Separate the parts specific to the SSL library from the general logic.
The previous code structure was
open_client_SSL()
calls verify_peer_name_matches_certificate()
calls verify_peer_name_matches_certificate_name()
calls wildcard_certificate_match()
and was completely in fe-secure-openssl.c. The new structure is
open_client_SSL() [openssl]
calls pq_verify_peer_name_matches_certificate() [generic]
calls pgtls_verify_peer_name_matches_certificate_guts() [openssl]
calls openssl_verify_peer_name_matches_certificate_name() [openssl]
calls pq_verify_peer_name_matches_certificate_name() [generic]
calls wildcard_certificate_match() [generic]
Move the generic functions into a new file fe-secure-common.c, so the
calls generally go fe-connect.c -> fe-secure.c -> fe-secure-${impl}.c ->
fe-secure-common.c, although there is a bit of back-and-forth between
the last two.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
pg_hba_file_rules erroneously reported this as scram-sha256. Fix that.
To avoid future errors and confusion, also adjust documentation links
and internal symbols to have a separator between "sha" and "256".
Reported-by: Christophe Courtois <christophe.courtois@dalibo.com>
Author: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Commit 4bbf6edfbd added a test case,
but it turns out that the test case doesn't reliably test for the
bug, and in the context of the regression test suite did not because
ANALYZE had not been run.
Report and patch by Etsuro Fujita. I added a comment along lines
previously suggested by Tom Lane.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5A6195D8.8060206@lab.ntt.co.jp
It's a common task to evaluate a qual and reset the corresponding
expression context. Currently that requires storing the result of the
qual eval, resetting the context, and then reacting on the result. As
that's awkward several places only reset the context next time through
a node. That's not great, so introduce a helper that evaluates and
resets.
It's a bit ugly that it currently uses MemoryContextReset() instead of
ResetExprContext(), but that seems easier than reordering all of
executor.h.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180109222544.f7loxrunqh3xjl5f@alap3.anarazel.de
There's never any value in giving a fully specified cache key to
SearchCatCacheList: you might as well call SearchCatCache instead,
since there could be only one match. So the maximum useful number of
key arguments is one less than the supported number of key columns.
We might as well remove the useless extra argument and save some few
bytes per call site, as well as a cycle or so per call.
I believe the reason it was coded like this is that originally, callers
had to write out all the dummy arguments in each call, and so it seemed
less confusing if SearchCatCache and SearchCatCacheList took the same
number of key arguments. But since commit e26c539e9, callers only write
their live arguments explicitly, making that a non-factor; and there's
surely been enough time for third-party modules to adapt to that coding
style. So this is only an ABI break not an API break for callers.
Per discussion with Oliver Ford, this might also make it less confusing
how to use SearchCatCacheList correctly.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/27788.1517069693@sss.pgh.pa.us
ExecPushExprSlots didn't initialize ExprEvalStep's resvalue/resnull
steps as it didn't use them. That caused wrong valgrind warnings for
an upcoming patch, so zero-intialize.
Also zero-initialize all scratch ExprEvalStep's allocated on the
stack, to avoid issues with similar future omissions of non-critial
data.
Clarify that the restriction against reg* types only applies to table
columns using these types, not to the type appearing in any other way,
for example as a function argument.
In cases where simplehash tables where filled with either a lot of
conflicting hash-values, or values that hash to consecutive
values (i.e. build "chains") the growth heuristics in
d4c62a6b62 could trigger rather
explosively.
To fix that, address some of the reasons (see previous commit) of why
the growth heuristics where needed, and only allow growth when the
table isn't too empty. While that means there's a few cases of bad
input that can be slower, that seems a lot better than running very
quickly out of memory.
Author: Tomas Vondra and Andres Freund, with additional input by
Thomas Munro, Tom Lane Todd A. Cook
Reported-By: Todd A. Cook, Tomas Vondra, Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171127185700.1470.20362@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch: 10, where simplehash was introduced
The changes in b81b5a96f4 did not fully
address the issue, because the bit-mixing of the IV into the final
hash-key didn't prevent clustering in the input-data survive in the
output data.
This didn't cause a lot of problems because of the additional growth
conditions added d4c62a6b62. But as we
want to rein those in due to explosive growth in some edges, this
needs to be fixed.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171127185700.1470.20362@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch: 10, where simplehash was introduced
When a password is needed, cases such as
psql -d "postgresql://alice@localhost/testdb" -U bob
would incorrectly prompt for "Password for user bob: ", when actually the
connection will be attempted with username alice. The priority order of
which name to use isn't that important here, but the misleading prompt is.
When we are prompting for a password after initial connection failure,
we can fix this reliably by looking at PQuser(conn) to see how libpq
interpreted the connection arguments. But when we're doing a forced
password prompt because of a -W switch, we can't use that solution.
Fortunately, because the main use of -W is for noninteractive situations,
it's less critical to produce a helpful prompt in such cases. I made
the startup prompt for -W just say "Password: " all the time, rather
than expending extra code on trying to identify which username to use.
In the case of a \c command (after -W has been given), there's already
logic in do_connect that determines whether the "dbname" is a connstring
or URI, so we can avoid lobotomizing the prompt except in cases that
are actually dubious. (We could do similarly in startup.c if anyone
complains, but for now it seems not worthwhile, especially since that
would still be only a partial solution.)
Per bug #15025 from Akos Vandra. Although this is arguably a bug fix,
it doesn't seem worth back-patching. The case where it matters seems
like a very corner-case usage, and someone might complain that we'd
changed the behavior of -W in a minor release.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180123130013.7407.24749@wrigleys.postgresql.org
create_plan_recurse lacked any stack depth check. This is not per
our normal coding rules, but I'd supposed it was safe because earlier
planner processing is more complex and presumably should eat more
stack. But bug #15033 from Andrew Grossman shows this isn't true,
at least not for queries having the form of a many-thousand-way
INTERSECT stack.
Further testing showed that recurse_set_operations is also capable
of being crashed in this way, since it likewise will recurse to the
bottom of a parsetree before calling any support functions that
might themselves contain any stack checks. However, its stack
consumption is only perhaps a third of create_plan_recurse's.
It's possible that this particular problem with create_plan_recurse can
only manifest in 9.6 and later, since before that we didn't build a Path
tree for set operations. But having seen this example, I now have no
faith in the proposition that create_plan_recurse doesn't need a stack
check, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180127050845.28812.58244@wrigleys.postgresql.org
DST law changes in Brazil, Sao Tome and Principe. Historical corrections
for Bolivia, Japan, and South Sudan. The "US/Pacific-New" zone has been
removed (it was only a link to America/Los_Angeles anyway).
Commit 09529a70b changed nodeIndexscan.c and nodeIndexonlyscan.c to
postpone initialization of the indexscan proper until the first tuple
fetch. It overlooked the question of mark/restore behavior, which means
that if some caller attempts to mark the scan before the first tuple fetch,
you get a null pointer dereference.
The only existing user of mark/restore is nodeMergejoin.c, which (somewhat
accidentally) will never attempt to set a mark before the first inner tuple
unless the inner child node is a Material node. Hence the case can't arise
normally, so it seems sufficient to document the assumption at both ends.
However, during an EvalPlanQual recheck, ExecScanFetch doesn't call
IndexNext but just returns the jammed-in test tuple. Therefore, if we're
doing a recheck in a plan tree with a mergejoin with inner indexscan,
it's possible to reach ExecIndexMarkPos with iss_ScanDesc still null,
as reported by Guo Xiang Tan in bug #15032.
Really, when there's a test tuple supplied during an EPQ recheck, touching
the index at all is the wrong thing: rather, the behavior of mark/restore
ought to amount to saving and restoring the es_epqScanDone flag. We can
avoid finding a place to actually save the flag, for the moment, because
given the assumption that no caller will set a mark before fetching a
tuple, es_epqScanDone must always be set by the time we try to mark.
So the actual behavior change required is just to not reach the index
access if a test tuple is supplied.
The set of plan node types that need to consider this issue are those
that support EPQ test tuples (i.e., call ExecScan()) and also support
mark/restore; which is to say, IndexScan, IndexOnlyScan, and perhaps
CustomScan. It's tempting to try to fix the problem in one place by
teaching ExecMarkPos() itself about EPQ; but ExecMarkPos supports some
plan types that aren't Scans, and also it seems risky to make assumptions
about what a CustomScan wants to do here. Also, the most likely future
change here is to decide that we do need to support marks placed before
the first tuple, which would require additional work in IndexScan and
IndexOnlyScan in any case. Hence, fix the EPQ issue in nodeIndexscan.c
and nodeIndexonlyscan.c, accepting the small amount of code duplicated
thereby, and leave it to CustomScan providers to fix this bug if they
have it.
Back-patch to v10 where commit 09529a70b came in. In earlier branches,
the index_markpos() call is a waste of cycles when EPQ is active, but
no more than that, so it doesn't seem appropriate to back-patch further.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180126074932.3098.97815@wrigleys.postgresql.org
We have a lot of code in which option names, which from the user's
viewpoint are logically keywords, are passed through the grammar as plain
identifiers, and then matched to string literals during command execution.
This approach avoids making words into lexer keywords unnecessarily. Some
places matched these strings using plain strcmp, some using pg_strcasecmp.
But the latter should be unnecessary since identifiers would have been
downcased on their way through the parser. Aside from any efficiency
concerns (probably not a big factor), the lack of consistency in this area
creates a hazard of subtle bugs due to different places coming to different
conclusions about whether two option names are the same or different.
Hence, standardize on using strcmp() to match any option names that are
expected to have been fed through the parser.
This does create a user-visible behavioral change, which is that while
formerly all of these would work:
alter table foo set (fillfactor = 50);
alter table foo set (FillFactor = 50);
alter table foo set ("fillfactor" = 50);
alter table foo set ("FillFactor" = 50);
now the last case will fail because that double-quoted identifier is
different from the others. However, none of our documentation says that
you can use a quoted identifier in such contexts at all, and we should
discourage doing so since it would break if we ever decide to parse such
constructs as true lexer keywords rather than poor man's substitutes.
So this shouldn't create a significant compatibility issue for users.
Daniel Gustafsson, reviewed by Michael Paquier, small changes by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/29405B24-564E-476B-98C0-677A29805B84@yesql.se
This is preparatory refactoring to prepare the way for partition-wise
aggregate, which will reuse the new subroutines for child grouping
rels. It also does not seem like a bad idea on general principle,
as the function was getting pretty long.
Jeevan Chalke. The larger patch series of which this patch is a part
was reviewed and tested by Antonin Houska, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi,
Ashutosh Bapat, David Rowley, Dilip Kumar, Konstantin Knizhnik,
Pascal Legrand, and me. Some cosmetic changes by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAM2+6=V64_xhstVHie0Rz=KPEQnLJMZt_e314P0jaT_oJ9MR8A@mail.gmail.com
This clause was superseded by SQL-standard syntax back in 7.3.
We've kept it around for backwards-compatibility purposes ever since;
but 15 years seems like long enough for that, especially seeing that
there are undocumented weirdnesses in how it interacts with the
SQL-standard syntax for specifying the same options.
Michael Paquier, per an observation by Daniel Gustafsson;
some small cosmetic adjustments to nearby code by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180115022748.GB1724@paquier.xyz
The existing "connection authorized" server log messages used OpenSSL
API calls directly, even though similar abstracted API calls exist.
Change to use the latter instead.
Change the function prototype for the functions that return the TLS
version and the cipher to return const char * directly instead of
copying into a buffer. That makes them slightly easier to use.
Add bits= to the message. psql shows that, so we might as well show the
same information on the client and server.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
As the comment there stated, these were needed for old-style
user-defined functions, but since we removed support for those, we don't
need this anymore.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
We have switches already to suppress other subsidiary object properties,
such as ACLs, security labels, ownership, and tablespaces, so just on
the grounds of symmetry we should allow suppressing comments as well.
Also, commit 0d4e6ed30 added a positive reason to have this feature,
i.e. to allow obtaining the old behavior of selective pg_restore should
anyone desire that.
Recent commits have removed the cases where pg_dump emitted comments on
built-in objects that the restoring user might not have privileges to
comment on, so the original primary motivation for this feature is gone,
but it still seems at least somewhat useful in its own right.
Robins Tharakan, reviewed by Fabrízio Mello
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEP4nAx22Z4ch74oJGzr5RyyjcyUSbpiFLyeYXX8pehfou92ug@mail.gmail.com
Ensure that CREATE DATABASE and related commands are issued when, and
only when, --create is specified. Previously there were scenarios
where using selective-dump switches would prevent --create from having
any effect. For example, it would fail to do anything in pg_restore
if the archive file had been made by a selective dump, because there
would be no TOC entry for the database.
Since we don't issue \connect either if we don't issue CREATE DATABASE,
this could result in unexpectedly restoring objects into the wrong
database.
Also fix pg_restore's selective restore logic so that when an object is
selected to be restored, we also restore its ACL, comment, and security
label if any. Previously there was no way to get the latter properties
except through tedious mucking about with a -L file. If, for some
reason, you don't want these properties, you can match the old behavior
by adding --no-acl etc.
While at it, try to make _tocEntryRequired() a little better organized
and better documented.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/32668.1516848577@sss.pgh.pa.us
get_relation_info() was too optimistic about opening indexes in
partitioned tables, which would raise errors when any queries were
planned on such tables. Fix by ignoring any indexes of the partitioned
kind.
CLUSTER (and ALTER TABLE CLUSTER ON) had a similar problem. Fix by
disallowing these commands in partitioned tables.
Fallout from 8b08f7d482.
We had some pretty ad-hoc handling of the public schema and the plpgsql
extension, which are both presumed to exist in template0 but might be
modified or deleted in the database being dumped.
Up to now, by default pg_dump would emit a CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS
command as well as a COMMENT command for plpgsql. The usefulness of the
former is questionable, and the latter caused annoying errors in
non-superuser dump/restore scenarios. Let's instead install a rule that
built-in extensions (identified by having low-numbered OIDs) are not to be
dumped. We were doing it that way already in binary-upgrade mode, so this
just makes regular mode behave the same. It remains true that if someone
has installed a non-default ACL on the plpgsql language, that will get
dumped thanks to the pg_init_privs mechanism. This is more consistent with
the handling of built-in objects of other kinds.
Also, change the very ad-hoc mechanism that was used to avoid dumping
creation and comment commands for the public schema. Instead of hardwiring
a test in _printTocEntry(), make use of the DUMP_COMPONENT_ infrastructure
to mark that schema up-front about what we want to do with it. This has
the visible effect that the public schema won't be mentioned in the output
at all, except for updating its ACL if it has a non-default ACL.
Previously, while it was normally not mentioned, --clean mode would drop
and recreate it, again causing headaches for non-superuser usage. This
change likewise makes the public schema less special and more like other
built-in objects.
If plpgsql, or the public schema, has been removed entirely in the source
DB, that situation won't be reproduced in the destination ... but that
was true before.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/29048.1516812451@sss.pgh.pa.us
Previously, the docs implied that only Linux and Windows could use huge
pages. That's not quite true: it's just that we only know how to
request them explicitly on those OSes. Be more explicit about what
huge_pages really does and mention that some OSes may use huge pages
automatically.
Author: Thomas Munro and Catalin Iacob
Reviewed-By: Justin Pryzby, Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=3qzR-hfjepymohuC4XO5phxoSoipOjm6BEhnJHjNR+jg@mail.gmail.com
These were introduced in 4cbb646334, but
after further analysis and testing, they should not be necessary and
probably weren't the part of that commit that fixed anything.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Connection strings can have items with spaces in them, wrapped in
quotes. The tests however ran a SELECT '$connstr' upon connection which
broke on the embedded quotes. Use dollar quotes on the connstr to
protect against this. This was hit during the development of the macOS
Secure Transport patch, but is independent of it.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
record_image_eq was covered a bit by the materialized view code that it
is meant to support, but record_image_cmp was not tested at all.
While we're here, add more tests to record_eq and record_cmp as well,
for symmetry.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Avoid compiler warnings on MSVC (which doesn't want to see both
__forceinline and inline) and ancient GCC (which doesn't have
__attribute__((always_inline))).
Don't force inline-ing when building at -O0, as the programmer is probably
hoping for exact source-to-object-line correspondence in that case.
(For the moment this only works for GCC; maybe we can extend it later.)
Make pg_attribute_always_inline be syntactically a drop-in replacement
for inline, rather than an additional wart.
And improve the comments.
Thomas Munro and Michail Nikolaev, small tweaks by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/32278.1514863068@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANtu0oiYp74brgntKOxgg1FK5+t8uQ05guSiFU6FYz_5KUhr6Q@mail.gmail.com
If we're inside a lateral subquery, there may be no unparameterized paths
for a particular child relation of an appendrel, in which case we *must*
be able to create similarly-parameterized paths for each other child
relation, else the planner will fail with "could not devise a query plan
for the given query". This means that there are situations where we'd
better be able to reparameterize at least one path for each child.
This calls into question the assumption in reparameterize_path() that
it can just punt if it feels like it. However, the only case that is
known broken right now is where the child is itself an appendrel so that
all its paths are AppendPaths. (I think possibly I disregarded that in
the original coding on the theory that nested appendrels would get folded
together --- but that only happens *after* reparameterize_path(), so it's
not excused from handling a child AppendPath.) Given that this code's been
like this since 9.3 when LATERAL was introduced, it seems likely we'd have
heard of other cases by now if there were a larger problem.
Per report from Elvis Pranskevichus. Back-patch to 9.3.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5981018.zdth1YWmNy@hammer.magicstack.net
Since 9.6, heavyweight locking is not an abstract and unhandled
concern of the parallel machinery, but rather something to which
we have a specific approach.
Commit 28724fd90d fixed things so that
if a background worker fails to start due to fork() failure or because
it is terminated before startup succeeds, BGWH_STOPPED will be
reported. However, that only helps if the code that uses the
background worker machinery notices the change in status, and the code
in parallel.c did not.
To fix that, do two things. First, make sure that when a worker
exits, it triggers the leader to read from error queues. That way, if
a worker which has attached to an error queue exits uncleanly, the
leader is sure to throw some error, either the contents of the
ErrorResponse sent by the worker, or "lost connection to parallel
worker" if it exited without sending one. To cover the case where
the worker never starts up in the first place or exits before
attaching to the error queue, the ParallelContext now keeps track
of which workers have sent at least one message via the error
queue. A worker which sends no messages by the time the parallel
operation finishes will be checked to see whether it exited before
attaching to the error queue; if so, a new error message, "parallel
worker failed to initialize", will be reported. If not, we'll
continue to wait until it either starts up and exits cleanly, starts
up and exits uncleanly, or fails to start, and then take the
appropriate action.
Patch by me, reviewed by Amit Kapila.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYnBgXgdTu6wk5YPdWhmgabYc9nY_pFLq=tB=FSLYkD8Q@mail.gmail.com
The folly of not doing this was exposed by the buildfarm: in some cases,
the GUC settings applied through ALTER DATABASE SET may be essential to
interpreting the reloaded data correctly. Another argument why we can't
really get away with the scheme proposed in commit b3f840120 is that it
cannot work for parallel restore: even if the parent process manages to
hang onto the previous GUC state, worker processes would see the state
post-ALTER-DATABASE. (Perhaps we could have dodged that bullet by
delaying DATABASE PROPERTIES restoration to the end of the run, but
that does nothing for the data semantics problem.)
This leaves us with no solution for the default_transaction_read_only issue
that commit 4bd371f6f intended to work around, other than "you gotta remove
such settings before dumping/upgrading". However, in view of the fact that
parallel restore broke that hack years ago and no one has noticed, it's
fair to question how many people care. I'm unexcited about adding a large
dollop of new complexity to handle that corner case.
This would be a one-liner fix, except it turns out that ReconnectToServer
tries to optimize away "redundant" reconnections. While that may have been
valuable when coded, a quick survey of current callers shows that there are
no cases where that's actually useful, so just remove that check. While at
it, remove the function's useless return value.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/12453.1516655001@sss.pgh.pa.us
Some things in be-secure-openssl.c and fe-secure-openssl.c were not
actually specific to OpenSSL but could also be used by other
implementations. In order to avoid copy-and-pasting, move some of that
code to common files.
Move the documentation of the SSL API calls are supposed to do into the
headers files, instead of keeping them in the files for the OpenSSL
implementation. That way, they don't have to be duplicated or be
inconsistent when other implementations are added.
Robert Haas