Presently, these functions look up the relation's OID, lock it, and
then check privileges. Not only does this approach provide no
guarantee that the locked relation matches the arguments of the
lookup, but it also allows users to briefly lock relations for
which they do not have privileges, which might enable
denial-of-service attacks. This commit adjusts these functions to
use RangeVarGetRelidExtended(), which is purpose-built to avoid
both of these issues. The new RangeVarGetRelidCallback function is
somewhat complicated because it must handle both tables and
indexes, and for indexes, we must check privileges on the parent
table and lock it first. Also, it needs to handle a couple of
extremely unlikely race conditions involving concurrent OID reuse.
A downside of this change is that the coding doesn't allow for
locking indexes in AccessShare mode anymore; everything is locked
in ShareUpdateExclusive mode. Per discussion, the original choice
of lock levels was intended for a now defunct implementation that
used in-place updates, so we believe this change is okay.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Z8zwVmGzXyDdkAXj%40nathan
Backpatch-through: 18
The log output functionality of log_autovacuum_min_duration applies to
both VACUUM and ANALYZE, so it is not possible to separate the VACUUM
and ANALYZE log output thresholds. Logs are likely to be output only for
VACUUM and not for ANALYZE.
Therefore, we decided to separate the threshold for log output of VACUUM
by autovacuum (log_autovacuum_min_duration) and the threshold for log
output of ANALYZE by autovacuum (log_autoanalyze_min_duration).
Author: Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasaharatt@oss.nttdata.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAOzEurQtfV4MxJiWT-XDnimEeZAY+rgzVSLe8YsyEKhZcajzSA@mail.gmail.com
If inside an EPQ recheck, ExecScanFetch would run the recheck method
function for foreign/custom joins even if they aren't descendant nodes
in the EPQ recheck plan tree, which is problematic at least in the
foreign-join case, because such a foreign join isn't guaranteed to have
an alternative local-join plan required for running the recheck method
function; in the postgres_fdw case this could lead to a segmentation
fault or an assert failure in an assert-enabled build when running the
recheck method function.
Even if inside an EPQ recheck, any scan nodes that aren't descendant
ones in the EPQ recheck plan tree should be normally processed by using
the access method function; fix by modifying ExecScanFetch so that if
inside an EPQ recheck, it runs the recheck method function for
foreign/custom joins that are descendant nodes in the EPQ recheck plan
tree as before and runs the access method function for foreign/custom
joins that aren't.
This fix also adds to postgres_fdw an isolation test for an EPQ recheck
that caused issues stated above.
Oversight in commit 385f337c9.
Reported-by: Kristian Lejao <kristianlejao@gmail.com>
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBpo6Gx55FBOW+9s5X=nUw3Xpq64v35fpDEKsTERnc4TQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
This essentially reverts commit 866566a690, which installed
safeguards against loading plpython2 and plpython3 into the same
process. We don't support plpython2 anymore, so this is obsolete.
The Python and PL/Python initialization now happens again in
_PG_init() rather than the first time a PL/Python call handler is
invoked. (Often, these will be very close together.)
I kept the separate PLy_initialize() function introduced by
866566a690 to keep _PG_init() a bit modular.
Reviewed-by: Mario González Troncoso <gonzalemario@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/9eb9feb6-1df3-4f0c-a0dc-9bcf35273111%40eisentraut.org
This patch replaces ALTER SUBSCRIPTION REFRESH with
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION REFRESH PUBLICATION in comments and error messages to
improve clarity and support future extensibility. The change aligns with
upcoming addition REFRESH SEQUENCES for sequence synchronization.
Author: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Author: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LC+KJiAkSrpE_NwvNdidw9F2os7GERUeSxSKv71gXysQ@mail.gmail.com
pg_createsubscriber is documented as requiring the same major version as
the target clusters. Attempting to use this tool on a cluster where the
control file version read does not match with the version compiled with
would lead to the following error message:
pg_createsubscriber: error: control file appears to be corrupt
This is confusing as the control file is correct: only the version
expected does not match. This commit integrates pg_createsubscriber
with the facility added by cd0be131ba, where the contents of
PG_VERSION are read and compared with the value of PG_MAJORVERSION_NUM
expected by the tool. This puts pg_createsubscriber in line with the
documentation, with a better error message when the version does not
match.
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aONDWig0bIGilixs@paquier.xyz
pg_resetwal's custom logic to retrieve the version number of a data
folder's PG_VERSION can be replaced by the facility introduced in
cd0be131ba. This removes some code.
One thing specific to pg_resetwal is that the first line of PG_VERSION
is read and reported in the error report generated when the major
version read does not match with the version pg_resetwal has been
compiled with. The new logic preserves this property, without changes
to neither the error message nor the data used in the error report.
Note that as a chdir() is done within the data folder before checking the
data of PG_VERSION, get_pg_version() needs to be tweaked to look for
PG_VERSION in the current folder.
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aOiirvWJzwdVCXph@paquier.xyz
pg_combinebackup's custom logic to retrieve the version number of a data
folder's PG_VERSION can be replaced by the facility introduced in
cd0be131ba. This removes some code.
One thing specific to this tool is that backend versions older than v10
are not supported. The new code does the same checks as the previous
code.
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aOiirvWJzwdVCXph@paquier.xyz
This reverts commit 74ac377d75.
The previous change contained a misconception about how publications
are cleaned up on the subscriber. The newly added log message could
confuse users, particularly when running pg_createsubscriber with
--dry-run - users would see a "dropping publication" message
immediately followed by a "no publications found" message.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pu7xz1LqNvyQyvSHrV0Sw6D=e6T-Jm=gh1MRJrkuWGyBQ@mail.gmail.com
This function only requires a few fields from LVRelState, so pass them
in individually.
This change allows calling heap_page_is_all_visible() from code such as
pruneheap.c, which does not have access to an LVRelState.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2wk7jo4m4qwh5sn33pfgerdjfujebbccsmmlownybddbh6nawl%40mdyyqpqzxjek
These functions appeared prominently in a profile of a patch that sets
the visibility map on-access. Inline them to remove call overhead and
make them cheaper to use in hot paths.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2wk7jo4m4qwh5sn33pfgerdjfujebbccsmmlownybddbh6nawl%40mdyyqpqzxjek
After scanning the line pointers on a heap page during the first phase
of vacuum, we use the information collected to decide whether to use
the assembled freeze plans.
Move this decision logic into a helper function to improve readability.
While here, rename a PruneState member and disambiguate some local
variables in heap_page_prune_and_freeze().
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2wk7jo4m4qwh5sn33pfgerdjfujebbccsmmlownybddbh6nawl%40mdyyqpqzxjek
When specifying --clean=publication to pg_createsubscriber, it drops
all existing publications with a log message "dropping all existing
publications in database "testdb"". Add a new log message "no
publications found" when there are no publications to drop, making the
progress more transparent to users.
Author: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Ptm+WJwbbYXhC0s6FP_98KzZCR=5CPu8F8N5uV8P7BpqA@mail.gmail.com
The present coding of dblink's get_rel_from_relname() predates the
introduction of RangeVarGetRelidExtended(), which provides a way to
check permissions before locking the relation. This commit adjusts
get_rel_from_relname() to use that function.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aOgmi6avE6qMw_6t%40nathan
add323da40 altered xl_heap_prune, changing the WAL format, but
neglected to bump XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC. Do so now.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aO3Gw6hCAZFUd5ab%40paquier.xyz
Previously WinCheckAndInitializeNullTreatment() used elog() to emit an
error message. ereport() should be used instead because it's a
user-facing error. Also use existing get_func_name() to get a
function's name, rather than own implementation.
Moreover add an assertion to validate winobj parameter, just like
other window function API.
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Author: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2952409.1760023154%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Unsurprisingly, this shaves code. get_major_server_version() can be
replaced by the new routine added by cd0be131ba, with the contents of
PG_VERSION stored in an allocated buffer instead of a fixed-sized one.
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aOiirvWJzwdVCXph@paquier.xyz
get_pg_version() is able to return a version number, that can be used
for comparisons based on PG_VERSION_NUM. A macro is added to convert
the result to a major version number, to work with PG_MAJORVERSION_NUM.
It is possible to pass to the routine an optional argument, where the
contents retrieved from PG_VERSION are saved. This requirement matters
for some of the frontend code (one example: pg_upgrade wants that for
tablespace paths with a version number strictly older than v10).
This will be used by a set of follow-up patches, to be consumed in
various frontend tools that duplicate a logic similar to do what this
new routine does, like:
- pg_resetwal
- pg_combinebackup
- pg_createsubscriber
- pg_upgrade
This routine supports both the post-v10 version number and the older
flavor (aka 9.6), as required at least by pg_upgrade.
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aOiirvWJzwdVCXph@paquier.xyz
The version number calculated by read_pg_version_file() is multiplied
once by 10000, to be able to do comparisons based on PG_VERSION_NUM or
equivalents with a minor version included. However, the version number
given sync_pgdata() was multiplied by 10000 a second time, leading to an
overestimated number.
This issue was harmless (still incorrect) as pg_combinebackup does not
support versions of Postgres older than v10, and sync_pgdata() only
includes a version check due to the rename of pg_xlog/ to pg_wal/. This
folder rename happened in the development cycle of v10. This would
become a problem if in the future sync_pgdata() is changed to have more
version-specific checks.
Oversight in dc21234005, so backpatch down to v17.
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aOil5d0y87ZM_wsZ@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 17
Instead of emitting a separate XLOG_HEAP2_VISIBLE WAL record for each
page that becomes all-visible in vacuum's third phase, specify the VM
changes in the already emitted XLOG_HEAP2_PRUNE_VACUUM_CLEANUP record.
Visibility checks are now performed before marking dead items unused.
This is safe because the heap page is held under exclusive lock for the
entire operation.
This reduces the number of WAL records generated by VACUUM phase III by
up to 50%.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/CAAKRu_ZMw6Npd_qm2KM%2BFwQ3cMOMx1Dh3VMhp8-V7SOLxdK9-g%40mail.gmail.com
log_error() would probably fail completely if used, and would
certainly print garbage for anything that needed to be interpolated
into the message, because it was failing to use the correct printing
subroutine for a va_list argument.
This bug likely went undetected because the error cases this code
is used for are rarely exercised - they only occur when Windows
security API calls fail catastrophically (out of memory, security
subsystem corruption, etc).
The FRONTEND variant can be fixed just by calling vfprintf()
instead of fprintf(). However, there was no va_list variant
of write_stderr(), so create one by refactoring that function.
Following the usual naming convention for such things, call
it vwrite_stderr().
Author: Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAF+pBj8goe4fRmZ0V3Cs6eyWzYLvK+HvFLYEYWG=TzaM+tWPnw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
There was some confusion around how to adjust the n_distinct estimates
for partitioned tables. Here we try and clarify that
n_distinct_inherited needs to be adjusted rather than n_distinct.
Also fix some slightly misleading text which was talking about table
size rather than table rows, fix a grammatical error, and adjust some
text which indicated that ANALYZE was performing calculations based on
the n_distinct settings. Really it's the query planner that does this
and ANALYZE only stores the overridden n_distinct estimate value in
pg_statistic.
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrL7a-ZytM1SP8Uk9nEw9bR2CPzVb+uP+bcNj=_q-ZmVw@mail.gmail.com
I was distressed to find that reading an LZ4-compressed toc.dat
file was hundreds of times slower than it ought to be. On
investigation, the blame mostly affixes to LZ4Stream_read_overflow's
habit of memmove'ing all the remaining buffered data after each read
operation. Since reading a TOC file tends to involve a lot of small
(even one-byte) decompression calls, that amounts to an O(N^2) cost.
This could have been fixed with a minimal patch, but to my
eyes LZ4Stream_read_internal and LZ4Stream_read_overflow are
badly-written spaghetti code; in particular the eol_flag logic
is inefficient and duplicative. I chose to throw the code
away and rewrite from scratch. This version is about sixty
lines shorter as well as not having the performance issue.
Fortunately, AFAICT the only way to get to this problem is to
manually LZ4-compress the toc.dat and/or blobs.toc files within a
directory-style archive; in the main data files, we read blocks
that are large enough that the O(N^2) behavior doesn't manifest.
Few people do that, which likely explains the lack of field
complaints. Otherwise this performance bug might be considered
bad enough to warrant back-patching.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3515357.1760128017@sss.pgh.pa.us
Both of these modules dumped each bit of output that they got from
the underlying compression library as a separate "data block" in
the emitted archive file. In the case of zstd this'd frequently
result in block sizes well under 100 bytes; lz4 is a little better
but still produces blocks around 300 bytes, at least in the test
case I tried. This bloats the archive file a little bit compared
to larger block sizes, but the real problem is that when pg_restore
has to skip each data block rather than seeking directly to some
target data, tiny block sizes are enormously inefficient.
Fix both modules so that they fill their allocated buffer reasonably
well before dumping a data block. In the case of lz4, also delete
some redundant logic that caused the lz4 frame header to be emitted
as a separate data block. (That saves little, but I see no reason
to expend extra code to get worse results.)
I fixed the "stream API" code too. In those cases, feeding small
amounts of data to fwrite() probably doesn't have any meaningful
performance consequences. But it seems like a bad idea to leave
the two sets of code doing the same thing in two different ways.
In passing, remove unnecessary "extra paranoia" check in
_ZstdWriteCommon. _CustomWriteFunc (the only possible referent
of cs->writeF) already protects itself against zero-length writes,
and it's really a modularity violation for _ZstdWriteCommon to know
that the custom format disallows empty data blocks. Also, fix
Zstd_read_internal to do less work when passed size == 0.
Reported-by: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3515357.1760128017@sss.pgh.pa.us
pg_dump expects a read request of zero bytes to be a no-op; see for
example ReadStr(). Gzip_read got this wrong and falsely supposed
that the resulting gzret == 0 indicated an error. We could complicate
that error-checking logic some more, but it seems best to just fall
out immediately when passed size == 0.
This bug breaks the nominally-supported case of manually gzip'ing
the toc.dat file within a directory-style dump, so back-patch to v16
where this code came in. (Prior branches already have a short-circuit
for size == 0 before their only gzread call.)
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3515357.1760128017@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 16
Since protocol version 3.2 the CancelRequest does not have a fixed size
length anymore. The protocol docs still listed the length field to be a
constant number though. This fixes that.
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Reported-by: Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 18
Remove a variable that is no longer in use following commit 9a2e2a28.
It's not immediately clear why there were no compiler warnings about
this oversight.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Backpatch-through: 18
In commit a45c78e32 I removed the only regression test case that
reaches this function, because it turns out that we only use it
if reading an LZ4-compressed blobs.toc file in a directory dump,
and that is a state that has to be created manually. That seems
like a bad thing to not test, not so much for LZ4Stream_gets()
itself as because it means the squirrely eol_flag logic in
LZ4Stream_read_internal() is not tested.
The reason for the change was that I thought the lz4 program did not
have any way to perform compression without explicit specification
of the output file name. However, it turns out that the syntax
synopsis in its man page is a lie, and if you read enough of the
man page you find out that with "-m" it will do what's needful.
So restore the manual compression step in that test case.
Noted while testing some proposed changes in pg_dump's compression
logic.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3515357.1760128017@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 17
Commit 71f4c8c6f7 (which implemented DETACH CONCURRENTLY) added code
to create a separate table constraint when a table is detached
concurrently, identical to the partition constraint, on the theory that
such a constraint was needed in case the optimizer had constructed any
query plans that depended on the constraint being there. However, that
theory was apparently bogus because any such plans would be invalidated.
For hash partitioning, those constraints are problematic, because their
expressions reference the OID of the parent partitioned table, to which
the detached table is no longer related; this causes all sorts of
problems (such as inability of restoring a pg_dump of that table, and
the table no longer working properly if the partitioned table is later
dropped).
We'd like to get rid of all those constraints. In fact, for branch
master, do that -- no longer create any substitute constraints.
However, out of fear that some users might somehow depend on these
constraints for other partitioning strategies, for stable branches
(back to 14, which added DETACH CONCURRENTLY), only do it for hash
partitioning.
(If you repeatedly DETACH CONCURRENTLY and then ATTACH a partition, then
with this constraint addition you don't need to scan the table in the
ATTACH step, which presumably is good. But if users really valued this
feature, they would have requested that it worked for non-concurrent
DETACH also.)
Author: Haiyang Li <mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com>
Reported-by: Fei Changhong <feichanghong@qq.com>
Reported-by: Haiyang Li <mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com>
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18371-7fef49f63de13f02@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19070-781326347ade7c57@postgresql.org
Introduced by my (Álvaro's) commit 9e4f914b5e, which was itself
backpatched to pg10, though only pg15 and up contain the problem
because of commit 9c08aea6a3.
This isn't a particularly significant leak, but given the fix is
trivial, we might as well backpatch to all branches where it applies, so
do that.
Author: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/x4odfdlrwvsjawscnqsqjpofvauxslw7b4oyvxgt5owoyf4ysn@heafjusodrz7
An assertion in _bt_killitems expected the scan's currPos state to
contain a valid LSN, saved from when currPos's page was initially read.
The assertion failed to account for the fact that even logged relations
can have leaf pages with an invalid LSN when built with wal_level set to
"minimal". Remove the faulty assertion.
Oversight in commit e6eed40e (though note that the assertion was
backpatched to stable branches before 18 by commit 7c319f54).
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Matthijs van der Vleuten <postgresql@zr40.nl>
Bug: #19082
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19082-628e62160dbbc1c1@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
An error happening while a slot data is saved on disk in
SaveSlotToPath() could cause a state.tmp file (temporary file holding
the slot state data, renamed to its permanent name at the end of the
function) to remain around after it has been created. This temporary
file is created with O_EXCL, meaning that if an existing state.tmp is
found, its creation would fail. This would prevent the slot data to be
saved, requiring a manual intervention to remove state.tmp before being
able to save again a slot. Possible scenarios where this temporary file
could remain on disk is for example a ENOSPC case (no disk space) while
writing, syncing or renaming it. The bug reports point to a write
failure as the principal cause of the problems.
Using O_TRUNC has been argued back in 2019 as a potential solution to
discard any temporary file that could exist. This solution was rejected
as O_EXCL can also act as a safety measure when saving the slot state,
crash recovery offering cleanup guarantees post-crash. This commit uses
the alternative approach that has been suggested by Andres Freund back
in 2019. When the temporary state file cannot be written, synced,
closed or renamed (note: not when created!), an unlink() is used to
remove the temporary state file while holding the in-progress I/O
LWLock, so as any follow-up attempts to save a slot's data would not
choke on an existing file that remained around because of a previous
failure.
This problem has been reported a few times across the years, going back
to 2019, but for some reason I have never come back to do something
about it and it has been forgotten. A recent report has reminded me
that this was still a problem.
Reported-by: Kevin K Biju <kevinkbiju@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>
Reported-by: Grigory Smolkin <g.smolkin@postgrespro.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAM45KeHa32soKL_G8Vk38CWvTBeOOXcsxAPAs7Jt7yPRf2mbVA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3559061693910326@qy4q4a6esb2lebnz.sas.yp-c.yandex.net
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/08bbfab1-a61d-3750-fc18-4ab2c1aa7f09@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 13
test_random_operations() did not check the result returned by
bms_is_member() in its last phase, when checking that the contents of
the bitmap match with what is expected. This was impacting the
reliability of the function and the coverage it could provide.
This commit improves the whole function, adding more checks based on
bms_is_member(), using a bitmap and a secondary array that tracks the
members added by random additions and deletions.
While on it, more comments are added to document the internals of the
function.
Reported-by: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Author: Greg Burd <greg@burd.me>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAq_zOSA2NUQSWePTGV_=90Uw0WcXxGOWnN-vwF046OOqA@mail.gmail.com
Instead of emitting a separate WAL XLOG_HEAP2_VISIBLE record for setting
bits in the VM, specify the VM block changes in the
XLOG_HEAP2_MULTI_INSERT record.
This halves the number of WAL records emitted by COPY FREEZE.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/CAAKRu_ZMw6Npd_qm2KM%2BFwQ3cMOMx1Dh3VMhp8-V7SOLxdK9-g%40mail.gmail.com
The processing of the PARALLEL option for VACUUM was not quite
following what the DefElem code had intended. defGetInt32() already has
code to handle missing parameters and returns a perfectly good error
message for when that happens.
Here we get rid of the ExecVacuum() error:
ERROR: parallel option requires a value between 0 and N
and leave defGetInt32() handle it, which will give:
ERROR: parallel requires an integer value
defGetInt32() was already handling the non-integer parameter case, so it
may as well handle the missing parameter case too.
Additionally, parameterize the option name to make translator work easier,
and also use errhint_internal() rather than errhint() for the
BUFFER_USAGE_LIMIT option since there isn't any work for a translator to
do for "%s".
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvovH14tNWB+WvP6TSbfi7-=TysQ9h5tQ5AgavwyWRWKHA@mail.gmail.com
An error context callback function might leak some memory into
ErrorContext, since those functions are run with ErrorContext as
current context. In the case where the elevel is ERROR, this is
no problem since the code level that catches the error should do
FlushErrorState to clean up, and that will reset ErrorContext.
However, if the elevel is less than ERROR then no such cleanup occurs.
In principle, repeated leaks while emitting log messages or client
notices could accumulate arbitrarily much leaked data, if no ERROR
occurs in the session.
To fix, let errfinish() perform an ErrorContext reset if it is
at the outermost error nesting level. (If it isn't, we'll delay
cleanup until the outermost nesting level is exited.)
The only actual leakage of this sort that I've been able to observe
within our regression tests was recently introduced by commit
f727b63e8. While it seems plausible that there are other such
leaks not reached in the regression tests, the lack of field
reports suggests that they're not a big problem. Accordingly,
I won't take the risk of back-patching this now. We can always
back-patch later if we get field reports of leaks.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/jngsjonyfscoont4tnwi2qoikatpd5hifsg373vmmjvugwiu6g@m6opxh7uisgd
While pgoutput caches relation synchronization information in
RelationSyncCache that resides in CacheMemoryContext, each entry's
information (such as row filter expressions and column lists) is
stored in the entry's private memory context (entry_cxt in
RelationSyncEntry), which is a descendant memory context of the
decoding context. If a logical decoding invoked via SQL functions like
pg_logical_slot_get_binary_changes fails with an error, subsequent
logical decoding executions could access already-freed memory of the
entry's cache, resulting in a crash.
With this change, it's ensured that RelationSyncCache is cleaned up
even in error cases by using a memory context reset callback function.
Backpatch to 15, where entry_cxt was introduced for column filtering
and row filtering.
While the backbranches v13 and v14 have a similar issue where
RelationSyncCache persists even after an error when pgoutput is used
via SQL API, we decided not to backport this fix. This decision was
made because v13 is approaching its final minor release, and we won't
have an chance to fix any new issues that might arise. Additionally,
since using pgoutput via SQL API is not a common use case, the risk
outwights the benefit. If we receive bug reports, we can consider
backporting the fixes then.
Author: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm0x-aCehgt8Bevs2cm=uhmwS28MvbYq1=s2Ekf0aDPkOA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
Some of the buildfarm is still unhappy with WinGetFuncArgInPartition
even after 2273fa32b. While it seems to be just very old compilers,
we can suppress the warnings and arguably make the code more readable
by not initializing these variables till closer to where they are
used. While at it, make a couple of cosmetic comment improvements.
The creation of a replication slot done in a specific database on a
publisher was logged twice, with the second log not mentioning the
database where the slot creation happened. This commit removes the
information logged after a slot has been successfully created, moving
the information about the publisher from the second to the first log.
Note that failing a slot creation is also logged, so there is no loss of
information.
Author: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pv7qDvLbDgc9PQGhULT3rPXTxdu_=w+iW-kMs+zPADR+w@mail.gmail.com
This patch adds support for the ALL SEQUENCES clause in publications,
enabling synchronization/replication of all sequences that is useful for
upgrades.
Publications can now include all sequences via FOR ALL SEQUENCES.
psql enhancements:
\d shows publications for a given sequence.
\dRp indicates if a publication includes all sequences.
ALL SEQUENCES can be combined with ALL TABLES, but not with other options
like TABLE or TABLES IN SCHEMA. We can extend support for more granular
clauses in future.
The view pg_publication_sequences provides information about the mapping
between publications and sequences.
This patch enables publishing of sequences; subscriber-side support will
be added in upcoming patches.
Author: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Author: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LC+KJiAkSrpE_NwvNdidw9F2os7GERUeSxSKv71gXysQ@mail.gmail.com
Nathan Bossart