POSIX specifies that jrand48() returns a signed 32-bit value (in the
range [-2^31, 2^31)), but our code was returning an unsigned 32-bit
value (in the range [0, 2^32)). This doesn't actually matter to any
existing call site, because they all cast the "long" result to int32
or uint32; but it will doubtless bite somebody in the future.
To fix, cast the arithmetic result to int32 explicitly before the
compiler widens it to long (if widening is needed).
While at it, upgrade this file's far-short-of-project-style comments.
Had there been some peer pressure to document pg_jrand48() properly,
maybe this thinko wouldn't have gotten committed to begin with.
Backpatch to v10 where pg_jrand48() was added, just in case somebody
back-patches a fix that uses it and depends on the standard behavior.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17235.1545951602@sss.pgh.pa.us
Isolation test suite of GIN predicate locking was criticized for being too slow,
especially under Valgrind. This commit is intended to accelerate it. Tests are
simplified in the following ways.
1) Amount of data is reduced. We're now close to the minimal amount of data,
which produces at least one posting tree and at least two pages of entry
tree.
2) Three isolation tests are merged into one.
3) Only one tuple is queried from posting tree. So, locking of index is the
same, but tuple locks are not propagated to relation lock. Also, it is
faster.
4) Test cases itself are simplified. Now each test case run just one INSERT
and one SELECT involving GIN, which either conflict or not.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181204000740.ok2q53nvkftwu43a%40alap3.anarazel.de
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Tested-by: Andrew Dunstan
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 11
According to README we acquire predicate locks on entry tree leafs and posting
tree roots. However, when ginFindLeafPage() is going to lock leaf in exclusive
mode, then it checks root for conflicts regardless whether it's a entry or
posting tree. Assuming that we never place predicate lock on entry tree root
(excluding corner case when root is leaf), this check is redundant. This
commit removes this check. Now, root conflict checking is controlled by
separate argument of ginFindLeafPage().
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdv7rrDyy%3DMgsaK-L9kk0AH7az0B-mdC3w3p0FSb9uoyEg%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 11
Inheritance trees can include temporary tables if the parent is
permanent, which makes possible the presence of multiple temporary
children from different sessions. Trying to issue a TRUNCATE on the
parent in this scenario causes a failure, so similarly to any other
queries just ignore such cases, which makes TRUNCATE work
transparently.
This makes truncation behave similarly to any other DML query working on
the parent table with queries which need to be issues on children. A
set of isolation tests is added to cover basic cases.
Reported-by: Zhou Digoal
Author: Amit Langote, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15565-ce67a48d0244436a@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 9.4
I made a frontend fprintf() format use %m, forgetting that that's only
safe in HEAD not the back branches; prior to 96bf88d52 and d6c55de1f,
it would work on glibc platforms but not elsewhere. Revert to using
%s ... strerror(errno) as the code did before.
We could have left HEAD as-is, but for code consistency across branches,
I chose to apply this patch there too.
Per Coverity and a few buildfarm members.
At the end of recovery for the post-promotion process, a new history
file is created followed by the last partial segment of the previous
timeline. Based on the timing, the archiver would first try to archive
the last partial segment and then the history file. This can delay the
detection of a new timeline taken, particularly depending on the time it
takes to transfer the last partial segment as it delays the moment the
history file of the new timeline gets archived. This can cause promoted
standbys to use the same timeline as one already taken depending on the
circumstances if multiple instances look at archives at the same
location.
This commit changes the order of archiving so as history files are
archived in priority over other file types, which reduces the likelihood
of the same timeline being taken (still not reducing the window to
zero), and it makes the archiver behave more consistently with the
startup process doing its post-promotion business.
Author: David Steele
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/929068cf-69e1-bba2-9dc0-e05986aed471@pgmasters.net
Backpatch-through: 9.5
COPY can skip writing WAL when loading data on a table which has been
created in the same transaction as the one loading the data, however
this cannot work on views or foreign table as this would result in
trying to flush relation files which do not exist. So disable the
optimization so as commands are able to work the same way with any
configuration of wal_level.
Tests are added to cover the different cases, which need to have
wal_level set to minimal to allow the problem to show up, and that is
not the default configuration.
Reported-by: Luis M. Carril, Etsuro Fujita
Author: Amit Langote, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Etsuro Fujita
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15552-c64aa14c5c22f63c@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 10, where support for COPY on views has been added,
while v11 has added support for COPY on foreign tables.
013ebc0a7b implements so-called GiST microvacuum. That is gistgettuple() marks
index tuples as dead when kill_prior_tuple is set. Later, when new tuple
insertion claims page space, those dead index tuples are physically deleted
from page. When this deletion is replayed on standby, it might conflict with
read-only queries. But 013ebc0a7b doesn't handle this. That may lead to
disappearance of some tuples from read-only snapshots on standby.
This commit implements resolving of conflicts between replay of GiST microvacuum
and standby queries. On the master we implement new WAL record type
XLOG_GIST_DELETE, which comprises necessary information. On stable releases
we've to be tricky to keep WAL compatibility. Information required for conflict
processing is just appended to data of XLOG_GIST_PAGE_UPDATE record. So,
PostgreSQL version, which doesn't know about conflict processing, will just
ignore that.
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Diagnosed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181212224524.scafnlyjindmrbe6%40alap3.anarazel.de
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 9.6
For probably bogus reasons, we acquire only AccessShareLock on the
partition when we try to detach it from its parent partitioned table.
This can cause ugly things to happen if another transaction is doing
any sort of DDL to the partition concurrently.
Upgrade that lock to ShareUpdateExclusiveLock, which per discussion
seems to be the minimum needed.
Reported by Robert Haas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYruJQ+2qnFLtF1xQtr71pdwgfxy3Ziy-TxV28M6pEmyA@mail.gmail.com
"$user" in a search_path string is replaced by CURRENT_USER not
SESSION_USER. (It actually was SESSION_USER in the initial implementation,
but we changed it shortly later, and evidently forgot to fix the docs to
match.)
Noted by antonov@stdpr.ru
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/159151fb45d490c8d31ea9707e9ba99d@stdpr.ru
When a partition is detached from its parent, we acquire locks on all
attached indexes to also detach them ... but we release those locks
immediately. This is a violation of the policy of keeping locks on user
objects to the end of the transaction. Bug introduced in 8b08f7d482.
It's unclear that there are any ill effects possible, but it's clearly
wrong nonetheless. It's likely that bad behavior *is* possible, but
mostly because the relation that the index is for is only locked with
AccessShareLock, which is an older bug that shall be fixed separately.
While touching that line of code, close the index opened with
index_open() using index_close() instead of relation_close().
No difference in practice, but let's be consistent.
Unearthed by Robert Haas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYruJQ+2qnFLtF1xQtr71pdwgfxy3Ziy-TxV28M6pEmyA@mail.gmail.com
The flag for IF NOT EXISTS was only being passed down in the normal
recursing case. It's been this way since originally added in 9.6 in
commit 2cd40adb85 so backpatch back to 9.6.
Commit 40dae7ec53, which made the handling of interrupted nbtree page
splits more robust, removed an nbtree-specific end-of-recovery cleanup
step. This meant that it was no longer possible to complete an
interrupted page split during recovery. However, a reference to
recovery as a reason for using a NULL stack while inserting into a
parent page was missed. Remove the reference.
Remove a similar obsolete reference to recovery that was introduced much
more recently, as part of the btree fastpath optimization enhancement
that made it into Postgres 11 (commit 2b272734, and follow-up commits).
Backpatch: 11-, where the fastpath optimization was introduced.
"rescanratio" was computed as 1 + rescanned-tuples / total-inner-tuples,
which is sensible if it's to be multiplied by total-inner-tuples or a cost
value corresponding to scanning all the inner tuples. But in reality it
was (mostly) multiplied by inner_rows or a related cost, numbers that take
into account the possibility of stopping short of scanning the whole inner
relation thanks to a limited key range in the outer relation. This'd
still make sense if we could expect that stopping short would result in a
proportional decrease in the number of tuples that have to be rescanned.
It does not, however. The argument that establishes the validity of our
estimate for that number is independent of whether we scan all of the inner
relation or stop short, and experimentation also shows that stopping short
doesn't reduce the number of rescanned tuples. So the correct calculation
is 1 + rescanned-tuples / inner_rows, and we should be sure to multiply
that by inner_rows or a corresponding cost value.
Most of the time this doesn't make much difference, but if we have
both a high rescan rate (due to lots of duplicate values) and an outer
key range much smaller than the inner key range, then the error can
be significant, leading to a large underestimate of the cost associated
with rescanning.
Per report from Vijaykumar Jain. This thinko appears to go all the way
back to the introduction of the rescan estimation logic in commit
70fba7043, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAE7uO5hMb_TZYJcZmLAgO6iD68AkEK6qCe7i=vZUkCpoKns+EQ@mail.gmail.com
The new grammar pattern of ALTER INDEX SET STATISTICS able to use column
numbers on top of the existing column names introduced by commit 5b6d13e
forgot to add support for the feature in pg_dump, so defining statistics
on index columns was missing from the dumps, potentially causing silent
planning problems with a subsequent restore.
pg_dump ought to not use column names in what it generates as these are
automatically generated by the server and could conflict with real
relation attributes with matching patterns. "expr" and "exprN", N
incremented automatically after the creation of the first one, are used
as default attribute names for index expressions, and that could easily
match what is defined in other relations, causing the dumps to fail if
some of those attributes are renamed at some point. So to avoid any
problems, the new grammar with column numbers gets used.
Reported-by: Ronan Dunklau
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Adrien Nayrat, Amul Sul
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAARsnT3UQ4V=yDNW468w8RqHfYiY9mpn2r_c5UkBJ97NAApUEw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11, where the new syntax has been introduced.
This is an oversight from recent commit b13fd344. While on it, tweak
the previous test with a better name for the renamed primary key.
Detected by buildfarm member prion which forces relation cache release
with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE. Back-patch down to 9.4 as the previous
commit.
When a constraint gets renamed, it may have associated with it a target
relation (for example domain constraints don't have one). Not
invalidating the target relation cache when issuing the renaming can
result in issues with subsequent commands that refer to the old
constraint name using the relation cache, causing various failures. One
pattern spotted was using CREATE TABLE LIKE after a constraint
renaming.
Reported-by: Stuart <sfbarbee@gmail.com>
Author: Amit Langote
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2047094.V130LYfLq4@station53.ousa.org
reap_child() basically ignored the possibility of either an error in
waitpid() itself or a child process failure on signal. We don't really
need to do more than report and crash hard, but proceeding as though
nothing is wrong is definitely Not Acceptable. The error report for
nonzero child exit status was pretty off-point, as well.
Noted while fooling around with child-process failure detection
logic elsewhere. It's been like this a long time, so back-patch to
all supported branches.
Commit ffa4cbd62 added logic to detect SIGPIPE failure of a COPY child
process, but it only worked correctly if the SIGPIPE occurred in the
immediate child process. Depending on the shell in use and the
complexity of the shell command string, we might instead get back
an exit code of 128 + SIGPIPE, representing a shell error exit
reporting SIGPIPE in the child process.
We could just hack up ClosePipeToProgram() to add the extra case,
but it seems like this is a fairly general issue deserving a more
general and better-documented solution. I chose to add a couple
of functions in src/common/wait_error.c, which is a natural place
to know about wait-result encodings, that will test for either a
specific child-process signal type or any child-process signal failure.
Then, adjust other places that were doing ad-hoc tests of this type
to use the common functions.
In RestoreArchivedFile, this fixes a race condition affecting whether
the process will report an error or just silently proc_exit(1): before,
that depended on whether the intermediate shell got SIGTERM'd itself
or reported a child process failing on SIGTERM.
Like the previous patch, back-patch to v10; we could go further
but there seems no real need to.
Per report from Erik Rijkers.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f3683f87ab1701bea5d86a7742b22432@xs4all.nl
The idea here is to not call recordDependencyOn for the default collation,
since we know that's pinned. But what the code actually did was to record
the partition key's dependency on the opclass twice, instead.
Evidently introduced by sloppy coding in commit 2186b608b. Back-patch
to v10 where that came in.
When GIN vacuum deletes a posting tree page, it assumes that no concurrent
searchers can access it, thanks to ginStepRight() locking two pages at once.
However, since 9.4 searches can skip parts of posting trees descending from the
root. That leads to the risk that page is deleted and reclaimed before
concurrent search can access it.
This commit prevents the risk of above by waiting for every transaction, which
might wait to reference this page, to finish. Due to binary compatibility
we can't change GinPageOpaqueData to store corresponding transaction id.
Instead we reuse page header pd_prune_xid field, which is unused in index pages.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31a702a.14dd.166c1366ac1.Coremail.chjischj%40163.com
Author: Andrey Borodin, Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 9.4
On standby ginRedoDeletePage() can work concurrently with read-only queries.
Those queries can traverse posting tree in two ways.
1) Using rightlinks by ginStepRight(), which locks the next page before
unlocking its left sibling.
2) Using downlinks by ginFindLeafPage(), which locks at most one page at time.
Original lock order was: page, parent, left sibling. That lock order can
deadlock with ginStepRight(). In order to prevent deadlock this commit changes
lock order to: left sibling, page, parent. Note, that position of parent in
locking order seems insignificant, because we only lock one page at time while
traversing downlinks.
Reported-by: Chen Huajun
Diagnosed-by: Chen Huajun, Peter Geoghegan, Andrey Borodin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31a702a.14dd.166c1366ac1.Coremail.chjischj%40163.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Before 218f51584d if posting tree page is about to be deleted, then the whole
posting tree is locked by LockBufferForCleanup() on root preventing all the
concurrent inserts. 218f51584d reduced locking to the subtree containing
page to be deleted. However, due to concurrent parent split, inserter doesn't
always holds pins on all the pages constituting path from root to the target
leaf page. That could cause a deadlock between GIN vacuum process and GIN
inserter. And we didn't find non-invasive way to fix this.
This commit reverts VACUUM behavior to lock the whole posting tree before
delete any page. However, we keep another useful change by 218f51584d5: the
tree is locked only if there are pages to be deleted.
Reported-by: Chen Huajun
Diagnosed-by: Chen Huajun, Andrey Borodin, Peter Geoghegan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31a702a.14dd.166c1366ac1.Coremail.chjischj%40163.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov, based on ideas from Andrey Borodin and Peter Geoghegan
Reviewed-by: Andrey Borodin
Backpatch-through: 10
postgres_fdw's postgresGetForeignPlan() assumes without checking that the
outer_plan it's given for a join relation must have a NestLoop, MergeJoin,
or HashJoin node at the top. That's been wrong at least since commit
4bbf6edfb (which could cause insertion of a Sort node on top) and it seems
like a pretty unsafe thing to Just Assume even without that.
Through blind good fortune, this doesn't seem to have any worse
consequences today than strange EXPLAIN output, but it's clearly trouble
waiting to happen.
To fix, test the node type explicitly before touching Join-specific
fields, and avoid jamming the new tlist into a node type that can't
do projection. Export a new support function from createplan.c
to avoid building low-level knowledge about the latter into FDWs.
Back-patch to 9.6 where the faulty coding was added. Note that the
associated regression test cases don't show any changes before v11,
apparently because the tests back-patched with 4bbf6edfb don't actually
exercise the problem case before then (there's no top-level Sort
in those plans).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8946.1544644803@sss.pgh.pa.us
Our support for multiple-set-clauses in UPDATE assumes that the Params
referencing a MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK SubPlan will appear before that SubPlan
in the targetlist of the plan node that calculates the updated row.
(Yeah, it's a hack...) In some PG branches it's possible that a Result
node gets inserted between the primary calculation of the update tlist
and the ModifyTable node. setrefs.c did the wrong thing in this case
and left the upper-level Params as Params, causing a crash at runtime.
What it should do is replace them with "outer" Vars referencing the child
plan node's output. That's a result of careless ordering of operations
in fix_upper_expr_mutator, so we can fix it just by reordering the code.
Fix fix_join_expr_mutator similarly for consistency, even though join
nodes could never appear in such a context. (In general, it seems
likely to be a bit cheaper to use Vars than Params in such situations
anyway, so this patch might offer a tiny performance improvement.)
The hazard extends back to 9.5 where the MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK stuff
was introduced, so back-patch that far. However, this may be a live
bug only in 9.6.x and 10.x, as the other branches don't seem to want
to calculate the final tlist below the Result node. (That plan shape
change between branches might be a mini-bug in itself, but I'm not
really interested in digging into the reasons for that right now.
Still, add a regression test memorializing what we expect there,
so we'll notice if it changes again.)
Per bug report from Eduards Bezverhijs.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b6cd572a-3e44-8785-75e9-c512a5a17a73@tieto.com
This module overlooked this necessary fixup step on the results of
transformWhereClause(). It accidentally worked anyway, because the
constructed expression involved type "name" which is not collatable,
but it fell over while I was experimenting with changing "name" to
be collatable.
Back-patch, not because there's any live bug here in back branches,
but because somebody might use this code as a model for some real
application and then not understand why it doesn't work.
Slow runs of buildfarm members chipmunk, hornet and mandrill saw the
shorter timeouts expire. The 180s timeout in poll_query_until has been
trouble-free since 2a0f89cd71 introduced
it two years ago, so use 180s more widely. Back-patch to 9.6, where the
first of these timeouts was introduced.
Reviewed by Michael Paquier.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181209001601.GC2973271@rfd.leadboat.com
Although copyfuncs.c has a check_stack_depth call in its recursion,
equalfuncs.c, outfuncs.c, and readfuncs.c lacked one. This seems
unwise.
Likewise fix planstate_tree_walker(), in branches where that exists.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30253.1544286631@sss.pgh.pa.us
Previously, it would just pass back a partially-uninitialized tupdesc,
which doesn't seem like a safe or useful behavior.
Backpatch to v10 where this code came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30830.1544384975@sss.pgh.pa.us
The stanza of ExecuteTruncate[Guts] that truncates a target table's toast
relation re-used the loop local variable "rel" to reference the toast rel.
This was safe enough when written, but commit d42358efb added code below
that that supposed "rel" still pointed to the parent table. Therefore,
the stats counter update was applied to the wrong relcache entry (the
toast rel not the user rel); and if we were unlucky and that relcache
entry had been flushed during reindex_relation, very bad things could
ensue.
(I'm surprised that CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS testing hasn't found this.
I'm even more surprised that the problem wasn't detected during the
development of d42358efb; it must not have been tested in any case
with a toast table, as the incorrect stats counts are very obvious.)
To fix, replace use of "rel" in that code branch with a more local
variable. Adjust test cases added by d42358efb so that some of them
use tables with toast tables.
Per bug #15540 from Pan Bian. Back-patch to 9.5 where d42358efb came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15540-01078812338195c0@postgresql.org
Remove dead code (which would be incorrect if it weren't dead),
per report from Pan Bian. Add a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in the
inner loop over child relations, because there's little point
in having one in the outer loop if there's not one here too.
Minor stylistic adjustments and comment improvements.
Seems to be aboriginal to this code (cf commit 665d1fad9).
Back-patch to v10 where that came in, not because any of this
is significant, but just to keep the branches looking similar.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15539-06d00ef6b1e2e1bb@postgresql.org
Places that are testing for *printf failure ought to include the format
string in their error reports, since bad-format-string is one of the
more likely causes of such failure. This both makes it easier to find
and repair the mistake, and provides at least some useful info to the
user who stumbles across such a problem.
Also, tighten snprintf.c to report EINVAL for an invalid flag or
final character in a format %-spec (including the case where the
%-spec is missing a final character altogether). This seems like
better project policy, and it also allows removing an instruction
or two from the hot code path.
Back-patch the error reporting change in pvsnprintf, since it should be
harmless and may be helpful; but not the snprintf.c change.
Per discussion of bug #15511 from Ertuğrul Kahveci, which reported an
invalid translated format string. These changes don't fix that error,
but they should improve matters next time we make such a mistake.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15511-1d8b6a0bc874112f@postgresql.org
When an indexes is created on a partitioned table using ONLY (don't
recurse to partitions), it gets marked invalid until index partitions
are attached for each table partition. But there's no reason to do this
if there are no partitions ... and moreover, there's no way to get the
index to become valid afterwards, because all partitions that get
created/attached get their own index partition already attached to the
parent index, so there's no chance to do ALTER INDEX ... ATTACH PARTITION
that would make the parent index valid.
Fix by not marking the index as invalid to begin with.
This is very similar to 9139aa1942, but the pg_dump aspect does not
appear to be relevant until we add FKs that can point to PKs on
partitioned tables. (I tried to cause the pg_upgrade test to break by
leaving some of these bogus tables around, but wasn't able to.)
Making this change means that an index that was supposed to be invalid
in the insert_conflict regression test is no longer invalid; reorder the
DDL so that the test continues to verify the behavior we want it to.
Author: Álvaro Herrera
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181203225019.2vvdef2ybnkxt364@alvherre.pgsql
Three issues are fixed in this patch:
- Base backups forgot to ignore files specific to EXEC_BACKEND, leading
to spurious warnings when checksums are enabled, per analysis from me.
- pg_verify_checksums forgot about files specific to EXEC_BACKEND,
leading to failures of the tool on any such build, particularly Windows.
This error was originally found by newly-introduced TAP tests in various
buildfarm members using EXEC_BACKEND.
- pg_verify_checksums forgot to count for temporary files and temporary
paths, which could be valid relation files, without checksums, per
report from Andres Freund. More tests are added to cover this case.
A new test case which emulates corruption for a file in a different
tablespace is added, coming from from Michael Banck, while I have coded
the main code and refactored the test code.
Author: Michael Banck, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Stephen Frost, David Steele
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181021134206.GA14282@paquier.xyz
This basically reverts commit d55241af70,
leaving around a portion of the regression tests still adapted with
empty relation files, and corrupted cases. This is also proving to be
failing to check properly relation files located in a non-default
tablespace path.
Per discussion with various folks, including Stephen Frost, David
Steele, Andres Freund, Michael Banck and myself.
Reported-by: Michael Banck
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181021134206.GA14282@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 11
The source code comments documented this, but the user-facing docs, not
so much. Add a section to Appendix B that discusses it.
In passing, improve a couple other things in Appendix B --- notably,
a long-obsolete claim that time zone abbreviations are looked up in
a fixed table.
Per bug #15527 from Michael Davidson.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15527-f1be0b4dc99ebbe7@postgresql.org
In at least Apple's version of ranlib, the output file is updated to have
a mod time equal to the max of the timestamps of its components, and that
data only has seconds precision. On a filesystem with sub-second file
timestamp precision --- say, APFS --- this can result in the finished
static library appearing older than its input files, which causes useless
rebuilds and possible outright failures in parallel makes.
We've only seen this reported in the field from people using Apple's
ranlib with a non-Apple make, because Apple's make doesn't know about
sub-second timestamps either so it doesn't decide rebuilds are needed.
But Apple's ranlib presumably shares code with at least some BSDen,
so it's not that unlikely that the same problem could arise elsewhere.
To fix, just "touch" the output file after ranlib finishes.
We seem to need this in only one place. There are other calls of
ranlib in our makefiles, but they are working on intermediate files
whose timestamps are not actually important, or else on an installed
static library for which sub-second timestamp precision is unlikely
to matter either. (Also, so far as I can tell, Apple's ranlib doesn't
mess up the file timestamp in the latter usage anyhow.)
In passing, change "ranlib" to "$(RANLIB)" in one place that was
bypassing the make macro for no good reason.
Per bug #15525 from Jack Kelly (via Alyssa Ross).
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15525-a30da084f17a1faa@postgresql.org
Peter Eisentraut