|
|
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ |
|
|
|
alink="#0000ff"> |
|
|
|
alink="#0000ff"> |
|
|
|
<H1>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for PostgreSQL</H1> |
|
|
|
<H1>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for PostgreSQL</H1> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<P>Last updated: Fri Oct 3 22:36:54 EDT 2003</P> |
|
|
|
<P>Last updated: Sat Oct 4 23:52:01 EDT 2003</P> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<P>Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (<A href= |
|
|
|
<P>Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (<A href= |
|
|
|
"mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us">pgman@candle.pha.pa.us</A>)<BR> |
|
|
|
"mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us">pgman@candle.pha.pa.us</A>)<BR> |
|
|
@ -439,9 +439,9 @@ |
|
|
|
others. In comparison to MySQL or leaner database systems, we are |
|
|
|
others. In comparison to MySQL or leaner database systems, we are |
|
|
|
faster for multiple users, complex queries, and a read/write query |
|
|
|
faster for multiple users, complex queries, and a read/write query |
|
|
|
load. MySQL is faster for simple SELECT queries done by a few users. |
|
|
|
load. MySQL is faster for simple SELECT queries done by a few users. |
|
|
|
Of course, MySQL does not have any of the features mentioned in the |
|
|
|
Of course, MySQL does not have most of the features mentioned in the |
|
|
|
<I>Features</I> section above. We are built for reliability and |
|
|
|
<I>Features</I> section above. We are built for reliability and |
|
|
|
features, though we continue to improve performance in every |
|
|
|
features, and we continue to improve performance in every |
|
|
|
release. There is an interesting Web page comparing PostgreSQL to |
|
|
|
release. There is an interesting Web page comparing PostgreSQL to |
|
|
|
MySQL at <A href="http://openacs.org/philosophy/why-not-mysql.html"> |
|
|
|
MySQL at <A href="http://openacs.org/philosophy/why-not-mysql.html"> |
|
|
|
http://openacs.org/philosophy/why-not-mysql.html</A><BR> |
|
|
|
http://openacs.org/philosophy/why-not-mysql.html</A><BR> |
|
|
|