This adds extra tests for the error message generated for partition
tuple routing in the executor, using more than three levels of
partitioning including partitioned tables with no partitions. These
tests have been added to fix CVE-2019-10129 on REL_11_STABLE. HEAD has
no active bugs in this area, but it lacked coverage.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch
Security: CVE-2019-10129
In examine_variable() and examine_simple_variable(), when checking the
user's table and column privileges to determine whether to grant
access to the pg_statistic data, use checkAsUser for the privilege
checks, if it's set. This will be the case if we're accessing the
table via a view, to indicate that we should perform privilege checks
as the view owner rather than the current user.
This change makes this planner check consistent with the check in the
executor, so the planner will be able to make use of statistics if the
table is accessible via the view. This fixes a performance regression
introduced by commit e2d4ef8de8, which affects queries against
non-security barrier views in the case where the user doesn't have
privileges on the underlying table, but the view owner does.
Note that it continues to provide the same safeguards controlling
access to pg_statistic for direct table access (in which case
checkAsUser won't be set) and for security barrier views, because of
the nearby checks on rte->security_barrier and rte->securityQuals.
Back-patch to all supported branches because e2d4ef8de8 was.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Jonathan Katz and Stephen Frost.
In commit e2d4ef8de8, security checks were added to prevent
user-supplied operators from running over data from pg_statistic
unless the user has table or column privileges on the table, or the
operator is leakproof. For a table with RLS, however, checking for
table or column privileges is insufficient, since that does not
guarantee that the user has permission to view all of the column's
data.
Fix this by also checking for securityQuals on the RTE, and insisting
that the operator be leakproof if there are any. Thus the
leakproofness check will only be skipped if there are no securityQuals
and the user has table or column privileges on the table -- i.e., only
if we know that the user has access to all the data in the column.
Back-patch to 9.5 where RLS was added.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Jonathan Katz and Stephen Frost.
Security: CVE-2019-10130
Noticed while reviewing nearby code. Given all the disclaimers about
this not being meant as user-facing code, I wonder whether we should
make these non-translatable? But in any case there's little excuse
for them not to be good English.
Project style is to check the success of SearchSysCacheN and friends
by applying HeapTupleIsValid to the result. A tiny minority of calls
creatively did it differently. Bring them into line with the rest.
This is just cosmetic, since HeapTupleIsValid is indeed just a null
check at the moment ... but that may not be true forever, and in any
case it puts a mental burden on readers who may wonder why these
call sites are not like the rest.
Back-patch to v11 just to keep the branches in sync. (The bulk of these
errors seem to have originated in v11 or v12, though a few are old.)
Per searching to see if anyplace else had made the same error
repaired in 62148c352.
Omitted in commit 05b38c7e6 (though it looks like the original blame
belongs to 9e9befac4). A failure is admittedly unlikely, but if it
did happen, SIGSEGV is not the approved method of reporting it.
Per Coverity. Back-patch to v11 where the broken code originated.
Like the backend, the frontend has wrappers on top of malloc() and such
whose use is recommended. Particularly, it is possible to do memory
allocation without issuing an error. Some binaries missed the use of
those wrappers, so let's fix the gap for consistency.
This also fixes two latent bugs:
- In pg_dump/pg_dumpall when parsing an ACL item, on an out-of-memory
error for strdup(), the code considered the failure as a ACL parsing
problem instead of an actual OOM.
- In pg_waldump, an OOM when building the target directory string would
cause a crash.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/gY0y9xenfoBPc-Tufsr2Zg-MmkrJslm0Tw_CMg4p_j58-k_PXNC0klMdkKQkg61BkXC9_uWo-DcUzfxnHqpkpoR5jjVZrPHqKYikcHIiONhg=@yesql.se
Commit 3f342839 corrected obsolete comments about buffer locks at the
main _bt_insert_parent() call site, but missed similar obsolete comments
above _bt_insert_parent() itself. Both sets of comments were rendered
obsolete by commit 40dae7ec53, which made the nbtree page split
algorithm more robust. Fix the comments that were missed the first time
around now.
In passing, refine a related _bt_insert_parent() comment about
re-finding the parent page to insert new downlink.
In the wake of commit f912d7dec, RelationSetIndexList isn't used any
more. It was always a horrid wart, so getting rid of it is very nice.
We can also convert rd_indexvalid back to a plain boolean.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28926.1556664156@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commits 3dbb317d3 et al failed under CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS testing.
Investigation showed that to reindex pg_class_oid_index, we must
suppress accesses to the index (via SetReindexProcessing) before we call
RelationSetNewRelfilenode, or at least before we do CommandCounterIncrement
therein; otherwise, relcache reloads happening within the CCI may try to
fetch pg_class rows using the index's new relfilenode value, which is as
yet an empty file.
Of course, the point of 3dbb317d3 was that that ordering didn't work
either, because then RelationSetNewRelfilenode's own update of the index's
pg_class row cannot access the index, should it need to.
There are various ways we might have got around that, but Andres Freund
came up with a brilliant solution: for a mapped index, we can really just
skip the pg_class update altogether. The only fields it was actually
changing were relpages etc, but it was just setting them to zeroes which
is useless make-work. (Correct new values will be installed at the end
of index build.) All pg_class indexes are mapped and probably always will
be, so this eliminates the problem by removing work rather than adding it,
always a pleasant outcome. Having taught RelationSetNewRelfilenode to do
it that way, we can revert the code reordering in reindex_index. (But
I left the moved setup code where it was; there seems no reason why it
has to run without use of the old index. If you're trying to fix a
busted pg_class index, you'll have had to disable system index use
altogether to get this far.)
Moreover, this means we don't need RelationSetIndexList at all, because
reindex_relation's hacking to make "REINDEX TABLE pg_class" work is
likewise now unnecessary. We'll leave that code in place in the back
branches, but a follow-on patch will remove it in HEAD.
In passing, do some minor cleanup for commit 5c1560606 (in HEAD only),
notably removing a duplicate newrnode assignment.
Patch by me, using a core idea due to Andres Freund. Back-patch to all
supported branches, as 3dbb317d3 was.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28926.1556664156@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit d2599ecfcc introduced some contorted, confused code around:
readers would think that it's possible for HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin return
a non-frozen value for some frozen tuples, which would be disastrous.
There's no actual bug, but it seems better to make it clearer.
Per gripe from Tom Lane and Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30116.1555430496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit dd299df818, which made heap TID a tiebreaker nbtree index
column, introduced new rules on page space management to make suffix
truncation safe. In general, suffix truncation needs to have a small
amount of extra space available on the new left page when splitting a
leaf page. This is needed in case it turns out that truncation cannot
even "truncate away the heap TID column", resulting in a
larger-than-firstright leaf high key with an explicit heap TID
representation.
Despite all this, CREATE INDEX/nbtsort.c did not account for the
possible need for extra heap TID space on leaf pages when deciding
whether or not a new item could fit on current page. This could lead to
"failed to add item to the index page" errors when CREATE
INDEX/nbtsort.c tried to finish off a leaf page that lacked space for a
larger-than-firstright leaf high key (it only had space for firstright
tuple, which was just short of what was needed following "truncation").
Several conditions needed to be met all at once for CREATE INDEX to
fail. The problem was in the hard limit on what will fit on a page,
which tends to be masked by the soft fillfactor-wise limit. The easiest
way to recreate the problem seems to be a CREATE INDEX on a low
cardinality text column, with tuples that are of non-uniform width,
using a fillfactor of 100.
To fix, bring nbtsort.c in line with nbtsplitloc.c, which already
pessimistically assumes that all leaf page splits will have high keys
that have a heap TID appended.
Reported-By: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/VisenaEmail.c5.3ee7fe277d514162.16a6d785bea@tc7-visena
The new nleft_dead_tuples and nleft_dead_itemids fields are confusing
and do not seem like the correct way forward. One of them is tested
via an assertion that can fail, as it has already done on buildfarm
member topminnow. Remove the assertion and the fields.
Change the logic for the case where a tuple is not initially pruned
by heap_page_prune but later diagnosed HEAPTUPLE_DEAD by
HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum. Previously, tupgone = true was set in
that case, which leads to treating the tuple as one that will be
removed. In a normal vacuum, that's OK, because we'll remove
index entries for it and then the second heap pass will remove the
tuple itself, but when index cleanup is disabled, those things
don't happen, so we must instead treat it as a recently-dead
tuple that we have voluntarily chosen to keep.
Report and analysis by Tom Lane. This patch loosely based on one
from Masahiko Sawada, but I changed most of it.
The message type for temp files and for checksum failures were missing
from the union. Due to the coding style used there was no compiler error
when this happend. So change the code to actively use the union thereby
producing a compiler error if the same mistake happens again, suggested
by Tom Lane.
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reported-By: Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190430163328.zd4rrlnbvgaqlcdz@development
The tests turn out to cause deadlocks in some circumstances. Fairly
reproducibly so with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE
-DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE. Some of the deadlocks may be hard to fix
without disproportionate measures, but others probably should be fixed
- but not in 12.
We discussed removing the new tests until we can fix the issues
underlying the deadlocks, but results from buildfarm animal
markhor (which runs with CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS) indicates that there
might be a more severe, as of yet undiagnosed, issue (including on
stable branches) with reindexing catalogs. The failure is:
ERROR: could not read block 0 in file "base/16384/28025": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Therefore it seems advisable to keep the tests.
It's not certain that running the tests in isolation removes the risk
of deadlocks. It's possible that additional locks are needed to
protect against a concurrent auto-analyze or such.
Per discussion with Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28926.1556664156@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: 9.4-, like 3dbb317d3
While discussing comment improvements (see next commit) by Justin
Pryzby, Tom complained about a few details of the logic to infer the
length of the NULL bitmap when building the JITed tuple deforming
function. That bitmap allows to avoid checking the tuple header's
natts, a check which often causes a pipeline stall
Improvements:
a) As long as missing columns aren't taken into account, we can
continue to infer the length of the NULL bitmap from NOT NULL
columns following it. Previously we stopped at the first missing
column. It's unlikely to matter much in practice, but the
alternative would have been to document why we stop.
b) For robustness reasons it seems better to also check against
attisdropped - RemoveAttributeById() sets attnotnull to false, but
an additional check is trivial.
c) Improve related comments
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20637.1555957068@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: -
The interaction of these parameters was a bit confused/confusing,
and in fact v11 entirely misses the opportunity to apply partition
constraints when a partition is accessed directly (rather than
indirectly from its parent).
In HEAD, establish the principle that enable_partition_pruning controls
partition pruning and nothing else. When accessing a partition via its
parent, we do partition pruning (if enabled by enable_partition_pruning)
and then there is no need to consider partition constraints in the
constraint_exclusion logic. When accessing a partition directly, its
partition constraints are applied by the constraint_exclusion logic,
only if constraint_exclusion = on.
In v11, we can't have such a clean division of these GUCs' effects,
partly because we don't want to break compatibility too much in a
released branch, and partly because the clean coding requires
inheritance_planner to have applied partition pruning to a partitioned
target table, which it doesn't in v11. However, we can tweak things
enough to cover the missed case, which seems like a good idea since
it's potentially a performance regression from v10. This patch keeps
v11's previous behavior in which enable_partition_pruning overrides
constraint_exclusion for an inherited target table, though.
In HEAD, also teach relation_excluded_by_constraints that it's okay to use
inheritable constraints when trying to prune a traditional inheritance
tree. This might not be thought worthy of effort given that that feature
is semi-deprecated now, but we have enough infrastructure that it only
takes a couple more lines of code to do it correctly.
Amit Langote and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9813f079-f16b-61c8-9ab7-4363cab28d80@lab.ntt.co.jp
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/29069.1555970894@sss.pgh.pa.us
When reindexing individual indexes on pg_class it was possible to
either trigger an assertion failure:
TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(!ReindexIsProcessingIndex(((index)->rd_id)))
That's because reindex_index() called SetReindexProcessing() - which
enables an asserts ensuring no index insertions happen into the index
- before calling RelationSetNewRelfilenode(). That not correct for
indexes on pg_class, because RelationSetNewRelfilenode() updates the
relevant pg_class row, which needs to update the indexes.
The are two reasons this wasn't noticed earlier. Firstly the bug
doesn't trigger when reindexing all of pg_class, as reindex_relation
has code "hiding" all yet-to-be-reindexed indexes. Secondly, the bug
only triggers when the the update to pg_class doesn't turn out to be a
HOT update - otherwise there's no index insertion to trigger the
bug. Most of the time there's enough space, making this bug hard to
trigger.
To fix, move RelationSetNewRelfilenode() to before the
SetReindexProcessing() (and, together with some other code, to outside
of the PG_TRY()).
To make sure the error checking intended by SetReindexProcessing() is
more robust, modify CatalogIndexInsert() to check
ReindexIsProcessingIndex() even when the update is a HOT update.
Also add a few regression tests for REINDEXing of system catalogs.
The last two improvements would have prevented some of the issues
fixed in 5c1560606d from being introduced in the first place.
Reported-By: Michael Paquier
Diagnosed-By: Tom Lane and Andres Freund
Author: Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190418011430.GA19133@paquier.xyz
Backpatch: 9.4-, the bug is present in all branches
Most of these stem from d25f519107 "tableam: relation creation, VACUUM
FULL/CLUSTER, SET TABLESPACE.".
1) To pass data to the relation_set_new_filenode()
RelationSetNewRelfilenode() was made to update RelationData.rd_rel
directly. That's not OK however, as it makes the relcache entries
temporarily inconsistent. Which among other scenarios is a problem
if a REINDEX targets an index on pg_class - the
CatalogTupleUpdate() in RelationSetNewRelfilenode(). Presumably
that was introduced because other places in the code do so - while
those aren't "good practice" they don't appear to be actively
buggy (e.g. because system tables may not be targeted).
I (Andres) should have caught this while reviewing and signficantly
evolving the code in that commit, mea culpa.
Fix that by instead passing in the new RelFileNode as separate
argument to relation_set_new_filenode() and rely on the relcache to
update the catalog entry. Also revert that the
RelationMapUpdateMap() call was changed to immediate, and undo some
other more unnecessary changes.
2) Document that the relation_set_new_filenode cannot rely on the
whole relcache entry to be valid. It might be worthwhile to
refactor the code to never have to rely on that, but given the way
heap_create() is currently coded, that'd be a large change.
3) ATExecSetTableSpace() shouldn't do FlushRelationBuffers() itself. A
table AM might not use shared buffers at all. Move to
index_copy_data() and heapam_relation_copy_data().
4) heapam_relation_set_new_filenode() previously sometimes accessed
rel->rd_rel->relpersistence rather than the `persistence`
argument. Code movement mistake.
5) Previously heapam_relation_set_new_filenode() re-opened the smgr
relation to create the init for, if necesary. Instead have
RelationCreateStorage() return the SMgrRelation and use it to
create the init fork.
6) Add a note about the danger of modifying the relcache directly to
ATExecSetTableSpace() - it's currently not a bug because there's a
check ERRORing for catalog tables.
Regression tests and assertion improvements that together trigger the
bug described in 1) will be added in a later commit, as there is a
related bug on all branches.
Reported-By: Michael Paquier
Diagnosed-By: Tom Lane and Andres Freund
Author: Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190418011430.GA19133@paquier.xyz
Remove a comment that refers to a coding practice that was fully removed
by commit a8b8f4db, which introduced MarkBufferDirty(). It looks like
the comment was even obsolete before then, since it concerns
write-ordering dependencies with synchronous buffer writes.
This is quite unsafe, even for the case of ereport(FATAL) where we won't
return control to the interrupted code, and despite this code's use of
a flag to restrict the areas where we'd try to do it. It's possible
for example that we interrupt malloc or free while that's holding a lock
that's meant to protect against cross-thread interference. Then, any
attempt to do malloc or free within ereport() will result in a deadlock,
preventing the walreceiver process from exiting in response to SIGTERM.
We hypothesize that this explains some hard-to-reproduce failures seen
in the buildfarm.
Hence, get rid of the immediate-exit code in WalRcvShutdownHandler,
as well as the logic associated with WalRcvImmediateInterruptOK.
Instead, we need to take care that potentially-blocking operations
in the walreceiver's data transmission logic (libpqwalreceiver.c)
will respond reasonably promptly to the process's latch becoming
set and then call ProcessWalRcvInterrupts. Much of the needed code
for that was already present in libpqwalreceiver.c. I refactored
things a bit so that all the uses of PQgetResult use latch-aware
waiting, but didn't need to do much more.
These changes should be enough to ensure that libpqwalreceiver.c
will respond promptly to SIGTERM whenever it's waiting to receive
data. In principle, it could block for a long time while waiting
to send data too, and this patch does nothing to guard against that.
I think that that hazard is mostly theoretical though: such blocking
should occur only if we fill the kernel's data transmission buffers,
and we don't generally send enough data to make that happen without
waiting for input. If we find out that the hazard isn't just
theoretical, we could fix it by using PQsetnonblocking, but that
would require more ticklish changes than I care to make now.
This is a bug fix, but it seems like too big a change to push into
the back branches without much more testing than there's time for
right now. Perhaps we'll back-patch once we have more confidence
in the change.
Patch by me; thanks to Thomas Munro for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190416070119.GK2673@paquier.xyz
If a temporary table with an identity column and ON COMMIT DROP is
created in a single-statement transaction (not useful, but allowed),
it would leave the catalog corrupted. We need to add a
CommandCounterIncrement() so that PreCommit_on_commit_actions() sees
the created dependency between table and sequence and can clean it
up.
The analogous and more useful case of doing this in a transaction
block already runs some CommandCounterIncrement() before it gets to
the on-commit cleanup, so it wasn't a problem in practical use.
Several locations for placing the new CommandCounterIncrement() call
were discussed. This patch places it at the end of
standard_ProcessUtility(). That would also help if other commands
were to create catalog entries that some on-commit action would like
to see.
Bug: #15631
Reported-by: Serge Latyntsev <dnsl48@gmail.com>
Author: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Run renumber_oids.pl to move high-numbered OIDs down, as per pre-beta
tasks specified by RELEASE_CHANGES. (The only change is 8394 -> 3428.)
Also run reformat_dat_file.pl while I'm here.
While looking at the reformat diffs, I chanced to notice that type
jsonpath had typsend and typreceive = '-', which surely is not the
intention given that jsonpath_send and jsonpath_recv exist.
Fix that. It's safe to assume that these functions have never been
tested :-(. I didn't try, but somebody should.
Be more consistent about use of XXXGetDatum macros in new jsonpath
code. This is mostly to avoid having code that looks randomly
different from everyplace else that's doing the exact same thing.
In pg_regress.c, avoid an unreferenced-function warning from
compilers that don't understand pg_attribute_unused(). Putting
the function inside the same #ifdef as its only caller is more
straightforward coding anyway.
In be-secure-openssl.c, avoid use of pg_attribute_unused() on a label.
That's pretty creative, but there's no good reason to suppose that
it's portable, and there's absolutely no need to use goto's here in the
first place. (This wasn't actually causing any buildfarm complaints,
but it's new code in v12 so it has no portability track record.)
This fixes a couple of grammar mistakes, typos and inconsistencies in
the documentation. Particularly, the configuration parsing allows only
"kB" to mean kilobyte but there were references in the docs to "KB".
Some instances of the latter are still in the code comments. Some
parameter values were mentioned with "Minus-one", and using directly
"-1" with proper markups is more helpful to the reader.
Some of these have been pointed out by Justin, and some others are
things I bumped into.
Author: Justin Pryzby, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190330224333.GQ5815@telsasoft.com
foreign_grouping_ok() is willing to put fairly arbitrary expressions into
the targetlist of a remote SELECT that's doing grouping or aggregation on
the remote side, including expressions that have no foreign component to
them at all. This is possibly a bit dubious from an efficiency standpoint;
but it rises to the level of a crash-causing bug if the expression is just
a Param or non-foreign Var. In that case, the expression will necessarily
also appear in the fdw_exprs list of values we need to send to the remote
server, and then setrefs.c's set_foreignscan_references will mistakenly
replace the fdw_exprs entry with a Var referencing the targetlist result.
The root cause of this problem is bad design in commit e7cb7ee14: it put
logic into set_foreignscan_references that IMV is postgres_fdw-specific,
and yet this bug shows that it isn't postgres_fdw-specific enough. The
transformation being done on fdw_exprs assumes that fdw_exprs is to be
evaluated with the fdw_scan_tlist as input, which is not how postgres_fdw
uses it; yet it could be the right thing for some other FDW. (In the
bigger picture, setrefs.c has no business assuming this for the other
expression fields of a ForeignScan either.)
The right fix therefore would be to expand the FDW API so that the
FDW could inform setrefs.c how it intends to evaluate these various
expressions. We can't change that in the back branches though, and we
also can't just summarily change setrefs.c's behavior there, or we're
likely to break external FDWs.
As a stopgap, therefore, hack up postgres_fdw so that it won't attempt
to send targetlist entries that look exactly like the fdw_exprs entries
they'd produce. In most cases this actually produces a superior plan,
IMO, with less data needing to be transmitted and returned; so we probably
ought to think harder about whether we should ship tlist expressions at
all when they don't contain any foreign Vars or Aggs. But that's an
optimization not a bug fix so I left it for later. One case where this
produces an inferior plan is where the expression in question is actually
a GROUP BY expression: then the restriction prevents us from using remote
grouping. It might be possible to work around that (since that would
reduce to group-by-a-constant on the remote side); but it seems like a
pretty unlikely corner case, so I'm not sure it's worth expending effort
solely to improve that. In any case the right long-term answer is to fix
the API as sketched above, and then revert this hack.
Per bug #15781 from Sean Johnston. Back-patch to v10 where the problem
was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15781-2601b1002bad087c@postgresql.org
Recently added guidance on adding SVG images to the documentation
sources lacks advice on making the images responsive when rendered
in a variety of media types and viewports. Add some.
Patch by Jonathan Katz with some editorialization by me.
Author: Jonathan Katz
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6358ae6f-7191-a02b-e7b5-68050636ae71@postgresql.org
The documentation includes a section about index maintenance and
reindexing, mentioning a set of steps based on CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY
and ALTER TABLE (for constraint dependencies) to emulate REINDEX
CONCURRENTLY. Now that REINDEX CONCURRENTLY is supported, let's just
directly mention it instead.
Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzmEL168t6w29aKrKXtpq9-apcmp0HC7K-fKt6ZgLXV6Dg@mail.gmail.com
This corrects a small bug in zic that caused it to output an incorrect
year-2440 transition in the Africa/Casablanca zone.
More interestingly, zic has grown a "-r" option that limits the range of
zone transitions that it will put into the output files. That might be
useful to people who don't like the weird GMT offsets that tzdb likes
to use for very old dates. It appears that for dates before the cutoff
time specified with -r, zic will use the zone's standard-time offset
as of the cutoff time. So for example one might do
make install ZIC_OPTIONS='-r @-1893456000'
to cause all dates before 1910-01-01 to be treated as though 1910
standard time prevailed indefinitely far back. (Don't blame me for
the unfriendly way of specifying the cutoff time --- it's seconds
since or before the Unix epoch. You can use extract(epoch ...)
to calculate it.)
As usual, back-patch to all supported branches.
Michael Paquier