The reason this wasn't supported before was that GiST indexes need an
increasing sequence to detect concurrent page-splits. In a regular WAL-
logged GiST index, the LSN of the page-split record is used for that
purpose, and in a temporary index, we can get away with a backend-local
counter. Neither of those methods works for an unlogged relation.
To provide such an increasing sequence of numbers, create a "fake LSN"
counter that is saved and restored across shutdowns. On recovery, unlogged
relations are blown away, so the counter doesn't need to survive that
either.
Jeevan Chalke, based on discussions with Robert Haas, Tom Lane and me.
The intention was to request a regular online checkpoint immediately after
end of recovery, when performing "fast promotion". However, because the
checkpoint was requested before other backends were allowed to write WAL,
the checkpointer process performed a restartpoint rather than a checkpoint.
Delay the RequestCheckPoint call until after recovery has truly ended, so
that you get a real checkpoint.
This isn't used for anything but a sanity check at the moment, but it could
be highly valuable for debugging purposes. It could also be used to recreate
timeline history by traversing WAL, which seems useful.
After further reflection I was unconvinced that the existing coding is
guaranteed to return valid union datums in every code path for multi-column
indexes. Fix that by forcing a gistunionsubkey() call at the end of the
recursion. Having done that, we can remove some clearly-redundant calls
elsewhere. This should be a little faster for multi-column indexes (since
the previous coding would uselessly do such a call for each column while
unwinding the recursion), as well as much harder to break.
Also, simplify the handling of cases where one side or the other of a
primary split contains only don't-care tuples. The previous coding used a
very ugly hack in removeDontCares() that essentially forced one random
tuple to be treated as non-don't-care, providing a random initial choice of
seed datum for the secondary split. It seems unlikely that that method
will give better-than-random splits. Instead, treat such a split as
degenerate and just let the next column determine the split, the same way
that we handle fully degenerate cases where the two sides produce identical
union datums.
This LOG message was put in over five years ago with the evident
expectation that we'd make all GiST opclasses support secondary split
directly. However, no such thing ever happened, and indeed the number of
opclasses supporting it decreased to zero in 9.2. The reason is that
improving on the default implementation isn't that easy --- the
opclass-specific code that did exist, before 9.2, doesn't appear to have
been any improvement over the default.
Hence, remove the message altogether. There's certainly no point in
nagging users about this in released branches, but I doubt that we'll
ever implement complete opclass-specific support anyway.
Not only is this implementation of secondary-split not better than the
default implementation in gistsplit.c, it's actually worse. The gistsplit.c
code at least looks to see if switching the left and right sides would make
a better merge with the previously-split tuples, while this doesn't.
In any case it's rather useless to support secondary split only in an edge
case. There used to be more complete support for it here (in chooseLR()),
but that was removed in commit 7f3bd86843.
It appears to me though that the chooseLR() code was really isomorphic to
the default implementation, since it was still based on choosing the cheaper
way of adding two sub-split vectors that had been chosen without regard to
the primary split initially. I think an implementation of secondary split
that could beat the default implementation would have to be pretty fully
integrated into the split algorithm, not plastered on at the end.
Back-patch to 9.2, but not further; previous branches have the chooseLR()
code which I don't feel a great need to mess with. This is mainly so we
just have two behaviors and not three among the various branches (IOW, this
patch is cleanup for commit 7f3bd86843e5aad84585a57d3f6b80db3c609916's
incomplete removal of secondary-split support).
Improve comments, rename some variables and functions, slightly simplify
a couple of APIs, in an attempt to make this code readable by people other
than its original author.
Even though this is essentially just cosmetic, back-patch to all active
branches, because otherwise it's going to make back-patching future fixes
in this file very painful.
When there are zero result rows, in expanded mode, "(No rows)" is
printed. So far, there was no way to turn this off. Now, when
tuples-only mode is turned on, nothing is printed in this case.
Given the assumption that a box's high coordinates are not less than its
low coordinates, the tests in box_ov() are overly complicated and can be
reduced to about half as much work. Since many other functions in
geo_ops.c rely on that assumption, there doesn't seem to be a good reason
not to use it here.
Per discussion of Alexander Korotkov's GiST fix, which was already using
the simplified logic (in a non-fuzzy form, but the equivalence holds just
as well for fuzzy).
While there's considerable doubt that we want fuzzy behavior in the
geometric operators at all (let alone as currently implemented), nobody is
stepping forward to redesign that stuff. In the meantime it behooves us
to make sure that index searches agree with the behavior of the underlying
operators. This patch fixes two problems in this area.
First, gist_box_same was using fuzzy equality, but it really needs to use
exact equality to prevent not-quite-identical upper index keys from being
treated as identical, which for example would prevent an existing upper
key from being extended by an amount less than epsilon. This would result
in inconsistent indexes. (The next release notes will need to recommend
that users reindex GiST indexes on boxes, polygons, circles, and points,
since all four opclasses use gist_box_same.)
Second, gist_point_consistent used exact comparisons for upper-page
comparisons in ~= searches, when it needs to use fuzzy comparisons to
ensure it finds all matches; and it used fuzzy comparisons for point <@ box
searches, when it needs to use exact comparisons because that's what the
<@ operator (rather inconsistently) does.
The added regression test cases illustrate all three misbehaviors.
Back-patch to all active branches. (8.4 did not have GiST point_ops,
but it still seems prudent to apply the gist_box_same patch to it.)
Alexander Korotkov, reviewed by Noah Misch
Improve description of the vacuum_freeze_table_age bug (it's much more
serious than we realized at the time the fix was committed), and correct
attribution of pg_upgrade -O/-o fix (Marti Raudsepp contributed that,
but Bruce forgot to credit him in the commit log).
No need to back-patch right now, it'll happen when the next set of
release notes are prepared.
Without this, building in src/bin/scripts directly will fail if
libpgport wasn't built first. Other bin components are handled the same
way.
Phil Sorber
Instead of hardcoding a specific link, give a general link to the
download section of the web site. This gives the user more download
options and the sysadmins more flexibility. Also, the previously
presented link didn't work for devel versions.
Commit af7914c662, which added the TIMING
option to EXPLAIN, had an oversight: if the TIMING option is disabled
then control in InstrStartNode() goes through an elog(DEBUG2) call, which
typically does nothing but takes a noticeable amount of time to do it.
Tweak the logic to avoid that.
In HEAD, also change the elog(DEBUG2)'s in instrument.c to elog(ERROR).
It's not very clear why they weren't like that to begin with, but this
episode shows that not complaining more vociferously about misuse is
likely to do little except allow bugs to remain hidden.
While at it, adjust some code that was making possibly-dangerous
assumptions about flag bits being in the rightmost byte of the
instrument_options word.
Problem reported by Pavel Stehule (via Tomas Vondra).
The previous coding supposed that the first differing bytes in two varlena
datums must have the same sign difference as their overall comparison
result. This is obviously bogus for text strings in non-C locales, and
probably wrong for numeric, and even for bytea I think it was wrong on
machines where char is signed. When the assumption failed, the function
could deliver a zero or negative penalty in situations where such a result
is quite ridiculous, leading the core GiST code to make very bad page-split
decisions.
To fix, take the absolute values of the byte-level differences. Also,
switch the code to using unsigned char not just char, so that the behavior
will be consistent whether char is signed or not.
Per investigation of a trouble report from Tomas Vondra. Back-patch to all
supported branches.
gbt_var_bin_union() failed to do the right thing when the existing range
needed to be widened at both ends rather than just one end. This could
result in an invalid index in which keys that are present would not be
found by searches, because the searches would not think they need to
descend to the relevant leaf pages. This error affected all the varlena
datatypes supported by btree_gist (text, bytea, bit, numeric).
Per investigation of a trouble report from Tomas Vondra. (There is also
an issue in gbt_var_penalty(), but that should only result in inefficiency
not wrong answers. I'm committing this separately so that we have a git
state in which it can be tested that bad penalty results don't produce
invalid indexes.) Back-patch to all supported branches.
When considering a non-last column in a multi-column GiST index,
gistsplit.c tries to improve on the split chosen by the opclass-specific
pickSplit function by considering penalties for the next column. However,
there were two bugs in this code: it failed to recompute the union keys for
the leftmost index columns, even though these might well change after
reassigning tuples; and it included the old union keys in the recomputation
for the columns it did recompute, so that those keys couldn't get smaller
even if they should. The first problem could result in an invalid index
in which searches wouldn't find index entries that are in fact present;
the second would make the index less efficient to search.
Both of these errors were caused by misuse of gistMakeUnionItVec, whose
API was designed in a way that just begged such errors to be made. There
is no situation in which it's safe or useful to compute the union keys for
a subset of the index columns, and there is no caller that wants any
previous union keys to be included in the computation; so the undocumented
choice to treat the union keys as in/out rather than pure output parameters
is a waste of code as well as being dangerous.
Hence, rather than just making a minimal patch, I've changed the API of
gistMakeUnionItVec to remove the "startkey" parameter (it now always
processes all index columns) and treat the attr/isnull arrays as purely
output parameters.
In passing, also get rid of a couple of unnecessary and dangerous uses
of static variables in gistutil.c. It's remarkable that the one in
gistMakeUnionKey hasn't given us portability troubles before now, because
in addition to posing a re-entrancy hazard, it was unsafely assuming that
a static char[] array would have at least Datum alignment.
Per investigation of a trouble report from Tomas Vondra. (There are also
some bugs in contrib/btree_gist to be fixed, but that seems like material
for a separate patch.) Back-patch to all supported branches.
Normally, we suppress sending a tabstats message to the collector unless
there were some actual table stats to send. However, during backend exit
we should force out the message if there are any transaction commit/abort
counts to send, else the session's last few commit/abort counts will never
get reported at all. We had logic for this, but the short-circuit test
at the top of pgstat_report_stat() ignored the "force" flag, with the
consequence that session-ending transactions that touched no database-local
tables would not get counted. Seems to be an oversight in my commit
641912b4d1, which added the "force" flag.
That was back in 8.3, so back-patch to all supported versions.
The new rmgrlist.h header, containing all necessary data
about built-in resource managers, allows other pieces of code to
access them.
In particular, this allows a future pg_xlogdump program to extract
rm_desc function pointers, without having to keep a duplicate list of
them.
This function was misdeclared to take cstring when it should take internal.
This at least allows crashing the server, and in principle an attacker
might be able to use the function to examine the contents of server memory.
The correct fix is to adjust the system catalog contents (and fix the
regression tests that should have caught this but failed to). However,
asking users to correct the catalog contents in existing installations
is a pain, so as a band-aid fix for the back branches, install a check
in enum_recv() to make it throw error if called with a cstring argument.
We will later revert this in HEAD in favor of correcting the catalogs.
Our thanks to Sumit Soni (via Secunia SVCRP) for reporting this issue.
Security: CVE-2013-0255
This patch changes pg_get_viewdef() and allied functions so that
PRETTY_INDENT processing is always enabled. Per discussion, only the
PRETTY_PAREN processing (that is, stripping of "unnecessary" parentheses)
poses any real forward-compatibility risk, so we may as well make dump
output look as nice as we safely can.
Also, set the default wrap length to zero (i.e, wrap after each SELECT
or FROM list item), since there's no very principled argument for the
former default of 80-column wrapping, and most people seem to agree this
way looks better.
Marko Tiikkaja, reviewed by Jeevan Chalke, further hacking by Tom Lane
In the previous coding, psql's state variable saying that output should
go to a file was only reset after successful completion of a query
returning tuples. Thus for example,
regression=# select 1/0
regression-# \g somefile
ERROR: division by zero
regression=# select 1/2;
regression=#
... huh, I wonder where that output went. Even more oddly, the state
was not reset even if it's the file that's causing the failure:
regression=# select 1/2 \g /foo
/foo: Permission denied
regression=# select 1/2;
/foo: Permission denied
regression=# select 1/2;
/foo: Permission denied
This seems to me not to satisfy the principle of least surprise.
\g is certainly not documented in a way that suggests its effects are
at all persistent.
To fix, adjust the code so that the flag is reset at exit from SendQuery
no matter what happened.
Noted while reviewing the \gset patch, which had comparable issues.
Arguably this is a bug fix, but I'll refrain from back-patching for now.
This way, they can be used by frontend and backend code. We already
supported that, but doing it this way allows us to mix true frontend
files with backend files compiled in frontend environment.
Author: Andres Freund
The original code used freeze_min_age instead of freeze_table_age. The
main consequence of this mistake is that lowering freeze_min_age would
cause full-table scans to occur much more frequently, which causes
serious issues because the number of writes required is much larger.
That feature (freeze_min_age) is supposed to affect only how soon tuples
are frozen; some pages should still be skipped due to the visibility
map.
Backpatch to 8.4, where the freeze_table_age feature was introduced.
Report and patch from Andres Freund
Failing to do this results in almost all updates to system catalogs
being non-HOT updates, because the OID column would differ (not having
been set for the new tuple), which is an indexed column.
While at it, make sure to set the tableoid early in both old and new
tuples as well. This isn't of much consequence, since that column is
seldom (never?) indexed.
Report and patch from Andres Freund.
This is specified in the SQL standard. The CREATE RECURSIVE VIEW
specification is transformed into a normal CREATE VIEW statement with a
WITH RECURSIVE clause.
reviewed by Abhijit Menon-Sen and Stephen Frost
We must only set the bit(s) for the strongest lock held in the tuple;
otherwise, a multixact containing members with exclusive lock and
key-share lock will behave as though only a share lock is held.
This bug was introduced in commit 0ac5ad5134, somewhere along
development, when we allowed a singleton FOR SHARE lock to be
implemented without a MultiXact by using a multi-bit pattern.
I overlooked that GetMultiXactIdHintBits() needed to be tweaked as well.
Previously, we could have the bits for FOR KEY SHARE and FOR UPDATE
simultaneously set and it wouldn't cause a problem.
Per report from digoal@126.com
Peter Eisentraut