Currently, lastOverflowedXid is never reset. It's just adjusted on new
transactions known to be overflowed. But if there are no overflowed
transactions for a long time, snapshots could be mistakenly marked as
suboverflowed due to wraparound.
This commit fixes this issue by resetting lastOverflowedXid when needed
altogether with KnownAssignedXids.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Reported-by: Stan Hu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMBWrQ%3DFp5UAsU_nATY7EMY7NHczG4-DTDU%3DmCvBQZAQ6wa2xQ%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Stan Hu, Simon Riggs, Nikolay Samokhvalov, Andrey Borodin, Dmitry Dolgov
When calculating distance between float4/float8 values, we need to be a
bit more careful about NaN values in order not to trigger assert. We
consider NaN values to be equal (distace 0.0) and in infinite distance
from all other values.
On builds without asserts, this issue is mostly harmless - the ranges
may be merged in less efficient order, but the index is still correct.
Per report from Andreas Seltenreich. Backpatch to 14, where this new
BRIN opclass was introduced.
Reported-by: Andreas Seltenreich
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87r1bw9ukm.fsf@credativ.de
As usual, the release notes for other branches will be made by cutting
these down, but put them up for community review first.
Also as usual for a .1 release, there are some entries here that
are not really relevant for v14 because they already appeared in 14.0.
Those'll be removed later.
When a role being dropped contains is referenced by catalog objects that
are concurrently also being dropped, a crash can result while trying to
construct the string that describes the objects. Suppress that by
ignoring objects whose descriptions are returned as NULL.
The majority of relevant codesites were already cautious about this
already; we had just missed a couple.
This is an old bug, so backpatch all the way back.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17126-21887f04508cb5c8@postgresql.org
If lo_export() fails to open the target file or to write to it, it leaks
the created LargeObjectDesc and its snapshot in the top-transaction
context and resource owner. That's pretty harmless, it's a small leak
after all, but it gives the user a "Snapshot reference leak" warning.
Fix by using a short-lived memory context and no resource owner for
transient LargeObjectDescs that are opened and closed within one function
call. The leak is easiest to reproduce with lo_export() on a directory
that doesn't exist, but in principle the other lo_* functions could also
fail.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Reported-by: Andrew B
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/32bf767a-2d65-71c4-f170-122f416bab7e@iki.fi
Commit b4af70cb inverted the return value of the function
parallel_processing_is_safe(), but missed the amvacuumcleanup test.
Index AMs that don't support parallel cleanup at all were affected.
The practical consequences of this bug were not very serious. Hash
indexes are affected, but since they just return the number of blocks
during hashvacuumcleanup anyway, it can't have had much impact.
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoA-Em+aeVPmBbL_s1V-ghsJQSxYL-i3JP8nTfPiD1wjKw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 14-, where commit b4af70cb appears.
Commit b4af70cb, which simplified state managed by VACUUM, performed
refactoring of parallel VACUUM in passing. Confusion about the exact
details of the tasks that the leader process is responsible for led to
code that made it possible for parallel VACUUM to miss a subset of the
table's indexes entirely. Specifically, indexes that fell under the
min_parallel_index_scan_size size cutoff were missed. These indexes are
supposed to be vacuumed by the leader (alongside any parallel unsafe
indexes), but weren't vacuumed at all. Affected indexes could easily
end up with duplicate heap TIDs, once heap TIDs were recycled for new
heap tuples. This had generic symptoms that might be seen with almost
any index corruption involving structural inconsistencies between an
index and its table.
To fix, make sure that the parallel VACUUM leader process performs any
required index vacuuming for indexes that happen to be below the size
cutoff. Also document the design of parallel VACUUM with these
below-size-cutoff indexes.
It's unclear how many users might be affected by this bug. There had to
be at least three indexes on the table to hit the bug: a smaller index,
plus at least two additional indexes that themselves exceed the size
cutoff. Cases with just one additional index would not run into
trouble, since the parallel VACUUM cost model requires two
larger-than-cutoff indexes on the table to apply any parallel
processing. Note also that autovacuum was not affected, since it never
uses parallel processing.
Test case based on tests from a larger patch to test parallel VACUUM by
Masahiko Sawada.
Many thanks to Kamigishi Rei for her invaluable help with tracking this
problem down.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reported-By: Kamigishi Rei <iijima.yun@koumakan.jp>
Reported-By: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Diagnosed-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Bug: #17245
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17245-ddf06aaf85735f36@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211030023740.qbnsl2xaoh2grq3d@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 14-, where the refactoring commit appears.
This undoes a mistake in 1ec7679f1: domainval and domainnull were
meant to live across loop iterations, but they were incorrectly
moved inside the loop. The effect was only to emit useless extra
EEOP_MAKE_READONLY steps, so it's not a big deal; nonetheless,
back-patch to v13 where the mistake was introduced.
Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAqXuhbkaAp-sGH6dR6Nsq7v28_0TPexHOm6FiDYqwQD-w@mail.gmail.com
As in commits 6301c3ada and e9d9ba2a4, avoid doing repetitive
list_delete_first() operations, since that would be expensive when
there are many files waiting to be unlinked. This is a slightly
larger change than in those cases. We have to keep the list state
valid for calls to AbsorbSyncRequests(), so it's necessary to invent a
"canceled" field instead of immediately deleting PendingUnlinkEntry
entries. Also, because we might not be able to process all the
entries, we need a new list primitive list_delete_first_n().
list_delete_first_n() is almost list_copy_tail(), but it modifies the
input List instead of making a new copy. I found a couple of existing
uses of the latter that could profitably use the new function. (There
might be more, but the other callers look like they probably shouldn't
overwrite the input List.)
As before, back-patch to v13.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CD2F0E7F-9822-45EC-A411-AE56F14DEA9F@amazon.com
In the same spirit as 6301c3ada, fix some more places where we were
using list_delete_first() in a loop and thereby risking O(N^2)
behavior. It's not clear that the lists manipulated in these spots
can get long enough to be really problematic ... but it's not clear
that they can't, either, and the fixes are simple enough.
As before, back-patch to v13.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CD2F0E7F-9822-45EC-A411-AE56F14DEA9F@amazon.com
Failing to do so results in inability of logical decoding to process the
WAL stream. Handle it by doing nothing.
Backpatch all the way back.
Reported-by: Petr Jelínek <petr.jelinek@enterprisedb.com>
The opclass parameter Datums from the old index are fetched in the same
way as for predicates and expressions, by grabbing them directly from
the system catalogs. They are then copied into the new IndexInfo that
will be used for the creation of the new copy.
This caused the new index to be rebuilt with default parameters rather
than the ones pre-defined by a user. The only way to get back a new
index with correct opclass parameters would be to recreate a new index
from scratch.
The issue has been introduced by 911e702.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YX0CG/QpLXcPr8HJ@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 13
Windows fails on a request to read() more than INT_MAX bytes,
and perhaps other platforms could have similar issues. Let's
adjust this code to read at most 1GB per call.
(One would not have thought the file could get that big, but now
we have a field report of trouble, so it can. We likely ought to
add some mechanism to limit the size of the query-texts file
separately from the size of the hash table. That is not this
patch, though.)
Per bug #17254 from Yusuke Egashira. It's been like this for
awhile, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17254-a926c89dc03375c2@postgresql.org
When replaying a transaction that held many exclusive locks on the
primary, a standby server's startup process would expend O(N^2)
effort on manipulating the list of locks. This code was fine when
written, but commit 1cff1b95a made repetitive list_delete_first()
calls inefficient, as explained in its commit message. Fix by just
iterating the list normally, and releasing storage only when done.
(This'd be inadequate if we needed to recover from an error occurring
partway through; but we don't.)
Back-patch to v13 where 1cff1b95a came in.
Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CD2F0E7F-9822-45EC-A411-AE56F14DEA9F@amazon.com
Commit d168b66682, which overhauled index deletion, added a
pg_unreachable() to the end of a sort comparator used when sorting heap
TIDs from an index page. This allows the compiler to apply
optimizations that assume that the heap TIDs from the index AM must
always be unique.
That doesn't seem like a good idea now, given recent reports of
corruption involving duplicate TIDs in indexes on Postgres 14. Demote
to an assertion, just in case.
Backpatch: 14-, where index deletion was overhauled.
DST law changes in Fiji, Jordan, Palestine, and Samoa. Historical
corrections for Barbados, Cook Islands, Guyana, Niue, Portugal, and
Tonga.
Also, the Pacific/Enderbury zone has been renamed to Pacific/Kanton.
The following zones have been merged into nearby, more-populous zones
whose clocks have agreed since 1970: Africa/Accra, America/Atikokan,
America/Blanc-Sablon, America/Creston, America/Curacao,
America/Nassau, America/Port_of_Spain, Antarctica/DumontDUrville,
and Antarctica/Syowa.
Commits fdd965d07 and 3cd9c3b92 tested CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY by
launching two separate pgbench runs concurrently. This was needed so
that only a single client thread would run CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY,
avoiding deadlock between two CICs. However, there's a better way,
which is to use an advisory lock to prevent concurrent CICs. That's
better in part because the test code is shorter and more readable, but
mostly because it automatically scales things to launch an appropriate
number of CICs relative to the number of INSERT transactions.
As committed, typically half to three-quarters of the CIC transactions
were pointless because the INSERT transactions had already stopped.
In passing, remove background_pgbench, which was added to support
these tests and isn't needed anymore. We can always put it back
if we find a use for it later.
Back-patch to v12; older pgbench versions lack the
conditional-execution features needed for this method.
Tom Lane and Andrey Borodin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/139687.1635277318@sss.pgh.pa.us
The previous coding relied on the memory for the slots being zeroed
elsewhere, which while it was true in this case is not an contract
which is guaranteed to hold. Explicitly clear the tts_isnull array
to ensure that the slots are filled from a known state.
Backpatch to v14 where the catalog multi-inserts were introduced.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TP0AowkUgNL6zcAK-s5HYsVHVBRWfu69FRubPpfwZGM9A@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
The purpose of commit 8a54e12a38 was to
fix this, and it sufficed when the PREPARE TRANSACTION completed before
the CIC looked for lock conflicts. Otherwise, things still broke. As
before, in a cluster having used CIC while having enabled prepared
transactions, queries that use the resulting index can silently fail to
find rows. It may be necessary to reindex to recover from past
occurrences; REINDEX CONCURRENTLY suffices. Fix this for future index
builds by making CIC wait for arbitrarily-recent prepared transactions
and for ordinary transactions that may yet PREPARE TRANSACTION. As part
of that, have PREPARE TRANSACTION transfer locks to its dummy PGPROC
before it calls ProcArrayClearTransaction(). Back-patch to 9.6 (all
supported versions).
Andrey Borodin, reviewed (in earlier versions) by Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/01824242-AA92-4FE9-9BA7-AEBAFFEA3D0C@yandex-team.ru
CIC and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY assume backends see their catalog changes
no later than each backend's next transaction start. That failed to
hold when a backend absorbed a relevant invalidation in the middle of
running RelationBuildDesc() on the CIC index. Queries that use the
resulting index can silently fail to find rows. Fix this for future
index builds by making RelationBuildDesc() loop until it finishes
without accepting a relevant invalidation. It may be necessary to
reindex to recover from past occurrences; REINDEX CONCURRENTLY suffices.
Back-patch to 9.6 (all supported versions).
Noah Misch and Andrey Borodin, reviewed (in earlier versions) by Andres
Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210730022548.GA1940096@gust.leadboat.com
The documentation was imprecise about the starting LSN used for WAL
streaming if nothing can be found in the local archive directory
defined with the pg_receivewal command, so be more talkative on this
matter.
Extracted from a larger patch by the same author.
Author: Ronan Dunklau, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18708360.4lzOvYHigE@aivenronan
Backpatch-through: 10
The code does not expect sh_error() to return, but the patch
that made this header usable in frontend didn't get that memo.
While here, plaster unlikely() on the tests that decide whether
to invoke sh_error(), and add our standard copyright notice.
Noted by Andres Freund. Back-patch to v13 where this frontend
support came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0D54435C-1199-4361-9D74-2FBDCF8EA164@anarazel.de
Non-global default privilege entries should be dumped as-is,
not made relative to the default ACL for their object type.
This would typically only matter if one had revoked some
on-by-default privileges in a global entry, and then wanted
to grant them again in a non-global entry.
Per report from Boris Korzun. This is an old bug, so back-patch
to all supported branches.
Neil Chen, test case by Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/111621616618184@mail.yandex.ru
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA3qoJnr2+1dVJObNtfec=qW4Z0nz=A9+r5bZKoTSy5RDjskMw@mail.gmail.com
For non-MSVC builds this is make's $(CURDIR), while for MSVC builds it
is $topdir/$Config/$module. The directory is added as the second element
in the PATH, so that the install location takes precedence, but the
added PATH element takes precedence over the rest of the PATH.
The reason for this is to allow tests to find built products that are
not installed, such as the libpq_pipeline test driver.
The libpq_pipeline test is adjusted to take advantage of this.
Based on a suggestion from Andres Freund.
Backpatch to release 14.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4941f5a5-2d50-1a0e-6701-14c5fefe92d6@dunslane.net
Using for a new database a template database with shared dependencies
that need to be copied over was causing a corruption of pg_shdepend
because of an off-by-one computation error of the index number used for
the values inserted with a slot.
Issue introduced by e3931d0. Monitoring the rest of the code, there are
no similar mistakes.
Reported-by: Sven Klemm
Author: Aleksander Alekseev
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TP0AowkUgNL6zcAK-s5HYsVHVBRWfu69FRubPpfwZGM9A@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
The build scripts of Visual Studio would fail to detect properly a 3.0.0
build as the check on the second digit was failing. This is adjusted
where needed, allowing the builds to complete. Note that the MSIs of
OpenSSL mentioned in the documentation have not changed any library
names for Win32 and Win64, making this change straight-forward.
Reported-by: htalaco, via github
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YW5XKYkq6k7OtrFq@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Commit 1b5d797cd4 intended to relax the lock level used to rename
indexes, but inadvertently allowed *any* relation to be renamed with a
lowered lock level, as long as the command is spelled ALTER INDEX.
That's undesirable for other relation types, so retry the operation with
the higher lock if the relation turns out not to be an index.
After this fix, ALTER INDEX <sometable> RENAME will require access
exclusive lock, which it didn't before.
Author: Nathan Bossart <bossartn@amazon.com>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reported-by: Onder Kalaci <onderk@microsoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/PH0PR21MB1328189E2821CDEC646F8178D8AE9@PH0PR21MB1328.namprd21.prod.outlook.com
ldapsearch's deprecated -h/-p arguments were removed, need to use -H now -
which has been around for over 20 years.
As perltidy insists on reflowing the parameters anyway, change order and
"phrasing" to yield a less confusing layout (per suggestion from Tom Lane).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211009233850.wvr6apcrw2ai6cnj@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 11-, where the tests were added.
An update such as "UPDATE ... SET fld[n].subfld = whatever"
failed if the array elements were domains rather than plain
composites. That's because isAssignmentIndirectionExpr()
failed to cope with the CoerceToDomain node that would appear
in the expression tree in this case. The result would typically
be a crash, and even if we accidentally didn't crash, we'd not
correctly preserve other fields of the same array element.
Per report from Onder Kalaci. Back-patch to v11 where arrays of
domains came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/PH0PR21MB132823A46AA36F0685B7A29AD8BD9@PH0PR21MB1328.namprd21.prod.outlook.com
I think when I added this assertion (in commit 8f889b108), I was only
thinking of the use of transformExpressionList at top level of INSERT
and VALUES. But it's also called by transformRowExpr(), which can
certainly occur in an UPDATE targetlist, so it's inappropriate to
suppose that p_multiassign_exprs must be empty. Besides, since the
input is not expected to contain ResTargets, there's no reason it
should contain MultiAssignRefs either. Hence this code need not
be concerned about the state of p_multiassign_exprs, and we should
just drop the assertion.
Per bug #17236 from ocean_li_996. It's been wrong for years,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17236-3210de9bcba1d7ca@postgresql.org
If the blob TOC file cannot be parsed, the error message was failing
to print the filename as the variable holding it was shadowed by the
destination buffer for parsing. When the filename fails to parse,
the error will print an empty string:
./pg_restore -d foo -F d dump
pg_restore: error: invalid line in large object TOC file "": ..
..instead of the intended error message:
./pg_restore -d foo -F d dump
pg_restore: error: invalid line in large object TOC file "dump/blobs.toc": ..
Fix by renaming both variables as the shared name was too generic to
store either and still convey what the variable held.
Backpatch all the way down to 9.6.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/A2B151F5-B32B-4F2C-BA4A-6870856D9BDE@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Make sure that the string parsing is limited by the size of the
destination buffer.
In pg_basebackup the available values sent from the server
is limited to two characters so there was no risk of overflow.
In pg_dump the buffer is bounded by MAXPGPATH, and thus the limit
must be inserted via preprocessor expansion and the buffer increased
by one to account for the terminator. There is no risk of overflow
here, since in this case, the buffer scanned is smaller than the
destination buffer.
Backpatch the pg_basebackup fix to 11 where it was introduced, and
the pg_dump fix all the way down to 9.6.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B14D3D7B-F98C-4E20-9459-C122C67647FB@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: 11 and 9.6
The grammar of this command run on indexes with column names has always
been authorized by the parser, and it has never been documented.
Since 911e702, it is possible to define opclass parameters as of CREATE
INDEX, which actually broke the old case of ALTER INDEX/TABLE where
relation-level parameters n_distinct and n_distinct_inherited could be
defined for an index (see 76a47c0 and its thread where this point has
been touched, still remained unused). Attempting to do that in v13~
would cause the index to become unusable, as there is a new dedicated
code path to load opclass parameters instead of the relation-level ones
previously available. Note that it is possible to fix things with a
manual catalog update to bring the relation back online.
This commit disables this command for now as the use of column names for
indexes does not make sense anyway, particularly when it comes to index
expressions where names are automatically computed. One way to properly
support this case properly in the future would be to use column numbers
when it comes to indexes, in the same way as ALTER INDEX .. ALTER COLUMN
.. SET STATISTICS.
Partitioned indexes were already blocked, but not indexes. Some tests
are added for both cases.
There was some code in ANALYZE to enforce n_distinct to be used for an
index expression if the parameter was defined, but just remove it for
now until/if there is support for this (note that index-level parameters
never had support in pg_dump either, previously), so this was just dead
code.
Reported-by: Matthijs van der Vleuten
Author: Nathan Bossart, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing, Dilip Kumar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17220-15d684c6c2171a83@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Failing to do that, any direct inserts/updates of those partitions
would fail to enforce the correct constraint, that is, one that
considers the new partition constraint of their parent table.
Backpatch to 10.
Reported by: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS3PR01MB5718DA1C4609A25186D1FBF194089%40OS3PR01MB5718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
During a replication slot creation, an ERROR generated in the same
transaction as the one creating a to-be-exported snapshot would have
left the backend in an inconsistent state, as the associated static
export snapshot state was not being reset on transaction abort, but only
on the follow-up command received by the WAL sender that created this
snapshot on replication slot creation. This would trigger inconsistency
failures if this session tried to export again a snapshot, like during
the creation of a replication slot.
Note that a snapshot export cannot happen in a transaction block, so
there is no need to worry resetting this state for subtransaction
aborts. Also, this inconsistent state would very unlikely show up to
users. For example, one case where this could happen is an
out-of-memory error when building the initial snapshot to-be-exported.
Dilip found this problem while poking at a different patch, that caused
an error in this code path for reasons unrelated to HEAD.
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Zhihong Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-s0zA1Kj0ozGHwkYkHwa5U0zUE94RSc_g81WrpcETB5=w@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6
It was clearly the intent to do so all along, but the original coding
fat-fingered this by checking the wrong array element. We fixed it
in passing in 403a3d91c, but that later got reverted, and we forgot
to keep this bug fix.
Most of the time this'd be relatively harmless, since once we lock
any of the partitioned table's leaf partitions, that would suffice
to prevent major DDL on the partitioned table itself. However, a
childless partitioned table would get dumped with no relevant lock
whatsoever, possibly allowing dump failure or inconsistent output.
Unlike 403a3d91c, there are no versioning concerns, since every server
version that has partitioned tables will allow you to lock one.
Back-patch to v10 where partitioned tables were introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1018205.1634346327@sss.pgh.pa.us
Tom Lane