushRuleTable.fields)+" "
"FROM "+PushRuleTable.table_name+" "
"WHERE user_name = ? "
"ORDER BY priority_class DESC, priority DESC"
rows = yield self._simple_select_list(
table=PushRuleTable.table_name,
keyvalues={
"user_name": user_name,
},
retcols=PushRuleTable.fields,
)
rows = yield self._execute("get_push_rules_for_user", None, sql, user_name)
dicts = []
for r in rows:
d = {}
for i, f in enumerate(PushRuleTable.fields):
d[f] = r[i]
dicts.append(d)
rows.sort(
key=lambda row: (-int(row["priority_class"]), -int(row["priority"]))
)
defer.returnValue(dicts)
defer.returnValue(rows)
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def get_push_rules_enabled_for_user(self, user_name):
results = yield self._simple_select_list(
PushRuleEnableTable.table_name,
{'user_name': user_name},
PushRuleEnableTable.fields,
table=PushRuleEnableTable.table_name,
keyvalues={
'user_name': user_name
},
retcols=PushRuleEnableTable.fields,
desc="get_push_rules_enabled_for_user",
)
defer.returnValue(
{r['rule_id']: False if r['enabled'] == 0 else True for r in results}
)
defer.returnValue({
r['rule_id']: False if r['enabled'] == 0 else True for r in results
})
@defer.inlineCallbacks
def add_push_rule(self, before, after, **kwargs):
vals = copy.copy(kwargs)
vals = kwargs
if 'conditions' in vals:
vals['conditions'] = json.dumps(vals['conditions'])
if 'actions' in vals:
vals['actions'] = json.dumps(vals['actions'])
# we could check the rest of the keys are valid column names
# but sqlite will do that anyway so I think it's just pointless.
if 'id' in vals:
del vals['id']
vals.pop("id", None)
if before or after:
ret = yield self.runInteraction(
@ -87,37 +85,36 @@ class PushRuleStore(SQLBaseStore):
defer.returnValue(ret)
def _add_push_rule_relative_txn(self, txn, user_name, **kwargs):
after = None
relative_to_rule = None
if 'after' in kwargs and kwargs['after']:
after = kwargs['after']
relative_to_rule = after
if 'before' in kwargs and kwargs['before']:
relative_to_rule = kwargs['before']
# get the priority of the rule we're inserting after/before
sql = (
"SELECT priority_class, priority FROM ? "
"WHERE user_name = ? and rule_id = ?" % (PushRuleTable.table_name,)
after = kwargs.pop("after", None)
relative_to_rule = kwargs.pop("before", after)
res = self._simple_select_one_txn(
txn,
table=PushRuleTable.table_name,
keyvalues={
"user_name": user_name,
"rule_id": relative_to_rule,
},
retcols=["priority_class", "priority"],
allow_none=True,
)
txn.execute(sql, (user_name, relative_to_rule))
res = txn.fetchall()
if not res:
raise RuleNotFoundException(
"before/after rule not found: %s" % (relative_to_rule,)
)
priority_class, base_rule_priority = res[0]
priority_class = res["priority_class"]
base_rule_priority = res["priority"]
if 'priority_class' in kwargs and kwargs['priority_class'] != priority_class:
raise InconsistentRuleException(
"Given priority class does not match class of relative rule"
)
new_rule = copy.copy(kwargs)
if 'before' in new_rule:
del new_rule['before']
if 'after' in new_rule:
del new_rule['after']
new_rule = kwargs
new_rule.pop("before", None)
new_rule.pop("after", None)
new_rule['priority_class'] = priority_class
new_rule['user_name'] = user_name
new_rule['id'] = self._push_rule_id_gen.get_next_txn(txn)
@ -176,7 +173,7 @@ class PushRuleStore(SQLBaseStore):
new_prio = highest_prio + 1
# and insert the new rule
new_rule = copy.copy(kwargs)
new_rule = kwargs
new_rule['id'] = self._push_rule_id_gen.get_next_txn(txn)
new_rule['user_name'] = user_name
new_rule['priority_class'] = priority_class

Loading…
Cancel
Save