A superuser may create a subscription with password_required=true, but
which uses a connection string without a password.
Previously, if the owner of such a subscription was changed to a
non-superuser, the non-superuser was able to utilize a password from
another source (like a password file or the PGPASSWORD environment
variable), which should not have been allowed.
This commit adds a step to re-validate the connection string before
connecting.
Reported-by: Jeff Davis
Author: Vignesh C
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith, Robert Haas, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e5892973ae2a80a1a3e0266806640dae3c428100.camel%40j-davis.com
Backpatch-through: 16
BuildDescForRelation() has all the knowledge for converting a
ColumnDef into pg_attribute/tuple descriptor. ATExecAddColumn() can
make use of that, instead of duplicating all that logic. We just pass
a one-element list of ColumnDef and we get back exactly the data
structure we need. Note that we don't even need to touch
BuildDescForRelation() to make this work.
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/52a125e4-ff9a-95f5-9f61-b87cf447e4da@eisentraut.org
It missed a entry for tmp_check/ generated by the tests. While on it,
append a slash at the beginning of "pg_walsummary" to restrict its check
to the current directory, like anywhere else.
Oversights in ee1bfd1683.
jit.c and dfgr.c had a copy of the same code to check if a file exists
or not, with a twist: jit.c did not check for EACCES when failing the
stat() call for the path whose existence is tested. This refactored
routine will be used by an upcoming patch.
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZTiV8tn_MIb_H2rE@paquier.xyz
This is a rework of 7021d3b176, where we relied on forcing
max_logical_replication_workers to 0 in the postgres command. This
commit now prevents logical replication launchers to start using -b and
a backend-side check based on IsBinaryUpgrade, effective when upgrading
from 17 and newer versions.
This commit improves the comments explaining why this restriction is
necessary.
This discussion was on hold until we were sure how to add support for
subscribers in pg_upgrade, something now done thanks to 9a17be1e24.
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Amit Kapila, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZU2TeVkUg5qEi7Oy@paquier.xyz
The code for wrapping subquery output expressions in PlaceHolderVars
believed that if the expression already was a PlaceHolderVar, it was
never necessary to wrap that in another one. That's wrong if the
expression is underneath an outer join and involves a lateral
reference to outside that scope: failing to add an additional PHV
risks evaluating the expression at the wrong place and hence not
forcing it to null when the outer join should do so. This is an
oversight in commit 9e7e29c75, which added logic to forcibly wrap
lateral-reference Vars in PlaceHolderVars, but didn't see that the
adjacent case for PlaceHolderVars needed the same treatment.
The test case we have for this doesn't fail before 4be058fe9, but now
that I see the problem I wonder if it is possible to demonstrate
related errors before that. That's moot though, since all such
branches are out of support.
Per bug #18284 from Holger Reise. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18284-47505a20c23647f8@postgresql.org
Instead, just have lazy_scan_prune() and lazy_scan_noprune() update
LVRelState->nonempty_pages directly. This makes the two functions
more similar and also removes makes lazy_scan_noprune need one fewer
output parameters.
Melanie Plageman, reviewed by Andres Freund, Michael Paquier, and me
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_btji_wQdg=ok-5E4v_bGVxKYnnFFe7RA6Frc1EcOwtSg@mail.gmail.com
pg_combinebackup had various problems:
* strncpy was used in various places where strlcpy should be used
instead, to avoid any possibility of the result not being
\0-terminated.
* scan_for_existing_tablespaces() failed to close the directory,
and an error when opening the directory was reported with the
wrong pathname.
* write_reconstructed_file() contained some redundant and therefore
dead code.
* flush_manifest() didn't check the result of pg_checksum_update()
as we do in other places, and misused a local pathname variable
that shouldn't exist at all.
In pg_basebackup, the wrong variable name was used in one place,
due to a copy and paste that was not properly adjusted.
In blkreftable.c, the loop incorrectly doubled chunkno instead of
max_chunks. Fix that. Also remove a nearby assertion per repeated
off-list complaints from Tom Lane.
Per Coverity and subsequent code inspection by me and by Tom Lane.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobvqqj-DW9F7uUzT-cQqs6wcVb-Xhs=w=hzJnXSE-kRGw@mail.gmail.com
This can dump the contents of the WAL summary files found in
pg_wal/summaries. Normally, this shouldn't really be something anyone
needs to do, but it may be needed for debugging problems with
incremental backup, or could possibly be useful to external tools.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobvqqj-DW9F7uUzT-cQqs6wcVb-Xhs=w=hzJnXSE-kRGw@mail.gmail.com
This makes it possible to access information about the progress
of WAL summarization from SQL. The previously-added functions
pg_available_wal_summaries() and pg_wal_summary_contents() only
examine on-disk state, but this function exposes information from
the server's shared memory.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobvqqj-DW9F7uUzT-cQqs6wcVb-Xhs=w=hzJnXSE-kRGw@mail.gmail.com
UNIQUE and PRIMARY KEY constraints can be created on ONLY the
partitioned table. We already had an example demonstrating that,
but forgot to mention it in the documentation of the limits of
partitioning.
Author: Laurenz Albe
Reviewed-By: shihao zhong, Shubham Khanna, Ashutosh Bapat
Backpatch-through: 12
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/167299368731.659.16130012959616771853@wrigleys.postgresql.org
During upgrade, when pg_restore performs CREATE DATABASE, bgwriter or
checkpointer may flush buffers and hold a file handle for pg_largeobject,
so later TRUNCATE pg_largeobject command will fail if OS (such as older
Windows versions) doesn't remove an unlinked file completely till it's
open. The probability of seeing this behavior is higher in this test
because we use wal_level as logical via allows_streaming => 'logical'
which in turn set shared_buffers as 1MB and make it more probable for
bgwriter to hold the file handle.
Diagnosed-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Hayato Kuroda, Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYAPR01MB5866AB7FD922CE30A2565B8BF5A8A@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
In commit 3e51b278d I (tgl) caused initdb to leave lc_messages and
other lc_xxx GUCs commented-out in the installed postgresql.conf file
if they were going to be set to 'C'. This was a hack for cosmetic
purposes, and it was buggy because lc_messages' wired-in default is
not 'C' but '' (empty string). That led to --no-locale not having
the expected effect, since the postmaster would then obtain
lc_messages from its startup environment.
Let's just revert to the prior behavior of always de-commenting the
lc_xxx entries; the argument for changing that longstanding behavior
was weak in the first place.
Also, fix postgresql.conf.sample's erroneous claim that the default
value of lc_messages is 'C'. I suspect that was what misled me into
making this mistake in the first place.
Report and patch by Kyotaro Horiguchi. Back-patch to v16 where
the problem was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231122.162700.1995154567625541112.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Many psql backslash commands tolerate trailing semicolons, even
though that's not part of the official syntax. These did not.
They tried to, by passing semicolon = true to psql_scan_slash_option,
but that function ignored this parameter in OT_WHOLE_LINE mode.
Teach it to do the right thing, and remove the now-duplicative
logic in exec_command_help.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2012251.1704746912@sss.pgh.pa.us
These were not testing the same thing as the comparable Assert
in calc_nestloop_required_outer(), because we neglected to map
the given Paths' relids to top-level relids. When considering
a partition child join the latter is the correct thing to do.
This oversight is old, but since it's only an overly-weak Assert
check there doesn't seem to be much value in back-patching.
Richard Guo (with cosmetic changes and comment updates by me)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs49sqbe9GBZ8sy8dSfKRNURgicR85HX8vgzcgQsPF0XY1w@mail.gmail.com
Commit 9d9c02ccd, which added the notion of a "run condition" for
window functions, neglected to teach nodeFuncs.c to process the new
field. Remarkably, that doesn't seem to have had any ill effects
before we invented Var.varnullingrels, but now it can cause visible
failures in join-removal scenarios.
I have no faith that there's not reachable problems in v15 too,
so back-patch the code change to v15 where 9d9c02ccd came in.
The test case seems irrelevant to v15, though.
Per bug #18277 from Zuming Jiang. Diagnosis and patch by
Richard Guo.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18277-089ead83b329a2fd@postgresql.org
On Windows, cmd.exe is used to launch the postmaster process to ease its
redirection setup. However, cmd.exe may execute other programs at
startup due to autorun configurations, which could influence the
postmaster startup. This patch adds /D flag to the launcher cmd.exe
command line to disable autorun settings written in the registry.
This is arguably a bug, but no backpatch is done now out of caution.
Reported-by: Hayato Kuroda
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230922.161551.320043332510268554.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
The documentation for this parameter lists its type as boolean, but
it is actually an integer. Furthermore, there is no mention of how
the value is interpreted when specified without units. This commit
fixes these oversights in commit 174c480508.
Co-authored-by: Hubert Depesz Lubaczewski
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZwkujFihO2uqKwp%40depesz.com
Both lwlocknames.txt and wait_event_names.txt contain a list of all
the predefined LWLocks, i.e., those with predefined positions
within MainLWLockArray. It is easy to miss one or the other,
especially since the list in wait_event_names.txt omits the "Lock"
suffix from all the LWLock wait events. This commit adds a cross-
check of these lists to the script that generates lwlocknames.h.
If the lists do not match exactly, building will fail.
Suggested-by: Robert Haas
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Michael Paquier, Bertrand Drouvot
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240102173120.GA1061678%40nathanxps13
Essentially this moves the non-interactive part of psql's "\password"
command into an exported client function. The password is not sent to the
server in cleartext because it is "encrypted" (in the case of scram and md5
it is actually hashed, but we have called these encrypted passwords for a
long time now) on the client side. This is good because it ensures the
cleartext password is never known by the server, and therefore won't end up
in logs, pg_stat displays, etc.
In other words, it exists for the same reason as PQencryptPasswordConn(), but
is more convenient as it both builds and runs the "ALTER USER" command for
you. PQchangePassword() uses PQencryptPasswordConn() to do the password
encryption. PQencryptPasswordConn() is passed a NULL for the algorithm
argument, hence encryption is done according to the server's
password_encryption setting.
Also modify the psql client to use the new function. That provides a builtin
test case. Ultimately drivers built on top of libpq should expose this
function and its use should be generally encouraged over doing ALTER USER
directly for password changes.
Author: Joe Conway
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/b75955f7-e8cc-4bbd-817f-ef536bacbe93%40joeconway.com
The note regarding character encoding form in "The Information Schema"
said that LATIN1 character repertoires only use one encoding form
LATIN1. This is not correct because LATIN1 has another encoding form
ISO-2022-JP-2. To fix this, replace LATIN1 with LATIN2, which is not
supported by ISO-2022-JP-2, thus it can be said that LATIN2 only uses
one encoding form.
Back-patch to supported branches.
Author: Tatsuo Ishii
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/20240102.153925.1147403616414525145.t-ishii%40sranhm.sra.co.jp
The target relation for INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE/MERGE has a different behavior
than other relations in EvalPlanQual() and RETURNING clause. This is why we
forbid target relation to be either source or target relation in SJE.
It's not clear if we could ever support this.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b9e8f460-f9a6-0e9b-e8ba-60d59f0bc22c%40gmail.com
When SJE uses RelOptInfo.unique_for_rels cache, it passes filtered quals to
innerrel_is_unique_ext(). That might lead to an invalid match to cache entries
made by previous non self-join checking calls. Add UniqueRelInfo.self_join
flag to prevent such cases. Also, fix that SJE should require a strict match
of outerrelids to make sure UniqueRelInfo.extra_clauses are valid.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4788f781-31bd-9796-d7d6-588a751c8787%40gmail.com
This replaces dblink's blocking libpq calls, allowing cancellation and
allowing DROP DATABASE (of a database not involved in the query). Apart
from explicit dblink_cancel_query() calls, dblink still doesn't cancel
the remote side. The replacement for the blocking calls consists of
new, general-purpose query execution wrappers in the libpqsrv facility.
Out-of-tree extensions should adopt these. Use them in postgres_fdw,
replacing a local implementation from which the libpqsrv implementation
derives. This is a bug fix for dblink. Code inspection identified the
bug at least thirteen years ago, but user complaints have not appeared.
Hence, no back-patch for now.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231122012945.74@rfd.leadboat.com
Since commit 599b33b94, this function assumed that every RTE_RELATION
RangeTblEntry would have an associated RelOptInfo. But that's not so:
we only build RelOptInfos for relations that are scanned by the query.
In particular the target of an INSERT won't have one, so that Vars
appearing in an INSERT ... RETURNING list will not have an associated
RelOptInfo. This apparently wasn't a problem before commit f7816aec2
taught examine_simple_variable() to drill down into CTEs containing
INSERT RETURNING, but it is now.
To fix, add a fallback code path that gets the userid to use directly
from the RTEPermissionInfo associated with the RTE. (Sadly, we must
have two code paths, because not every RTE has a RTEPermissionInfo
either.)
Per report from Alexander Lakhin. No back-patch, since the case is
apparently unreachable before f7816aec2.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/608a4886-6c60-0f9e-97d5-591256bd4150@gmail.com
An array element equal to INT_MAX gave this code indigestion,
causing an infinite loop that surely ended in SIGSEGV. We fixed
some nearby problems awhile ago (cf 757c5182f) but missed this.
Report and diagnosis by Alexander Lakhin (bug #18273); patch by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18273-9a832d1da122600c@postgresql.org
During the calculations of the maximum for the number of buckets, take into
account that later we round that to the next power of 2.
Reported-by: Karen Talarico
Bug: #16925
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16925-ec96d83529d0d629%40postgresql.org
Author: Thomas Munro, Andrei Lepikhov, Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Alena Rybakina
Backpatch-through: 12
When the SJE code handles the transfer of qual clauses from the removed
relation to the remaining one, it replaces the Vars of the removed
relation with the Vars of the remaining relation for each clause, and
then reintegrates these clauses into the appropriate restriction or join
clause lists, while attempting to avoid duplicates.
However, the code compares RestrictInfo->clause to determine if two
clauses are duplicates. This is just flat wrong. Two RestrictInfos
with the same clause can have different required_relids,
incompatible_relids, is_pushed_down, and so on. This can cause qual
clauses to be mistakenly omitted, leading to wrong results.
This patch fixes it by comparing the entire RestrictInfos not just their
clauses ignoring 'rinfo_serial' field (otherwise almost all RestrictInfos will
be unique). Making 'rinfo_serial' equal_ignore would break other code. This
is why this commit implements our own comparison function for checking the
equality of RestrictInfos.
Reported-by: Zuming Jiang
Bug: #18261
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18261-2a75d748c928609b%40postgresql.org
Author: Richard Guo
Support referencing a composite-type variable in %TYPE.
Remove the undocumented, untested, and pretty useless ability
to have the subject of %TYPE be an (unqualified) type name.
You get the same result by just not writing %TYPE.
Add or adjust some test cases to improve code coverage here.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/716852.1704402127@sss.pgh.pa.us
A typo has been introduced by 31966b151e when updating the state of a
local buffer when a temporary relation is extended, for the case of a
block included in the relation range extended, when it is already found
in the hash table holding the local buffers. In this case, BM_VALID
should be cleared, but the buffer state was changed so as BM_VALID
remained while clearing the other flags.
As reported on the thread, it was possible to corrupt the state of the
local buffers on ENOSPC, but the states would be corrupted on any kind
of ERROR during the relation extend (like partial writes or some other
errno).
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Tender Wang
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, Alexander Lakhin, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18259-6e256429825dd435@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 16
If we have DECHIST statistics about the argument expression, use
the average number of distinct elements as the array length estimate.
(It'd be better to use the average total number of elements, but
that is not currently calculated by compute_array_stats(), and
it's unclear that it'd be worth extra effort to get.)
To do this, we have to change the signature of estimate_array_length
to pass the "root" pointer. While at it, also change its result
type to "double". That's probably not really necessary, but it
avoids any risk of overflow of the value extracted from DECHIST.
All existing callers are going to use the result in a "double"
calculation anyway.
Paul Jungwirth, reviewed by Jian He and myself
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyUnM2d+SmrxKpDuAdpiq6FOM=FByvi6aS6yi__qyf6j9A@mail.gmail.com
Jeff Davis