Upcoming versions of glibc will contain copy_file_range(2), a wrapper
around a new linux syscall for in-kernel copying of data ranges. This
conflicts with pg_rewinds function of the same name.
Therefore rename pg_rewinds version. As our version isn't a generic
copying facility we decided to choose a rewind specific function name.
Per buildfarm animal caiman and subsequent discussion with Tom Lane.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20180103033425.w7jkljth3e26sduc@alap3.anarazel.dehttps://postgr.es/m/31122.1514951044@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: 9.5-, where pg_rewind was introduced
Commit 614350a3 allowed for an different builds of OpenSSL libraries on
Windows, but ignored the fact that the alternative builds don't have
config-specific libraries. This patch fixes the Solution file to ask for
the correct libraries.
per offline discussions with Leonardo Cecchi and Marco Nenciarini,
Backpatch to all live branches.
XactLockTableWait assumed that its xid argument has already added itself
to the lock table. That assumption led to another assumption that if
locking the xid has succeeded but the xid is reported as still in
progress, then the input xid must have been a subtransaction.
These assumptions hold true for the original uses of this code in
locking related to on-disk tuples, but they break down in logical
replication slot snapshot building -- in particular, when a standby
snapshot logged contains an xid that's already in ProcArray but not yet
in the lock table. This leads to assertion failures that can be
reproduced all the way back to 9.4, when logical decoding was
introduced.
To fix, change SubTransGetParent to SubTransGetTopmostTransaction which
has a slightly different API: it returns the argument Xid if there is no
parent, and it goes all the way to the top instead of moving up the
levels one by one. Also, to avoid busy-waiting, add a 1ms sleep to give
the other process time to register itself in the lock table.
For consistency, change ConditionalXactLockTableWait the same way.
Author: Petr Jelínek
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1B3E32D8-FCF4-40B4-AEF9-5C0E3AC57969@postgrespro.ru
Reported-by: Konstantin Knizhnik
Diagnosed-by: Stas Kelvich, Petr Jelínek
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Robert Haas
Correct ExecParallelHashTuplePrealloc's estimate of whether the
space_allowed limit is exceeded. Be more consistent about tuples that
are exactly HASH_CHUNK_THRESHOLD in size (they're "small", not "large").
Neither of these things explain the current buildfarm unhappiness, but
they're still bugs.
Thomas Munro, per gripe by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=34PDuR69kfYVhmZPgMdy8pSA-MYbpesEN1SR+2oj3Y+w@mail.gmail.com
Add some infrastructure (mostly macros) to make it easier to write
typical cases for constant-expression simplification. Add simplification
processing for ArrayRef, RowExpr, and ScalarArrayOpExpr node types,
which formerly went unsimplified even if all their inputs were constants.
Also teach it to simplify FieldSelect from a composite constant.
Make use of the new infrastructure to reduce the amount of code needed
for the existing ArrayExpr and ArrayCoerceExpr cases.
One existing test case changes output as a result of the fact that
RowExpr can now be folded to a constant. All the new code is exercised
by existing test cases according to gcov, so I feel no need to add
additional tests.
Tom Lane, reviewed by Dmitry Dolgov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3be3b82c-e29c-b674-2163-bf47d98817b1@iki.fi
While ldaptls=1 provides an RFC 4513 conforming way to do LDAP
authentication with TLS encryption, there was an earlier de facto
standard way to do LDAP over SSL called LDAPS. Even though it's not
enshrined in a standard, it's still widely used and sometimes required
by organizations' network policies. There seems to be no reason not to
support it when available in the client library. Therefore, add support
when using OpenLDAP 2.4+ or Windows. It can be configured with
ldapscheme=ldaps or ldapurl=ldaps://...
Add tests for both ways of requesting LDAPS and a test for the
pre-existing ldaptls=1. Modify the 001_auth.pl test for "diagnostic
messages", which was previously relying on the server rejecting
ldaptls=1.
Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-By: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=1s+pA-LZUjQ-9GQz0Z4rX_eK=DFXAF1nBQ+ROPimuOYQ@mail.gmail.com
Previously aggregate transition values for hash and other forms of
aggregation (i.e. sort and no group by) were represented
differently. Hash based aggregation used a grouping set indexed array
pointing to an array of transition values, whereas other forms of
aggregation used one flattened array with the index being computed out
of grouping set and transition offsets.
That made upcoming changes hard, so represent both as grouping set
indexed array of per-group data.
As a nice side-effect this also makes aggregation slightly faster,
because computing offsets with `transno + (setno * numTrans)` turns
out not to be that cheap (too big for x86 lea for example).
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171128003121.nmxbm2ounxzb6n2t@alap3.anarazel.de
The previous coding relied (without any documentation) on the data[]
member of HashMemoryChunkData being at a MAXALIGN'ed offset. If it
was not, the tuples would not be maxaligned either, leading to failures
on alignment-picky machines. While there seems to be no live bug on any
platform we support, this is clearly pretty fragile: any addition to or
rearrangement of the fields in HashMemoryChunkData could break it.
Let's remove the hazard by getting rid of the data[] member and instead
using pointer arithmetic with an explicitly maxalign'ed offset.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14483.1514938129@sss.pgh.pa.us
Multiple sessions doing CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY simultaneously are
supposed to be able to work in parallel, as evidenced by fixes in commit
c3d09b3bd2 specifically to support this case. In reality, one of the
sessions would be aborted by a misterious "deadlock detected" error.
Jeff Janes diagnosed that this is because of leftover snapshots used for
system catalog scans -- this was broken by 8aa3e47510 keeping track of
(registering) the catalog snapshot. To fix the deadlocks, it's enough
to de-register that snapshot prior to waiting.
Backpatch to 9.4, which introduced MVCC catalog scans.
Include an isolationtester spec that 8 out of 10 times reproduces the
deadlock with the unpatched code for me (Álvaro).
Author: Jeff Janes
Diagnosed-by: Jeff Janes
Reported-by: Jeremy Finzel
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMa1XUhHjCv8Qkx0WOr1Mpm_R4qxN26EibwCrj0Oor2YBUFUTg%40mail.gmail.com
The original idea was that we could use an isNull-style bool array
directly as a GinNullCategory array. However, the existing code already
acknowledges that that doesn't really work, because of the possibility
that bool as currently defined can have arbitrary bit patterns for true
values. So it has to loop through the nullFlags array to set each bool
value to an acceptable value. But if we are looping through the whole
array anyway, we might as well build a proper GinNullCategory array
instead and abandon the type casting. That makes the code much safer in
case bool is ever changed to something else.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
In a race case, EXPLAIN ANALYZE could fail to display correct nbatch
and size information. Refactor so that participants report only on
batches they worked on rather than trying to report on all of them,
and teach explain.c to consider the HashInstrumentation object from
all participants instead of picking the first one it can find. This
should fix an occasional build farm failure in the "join" regression
test.
Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30219.1514428346%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Otherwise, the test fails with "Timed out while waiting for standby to
catch up". This happened rarely, perhaps only when autovacuum wrote WAL
between our choosing the recovery target and choosing the LSN to await.
Commit b26f7fa6ae fixed one case of this.
Fix two more. Back-patch to 9.6, which introduced the affected test.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180101055227.GA2952815@rfd.leadboat.com
plpgsql's five different loop control statements contained three distinct
implementations of the same (or what ought to be the same, at least)
logic for handling return/exit/continue result codes from their child
statements. At best, that's trouble waiting to happen, and there seems
no very good reason for the coding to be so different. Refactor so that
all the common logic is expressed in a single macro.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26314.1514670401@sss.pgh.pa.us
I noticed that our code coverage report showed considerable deficiency
in test coverage for PL/pgSQL control statements. Notably, both
exec_stmt_block and most of the loop control statements had very poor
coverage of handling of return/exit/continue result codes from their
child statements; and exec_stmt_fori was seriously lacking in feature
coverage, having no test that exercised its BY or REVERSE features,
nor verification that its overflow defenses work.
Now that we have some infrastructure for plpgsql-specific test scripts,
the natural thing to do is make a new script rather than further extend
plpgsql.sql. So I created a new script plpgsql_control.sql with the
charter to test plpgsql control structures, and moved a few existing
tests there because they fell entirely under that charter. I then
added new test cases that exercise the bits of code complained of above.
Of the five kinds of loop statements, only exec_stmt_while's result code
handling is fully exercised by these tests. That would be a deficiency
as things stand, but a follow-on commit will merge the loop statements'
result code handling into one implementation. So testing each usage of
that implementation separately seems redundant.
In passing, also add a couple test cases to plpgsql.sql to more fully
exercise plpgsql's code related to expanded arrays --- I had thought
that area was sufficiently covered already, but the coverage report
showed a couple of un-executed code paths.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26314.1514670401@sss.pgh.pa.us
This reduces code duplication a bit, but the primary benefit that it
makes JITing expression evaluation easier. When doing so we can't, as
previously done in the interpreted case, really change opcode without
recompiling. Nor dow we just carry around unnecessary branches to
avoid re-checking over and over.
As a minor side-effect this makes ExecEvalStepOp() O(log(N)) rather
than O(N).
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
This is useful because it gets rid of the sole direct user of
ExecAssignResultType(). A future commit will likely make use of that
and combine creating the targetlist with the initialization of the
result slot. But it seems like good code hygiene anyway.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
When walsenders were included in pg_stat_activity, only the ones
actually streaming WAL were listed as active when they were active. In
particular, the connections sending base backups were listed as being
idle. Which means that a regular pg_basebackup would show up with one
active and one idle connection, when both were active.
This patch updates to set all walsenders to active when they are
(including those doing very fast things like IDENTIFY_SYSTEM), and then
back to idle. Details about exactly what they are doing is available in
pg_stat_replication.
Patch by me, review by Michael Paquier and David Steele.
A momentary window exists when synchronous_standby_names
changes that allows commands issued after the change to
continue to act as async until the change becomes visible.
Remove the race by using more appropriate test in syncrep.c
Author: Asim Rama Praveen and Ashwin Agrawal
Reported-by: Xin Zhang, Ashwin Agrawal, and Asim Rama Praveen
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Masahiko Sawada
When a backend runs out of inner tuples to hash, it should detach from
grow_batch_barrier only after it has flushed all batches to disk and
merged counters, not before. Otherwise a concurrent backend in
ExecParallelHashIncreaseNumBatches() could stop waiting for this
backend and try to read tuples before they have been written. This
commit reorders those operations and should fix the assertion failures
seen occasionally on the build farm since commit
1804284042.
Author: Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1eRwXy-0004IK-TO%40gemulon.postgresql.org
Hash index depends on estimation of numbers of tuples and pages of relations,
incorrect value could be a reason of significantly growing of index. Vacuum
full recreates heap and reindex all indexes before renewal stats. The patch
fixes that, so indexes will see correct values.
Backpatch to v10 only because earlier versions haven't usable hash index and
growing of hash index is a single user-visible symptom.
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Sharma, me
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20171115232922.5tomkxnw3iq6jsg7@inml.weebeastie.net
Polygon opclass uses compress method feature of SP-GiST added earlier. For now
it's a single operator class which uses this feature. SP-GiST actually indexes
a bounding boxes of input polygons, so part of supported operations are lossy.
Opclass uses most methods of corresponding opclass over boxes of SP-GiST and
treats bounding boxes as point in 4D-space.
Bump catalog version.
Authors: Nikita Glukhov, Alexander Korotkov with minor editorization by me
Reviewed-By: all authors + Darafei Praliaskouski
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/54907069.1030506@sigaev.ru
Since 9.4, we've allowed the syntax "select union select" and variants
of that. However, the planner wasn't expecting a no-column set operation
and ended up treating the set operation as if it were UNION ALL.
Turns out it's trivial to fix in v10 and later; we just need to be careful
about not generating a Sort node with no sort keys. However, since a weird
corner case like this is never going to be exercised by developers, we'd
better have thorough regression tests if we want to consider it supported.
Per report from Victor Yegorov.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGnEbojGJrRSOgJwNGM7JSJZpVAf8xXcVPbVrGdhbVEHZ-BUMw@mail.gmail.com
currentCommandIdUsed is only used to skip redundant increments of the
command counter, and CommandCounterIncrement() is categorically denied
under parallelism anyway. Therefore, it's OK for
GetCurrentCommandId() to mark the counter value used, as long as it
happens in the leader, not a worker.
Prior to commit e9baa5e9fa, the slightly
incorrect check didn't matter, but now it does. A test case added by
commit 1804284042 uncovered the problem
by accident; it caused failures with force_parallel_mode=on/regress.
Report and review by Andres Freund. Patch by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20171221143106.5lhtygohvmazli3x@alap3.anarazel.de
This patch does three interrelated things:
* Create a new expression execution step type EEOP_PARAM_CALLBACK
and add the infrastructure needed for add-on modules to generate that.
As discussed, the best control mechanism for that seems to be to add
another hook function to ParamListInfo, which will be called by
ExecInitExpr if it's supplied and a PARAM_EXTERN Param is found.
For stand-alone expressions, we add a new entry point to allow the
ParamListInfo to be specified directly, since it can't be retrieved
from the parent plan node's EState.
* Redesign the API for the ParamListInfo paramFetch hook so that the
ParamExternData array can be entirely virtual. This also lets us get rid
of ParamListInfo.paramMask, instead leaving it to the paramFetch hook to
decide which param IDs should be accessible or not. plpgsql_param_fetch
was already doing the identical masking check, so having callers do it too
seemed redundant. While I was at it, I added a "speculative" flag to
paramFetch that the planner can specify as TRUE to avoid unwanted failures.
This solves an ancient problem for plpgsql that it couldn't provide values
of non-DTYPE_VAR variables to the planner for fear of triggering premature
"record not assigned yet" or "field not found" errors during planning.
* Rework plpgsql to get rid of the need for "unshared" parameter lists,
by dint of turning the single ParamListInfo per estate into a nearly
read-only data structure that doesn't instantiate any per-variable data.
Instead, the paramFetch hook controls access to per-variable data and can
make the right decisions on the fly, replacing the cases that we used to
need multiple ParamListInfos for. This might perhaps have been a
performance loss on its own, but by using a paramCompile hook we can
bypass plpgsql_param_fetch entirely during normal query execution.
(It's now only called when, eg, we copy the ParamListInfo into a cursor
portal. copyParamList() or SerializeParamList() effectively instantiate
the virtual parameter array as a simple physical array without a
paramFetch hook, which is what we want in those cases.) This allows
reverting most of commit 6c82d8d1f, though I kept the cosmetic
code-consolidation aspects of that (eg the assign_simple_var function).
Performance testing shows this to be at worst a break-even change,
and it can provide wins ranging up to 20% in test cases involving
accesses to fields of "record" variables. The fact that values of
such variables can now be exposed to the planner might produce wins
in some situations, too, but I've not pursued that angle.
In passing, remove the "parent" pointer from the arguments to
ExecInitExprRec and related functions, instead storing that pointer in a
transient field in ExprState. The ParamListInfo pointer for a stand-alone
expression is handled the same way; we'd otherwise have had to add
yet another recursively-passed-down argument in expression compilation.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/32589.1513706441@sss.pgh.pa.us
That function currently exists to avoid leaking memory in
CacheMemoryContext in case of trouble while the partition key is being
built, but there's a better way: allocate everything in a memcxt that
goes away if the current (sub)transaction fails, and once the partition
key is built and no further errors can occur, make the memcxt permanent
by making it a child of CacheMemoryContext.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171027172730.eh2domlkpn4ja62m@alvherre.pgsql
Various Perl scripts we use to generate files were in the habit of
printing things like "generated by $0" into their output files.
That looks like a fine idea at first glance, but it results in
non-reproducible output, because in VPATH builds $0 won't be just
the name of the script file, but a full path for it. We'd prefer
that you get identical results whether using VPATH or not, so this
is a bad thing.
Some of these places also printed their input file name(s), causing
an additional hazard of the same type.
Hence, establish a policy that thou shalt not print $0, nor input file
pathnames, into output files (they're still allowed in error messages,
though). Instead just write the script name verbatim. While we are at
it, we can make these annotations more useful by giving the script's
full relative path name within the PG source tree, eg instead of
Gen_fmgrtab.pl let's print src/backend/utils/Gen_fmgrtab.pl.
Not all of the changes made here actually affect any files shipped
in finished tarballs today, but it seems best to apply the policy
everyplace so that nobody copies unsafe code into places where it
could matter.
Christoph Berg and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171215102223.GB31812@msg.df7cb.de
Generally, error recovery paths that need to do things like
LWLockReleaseAll and pgstat_report_wait_end also need to call
ConditionVariableCancelSleep, but AbortSubTransaction was missed.
Since subtransaction abort might destroy up the DSM segment that
contains the ConditionVariable stored in cv_sleep_target, this
can result in a crash for anything using condition variables.
Reported and diagnosed by Andres Freund.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20171221110048.rxk6464azzl5t2fi@alap3.anarazel.de
Introduce parallel-aware hash joins that appear in EXPLAIN plans as Parallel
Hash Join with Parallel Hash. While hash joins could already appear in
parallel queries, they were previously always parallel-oblivious and had a
partial subplan only on the outer side, meaning that the work of the inner
subplan was duplicated in every worker.
After this commit, the planner will consider using a partial subplan on the
inner side too, using the Parallel Hash node to divide the work over the
available CPU cores and combine its results in shared memory. If the join
needs to be split into multiple batches in order to respect work_mem, then
workers process different batches as much as possible and then work together
on the remaining batches.
The advantages of a parallel-aware hash join over a parallel-oblivious hash
join used in a parallel query are that it:
* avoids wasting memory on duplicated hash tables
* avoids wasting disk space on duplicated batch files
* divides the work of building the hash table over the CPUs
One disadvantage is that there is some communication between the participating
CPUs which might outweigh the benefits of parallelism in the case of small
hash tables. This is avoided by the planner's existing reluctance to supply
partial plans for small scans, but it may be necessary to estimate
synchronization costs in future if that situation changes. Another is that
outer batch 0 must be written to disk if multiple batches are required.
A potential future advantage of parallel-aware hash joins is that right and
full outer joins could be supported, since there is a single set of matched
bits for each hashtable, but that is not yet implemented.
A new GUC enable_parallel_hash is defined to control the feature, defaulting
to on.
Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund, Robert Haas
Tested-By: Rafia Sabih, Prabhat Sahu
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=2W=cOkiZxcg6qiFQP-dHUe09aqTrEMM7yJDrHMhDv_RA@mail.gmail.comhttps://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=37HKyJ4U6XOLi=JgfSHM3o6B-GaeO-6hkOmneTDkH+Uw@mail.gmail.com
When a Gather or Gather Merge node is started and stopped multiple
times, accumulate instrumentation data only once, at the end, instead
of after each execution, to avoid recording inflated totals.
Commit 778e78ae9f, the previous attempt
at a fix, instead reset the state after every execution, which worked
for the general instrumentation data but had problems for the additional
instrumentation specific to Sort and Hash nodes.
Report by hubert depesz lubaczewski. Analysis and fix by Amit Kapila,
following a design proposal from Thomas Munro, with a comment tweak
by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20171127175631.GA405@depesz.com
Commit dc02c7bca4 changed this call
to create_sort_path() to take -1 rather than limit_tuples because,
at that time, there was no way for a Sort beneath a Gather Merge
to become a top-N sort.
Later, commit 3452dc5240 provided
a way for a Sort beneath a Gather Merge to become a top-N sort,
but failed to revert the previous commit in the process. Do that.
Report and analysis by Jeff Janes; patch by Thomas Munro; review by
Amit Kapila and by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=1BWtC34vUroA0Uqjw02MaqdUrW+d6WD85_k8SLyPiKHQ@mail.gmail.com
Alvaro Herrera