An array of LLVMBasicBlockRef is allocated with the size used for an
element being "LLVMBasicBlockRef *" rather than "LLVMBasicBlockRef".
LLVMBasicBlockRef is a type that refers to a pointer, so this did not
directly cause a problem because both should have the same size, still
it is incorrect.
This issue has been spotted while reviewing a different patch, and
exists since 2a0faed9d7, so backpatch all the way down.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGLngd9cKHtTUuUdEo2eWEgUcZ_EQRbP55MigV2t_zTReg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
The description of deferrable constraints in create_table.sgml states
that deferrable constraints cannot be used as conflict arbitrators in
an INSERT with an ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE clause, but in fact this
restriction applies to all ON CONFLICT clauses, not just those with DO
UPDATE. Fix this, and while at it, change the word "arbitrators" to
"arbiters", to match the terminology used elsewhere.
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWsybvZP3ce8rGcVNx-QHuDOJZDz8y=p1SzqHwjRXyV4Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
With this commit, the next multixid's offset will always be set on the
offsets page, by the time that a backend might try to read it, so we
no longer need the waiting mechanism with the condition variable. In
other words, this eliminates "corner case 2" mentioned in the
comments.
The waiting mechanism was broken in a few scenarios:
- When nextMulti was advanced without WAL-logging the next
multixid. For example, if a later multixid was already assigned and
WAL-logged before the previous one was WAL-logged, and then the
server crashed. In that case the next offset would never be set in
the offsets SLRU, and a query trying to read it would get stuck
waiting for it. Same thing could happen if pg_resetwal was used to
forcibly advance nextMulti.
- In hot standby mode, a deadlock could happen where one backend waits
for the next multixid assignment record, but WAL replay is not
advancing because of a recovery conflict with the waiting backend.
The old TAP test used carefully placed injection points to exercise
the old waiting code, but now that the waiting code is gone, much of
the old test is no longer relevant. Rewrite the test to reproduce the
IPC/MultixactCreation hang after crash recovery instead, and to verify
that previously recorded multixids stay readable.
Backpatch to all supported versions. In back-branches, we still need
to be able to read WAL that was generated before this fix, so in the
back-branches this includes a hack to initialize the next offsets page
when replaying XLOG_MULTIXACT_CREATE_ID for the last multixid on a
page. On 'master', bump XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC instead to indicate that the
WAL is not compatible.
Author: Andrey Borodin <amborodin@acm.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Yurichev <dsy.075@yandex.ru>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ivan Bykov <i.bykov@modernsys.ru>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/172e5723-d65f-4eec-b512-14beacb326ce@yandex.ru
Backpatch-through: 14
amcheck incorrectly reported the following error if there were any
half-dead pages in the index:
ERROR: mismatch between parent key and child high key in index
"amchecktest_id_idx"
It's expected that a half-dead page does not have a downlink in the
parent level, so skip the test.
Reported-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-by: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/33e39552-6a2a-46f3-8b34-3f9f8004451f@garret.ru
Backpatch-through: 14
Formerly, when updating an auto-updatable view, or a relation with
rules, if the original query had any data-modifying CTEs, the rewriter
would rewrite those CTEs multiple times as RewriteQuery() recursed
into the product queries. In most cases that was harmless, because
RewriteQuery() is mostly idempotent. However, if the CTE involved
updating an always-generated column, it would trigger an error because
any subsequent rewrite would appear to be attempting to assign a
non-default value to the always-generated column.
This could perhaps be fixed by attempting to make RewriteQuery() fully
idempotent, but that looks quite tricky to achieve, and would probably
be quite fragile, given that more generated-column-type features might
be added in the future.
Instead, fix by arranging for RewriteQuery() to rewrite each CTE
exactly once (by tracking the number of CTEs already rewritten as it
recurses). This has the advantage of being simpler and more efficient,
but it does make RewriteQuery() dependent on the order in which
rewriteRuleAction() joins the CTE lists from the original query and
the rule action, so care must be taken if that is ever changed.
Reported-by: Bernice Southey <bernice.southey@gmail.com>
Author: Bernice Southey <bernice.southey@gmail.com>
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEDh4nyD6MSH9bROhsOsuTqGAv_QceU_GDvN9WcHLtZTCYM1kA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
Normally, if a WHERE clause is implied by the predicate of a partial
index, we drop that clause from the set of quals used with the index,
since it's redundant to test it if we're scanning that index.
However, if it's a hash index (or any !amoptionalkey index), this
could result in dropping all available quals for the index's first
key, preventing us from generating an indexscan.
It's fair to question the practical usefulness of this case. Since
hash only supports equality quals, the situation could only arise
if the index's predicate is "WHERE indexkey = constant", implying
that the index contains only one hash value, which would make hash
a really poor choice of index type. However, perhaps there are
other !amoptionalkey index AMs out there with which such cases are
more plausible.
To fix, just don't filter the candidate indexquals this way if
the index is !amoptionalkey. That's a bit hokey because it may
result in testing quals we didn't need to test, but to do it
more accurately we'd have to redundantly identify which candidate
quals are actually usable with the index, something we don't know
at this early stage of planning. Doesn't seem worth the effort.
Reported-by: Sergei Glukhov <s.glukhov@postgrespro.ru>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e200bf38-6b45-446a-83fd-48617211feff@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 14
When running on Windows (or EXEC_BACKEND) the SSL configuration will
be reloaded on each backend start, so the passphrase command will be
reloaded along with it. This implies that passphrase command reload
must be enabled on Windows for connections to work at all. Document
this since it wasn't mentioned explicitly, and will there add markup
for parameter value to match the rest of the docs.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5F301096-921A-427D-8EC1-EBAEC2A35082@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: 14
Accidentally the code in LWLockWakeup() checked the list of to-be-woken up
processes to see if LW_FLAG_HAS_WAITERS should be unset. That means that
HAS_WAITERS would not get unset immediately, but only during the next,
unnecessary, call to LWLockWakeup().
Luckily, as the code stands, this is just a small efficiency issue.
However, if there were (as in a patch of mine) a case in which LWLockWakeup()
would not find any backend to wake, despite the wait list not being empty,
we'd wrongly unset LW_FLAG_HAS_WAITERS, leading to potentially hanging.
While the consequences in the backbranches are limited, the code as-is
confusing, and it is possible that there are workloads where the additional
wait list lock acquisitions hurt, therefore backpatch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fvfmkr5kk4nyex56ejgxj3uzi63isfxovp2biecb4bspbjrze7@az2pljabhnff
Backpatch-through: 14
The comment incorrectly indicated that indexcollations[] stored
collations for both key columns and INCLUDE columns, but in reality it
only has elements for the key columns. canreturn[] didn't get a mention,
so add that while we're here.
Author: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEG8a3LwbZgMKOQ9CmZarX5DEipKivdHp5PZMOO-riL0w%3DL%3D4A%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
The fix for bug #19055 (commit b0cc0a71e) allowed CTE references in
sub-selects within aggregate functions to affect the semantic levels
assigned to such aggregates. It turns out this broke some related
cases, leading to assertion failures or strange planner errors such
as "unexpected outer reference in CTE query". After experimenting
with some alternative rules for assigning the semantic level in
such cases, we've come to the conclusion that changing the level
is more likely to break things than be helpful.
Therefore, this patch undoes what b0cc0a71e changed, and instead
installs logic to throw an error if there is any reference to a
CTE that's below the semantic level that standard SQL rules would
assign to the aggregate based on its contained Var and Aggref nodes.
(The SQL standard disallows sub-selects within aggregate functions,
so it can't reach the troublesome case and hence has no rule for
what to do.)
Perhaps someone will come along with a legitimate query that this
logic rejects, and if so probably the example will help us craft
a level-adjustment rule that works better than what b0cc0a71e did.
I'm not holding my breath for that though, because the previous
logic had been there for a very long time before bug #19055 without
complaints, and that bug report sure looks to have originated from
fuzzing not from real usage.
Like b0cc0a71e, back-patch to all supported branches, though
sadly that no longer includes v13.
Bug: #19106
Reported-by: Kamil Monicz <kamil@monicz.dev>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19106-9dd3668a0734cd72@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14
This is a backpatch of 32b23664 to v14 and v15.
* Remove ancient test for __hurd__, which intended to activate
PS_USE_CHANGE_ARGV in these branches but turned out not to be
defined on modern systems.
* Add new test for__GNU__ to activate PS_USE_CLOBBER_ARGV, like the
newer branches.
Author: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJMNGUAqf27WbckYFrM-Mavy0RKJvocfJU%3DJ2XcAZyv%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14-15
As noted in the commit message for 5e4fcbe531, the addition of a
second parameter to CreateStatistics() breaks ABI compatibility,
but we are unaware of any impacted third-party code. This commit
updates .abi-compliance-history accordingly.
Backpatch-through: 14-18
Commit 5e4fcbe531 added a check_rights parameter to this function
for use by ALTER TABLE commands that re-create statistics objects.
However, we intentionally ignore check_rights when verifying
relation ownership because this function's lookup could return a
different answer than the caller's. This commit adds a note to
this effect so that we remember it down the road.
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Backpatch-through: 14
On the CREATE POLICY page, the "Policies Applied by Command Type"
table was missing MERGE ... THEN DELETE and some of the policies
applied during INSERT ... ON CONFLICT and MERGE. Fix that, and try to
improve readability by listing the various MERGE cases separately,
rather than together with INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE. Mention COPY ... TO
along with SELECT, since it behaves in the same way. In addition,
document which policy violations cause errors to be thrown, and which
just cause rows to be silently ignored.
Also, a paragraph above the table states that INSERT ... ON CONFLICT
DO UPDATE only checks the WITH CHECK expressions of INSERT policies
for rows appended to the relation by the INSERT path, which is
incorrect -- all rows proposed for insertion are checked, regardless
of whether they end up being inserted. Fix that, and also mention that
the same applies to INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING.
In addition, in various other places on that page, clarify how the
different types of policy are applied to different commands, and
whether or not errors are thrown when policy checks do not pass.
Backpatch to all supported versions. Prior to v17, MERGE did not
support RETURNING, and so MERGE ... THEN INSERT would never check new
rows against SELECT policies. Prior to v15, MERGE was not supported at
all.
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Viktor Holmberg <v@viktorh.net>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWqnfeChjK=n1V_dYZT4rt4mnq+ybf9c0qXDYTVMsy8pg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
Before we started to freeze async notify entries (commit 8eeb4a0f7c),
no one looked at the 'xid' on an entry with invalid 'dboid'. But now
we might actually need to freeze it later. Initialize them with
InvalidTransactionId to begin with, to avoid that work later.
Álvaro pointed this out in review of commit 8eeb4a0f7c, but I forgot
to include this change there.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202511071410.52ll56eyixx7@alvherre.pgsql
Backpatch-through: 14
Previous commit fixed a bug where VACUUM would truncate the CLOG
that's still needed to check the commit status of XIDs in the async
notify queue, but as mentioned in the commit message, it wasn't a full
fix. If a backend is executing asyncQueueReadAllNotifications() and
has just made a local copy of an async SLRU page which contains old
XIDs, vacuum can concurrently truncate the CLOG covering those XIDs,
and the backend still gets an error when it calls
TransactionIdDidCommit() on those XIDs in the local copy. This commit
fixes that race condition.
To fix, hold the SLRU bank lock across the TransactionIdDidCommit()
calls in NOTIFY processing.
Per Tom Lane's idea. Backpatch to all supported versions.
Reviewed-by: Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org>
Reviewed-by: Arseniy Mukhin <arseniy.mukhin.dev@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2759499.1761756503@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 14
The async notification queue contains the XID of the sender, and when
processing notifications we call TransactionIdDidCommit() on the
XID. But we had no safeguards to prevent the CLOG segments containing
those XIDs from being truncated away. As a result, if a backend didn't
for some reason process its notifications for a long time, or when a
new backend issued LISTEN, you could get an error like:
test=# listen c21;
ERROR: 58P01: could not access status of transaction 14279685
DETAIL: Could not open file "pg_xact/000D": No such file or directory.
LOCATION: SlruReportIOError, slru.c:1087
To fix, make VACUUM "freeze" the XIDs in the async notification queue
before truncating the CLOG. Old XIDs are replaced with
FrozenTransactionId or InvalidTransactionId.
Note: This commit is not a full fix. A race condition remains, where a
backend is executing asyncQueueReadAllNotifications() and has just
made a local copy of an async SLRU page which contains old XIDs, while
vacuum concurrently truncates the CLOG covering those XIDs. When the
backend then calls TransactionIdDidCommit() on those XIDs from the
local copy, you still get the error. The next commit will fix that
remaining race condition.
This was first reported by Sergey Zhuravlev in 2021, with many other
people hitting the same issue later. Thanks to:
- Alexandra Wang, Daniil Davydov, Andrei Varashen and Jacques Combrink
for investigating and providing reproducable test cases,
- Matheus Alcantara and Arseniy Mukhin for review and earlier proposed
patches to fix this,
- Álvaro Herrera and Masahiko Sawada for reviews,
- Yura Sokolov aka funny-falcon for the idea of marking transactions
as committed in the notification queue, and
- Joel Jacobson for the final patch version. I hope I didn't forget
anyone.
Backpatch to all supported versions. I believe the bug goes back all
the way to commit d1e027221d, which introduced the SLRU-based async
notification queue.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16961-25f29f95b3604a8a@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18804-bccbbde5e77a68c2@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAK98qZ3wZLE-RZJN_Y%2BTFjiTRPPFPBwNBpBi5K5CU8hUHkzDpw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
Previously, if async notify processing encountered an error, we would
report the error to the client and advance our read position past the
offending entry to prevent trying to process it over and over
again. Trying to continue after an error has a few problems however:
- We have no way of telling the client that a notification was
lost. They get an ERROR, but that doesn't tell you much. As such,
it's not clear if keeping the connection alive after losing a
notification is a good thing. Depending on the application logic,
missing a notification could cause the application to get stuck
waiting, for example.
- If the connection is idle, PqCommReadingMsg is set and any ERROR is
turned into FATAL anyway.
- We bailed out of the notification processing loop on first error
without processing any subsequent notifications. The subsequent
notifications would not be processed until another notify interrupt
arrives. For example, if there were two notifications pending, and
processing the first one caused an ERROR, the second notification
would not be processed until someone sent a new NOTIFY.
This commit changes the behavior so that any ERROR while processing
async notifications is turned into FATAL, causing the client
connection to be terminated. That makes the behavior more consistent
as that's what happened in idle state already, and terminating the
connection is a clear signal to the application that it might've
missed some notifications.
The reason to do this now is that the next commits will change the
notification processing code in a way that would make it harder to
skip over just the offending notification entry on error.
Reviewed-by: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Arseniy Mukhin <arseniy.mukhin.dev@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fedbd908-4571-4bbe-b48e-63bfdcc38f64@iki.fi
Backpatch-through: 14
Explicitly document that privileges are transferred along with the
ownership. Backpatch to all supported versions since this behavior
has always been present.
Author: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Gilles Parc <gparc@free.fr>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2023185982.281851219.1646733038464.JavaMail.root@zimbra15-e2.priv.proxad.net
Backpatch-through: 14
The range for commit_siblings was incorrectly listed as starting on 1
instead of 0 in the sample configuration file. Backpatch down to all
supported branches.
Author: Man Zeng <zengman@halodbtech.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/tencent_53B70BA72303AE9C6889E78E@qq.com
Backpatch-through: 14
This omission allowed table owners to create statistics in any
schema, potentially leading to unexpected naming conflicts. For
ALTER TABLE commands that require re-creating statistics objects,
skip this check in case the user has since lost CREATE on the
schema. The addition of a second parameter to CreateStatistics()
breaks ABI compatibility, but we are unaware of any impacted
third-party code.
Reported-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Co-authored-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Security: CVE-2025-12817
Backpatch-through: 13
Several functions could overflow their size calculations, when presented
with very large inputs from remote and/or untrusted locations, and then
allocate buffers that were too small to hold the intended contents.
Switch from int to size_t where appropriate, and check for overflow
conditions when the inputs could have plausibly originated outside of
the libpq trust boundary. (Overflows from within the trust boundary are
still possible, but these will be fixed separately.) A version of
add_size() is ported from the backend to assist with code that performs
more complicated concatenation.
Reported-by: Aleksey Solovev (Positive Technologies)
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Security: CVE-2025-12818
Backpatch-through: 13
generic-gcc.h maps our read and write barriers to C11 acquire and
release fences using compiler builtins, for platforms where we don't
have our own hand-rolled assembler. This is apparently enough for GCC,
but the C11 memory model is only defined in terms of atomic accesses,
and our barriers for non-atomic, non-volatile accesses were not always
respected under Clang's stricter interpretation of the standard.
This explains the occasional breakage observed on new RISC-V + Clang
animal greenfly in lock-free PgAioHandle manipulation code containing a
repeating pattern of loads and read barriers. The problem can also be
observed in code generated for MIPS and LoongAarch, though we aren't
currently testing those with Clang, and on x86, though we use our own
assembler there. The scariest aspect is that we use the generic version
on very common ARM systems, but it doesn't seem to reorder the relevant
code there (or we'd have debugged this long ago).
Fix by inserting an explicit compiler barrier. It expands to an empty
assembler block declared to have memory side-effects, so registers are
flushed and reordering is prevented. In those respects this is like the
architecture-specific assembler versions, but the compiler is still in
charge of generating the appropriate fence instruction. Done for write
barriers on principle, though concrete problems have only been observed
with read barriers.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d79691be-22bd-457d-9d90-18033b78c40a%40gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
The following parameters can only be set at server start because
their context is PGC_POSTMASTER, but this information was missing
or incorrectly documented. This commit adds or corrects
that information for the following parameters:
* debug_io_direct
* dynamic_shared_memory_type
* event_source
* huge_pages
* io_max_combine_limit
* max_notify_queue_pages
* shared_memory_type
* track_commit_timestamp
* wal_decode_buffer_size
Backpatched to all supported branches.
Author: Karina Litskevich <litskevichkarina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwGfPzcin-_6XwPgVbWTOUFVZgHF5g9ROrwLUdCTfjy=0A@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
XLogRecPtrIsInvalid() is inconsistent with the affirmative form of
macros used for other datatypes, and leads to awkward double negatives
in a few places. This commit introduces XLogRecPtrIsValid(), which
allows code to be written more naturally.
This patch only adds the new macro. XLogRecPtrIsInvalid() is left in
place, and all existing callers remain untouched. This means all
supported branches can accept hypothetical bug fixes that use the new
macro, and at the same time any code that compiled with the original
formulation will continue to silently compile just fine.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aQB7EvGqrbZXrMlg@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
postgres_fdw supports EvalPlanQual testing by using the infrastructure
provided by the core with the RecheckForeignScan callback routine (cf.
commits 5fc4c26db and 385f337c9), but there has been no test coverage
for that, except that recent commit 12609fbac, which fixed an issue in
commit 385f337c9, added a test case to exercise only a code path added
by that commit to the core infrastructure. So let's add test cases to
exercise other code paths as well at this time.
Like commit 12609fbac, back-patch to all supported branches.
Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Author: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK15%2B6H%3DkDA%3D-y3Y28OAPY7fbAdyMosVofZZ%2BNc769epVTQ%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
The test introduced by 17b2d5ec75 verifies that a WAL receiver
survives across a timeline jump by searching the server logs for
termination messages. However, it called restart() before the timeline
switch, which kills the WAL receiver and may log the exact message being
checked, hence failing the test. As TAP tests reuse the same log file
across restarts, a rotate_logfile() is used before the restart so as the
log matching check is not impacted by log entries generated by a
previous shutdown.
Recent changes to file handle inheritance altered I/O timing enough to
make this fail consistently while testing another patch.
While on it, this adds an extra check based on a PID comparison. This
test may lead to false positives as it could be possible that the WAL
receiver has processed a timeline jump before the initial PID is
grabbed, but it should be good enough in most cases.
Like 17b2d5ec75, backpatch down to v13.
Author: Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9d00b597-d64a-4f1e-802e-90f9dc394c70@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
In 2a0faed9d7, which added JIT compilation support for expressions, I
accidentally used sizeof(LLVMBasicBlockRef *) instead of
sizeof(LLVMBasicBlockRef) as part of computing the size of an allocation. That
turns out to have no real negative consequences due to LLVMBasicBlockRef being
a pointer itself (and thus having the same size). It still is wrong and
confusing, so fix it.
Reported by coverity.
Backpatch-through: 13
Commit a95e3d84c0 added ActiveSnapshot push+pop when processing
work-items (BRIN autosummarization), but forgot to handle the case of
a transaction failing during the run, which drops the snapshot untimely.
Fix by making the pop conditional on an element being actually there.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202511041648.nofajnuddmwk@alvherre.pgsql
Backpatch commit 7bc9a8bdd2 to 13-17. The motivation for backpatching is that
we want to update CI to Debian Trixie. Trixie contains a newer mingw
installation, which would trigger the warning addressed by 7bc9a8bdd2. The
risk of backpatching seems fairly low, given that it did not cause issues in
the branches the commit is already present.
While CI is not present in 13-14, it seems better to be consistent across
branches.
Author: Thomas Munro <tmunro@postgresql.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/o5yadhhmyjo53svzwvaocww6zkrp63i4f32cw3treuh46pxtza@hyqio5b2tkt6
Backpatch-through: 13
A generated column may end up being part of the partition key
expression, if it's specified as an expression e.g. "(<generated
column name>)" or if the partition key expression contains a whole-row
reference, even though we do not allow a generated column to be part
of partition key expression. Fix this hole.
Co-authored-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACJufxF%3DWDGthXSAQr9thYUsfx_1_t9E6N8tE3B8EqXcVoVfQw%40mail.gmail.com
It's possible to define BRIN indexes on functions that require a
snapshot to run, but the autosummarization feature introduced by commit
7526e10224 fails to provide one. This causes autovacuum to leave a
BRIN placeholder tuple behind after a failed work-item execution, making
such indexes less efficient. Repair by obtaining a snapshot prior to
running the task, and add a test to verify this behavior.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reported-by: Giovanni Fabris <giovanni.fabris@icon.it>
Reported-by: Arthur Nascimento <tureba@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202511031106.h4fwyuyui6fz@alvherre.pgsql
Commit b4f584f9d2 (affecting v15~, later backpatched down to 13 as of
3635a0a35a) introduced an unconditional WAL receiver shutdown when
switching from streaming to archive WAL sources. This causes problems
during a timeline switch, when a WAL receiver enters WALRCV_WAITING
state but remains alive, waiting for instructions.
The unconditional shutdown can break some monitoring scenarios as the
WAL receiver gets repeatedly terminated and re-spawned, causing
pg_stat_wal_receiver.status to show a "streaming" instead of "waiting"
status, masking the fact that the WAL receiver is waiting for a new TLI
and a new LSN to be able to continue streaming.
This commit changes the WAL receiver behavior so as the shutdown becomes
conditional, with InstallXLogFileSegmentActive being always reset to
prevent the regression fixed by b4f584f9d2a1: only terminate the WAL
receiver when it is actively streaming (WALRCV_STREAMING,
WALRCV_STARTING, or WALRCV_RESTARTING). When in WALRCV_WAITING state,
just reset InstallXLogFileSegmentActive flag to allow archive
restoration without killing the process. WALRCV_STOPPED and
WALRCV_STOPPING are not reachable states in this code path. For the
latter, the startup process is the one in charge of setting
WALRCV_STOPPING via ShutdownWalRcv(), waiting for the WAL receiver to
reach a WALRCV_STOPPED state after switching walRcvState, so
WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable() cannot be reached while a WAL receiver is
in a WALRCV_STOPPING state.
A regression test is added to check that a WAL receiver is not stopped
on timeline jump, that fails when the fix of this commit is reverted.
Reported-by: Ryan Bird <ryanzxg@gmail.com>
Author: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19093-c4fff49a608f82a0@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
The C standard says that the second and third arguments of a
conditional operator shall be both void type or both not-void
type. The Windows version of INTERRUPTS_PENDING_CONDITION()
got this wrong. It's pretty harmless because the result of
the operator is ignored anyway, but apparently recent versions
of MSVC have started issuing a warning about it. Silence the
warning by casting the dummy zero to void.
Reported-by: Christian Ullrich <chris@chrullrich.net>
Author: Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cc4ef8db-f8dc-4347-8a22-e7ebf44c0308@chrullrich.net
Backpatch-through: 13
Because long is 32-bit on 64-bit Windows, it isn't a good datatype to
store the difference between 2 pointers. The under-sized type could
overflow and lead to scary warnings in MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING builds,
such as:
WARNING: problem in alloc set ExecutorState: bad single-chunk %p in block %p
However, the problem lies only in the code running the check, not from
an actual memory accounting bug.
Fix by using "Size" instead of "long". This means using an unsigned
type rather than the previous signed type. If the block's freeptr was
corrupted, we'd still catch that if the unsigned type wrapped. Unsigned
allows us to avoid further needless complexities around comparing signed
and unsigned types.
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo-RmiT4s33J=aC9C_-wPZjOXQ232V-EZFgKftSsNRi4w@mail.gmail.com
The project Git server hasn't supported cloning with the Git protocol
in a very long time, but the documentation never got the memo. Remove
the mention of using the Git protocol, and while there wrap a mention
of Git in <productname> tags.
Backpatch down to all supported versions.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reported-by: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABwTF4WMiMb-KT2NRcib5W0C8TQF6URMb+HK9a_=rnZnY8Q42w@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
These two functions expect there to be room to insert another item
in the FreePageBtree's array, but their assertions were too weak
to guarantee that. This has little practical effect granting that
the callers are not buggy, but it seems to be misleading late-model
Coverity into complaining about possible array overrun.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/799984.1761150474@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
Michael Paquier