In databases with many tables, re-fetching the statistics takes some time,
so that this behavior seriously decreases the available concurrency for
multiple autovac workers. There's discussion afoot about more complete
fixes, but a simple and back-patchable amelioration is to claim the table
and release the lock before rechecking stats. If we find out there's no
longer a reason to process the table, re-taking the lock to un-claim the
table is cheap enough.
(This patch is quite old, but got lost amongst a discussion of more
aggressive fixes. It's not clear when or if such a fix will be
accepted, but in any case it'd be unlikely to get back-patched.
Let's do this now so we have some improvement for the back branches.)
In passing, make the normal un-claim step take AutovacuumScheduleLock
not AutovacuumLock, since that is what is documented to protect the
wi_tableoid field. This wasn't an actual bug in view of the fact that
readers of that field hold both locks, but it creates some concurrency
penalty against operations that need only AutovacuumLock.
Back-patch to all supported versions.
Jeff Janes
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26118.1520865816@sss.pgh.pa.us
Several places used similar code to convert a string to an int, so take
the function that we already had and make it globally available.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
A Value node would store an integer as a long. This causes needless
portability risks, as long can be of varying sizes. Change it to use
int instead. All code using this was already careful to only store
32-bit values anyway.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
CREATE TABLE / LIKE with a bigint identity column would fail on
platforms where long is 32 bits. Copying the sequence values used
makeInteger(), which would truncate the 64-bit sequence data to 32 bits.
To fix, use makeFloat() instead, like the parser. (This does not
actually make use of floats, but stores the values as strings.)
Bug: #15096
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
If a table containing a primary key is attach as partition to a
partitioned table which has a primary key with a different definition,
we would happily create a second one in the new partition. Oops. It
turns out that this is because an error check in DefineIndex is executed
only if you tell it that it's being run by ALTER TABLE, and the original
code here wasn't. Change it so that it does.
Added a couple of test cases for this, also. A previously working test
started to fail in a different way than before patch because the new
check is called earlier; change the PK to plain UNIQUE so that the new
behavior isn't invoked, so that the test continues to verify what we
want it to verify.
Reported by: Noriyoshi Shinoda
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DF4PR8401MB102060EC2615EC9227CC73F7EEDF0@DF4PR8401MB1020.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
One of the things canonicalize_qual() does is to remove constant-NULL
subexpressions of top-level AND/OR clauses. It does that on the assumption
that what it's given is a top-level WHERE clause, so that NULL can be
treated like FALSE. Although this is documented down inside a subroutine
of canonicalize_qual(), it wasn't mentioned in the documentation of that
function itself, and some callers hadn't gotten that memo.
Notably, commit d007a9505 caused get_relation_constraints() to apply
canonicalize_qual() to CHECK constraints. That allowed constraint
exclusion to misoptimize situations in which a CHECK constraint had a
provably-NULL subclause, as seen in the regression test case added here,
in which a child table that should be scanned is not. (Although this
thinko is ancient, the test case doesn't fail before 9.2, for reasons
I've not bothered to track down in detail. There may be related cases
that do fail before that.)
More recently, commit f0e44751d added an independent bug by applying
canonicalize_qual() to index expressions, which is even sillier since
those might not even be boolean. If they are, though, I think this
could lead to making incorrect index entries for affected index
expressions in v10. I haven't attempted to prove that though.
To fix, add an "is_check" parameter to canonicalize_qual() to specify
whether it should assume WHERE or CHECK semantics, and make it perform
NULL-elimination accordingly. Adjust the callers to apply the right
semantics, or remove the call entirely in cases where it's not known
that the expression has one or the other semantics. I also removed
the call in some cases involving partition expressions, where it should
be a no-op because such expressions should be canonical already ...
and was a no-op, independently of whether it could in principle have
done something, because it was being handed the qual in implicit-AND
format which isn't what it expects. In HEAD, add an Assert to catch
that type of mistake in future.
This represents an API break for external callers of canonicalize_qual().
While that's intentional in HEAD to make such callers think about which
case applies to them, it seems like something we probably wouldn't be
thanked for in released branches. Hence, in released branches, the
extra parameter is added to a new function canonicalize_qual_ext(),
and canonicalize_qual() is a wrapper that retains its old behavior.
Patch by me with suggestions from Dean Rasheed. Back-patch to all
supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/24475.1520635069@sss.pgh.pa.us
Historically, tab completion for functions has offered the names of
aggregates as well. This is essential in at least one context, namely
GRANT/REVOKE, because there is no GRANT ON AGGREGATE syntax. There
are other cases where a command that nominally is for functions will
allow aggregates as well, though not all do.
Commit fd1a421fe changed this query to disallow aggregates, but that
doesn't seem to have been thought through very carefully. Change it
to allow aggregates (but still ignore procedures).
We might at some point tighten this up, but it'd require sorting through
all the uses of this query to see which ones should offer aggregate
names and which shouldn't. Given the lack of field complaints about
the historical laxity here, that's work I'm not eager to do right now.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14268.1520283126@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit b08df9cab left things rather poorly documented as far as the
exact semantics of "clause_is_check" mode went. Also, that mode did
not really work correctly for predicate_refuted_by; although given the
lack of specification as to what it should do, as well as the lack
of any actual use-case, that's perhaps not surprising.
Rename "clause_is_check" to "weak" proof mode, and provide specifications
for what it should do. I defined weak refutation as meaning "truth of A
implies non-truth of B", which makes it possible to use the mode in the
part of relation_excluded_by_constraints that checks for mutually
contradictory WHERE clauses. Fix up several places that did things wrong
for that definition. (As far as I can see, these errors would only lead
to failure-to-prove, not incorrect claims of proof, making them not
serious bugs even aside from the fact that v10 contains no use of this
mode. So there seems no need for back-patching.)
In addition, teach predicate_refuted_by_recurse that it can use
predicate_implied_by_recurse after all when processing a strong NOT-clause,
so long as it asks for the correct proof strength. This is an optimization
that could have been included in commit b08df9cab, but wasn't.
Also, simplify and generalize the logic that checks for whether nullness of
the argument of IS [NOT] NULL would force overall nullness of the predicate
or clause. (This results in a change in the partition_prune test's output,
as it is now able to prune an all-nulls partition that it did not recognize
before.)
In passing, in PartConstraintImpliedByRelConstraint, remove bogus
conversion of the constraint list to explicit-AND form and then right back
again; that accomplished nothing except forcing a useless extra level of
recursion inside predicate_implied_by.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5983.1520487191@sss.pgh.pa.us
I'd initially supposed that predicate_refuted_by(..., true) ought to
say that "A refutes B" means "non-falsity of A implies non-truth of B".
But it seems better to define it as "truth of A implies non-truth of B".
This is more useful in the current system, slightly easier to prove,
and in closer correspondence to the existing code behavior.
With this change, test_predtest no longer claims that any existing
test cases show false proof reports, though there still are cases
where we could prove something and fail to.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5983.1520487191@sss.pgh.pa.us
Since commit 69f4b9c85f, the existing
code was no longer assessing the parallel-safety of the real tlist
for each upper rel, but rather the first of possibly several tlists
created by split_pathtarget_at_srfs(). Repair.
Even though this is clearly wrong, it's not clear that it has any
user-visible consequences at the moment, so no back-patch for now. If
we discover later that it does have user-visible consequences, we
might need to back-patch this to v10.
Patch by me, per a report from Rajkumar Raghuwanshi.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmoaob_Strkg4Dcx=VyxnyXtrmkV=ofj=pX7gH9hSre-g0Q@mail.gmail.com
The predicate-proof code in predtest.c is a bit hard to test as-is:
you have to construct a query whose plan changes depending on the success
of a test, and in tests that have been around for awhile, it's always
possible that the plan shape is now being determined by some other factor.
Our existing regression tests aren't doing real well at providing full
code coverage of predtest.c, either. So, let's add a small test module
that allows directly inspecting the results of predicate_implied_by()
and predicate_refuted_by() for arbitrary boolean expressions.
I chose the set of tests committed here in order to get reasonably
complete code coverage of predtest.c just from running this test
module, and to cover some cases called out as being interesting in
the existing comments. We might want to add more later. But this
set already shows a few cases where perhaps things could be improved.
Indeed, this exercise proves that predicate_refuted_by() is buggy for
the case of clause_is_check = true, though fortunately we aren't using
that case anywhere yet. I'll look into doing something about that in
a separate commit. For now, just memorialize the current behavior.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5983.1520487191@sss.pgh.pa.us
This reverts commit c2c537c56d.
It's now clear that whatever is going on there, it can't be blamed
on unexpected ANALYZE runs, because the statistics are the same
just before the failing query as they were at the start of the test.
The server won't actually start with that setting anymore, not since
we raised the default max_wal_senders to 10. Per discussion, we don't
wish to back down on that default, so instead raise the effective floor
for max_connections (to 20). It's still possible to configure a smaller
setting manually, but initdb won't set it that way.
Since that change happened in v10, back-patch to v10.
Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180209.170823.42008365.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
We were independently checking ReservedBackends < MaxConnections and
max_wal_senders < MaxConnections, but because walsenders aren't allowed
to use superuser-reserved connections, that's really the wrong thing.
Correct behavior is to insist on ReservedBackends + max_wal_senders being
less than MaxConnections. Fix the code and associated documentation.
This has been wrong for a long time, but since the situation probably
hardly ever arises in the field (especially pre-v10, when the default
for max_wal_senders was zero), no back-patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28271.1520195491@sss.pgh.pa.us
Noticed while playing with changes that mess with the bootstrap
sequence; the operations patched here failed to emit anything, leading
the developer to think that the bug was in the previous operation that
did emit a message.
The branch that does not support tls-server-end-point runs more tests,
so we need to structure the test counting dynamically.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Commit 1804284042 established that single-batch
parallel-aware hash joins could create one large shared hash table using the
combined work_mem budget of all participants. The costing accidentally
assumed that parallel-oblivious hash joins could also do that. The
documentation for initial_cost_hashjoin() also failed to mention the new
argument. Repair.
Author: Thomas Munro
Reported-By: Antonin Houska
Reviewed-By: Antonin Houska
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/12441.1513935950%40localhost
The previous method worked off the full virtual address space, not just
the shared memory usage.
Author: Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Vasundhar Boddapati <bvasundhar@gmail.com>
If a walsender exits leaving data in reorderbuffers, the next walsender
that tries to decode the same transaction would append its decoded data
in the same spill files without truncating it first, which effectively
duplicate the data. Avoid that by removing any leftover reorderbuffer
spill files when a walsender starts.
Backpatch to 9.4; this bug has been there from the very beginning of
logical decoding.
Author: Craig Ringer, revised by me
Reviewed by: Álvaro Herrera, Petr Jelínek, Masahiko Sawada
Apparently, it doesn't work to use a plain cstring as a Name datum: you
may end up having random bytes because of failing to zero the bytes
after the terminating \0, as indicated by valgrind. I introduced this
bug in 5564c11815, so backpatch this fix to REL_10_STABLE, like that
commit.
While at it, fix a slightly misleading comment, pointed out by David
Rowley.
Like the LDAP and SSL tests, these are not run by default but can be
selected via PG_TEST_EXTRA.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Since edd44738bc WCO expressions of partitioned tables are
initialized with the first subplan as parent. That's not correct, as
the correct context is the ModifyTableState node. That's also what is
used for RETURNING processing, initialized nearby.
This appears not to cause any visible problems for in core code, but
is problematic for in development patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180303043818.tnvlo243bgy7una3@alap3.anarazel.de
This is analogous to the syntax allowed for VACUUM. This allows us to
avoid making new options reserved keywords and makes it easier to
allow arbitrary argument order. Oh, and it's consistent with the other
commands, too.
Author: Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/D3FC73E2-9B1A-4DB4-8180-55F57D116B4E@amazon.com
The LIKE INCLUDING ALL clause to CREATE TABLE intuitively indicates
cloning of extended statistics on the source table, but it failed to do
so. Patch it up so that it does. Also include an INCLUDING STATISTICS
option to the LIKE clause, so that the behavior can be requested
individually, or excluded individually.
While at it, reorder the INCLUDING options, both in code and in docs, in
alphabetical order which makes more sense than feature-implementation
order that was previously used.
Backpatch this to Postgres 10, where extended statistics were
introduced, because this is seen as an oversight in a fresh feature
which is better to get consistent from the get-go instead of changing
only in pg11.
In pg11, comments on statistics objects are cloned too. In pg10 they
are not, because I (Álvaro) was too coward to change the parse node as
required to support it. Also, in pg10 I chose not to renumber the
parser symbols for the various INCLUDING options in LIKE, for the same
reason. Any corresponding user-visible changes (docs) are backpatched,
though.
Reported-by: Stephen Froehlich
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CY1PR0601MB1927315B45667A1B679D0FD5E5EF0@CY1PR0601MB1927.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
It seems fairly hard to explain recent buildfarm failures without the
theory that something is doing an ANALYZE behind our backs. Probe
for this directly to see if it's true.
In principle the outputs of these queries should be stable, since the table
in question is small enough that ANALYZE's sample will include all rows.
But even if that turns out to be wrong, we can put up with some failures
for a bit. I don't intend to leave this here indefinitely.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/25502.1520277552@sss.pgh.pa.us
Up to now we've not worried about whether psql's tab completion queries
would work against prior server versions. But since we support older
server versions in describe.c, we really ought to do so here as well.
Failing to take care of this not only leads to loss of tab-completion
service when using an older server, but risks aborting a user's open
transaction when we send an incompatible query to the server.
The recent changes in pg_proc.prokind are one reason to take this more
seriously now than before, and the proposed patch for completion after
SELECT needs some such capability as well.
Hence, create some infrastructure to allow selection of one of several
versions of a query depending on server version. For cases where we
just need to select one of several query strings, introduce VersionedQuery
and COMPLETE_WITH_VERSIONED_QUERY(). Likewise extend the SchemaQuery
infrastructure to allow versioning of those.
I went ahead and fixed the prokind issues, to serve as an illustration
of how to use versioned SchemaQuery. To have some illustration of
VersionedQuery, change the support for completion of publication and
subscription names so that psql will not send sure-to-fail queries to
pre-v10 servers. There is much more that should be done to make tab
completion more friendly to older servers, but this commit is mainly
meant to get the infrastructure in place, so I stopped here.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/24314.1520190408@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit 34db06ef9a adopted a lock-free
design for shm_mq.c, but it introduced a race condition that could
lose messages. When shm_mq_receive_bytes() detects that the other end
has detached, it must make sure that it has seen the final version of
mq_bytes_written, or it might miss a message sent before detaching.
Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D2myZ4qxpt1a%3DC%2BwEv3o188K13K3UvD-44FK0SdAzHy%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com
pg_rewind checks whether each file is a relation data file, from its path.
Previously this check logic had the bug which made pg_rewind fail to
recognize any relation data files in tablespaces. Which also caused
an assertion failure in pg_rewind.
Back-patch to 9.5 where pg_rewind was added.
Author: Takayuki Tsunakawa
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F8D6C7A@G01JPEXMBYT05
If convert_to_scalar is passed a pair of datatypes it can't cope with,
its former behavior was just to elog(ERROR). While this is OK so far as
the core code is concerned, there's extension code that would like to use
scalarltsel/scalargtsel/etc as selectivity estimators for operators that
work on non-core datatypes, and this behavior is a show-stopper for that
use-case. If we simply allow convert_to_scalar to return FALSE instead of
outright failing, then the main logic of scalarltsel/scalargtsel will work
fine for any operator that behaves like a scalar inequality comparison.
The lack of conversion capability will mean that we can't estimate to
better than histogram-bin-width precision, since the code will effectively
assume that the comparison constant falls at the middle of its bin. But
that's still a lot better than nothing. (Someday we should provide a way
for extension code to supply a custom version of convert_to_scalar, but
today is not that day.)
While poking at this issue, we noted that the existing code for handling
type bytea in convert_to_scalar is several bricks shy of a load.
It assumes without checking that if the comparison value is type bytea,
the bounds values are too; in the worst case this could lead to a crash.
It also fails to detoast the input values, so that the comparison result is
complete garbage if any input is toasted out-of-line, compressed, or even
just short-header. I'm not sure how often such cases actually occur ---
the bounds values, at least, are probably safe since they are elements of
an array and hence can't be toasted. But that doesn't make this code OK.
Back-patch to all supported branches, partly because author requested that,
but mostly because of the bytea bugs. The change in API for the exposed
routine convert_network_to_scalar() is theoretically a back-patch hazard,
but it seems pretty unlikely that any third-party code is calling that
function directly.
Tomas Vondra, with some adjustments by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b68441b6-d18f-13ab-b43b-9a72188a4e02@2ndquadrant.com
In PostgreSQL 9.5, the documentation for pg_stat_replication was moved,
so some of the links pointed to an appropriate location.
Author: Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma@gmail.com>
Tom Lane