Fix integer-overflow edge case detection in interval_mul and pgbench.

This patch adopts the overflow check logic introduced by commit cbdb8b4c0
into two more places.  interval_mul() failed to notice if it computed a
new microseconds value that was one more than INT64_MAX, and pgbench's
double-to-int64 logic had the same sorts of edge-case problems that
cbdb8b4c0 fixed in the core code.

To make this easier to get right in future, put the guts of the checks
into new macros in c.h, and add commentary about how to use the macros
correctly.

Back-patch to all supported branches, as we did with the previous fix.

Yuya Watari

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ2pMkbkkFw2hb9Qb1Zj8d06EhWAQXFLy73St4qWv6aX=vqnjw@mail.gmail.com

src/backend/utils/adt/float.c

@@ -1212,15 +1212,8 @@ dtoi4(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	 */
 	num = rint(num);
 
-	/*
+	/* Range check */
-	 * Range check.  We must be careful here that the boundary values are
+	if (unlikely(isnan(num) || !FLOAT8_FITS_IN_INT32(num)))
-	 * expressed exactly in the float domain.  We expect PG_INT32_MIN to be an
-	 * exact power of 2, so it will be represented exactly; but PG_INT32_MAX
-	 * isn't, and might get rounded off, so avoid using it.
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(num < (float8) PG_INT32_MIN ||
-				 num >= -((float8) PG_INT32_MIN) ||
-				 isnan(num)))
 		ereport(ERROR,
 				(errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
 				 errmsg("integer out of range")));
@@ -1244,15 +1237,8 @@ dtoi2(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	 */
 	num = rint(num);
 
-	/*
+	/* Range check */
-	 * Range check.  We must be careful here that the boundary values are
+	if (unlikely(isnan(num) || !FLOAT8_FITS_IN_INT16(num)))
-	 * expressed exactly in the float domain.  We expect PG_INT16_MIN to be an
-	 * exact power of 2, so it will be represented exactly; but PG_INT16_MAX
-	 * isn't, and might get rounded off, so avoid using it.
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(num < (float8) PG_INT16_MIN ||
-				 num >= -((float8) PG_INT16_MIN) ||
-				 isnan(num)))
 		ereport(ERROR,
 				(errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
 				 errmsg("smallint out of range")));
@@ -1300,15 +1286,8 @@ ftoi4(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	 */
 	num = rint(num);
 
-	/*
+	/* Range check */
-	 * Range check.  We must be careful here that the boundary values are
+	if (unlikely(isnan(num) || !FLOAT4_FITS_IN_INT32(num)))
-	 * expressed exactly in the float domain.  We expect PG_INT32_MIN to be an
-	 * exact power of 2, so it will be represented exactly; but PG_INT32_MAX
-	 * isn't, and might get rounded off, so avoid using it.
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(num < (float4) PG_INT32_MIN ||
-				 num >= -((float4) PG_INT32_MIN) ||
-				 isnan(num)))
 		ereport(ERROR,
 				(errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
 				 errmsg("integer out of range")));
@@ -1332,15 +1311,8 @@ ftoi2(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	 */
 	num = rint(num);
 
-	/*
+	/* Range check */
-	 * Range check.  We must be careful here that the boundary values are
+	if (unlikely(isnan(num) || !FLOAT4_FITS_IN_INT16(num)))
-	 * expressed exactly in the float domain.  We expect PG_INT16_MIN to be an
-	 * exact power of 2, so it will be represented exactly; but PG_INT16_MAX
-	 * isn't, and might get rounded off, so avoid using it.
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(num < (float4) PG_INT16_MIN ||
-				 num >= -((float4) PG_INT16_MIN) ||
-				 isnan(num)))
 		ereport(ERROR,
 				(errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
 				 errmsg("smallint out of range")));

src/backend/utils/adt/int8.c

@@ -1216,15 +1216,8 @@ dtoi8(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	 */
 	num = rint(num);
 
-	/*
+	/* Range check */
-	 * Range check.  We must be careful here that the boundary values are
+	if (unlikely(isnan(num) || !FLOAT8_FITS_IN_INT64(num)))
-	 * expressed exactly in the float domain.  We expect PG_INT64_MIN to be an
-	 * exact power of 2, so it will be represented exactly; but PG_INT64_MAX
-	 * isn't, and might get rounded off, so avoid using it.
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(num < (float8) PG_INT64_MIN ||
-				 num >= -((float8) PG_INT64_MIN) ||
-				 isnan(num)))
 		ereport(ERROR,
 				(errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
 				 errmsg("bigint out of range")));
@@ -1258,15 +1251,8 @@ ftoi8(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	 */
 	num = rint(num);
 
-	/*
+	/* Range check */
-	 * Range check.  We must be careful here that the boundary values are
+	if (unlikely(isnan(num) || !FLOAT4_FITS_IN_INT64(num)))
-	 * expressed exactly in the float domain.  We expect PG_INT64_MIN to be an
-	 * exact power of 2, so it will be represented exactly; but PG_INT64_MAX
-	 * isn't, and might get rounded off, so avoid using it.
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(num < (float4) PG_INT64_MIN ||
-				 num >= -((float4) PG_INT64_MIN) ||
-				 isnan(num)))
 		ereport(ERROR,
 				(errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
 				 errmsg("bigint out of range")));

src/backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c

@@ -3233,7 +3233,7 @@ interval_mul(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	/* cascade units down */
 	result->day += (int32) month_remainder_days;
 	result_double = rint(span->time * factor + sec_remainder * USECS_PER_SEC);
-	if (result_double > PG_INT64_MAX || result_double < PG_INT64_MIN)
+	if (isnan(result_double) || !FLOAT8_FITS_IN_INT64(result_double))
 		ereport(ERROR,
 				(errcode(ERRCODE_DATETIME_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
 				 errmsg("interval out of range")));

src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c

@@ -1675,9 +1675,9 @@ coerceToInt(PgBenchValue *pval, int64 *ival)
 	}
 	else if (pval->type == PGBT_DOUBLE)
 	{
-		double		dval = pval->u.dval;
+		double		dval = rint(pval->u.dval);
 
-		if (dval < PG_INT64_MIN || PG_INT64_MAX < dval)
+		if (isnan(dval) || !FLOAT8_FITS_IN_INT64(dval))
 		{
 			fprintf(stderr, "double to int overflow for %f\n", dval);
 			return false;

src/include/c.h

@@ -1030,6 +1030,30 @@ extern void ExceptionalCondition(const char *conditionName,
 			*_start++ = 0; \
 	} while (0)
 
+/*
+ * Macros for range-checking float values before converting to integer.
+ * We must be careful here that the boundary values are expressed exactly
+ * in the float domain.  PG_INTnn_MIN is an exact power of 2, so it will
+ * be represented exactly; but PG_INTnn_MAX isn't, and might get rounded
+ * off, so avoid using that.
+ * The input must be rounded to an integer beforehand, typically with rint(),
+ * else we might draw the wrong conclusion about close-to-the-limit values.
+ * These macros will do the right thing for Inf, but not necessarily for NaN,
+ * so check isnan(num) first if that's a possibility.
+ */
+#define FLOAT4_FITS_IN_INT16(num) \
+	((num) >= (float4) PG_INT16_MIN && (num) < -((float4) PG_INT16_MIN))
+#define FLOAT4_FITS_IN_INT32(num) \
+	((num) >= (float4) PG_INT32_MIN && (num) < -((float4) PG_INT32_MIN))
+#define FLOAT4_FITS_IN_INT64(num) \
+	((num) >= (float4) PG_INT64_MIN && (num) < -((float4) PG_INT64_MIN))
+#define FLOAT8_FITS_IN_INT16(num) \
+	((num) >= (float8) PG_INT16_MIN && (num) < -((float8) PG_INT16_MIN))
+#define FLOAT8_FITS_IN_INT32(num) \
+	((num) >= (float8) PG_INT32_MIN && (num) < -((float8) PG_INT32_MIN))
+#define FLOAT8_FITS_IN_INT64(num) \
+	((num) >= (float8) PG_INT64_MIN && (num) < -((float8) PG_INT64_MIN))
+
 
 /* ----------------------------------------------------------------
  *				Section 8:	random stuff

src/test/regress/expected/interval.out

@@ -232,6 +232,9 @@ INSERT INTO INTERVAL_TBL_OF (f1) VALUES ('-2147483648 years');
 ERROR:  interval out of range
 LINE 1: INSERT INTO INTERVAL_TBL_OF (f1) VALUES ('-2147483648 years'...
                                                  ^
+-- Test edge-case overflow detection in interval multiplication
+select extract(epoch from '256 microseconds'::interval * (2^55)::float8);
+ERROR:  interval out of range
 SELECT r1.*, r2.*
    FROM INTERVAL_TBL_OF r1, INTERVAL_TBL_OF r2
    WHERE r1.f1 > r2.f1

src/test/regress/sql/interval.sql

@@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ INSERT INTO INTERVAL_TBL_OF (f1) VALUES ('-2147483649 days');
 INSERT INTO INTERVAL_TBL_OF (f1) VALUES ('2147483647 years');
 INSERT INTO INTERVAL_TBL_OF (f1) VALUES ('-2147483648 years');
 
+-- Test edge-case overflow detection in interval multiplication
+select extract(epoch from '256 microseconds'::interval * (2^55)::float8);
+
 SELECT r1.*, r2.*
    FROM INTERVAL_TBL_OF r1, INTERVAL_TBL_OF r2
    WHERE r1.f1 > r2.f1