While checking if a record could fit in the circular WAL decoding
buffer, the coding from commit 3f1ce973 used arithmetic that could
overflow. 64 bit systems were unaffected for various technical reasons,
which probably explains the lack of problem reports. Likewise for 32
bit systems running known 32 bit kernels. The systems at risk of
problems appear to be 32 bit processes running on 64 bit kernels, with
unlucky placement in memory.
Per complaint from GCC -fsanitize=undefined -m32, while testing
variations of 039_end_of_wal.pl.
Back-patch to 15.
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGKH0oRPOX7DhiQ_b51sM8HqcPp2J3WA-Oen%3DdXog%2BAGGQ%40mail.gmail.com
During a pg_upgrade test using an old dump, all references to the old
regress shared library path (so, dylib or dll) are updated to point to
the library path used by the new build, to ensure a consistent
comparison between the old and new dumps.
The test previously relied on a hardcoded value of "src/test/regress/"
to build the new path value, which would point to an incorrect location
for the meson and vpath builds. This is replaced by REGRESS_SHLIB, able
to point to the correct location of the regress shared library.
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a628d8ad-a08a-2eab-4ca9-641bc82d3193@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
tts_virtual_copyslot() contained an Assert that checked that the srcslot
contained <= attributes than the dstslot. This seems to be backwards as
if the srcslot contained fewer attributes then the dstslot could be left
with stale Datum values from the previously stored tuple. It might make
more sense to allow the source to contain additional attributes and only
copy the leading ones that also exist in the destination, however, that's
not what we're doing here.
Here we just remove the Assert from tts_virtual_copyslot() and add an
Assert to ExecCopySlot() to verify the attribute counts match. There
does not seem to be any places where the destination contains fewer
attributes, so instead of going to the trouble of making the code
properly handle this, let's just ensure the attribute counts match. If
this Assert fails then that will indicate that we do have cases that
require us to handle the srcslot with more attributes than the dstslot.
It seems better to only write this code if there's a genuine requirement
for it rather than write it now only to leave it untested.
Thanks to Andres Freund for helping with the analysis of this.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpMAvBL0T+TRORquyx1iqFQKMVTXtqNocOw0Pa2uh1heg@mail.gmail.com
An invalid index is skipped when doing REINDEX CONCURRENTLY at table
level, with INDEX_CORRUPTED used as errcode. This is confusing,
because an invalid index could exist after an interruption. The errcode
is switched to OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE instead, as per a
suggestion from Andres Freund.
While on it, the error messages are reworded, and a hint is added,
telling how to rebuild an invalid index in this case. This has been
suggested by Noah Misch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231118230958.4fm3fhk4ypshxopa@awork3.anarazel.de
The commit 29d0a77fa6 labelled binary_upgrade_logical_slot_has_caught_up()
as a non-strict function to allow providing a better error message to callers
in case the passed slot_name is NULL. On further discussion, it seems that
it is not helpful to have a different error message for NULL input in this
function, so this patch marks the function as strict.
This patch also removes the explicit permission check to use replication
slots as this function is invoked only by superusers and instead adds an
Assert.
Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada
Author: Hayato Kuroda
Reviewed-by: Vignesh C
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDSyiBKkMXBxN_gUayZZUCOgyHnG8Ge8rcPXNP3Tf6B4g@mail.gmail.com
A REINDEX CONCURRENTLY run on a table with no indexes would always pop
the topmost snapshot from the active snapshot stack, making the snapshot
handling inconsistent between the multiple-relation and single-relation
cases. This commit slightly changes the snapshot stack handling so as a
snapshot is popped only ReindexMultipleInternal() in this case after a
relation has been reindexed, fixing a problem where an event trigger
function may need a snapshot but does not have one. This also keeps the
places where PopActiveSnapshot() is called closer to each other.
While on it, this expands the existing tests to cover all the cases that
could be faced with REINDEX commands and such event triggers, for one or
more relations, with or without indexes.
This behavior is inconsistent since 5dc92b844e, but we've never had a
need for an active snapshot at the end of a REINDEX until now.
Thanks also to Jian He for the input.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cb538743-484c-eb6a-a8c5-359980cd3a17@gmail.com
pg_test_fsync's signal_cleanup() intentionally ignores the write()
result since there's not much we could do about it, but certain
compilers make that harder than it ought to be.
This was missed in commit 52e98d4502.
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin, Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231206161839.GA2828158%40nathanxps13
This commit removes the restriction that would not apply filters to the
dumps used for comparison in the TAP test of pg_upgrade when using the
same base version for the old and new nodes.
The previous logic would fail on Windows if loading a dump while using
the same set of binaries for the old and new nodes, as the library
dependencies updated in the old dump would append CRLFs to the dump
file as it is treated as a text file. The dump filtering logic replaces
all CRLFs (\r\n) by LFs (\n), which is able to prevent this issue.
When the old and new versions of the binaries are the same,
AdjustUpgrade removes all blank lines, removes version-based comments
generated by pg_dump and replaces CRLFs by LFs.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/60d434b9-53d9-9ea1-819b-efebdcf44e41@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
SEMI-JOIN is deparsed as the EXISTS subquery. It references outer and inner
relations, so it should be evaluated as the condition in the upper-level WHERE
clause. The signatures of deparseFromExprForRel() and deparseRangeTblRef() are
revised so that they can add conditions to the upper level.
PgFdwRelationInfo now has a hidden_subquery_rels field, referencing the relids
used in the inner parts of semi-join. They can't be referred to from upper
relations and should be used internally for equivalence member searches.
The planner can create semi-join, which refers to inner rel vars in its target
list. However, we deparse semi-join as an exists() subquery. So we skip the
case when the target list references to inner rel of semi-join.
Author: Alexander Pyhalov
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Ian Lawrence Barwick, Yuuki Fujii, Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c9e2a757cf3ac2333714eaf83a9cc184@postgrespro.ru
The old names were too generic, and would have applied to any binary
that made use of JsonManifestParseContext. Rename to make the names
specific to pg_verifybackup, since there are plans afoot to reuse
this infrastructure.
Per suggestion from Álvaro Herrra.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/202311131625.o7hzq3oukuyd@alvherre.pgsql
There is no real reason to just run multiple words together when
we can instead punctuate them with marks intended for that purpose.
Per suggestion from Álvaro Herrera.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/202311161021.nisg7imt7kyf@alvherre.pgsql
When preparing commit 98e675ed7a I accidentally forgot to run
pgindent, which did produce a diff. Fix by adding the required
whitespace per the koel buildfarm failure.
Commit 5a991ef869 accidentally reversed the order of the tuples
and fields parameters, making the error message incorrectly refer
to 3 tuples with 1 field when IDENTIFY_SYSTEM returns 1 tuple and
3 or 4 fields. Fix by changing the order of the parameters. This
also adds a comment describing why we check for < 3 when postgres
since 9.4 has been sending 4 fields.
Backpatch all the way since the bug is almost a decade old.
Author: Tomonari Katsumata <t.katsumata1122@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Bug: #18224
Backpatch-through: v12
The logic to keep the libpq command queue in sync with queries that have
been processed had a bug when errors were returned for reasons other
than problems in queries -- for example, when a connection is lost. We
incorrectly consumed an element from the command queue every time, but
this is wrong and can lead to the queue becoming empty ahead of time,
leading to later malfunction: PQgetResult would return nothing,
potentially causing the calling application to enter a busy loop.
Fix by making the SYNC queue element a barrier that can only be consumed
when a SYNC message is received.
Backpatch to 14.
Reported by: Иван Трофимов (Ivan Trofimov) <i.trofimow@yandex.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17948-fcace7557e449957@postgresql.org
The failed test was trying to validate that the two_phase option for a
slot is retained after the upgrade. The problem was that it didn't get
enabled before the upgrade so expecting to be enabled after the upgrade
was not right in the first place. This is a timing issue because we enable
the two_phase once the initial sync for all the tables is finished.
Normally, we wait for the two_phase state to be enabled but this test
missed that step.
Per buildfarm.
Author: Hayato Kuroda
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TY3PR01MB98892396D1071FC4320D6B31F586A@TY3PR01MB9889.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Presently, pg_convert() allocates a new bytea and copies the result
regardless of whether any conversion actually happened. This
commit adjusts this function to return the source pointer as-is if
no conversion occurred. This optimization isn't expected to make a
tremendous difference, but it still seems worthwhile to avoid
unnecessary memory allocations.
Author: Yurii Rashkovskii
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BRLCQyknBPSWXRBQGOi6aYEcdQ9RpH9Kch4GjoeY8dQ3D%2Bvhw%40mail.gmail.com
After commit fd5e8b440d, InitProcess() is called later in the
EXEC_BACKEND startup sequence, so it's enough to set the
am_autovacuum_[launcher|worker] variables at the same place as in the
!EXEC_BACKEND case.
It draws an unnecessary error in builds compiled without thread support.
Added by commit 038f586d5f, which was backpatched to 14; though in
branch master we no longer support such builds, there's no reason to
have this there, so remove it in all branches since 14.
Reported-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZW2G9Ix4nBKLcSSO@paquier.xyz
This commit adds support for REINDEX in event triggers, making this
command react for the events ddl_command_start and ddl_command_end. The
indexes rebuilt are collected with the ReindexStmt emitted by the
caller, for the concurrent and non-concurrent paths.
Thanks to that, it is possible to know a full list of the indexes that a
single REINDEX command has worked on.
Author: Garrett Thornburg, Jian He
Reviewed-by: Jim Jones, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEEqfk5bm32G7sbhzHbES9WejD8O8DCEOaLkxoBP7HNWxjPpvg@mail.gmail.com
The wording changed here comes from 991bfe11d2, when the only way to
trigger a promotion was with a trigger file. There are more options to
achieve this operation these days, like the SQL function pg_promote() or
the command `pg_ctl promote`, so it is confusing to assume that only a
trigger file is able to do the work.
Note also that promote_trigger_file has been removed as of cd4329d939
in 16~.
Author: Shinya Kato
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/201b08ea29aa61f96162080e75be503c@oss.nttdata.com
Backpatch-through: 12
The order of process initialization steps is now more consistent
between !EXEC_BACKEND and EXEC_BACKEND modes. InitProcess() is called
at the same place in either mode. We can now also move the
AttachSharedMemoryStructs() call into InitProcess() itself. This
reduces the number of "#ifdef EXEC_BACKEND" blocks.
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin, Andres Freund, Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7a59b073-5b5b-151e-7ed3-8b01ff7ce9ef@iki.fi
The BackgroundWorker struct is now passed the same way as the Port
struct. Seems more consistent.
This makes it possible to move InitProcess later in SubPostmasterMain
(in next commit), as we no longer need to access shared memory to read
background worker entry.
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin, Andres Freund, Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7a59b073-5b5b-151e-7ed3-8b01ff7ce9ef@iki.fi
For clarity, have separate functions for *creating* the shared memory
and semaphores at postmaster or single-user backend startup, and
for *attaching* to existing shared memory structures in EXEC_BACKEND
case. CreateSharedMemoryAndSemaphores() is now called only at
postmaster startup, and a new AttachSharedMemoryStructs() function is
called at backend startup in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7a59b073-5b5b-151e-7ed3-8b01ff7ce9ef@iki.fi
The padding bytes written to the backend params file were
uninitialized. That's harmless because we don't access the padding
bytes when we read the file back in, but Valgrind doesn't know
that. In any case, clear the padding bytes to make Valgrind happy.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/014768ed-8b39-c44f-b07c-098c87b1644c@gmail.com
When creating a partitioned index, the partition key must be a subset
of the index's columns. But this currently doesn't check that the
collations between the partition key and the index definition match.
So you can construct a unique index that fails to enforce uniqueness.
(This would most likely involve a nondeterministic collation, so it
would have to be crafted explicitly and is not something that would
just happen by accident.)
This patch adds the required collation check. As a result, any
previously allowed unique index that has a collation mismatch would no
longer be allowed to be created.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3327cb54-f7f1-413b-8fdb-7a9dceebb938%40eisentraut.org
Commit 861f86beea changed hash_xlog_squeeze_page() to start reading
the write buffer conditionally but forgot to initialize it leading to an
uninitialized access.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Hayato Kuroda
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin, Amit Kapila
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/62ed1a9f-746a-8e86-904b-51b9b806a1d9@gmail.com
The just released meson 1.3 strongly deprecated a hack we were using, emitting
a noisy warning (the hack basically depended on an implementation detail to
work). Turns out there has been a better way available for a while, I just
hadn't found it. 1.4 added a more convenient approach, but we can't rely on
that.
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231129185053.s6c7f73eg7b4ztfi@awork3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 16-, where the meson build was added.
Commit 7389aad6 removed the notion of backends started from inside a
signal handler. A stray comment still referred to them, while
explaining the need for a call to set_stack_base(). That leads to the
question of whether we still need the call in !EXEC_BACKEND builds.
There doesn't seem to be much point in suppressing it now, as it doesn't
hurt and probably helps to measure the stack base from the exact same
place in EXEC_BACKEND and !EXEC_BACKEND builds.
Back-patch to 16.
Reported-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Reported-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2BEJHcevNGNOxVWxTNFbuB%3Dvjf4U68%2B85rAC_Sxvy2zEQ%40mail.gmail.com
InitAuxiliaryProcess() closely resembles InitProcess(), but it didn't
call InitLWLockAccess(). But because InitLWLockAccess() is a no-op
unless compiled with LWLOCK_STATS, and everything works even if it's
not called, the only consequence was that the stats were not printed
for aux processes.
This was an oversight in commit 1c6821be31, in version 9.5, so it is
missing in all supported branches. But since it only affects
developers using LWLOCK_STATS and no one has complained, no
backpatching.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20231130202648.7k6agmuizdilufnv@awork3.anarazel.de
Commit a5cf808be5 accidentally passed signed chars to isalpha and
isspace in the parser code which leads to undefined behavior. Fix
by casting the parameters to unsigned chars.
Author: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reported-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/388186.1701315586@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZWgg5xim2CXQcfmh@paquier.xyz
It's not necessary to fill the key field in most cases, since
hash_search has already done that. Some existing call sites have an
assert or comment that this contract has been fulfilled, but those
are quite old and that practice seems unnecessary here.
While at it, remove a nearby redundant assignment that a smart compiler
will elide anyway.
Zhao Junwang, with some adjustments by me
Reviewed by Nathan Bossart, with additional feedback from Tom Lane
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEG8a3%2BUPF%3DR2QGPgJMF2mKh8xPd1H2TmfH77zPuVUFdBpiGUA%40mail.gmail.com
Heikki Linnakangas