Add comments explaining when and where it is safe for nbtree to treat
row compare keys as if they were simple scalar inequality keys on the
row's most significant column. This is particularly important within
_bt_advance_array_keys, which deals with required inequality keys in a
general and uniform way, without any special handling for row compares.
Also spell out the implications of _bt_check_rowcompare's approach of
_conditionally_ evaluating lower-order row compare subkeys, particularly
when one of its lower-order subkeys might see NULL index tuple values
(these may or may not affect whether the qual as a whole is satisfied).
The behavior in this area isn't particularly intuitive, so these issues
seem worth going into.
In passing, add a few more defensive/documenting row comparison related
assertions to _bt_first and _bt_check_rowcompare.
Follow-up to commits bd3f59fd and ec986020.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wznwkak_K7pcAdv9uH8ZfNo8QO7+tHXOaCUddMeTfaCCFw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
_bt_first reliably uses the same equality key (on each index column) for
initial positioning purposes as the one that _bt_checkkeys can use to
end the scan following commit f09816a0. _bt_first no longer applies its
own independent rules to determine which initial positioning key to use
on each column (for equality and inequality keys alike). Preprocessing
is now fully in control of determining which keys start and end each
scan, ensuring that _bt_first and _bt_checkkeys have symmetric behavior.
Remove obsolete comments that described why _bt_first was expected to
use at least one of the available required equality keys for initial
positioning purposes. The rules in this area are now maximally strict
and uniform, so there's no reason to draw attention to equality keys.
Any column with a required equality key cannot have a redundant required
inequality key (nor can it have a redundant required equality key).
Oversight in commit f09816a0, which removed similar comments from
_bt_first, but missed these comments.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Backpatch-through: 18
The C standard says that the second and third arguments of a
conditional operator shall be both void type or both not-void
type. The Windows version of INTERRUPTS_PENDING_CONDITION()
got this wrong. It's pretty harmless because the result of
the operator is ignored anyway, but apparently recent versions
of MSVC have started issuing a warning about it. Silence the
warning by casting the dummy zero to void.
Reported-by: Christian Ullrich <chris@chrullrich.net>
Author: Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cc4ef8db-f8dc-4347-8a22-e7ebf44c0308@chrullrich.net
Backpatch-through: 13
The original messages were confusing in dry-run mode in that they state
that something is being done, when in reality it isn't. Use alternative
wording in that case, to make the distinction clear.
Author: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Backpatch-through: 18
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PsvQJQnQO0KT0S2oegenkvJ8FUuY-QS5syyqmT24R2xFQ@mail.gmail.com
The code updates the system identifier, then runs pg_walreset; if the
latter fails, it complains about the former, which makes no sense.
Change the error message to complain about the right thing.
Noticed while reviewing a patch touching nearby code.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Backpatch-through: 17
The docs for max_protocol_version suggested PQprotocolVersion()
instead of PQfullProtocolVersion() to find out the exact protocol
version. Since PQprotocolVersion() only returns the major protocol
version, that is bad advice.
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Reviewed-by: Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAGECzQSKFxQsYAgr11PhdOr-RtPZEdAXZnHx6U3avLuk3xQaTQ%40mail.gmail.com
This commit reverts 818fefd8fd, that has been introduced to address a
an instability in some of the TAP tests due to the presence of random
standby snapshot WAL records, when slots are invalidated by
InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot().
Anyway, this commit had also the consequence of introducing a behavior
regression. After 818fefd8fd, the code may determine that a slot needs
to be invalidated while it may not require one: the slot may have moved
from a conflicting state to a non-conflicting state between the moment
when the mutex is released and the moment when we recheck the slot, in
InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot(). Hence, the invalidations may be more
aggressive than they actually have to.
105b2cb336 has tackled the test instability in a way that should be
hopefully sufficient for the buildfarm, even for slow members:
- In v18, the test relies on an injection point that bypasses the
creation of the random records generated for standby snapshots,
eliminating the random factor that impacted the test. This option was
not available when 818fefd8fd was discussed.
- In v16 and v17, the problem was bypassed by disallowing a slot to
become active in some of the scenarios tested.
While on it, this commit adds a comment to document that it is fine for
a recheck to use xmin and LSN values stored in the slot, without storing
and reusing them across multiple checks.
Reported-by: "suyu.cmj" <mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com>
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f492465f-657e-49af-8317-987460cb68b0.mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com
Backpatch-through: 16
RIGHT_SEMI joins rely on the HEAP_TUPLE_HAS_MATCH flag to guarantee
that only the first match for each inner tuple is considered.
However, in a parallel hash join, the inner relation is stored in a
shared global hash table that can be probed by multiple workers
concurrently. This allows different workers to inspect and set the
match flags of the same inner tuples at the same time.
If two workers probe the same inner tuple concurrently, both may see
the match flag as unset and emit the same tuple, leading to duplicate
output rows and violating RIGHT_SEMI join semantics.
For now, we disable parallel plans for RIGHT_SEMI joins. In the long
term, it may be possible to support parallel execution by performing
atomic operations on the match flag, for example using a CAS or
similar mechanism.
Backpatch to v18, where RIGHT_SEMI join was introduced.
Bug: #19094
Reported-by: Lori Corbani <Lori.Corbani@jax.org>
Diagnosed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19094-6ed410eb5b256abd@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 18
Because long is 32-bit on 64-bit Windows, it isn't a good datatype to
store the difference between 2 pointers. The under-sized type could
overflow and lead to scary warnings in MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING builds,
such as:
WARNING: problem in alloc set ExecutorState: bad single-chunk %p in block %p
However, the problem lies only in the code running the check, not from
an actual memory accounting bug.
Fix by using "Size" instead of "long". This means using an unsigned
type rather than the previous signed type. If the block's freeptr was
corrupted, we'd still catch that if the unsigned type wrapped. Unsigned
allows us to avoid further needless complexities around comparing signed
and unsigned types.
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo-RmiT4s33J=aC9C_-wPZjOXQ232V-EZFgKftSsNRi4w@mail.gmail.com
Two or more constants can have the same location. We handled this
correctly for non squashed constants, but failed to do it if squashed
(resulting in out-of-bounds memory access), because the code structure
became broken by commit 0f65f3eec478: we failed to update 'last_loc'
correctly when skipping these squashed constants.
The simplest fix seems to be to get rid of 'last_loc' altogether -- in
hindsight, it's quite pointless. Also, when ignoring a constant because
of this, make sure to fulfill fill_in_constant_lengths's duty of setting
its length to -1.
Lastly, we can use == instead of <= because the locations have been
sorted beforehand, so the < case cannot arise.
Co-authored-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Backpatch-through: 18
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2b91e358-0d99-43f7-be44-d2d4dbce37b3%40garret.ru
CRLF translation is already handled by the text mode, so there should be
no need for any specific logic. See also 1c6d462939, msys perl being
one case where the translation mattered.
Note: An equivalent has been first applied on HEAD with 8767b449a3.
The same change is backpatched to v18 as all the Windows buildfarm
members have reported green.
Author: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aPsh39bxwYKvUlAf@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 18
Some recent changes were made to remove the explicit dependency on
btree indexes in some parts of the code. One of these changes was
made in commit 9ef1851685, which allows non-btree indexes to be used
in get_actual_variable_range(). A follow-up commit ee1ae8b99f fixes
the cases where an index doesn’t have a sortopfamily as this is a
prerequisite to be used in get_actual_variable_range().
However, it was found that indexes that have amcanorder = true but do
not allow index-only-scans (amcanreturn returns false or is NULL) will
pass all of the conditions, while they should be rejected since
get_actual_variable_range() uses the index-only-scan machinery in
get_actual_variable_endpoint(). Such an index might cause errors like
ERROR: no data returned for index-only scan
during query planning.
The fix is to add a check in get_actual_variable_range() to reject
indexes that do not allow index-only scans.
Author: Maxime Schoemans <maxime.schoemans@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20ED852A-C2D9-41EB-8671-8C8B9D418BE9%40enterprisedb.com
Previously, the check_hook for synchronized_standby_slots attempted to
validate that each specified slot existed and was physical. However, these
checks were not performed during server startup. As a result, if users
configured non-existent slots before startup, the misconfiguration would
go undetected initially. This could later cause parallel query failures,
as newly launched workers would detect the issue and raise an ERROR.
This patch improves the check_hook by validating the syntax and format of
slot names. Validation of slot existence and type is deferred to the WAL
sender process, aligning with the behavior of the check_hook for
primary_slot_name.
Reported-by: Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com>
Author: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 17, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5-nLCeO4MQzWipCXH58qf0arruiw0OeUc1+Q=Z=4GM+=v1NQ@mail.gmail.com
When dealing with ResultRelInfos for partitions, there are cases where
there are mixed requirements for the ri_RootResultRelInfo. There are
cases when the partition itself requires a NULL ri_RootResultRelInfo and
in the same query, the same partition may require a ResultRelInfo with
its parent set in ri_RootResultRelInfo. This could cause the column
mapping between the partitioned table and the partition not to be done
which could result in crashes if the column attnums didn't match
exactly.
The fix is simple. We now check that the ri_RootResultRelInfo matches
what the caller passed to ExecGetTriggerResultRel() and only return a
cached ResultRelInfo when the ri_RootResultRelInfo matches what the
caller wants, otherwise we'll make a new one.
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Fomin <fomin.list@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7DCE78D7-0520-4207-822B-92F60AEA14B4@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
Commit 65281391a caused some additional error context lines to
appear in the output of one test case. That's fine, but we missed
updating the expected output. Do it now.
While here, add some missing test-output subdirectories to
contrib/sepgsql/.gitignore, so that we don't get git warnings
after running the tests.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1613232.1761255361@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 18
The project Git server hasn't supported cloning with the Git protocol
in a very long time, but the documentation never got the memo. Remove
the mention of using the Git protocol, and while there wrap a mention
of Git in <productname> tags.
Backpatch down to all supported versions.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reported-by: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABwTF4WMiMb-KT2NRcib5W0C8TQF6URMb+HK9a_=rnZnY8Q42w@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
These two functions expect there to be room to insert another item
in the FreePageBtree's array, but their assertions were too weak
to guarantee that. This has little practical effect granting that
the callers are not buggy, but it seems to be misleading late-model
Coverity into complaining about possible array overrun.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/799984.1761150474@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
Commit c6f7f11d8 intended to prevent leaking any PyObject reference
counts in edge cases (such as out-of-memory during string
construction), but actually it introduced a leak in the normal case.
Repeating an error-trapping operation often enough would lead to
session-lifespan memory bloat. The problem is that I failed to
think about the fact that PyObject_GetAttrString() increments the
refcount of the returned PyObject, so that simply walking down the
list of error frame objects causes all but the first one to have
their refcount incremented.
I experimented with several more-or-less-complex ways around that,
and eventually concluded that the right fix is simply to drop the
newly-obtained refcount as soon as we walk to the next frame
object in PLy_traceback. This sounds unsafe, but it's perfectly
okay because the caller holds a refcount on the first frame object
and each frame object holds a refcount on the next one; so the
current frame object can't disappear underneath us.
By the same token, we can simplify the caller's cleanup back to
simply dropping its refcount on the first object. Cleanup of
each frame object will lead in turn to the refcount of the next
one going to zero.
I also added a couple of comments explaining why PLy_elog_impl()
doesn't try to free the strings acquired from PLy_get_spi_error_data()
or PLy_get_error_data(). That's because I got here by looking at a
Coverity complaint about how those strings might get leaked. They
are not leaked, but in testing that I discovered this other leak.
Back-patch, as c6f7f11d8 was. It's a bit nervous-making to be
putting such a fix into v13, which is only a couple weeks from its
final release; but I can't see that leaving a recently-introduced
leak in place is a better idea.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1203918.1761184159@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
Commit 883a95646a introduced overflow entries in the replication lag tracker
to fix an issue where lag columns in pg_stat_replication could stall when
the replay LSN stopped advancing.
This commit adds comments clarifying the purpose and behavior of overflow
entries to improve code readability and understanding.
Since commit 883a95646a was recently applied and backpatched to all
supported branches, this follow-up commit is also backpatched accordingly.
Author: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABPTF7VxqQA_DePxyZ7Y8V+ErYyXkmwJ1P6NC+YC+cvxMipWKw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
When JIT deformed tuples (controlled via the jit_tuple_deforming GUC),
types narrower than sizeof(Datum) would be zero-extended up to Datum
width. This wasn't the same as what fetch_att() does in the standard
tuple deforming code. Logically the values are the same when fetching
via the DatumGet*() marcos, but negative numbers are not the same in
binary form.
In the report, the problem was manifesting itself with:
ERROR: could not find memoization table entry
in a query which had a "Cache Mode: binary" Memoize node. However, it's
currently unclear what else is affected. Anything that uses
datum_image_eq() or datum_image_hash() on a Datum from a tuple deformed by
JIT could be affected, but it may not be limited to that.
The fix for this is simple: use signed extension instead of zero
extension.
Many thanks to Emmanuel Touzery for reporting this issue and providing
steps and backup which allowed the problem to easily be recreated.
Reported-by: Emmanuel Touzery <emmanuel.touzery@plandela.si>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DB8P194MB08532256D5BAF894F241C06393F3A@DB8P194MB0853.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Backpatch-through: 13
One code path forgot to free the separately-malloc'd filename
part of a struct rfile. Another place freed the filename but
forgot the struct rfile itself. These seem worth fixing because
with a large backup we could be dealing with many files.
Coverity found the bug in make_rfile(). I found the other one
by manual inspection.
Previously, if primary_slot_name was set to an invalid slot name and
the configuration file was reloaded, both the postmaster and all other
backend processes reported a WARNING. With many processes running,
this could produce a flood of duplicate messages. The problem was that
the GUC check hook for primary_slot_name reported errors at WARNING
level via ereport().
This commit changes the check hook to use GUC_check_errdetail() and
GUC_check_errhint() for error reporting. As with other GUC parameters,
this causes non-postmaster processes to log the message at DEBUG3,
so by default, only the postmaster's message appears in the log file.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFud-cvthCTfusBfKHBS6Jj6kdAPTdLWKvP2qjUX6L_wA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Previously, when the replay LSN reported in feedback messages from a standby
stopped advancing, for example, due to a recovery conflict, the write_lag and
flush_lag columns in pg_stat_replication would initially update but then stop
progressing. This prevented users from correctly monitoring replication lag.
The problem occurred because when any LSN stopped updating, the lag tracker's
cyclic buffer became full (the write head reached the slowest read head).
In that state, the lag tracker could no longer compute round-trip lag values
correctly.
This commit fixes the issue by handling the slowest read entry (the one
causing the buffer to fill) as a separate overflow entry and freeing space
so the write and other read heads can continue advancing in the buffer.
As a result, write_lag and flush_lag now continue updating even if the reported
replay LSN remains stalled.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Reviewed-by: Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwGdGQ=1-X-71Caee-LREBUXSzyohkoQJd4yZZCMt24C0g@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
As foretold by commit a72f7d97be, this commit moves the baseline
point for ABI compatibility for v18 to commit c8af5019be. While at
it, add some more commentary and adjust the format of the entries
to improve both human and machine readability. There's a good
chance we'll add an .abi-compliance-history file to the other
back-branches, but for now this effort is limited to v18.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-by: David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com>
Reviewed-by: Mankirat Singh <mankiratsingh1315@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aPJ03E2itovDBcKX%40nathan
Backpatch-through: 18 only
A BlockNumber (32-bit) might not be large enough to add bo_pagesPerRange
to when the table contains close to 2^32 pages. At worst, this could
result in a cancellable infinite loop during the BRIN index scan with
power-of-2 pagesPerRange, and slow (inefficient) BRIN index scans and
scanning of unneeded heap blocks for non power-of-2 pagesPerRange.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: sunil s <sunilfeb26@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOG6S4-tGksTQhVzJM19NzLYAHusXsK2HmADPZzGQcfZABsvpA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
The comment fixed in this commit described the function as dealing with
database blocks, but in reality it processes shared memory allocations.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aH4DDhdiG9Gi0rG7@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Backpatch-through: 18
67a54b9e8 taught the planner to push down HAVING clauses even when
grouping sets are present, as long as the clause does not reference
any columns that are nullable by the grouping sets. However, there
was an oversight: if any empty grouping sets are present, the
aggregation node can produce a row that did not come from the input,
and pushing down a HAVING clause in this case may cause us to fail to
filter out that row.
Currently, non-degenerate HAVING clauses are not pushed down when
empty grouping sets are present, since the empty grouping sets would
nullify the vars they reference. However, degenerate (variable-free)
HAVING clauses are not subject to this restriction and may be
incorrectly pushed down.
To fix, explicitly check for the presence of empty grouping sets and
retain degenerate clauses in HAVING when they are present. This
ensures that we don't emit a bogus aggregated row. A copy of each
such clause is also put in WHERE so that query_planner() can use it in
a gating Result node.
To facilitate this check, this patch expands the groupingSets tree of
the query to a flat list of grouping sets before applying the HAVING
pushdown optimization. This does not add any additional planning
overhead, since we need to do this expansion anyway.
In passing, make a small tweak to preprocess_grouping_sets() by
reordering its initial operations a bit.
Backpatch to v18, where this issue was introduced.
Reported-by: Yuhang Qiu <iamqyh@gmail.com>
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0879D9C9-7FE2-4A20-9593-B23F7A0B5290@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
pgwin32_unsetenv() (compatibility routine of unsetenv() on Windows)
lacks the input validation that its sibling pgwin32_setenv() has.
Without these checks, calling unsetenv() with incorrect names crashes on
WIN32. However, invalid names should be handled, failing on EINVAL.
This commit adds the same checks as setenv() to fail with EINVAL for a
"name" set to NULL, an empty string, or if '=' is included in the value,
per POSIX requirements.
Like 7ca37fb040, backpatch down to v14. pgwin32_unsetenv() is defined
on REL_13_STABLE, but with the branch going EOL soon and the lack of
setenv() there for WIN32, nothing is done for v13.
Author: Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b6a1e52b-d808-4df7-87f7-2ff48d15003e@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
This is just a quick commit to verify that the buildfarm ABI
checker responds to this control file. Once we've tested
that, we will update the file to point at c8af5019b.
There's documentation mop-up yet to do, too.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aPJ03E2itovDBcKX@nathan
Backpatch-through: 18 only
The revised logic in 001_ssltests.pl would fail if openssl
doesn't work or if Perl is a 32-bit build, because it had
already overwritten $serialno with something inappropriate
to use in the eventual match. We could go back to the
previous code layout, but it seems best to introduce a
separate variable for the output of openssl.
Per failure on buildfarm member mamba, which has a 32-bit Perl.
It emerges that zlib's configuration logic is not robust enough
to guarantee that the macro will have the same ideas about struct
field layout as the library itself does, leading to corruption of
zlib's state struct followed by unintelligible failure messages.
This hazard has existed for a long time, but we'd not noticed
for several reasons:
(1) We only use gzgetc() when trying to read a manually-compressed
TOC file within a directory-format dump, which is a rarely-used
scenario that we weren't even testing before 20ec99589.
(2) No corruption actually occurs unless sizeof(long) is different
from sizeof(off_t) and the platform is big-endian.
(3) Some platforms have already fixed the configuration instability,
at least sufficiently for their environments.
Despite (3), it seems foolish to assume that the problem isn't
going to be present in some environments for a long time to come.
Hence, avoid relying on this macro. We can just #undef it and
fall back on the underlying function of the same name.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2122679.1760846783@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
We must tell init about each role name we plan to connect as,
else SSPI auth fails. Similar to previous patches such as
14793f471, 973542866.
Oversight in 208927e65, per buildfarm member drongo.
(Although that was back-patched to v13, the test script
only exists in v16 and up.)
It is possible to have a non-inherited not-null constraint on an
inherited column, but we were failing to preserve such constraints
during pg_upgrade where the source is 17 or older, because of a bug in
the pg_dump query for it. Oversight in commit 14e87ffa5c. Fix that
query. In passing, touch-up a bogus nearby comment introduced by the
same commit.
In version 17, make the regression tests leave a table in this
situation, so that this scenario is tested in the cross-version upgrade
tests of 18 and up.
Author: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Andrew Bille <andrewbille@gmail.com>
Bug: #19074
Backpatch-through: 18
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19074-ae2548458cf0195c@postgresql.org
This fixes an unlikely issue when fetching GROUPING SET results from
their internally stored hash tables. It was possible in rare cases that
the hash iterator would be set up incorrectly which could result in a
crash.
This was introduced in 4d143509c, so backpatch to v18.
Many thanks to Yuri Zamyatin for reporting and helping to debug this
issue.
Bug: #19078
Reported-by: Yuri Zamyatin <yuri@yrz.am>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19078-dfd62f840a2c0766@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 18
Commit a1b4f289be improved the hashjoin sizing to also consider the
memory used by BufFiles for batches. The code however had multiple
issues, making it ineffective or not working as expected in some cases.
* The amount of memory needed by buffers was calculated using uint32,
so it would overflow for nbatch >= 262144. If this happened the loop
would exit prematurely and the memory usage would not be reduced.
The nbatch overflow is fixed by reworking the condition to not use a
multiplication at all, so there's no risk of overflow. An explicit
cast was added to a similar calculation in ExecHashIncreaseBatchSize.
* The loop adjusting the nbatch value used hash_table_bytes to calculate
the old/new size, but then updated only space_allowed. The consequence
is the total memory usage was not reduced, but all the memory saved by
reducing the number of batches was used for the internal hash table.
This was fixed by using only space_allowed. This is also more correct,
because hash_table_bytes does not account for skew buckets.
* The code was also doubling multiple parameters (e.g. the number of
buckets for hash table), but was missing overflow protections.
The loop now checks for overflow, and terminates if needed. It'd be
possible to cap the value and continue the loop, but it's not worth
the complexity. And the overflow implies the in-memory hash table is
already very large anyway.
While at it, rework the comment explaining how the memory balancing
works, to make it more concise and easier to understand.
The initial nbatch overflow issue was reported by Vaibhav Jain. The
other issues were noticed by me and Melanie Plageman. Fix by me, with a
lot of review and feedback by Melanie.
Backpatch to 18, where the hashjoin memory balancing was introduced.
Reported-by: Vaibhav Jain <jainva@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 18
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABa-Az174YvfFq7rLS+VNKaQyg7inA2exvPWmPWqnEn6Ditr_Q@mail.gmail.com
pg_prewarm() currently checks for SELECT privileges on the target
relation. However, indexes do not have access rights of their own,
so a role may be denied permission to prewarm an index despite
having the SELECT privilege on its parent table. This commit fixes
this by locking the parent table before the index (to avoid
deadlocks) and checking for SELECT on the parent table. Note that
the code is largely borrowed from
amcheck_lock_relation_and_check().
An obvious downside of this change is the extra AccessShareLock on
the parent table during prewarming, but that isn't expected to
cause too much trouble in practice.
Author: Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACX%2BKaMz2ZoOojh0nQ6QNBYx8Ak1Dkoko%3DD4FSb80BYW%2Bo8CHQ%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
The SSL tests for pg_stat_ssl tries to exactly match the serial
from the certificate by extracting it with the openssl binary.
If that fails due to the binary not being available, a fallback
match is used, but the attempt to execute a missing binary adds
a warning to the output which can confuse readers for a failure
in the test. Fix by only attempting if the openssl binary was
found by autoconf/meson.
Backpatch down to v16 where commit c8e4030d1b made the test
use the OPENSSL variable from autoconf/meson instead of a hard-
coded value.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reported-by: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aNPSp1-RIAs3skZm@msg.df7cb.de
Backpatch-through: 16
042_low_level_backup compared the result of a query two times with a
comparison operator based on an integer, while the result should be
compared with a string.
The outcome of the tests is currently not impacted by this change.
However, it could be possible that the tests fail to detect future
issues if the query results become different, for some reason.
Oversight in 99b4a63bef.
Author: Sadhuprasad Patro <b.sadhu@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFF0-CHhwNx_Cv2uy7tKjODUbeOgPrJpW4Rpf1jqB16_1bU2sg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
040_pg_createsubscriber has been calling safe_psql(), that returns the
result of a SQL query, with ok() without checking the result generated
(in this case 't', for a number of publications).
The outcome of the tests is currently not impacted by this change.
However, it could be possible that the test fails to detect future
issues if the query results become different.
The test is rewritten so as the number of publications is checked. This
is not the fix suggested originally by the author, but this is more
reliable in the long run.
Oversight in e5aeed4b80.
Author: Sadhuprasad Patro <b.sadhu@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFF0-CHhwNx_Cv2uy7tKjODUbeOgPrJpW4Rpf1jqB16_1bU2sg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
The original formulation failed to take into account the fact that for
the PGXS case, the source dir is not $(top_srcdir), so it ended up not
doing anything. Handle it explicitly.
Author: Ryo Matsumura <matsumura.ryo@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYCPR01MB113164770FB0B0BE6ED21E68EE8DCA@TYCPR01MB11316.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Noah Misch