Fix autovacuum for shared relations

The table-skipping logic in autovacuum would fail to consider that
multiple workers could be processing the same shared catalog in
different databases.  This normally wouldn't be a problem: firstly
because autovacuum workers not for wraparound would simply ignore tables
in which they cannot acquire lock, and secondly because most of the time
these tables are small enough that even if multiple for-wraparound
workers are stuck in the same catalog, they would be over pretty
quickly.  But in cases where the catalogs are severely bloated it could
become a problem.

Backpatch all the way back, because the problem has been there since the
beginning.

Reported by Ondřej Světlík

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/572B63B1.3030603%40flexibee.eu
	https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/572A1072.5080308%40flexibee.eu

src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c

@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ typedef struct autovac_table
 	int			at_vacuum_cost_limit;
 	bool		at_dobalance;
 	bool		at_wraparound;
+	bool		at_sharedrel;
 	char	   *at_relname;
 	char	   *at_nspname;
 	char	   *at_datname;
@@ -193,6 +194,7 @@ typedef struct autovac_table
  * wi_links		entry into free list or running list
  * wi_dboid		OID of the database this worker is supposed to work on
  * wi_tableoid	OID of the table currently being vacuumed, if any
+ * wi_sharedrel	flag indicating whether table is marked relisshared
  * wi_proc		pointer to PGPROC of the running worker, NULL if not started
  * wi_launchtime Time at which this worker was launched
  * wi_cost_*	Vacuum cost-based delay parameters current in this worker
@@ -210,6 +212,7 @@ typedef struct WorkerInfoData
 	PGPROC	   *wi_proc;
 	TimestampTz wi_launchtime;
 	bool		wi_dobalance;
+	bool		wi_sharedrel;
 	int			wi_cost_delay;
 	int			wi_cost_limit;
 	int			wi_cost_limit_base;
@@ -742,6 +745,7 @@ AutoVacLauncherMain(int argc, char *argv[])
 					worker = AutoVacuumShmem->av_startingWorker;
 					worker->wi_dboid = InvalidOid;
 					worker->wi_tableoid = InvalidOid;
+					worker->wi_sharedrel = false;
 					worker->wi_proc = NULL;
 					worker->wi_launchtime = 0;
 					worker->wi_links.next = (SHM_QUEUE *) AutoVacuumShmem->av_freeWorkers;
@@ -1700,6 +1704,7 @@ FreeWorkerInfo(int code, Datum arg)
 		MyWorkerInfo->wi_links.next = (SHM_QUEUE *) AutoVacuumShmem->av_freeWorkers;
 		MyWorkerInfo->wi_dboid = InvalidOid;
 		MyWorkerInfo->wi_tableoid = InvalidOid;
+		MyWorkerInfo->wi_sharedrel = false;
 		MyWorkerInfo->wi_proc = NULL;
 		MyWorkerInfo->wi_launchtime = 0;
 		MyWorkerInfo->wi_dobalance = false;
@@ -2227,8 +2232,8 @@ do_autovacuum(void)
 			if (worker == MyWorkerInfo)
 				goto next_worker;
 
-			/* ignore workers in other databases */
+			/* ignore workers in other databases (unless table is shared) */
-			if (worker->wi_dboid != MyDatabaseId)
+			if (!worker->wi_sharedrel && worker->wi_dboid != MyDatabaseId)
 				goto next_worker;
 
 			if (worker->wi_tableoid == relid)
@@ -2273,6 +2278,7 @@ do_autovacuum(void)
 		 * the lock so that other workers don't vacuum it concurrently.
 		 */
 		MyWorkerInfo->wi_tableoid = relid;
+		MyWorkerInfo->wi_sharedrel = tab->at_sharedrel;
 		LWLockRelease(AutovacuumScheduleLock);
 
 		/*
@@ -2384,6 +2390,7 @@ deleted:
 		 */
 		LWLockAcquire(AutovacuumLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
 		MyWorkerInfo->wi_tableoid = InvalidOid;
+		MyWorkerInfo->wi_sharedrel = false;
 		LWLockRelease(AutovacuumLock);
 
 		/* restore vacuum cost GUCs for the next iteration */
@@ -2558,6 +2565,7 @@ table_recheck_autovac(Oid relid, HTAB *table_toast_map,
 
 		tab = palloc(sizeof(autovac_table));
 		tab->at_relid = relid;
+		tab->at_sharedrel = classForm->relisshared;
 		tab->at_dovacuum = dovacuum;
 		tab->at_doanalyze = doanalyze;
 		tab->at_freeze_min_age = freeze_min_age;