Invalid indexes are suffixed with "_ccnew" or "_ccold". The
documentation missed to mention the initial underscore.
ChooseRelationName() may also append an extra number if indexes with a
similar name already exist; let's add a note about that too.
Author: Alec Cozens <acozens@pixelpower.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/174733277404.1455388.11471370288789479593@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
In the grammar, <expr> is a c_expr, which accepts only a limited set
of integer literals and simple expressions without parens. The
deparsing logic didn't quite match the grammar rule, and failed to use
parens e.g. for "5::bigint".
To fix, always surround the expression with parens. Would be nice to
omit the parens in simple cases, but unfortunately it's non-trivial to
detect such simple cases. Even if the expression is a simple literal
123 in the original query, after parse analysis it becomes a FuncExpr
with COERCE_IMPLICIT_CAST rather than a simple Const.
Reported-by: yonghao lee
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18929-077d6b7093b176e2@postgresql.org
Prevent moving the confirmed_flush backwards, as this could lead to data
duplication issues caused by replicating already replicated changes.
This can happen when a client acknowledges an LSN it doesn't have to do
anything for, and thus didn't store persistently. After a restart, the
client can send the prior LSN that it stored persistently as an
acknowledgement, but we need to ignore such an LSN to avoid retreating
confirm_flush LSN.
Diagnosed-by: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Author: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJpy0uDZ29P=BYB1JDWMCh-6wXaNqMwG1u1mB4=10Ly0x7HhwQ@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB57164AB5716AF2E477D53F6F9489A@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Per the letter of the C11 standard, one must #define
__STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ as 1 before including <string.h> in order to
have access to memset_s(). It appears that many platforms are lenient
about this, because we weren't doing it and yet the code appeared to
work anyway. But we now find that with -std=c11, macOS is strict and
doesn't declare memset_s, leading to compile failures since we try to
use it anyway. (Given the lack of prior reports, perhaps this is new
behavior in the latest SDK? No matter, we're clearly in the wrong.)
In addition to the immediate problem, which could be fixed merely by
adding the needed #define to explicit_bzero.c, it seems possible that
our configure-time probe for memset_s() could fail in case a platform
implements the function in some odd way due to this spec requirement.
This concern can be fixed in largely the same way that we dealt with
strchrnul() in 6da2ba1d8: switch to using a declaration-based
configure probe instead of a does-it-link probe.
Back-patch to v13 where we started using memset_s().
Reported-by: Lakshmi Narayana Velayudam <dev.narayana.v@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4pTnLcKGG78xeOjiBr5yS7ZeE-Rh=FaFQQGOO=nPzA1L8yEA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
This aligns the copyright and legal notice wordig with commit
a233a603ba and pgweb commit 2d764dbc083ab8. Backpatch down
to all supported versions.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/744E414E-3F52-404C-97FB-ED9B3AA37DC8@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: 13
In an XMLTABLE expression, columns can be marked NOT NULL, and the
parser internally fabricates an option named "is_not_null" to
represent this. However, the parser also allows users to specify
arbitrary option names. This creates a conflict: a user can
explicitly use "is_not_null" as an option name and assign it a
non-Boolean value, which violates internal assumptions and triggers an
assertion failure.
To fix, this patch checks whether a user-supplied name collides with
the internally reserved option name and raises an error if so.
Additionally, the internal name is renamed to "__pg__is_not_null" to
further reduce the risk of collision with user-defined names.
Reported-by: Евгений Горбанев <gorbanyoves@basealt.ru>
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6bac9886-65bf-4cec-96bd-e304159f28db@basealt.ru
Backpatch-through: 15
The documentation for log_check() had the parameters in the wrong
order. Also while there, rename %parameters to %params to better
documentation for similar functions which use %params. Backpatch
down to v14 where this was introduced.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9F503B5-32F2-45D7-A0AE-952879AD65F1@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: 14
Right now there's only one caller, so that this is merely
an exercise in shoving code from one module to another,
but there will shortly be another one. It seems better to
avoid having two copies of this highly-subject-to-change test.
Back-patch to v15, where we first introduced some tests that
don't work with LibreSSL.
Reported-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKG+fLqyweHqFSBcErueUVT0vDuSNWui-ySz3+d_APmq7dw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
With GB18030 as source encoding, applications could crash the server via
SQL functions convert() or convert_from(). Applications themselves
could crash after passing unterminated GB18030 input to libpq functions
PQescapeLiteral(), PQescapeIdentifier(), PQescapeStringConn(), or
PQescapeString(). Extension code could crash by passing unterminated
GB18030 input to jsonapi.h functions. All those functions have been
intended to handle untrusted, unterminated input safely.
A crash required allocating the input such that the last byte of the
allocation was the last byte of a virtual memory page. Some malloc()
implementations take measures against that, making the SIGSEGV hard to
reach. Back-patch to v13 (all supported versions).
Author: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Security: CVE-2025-4207
Start the file with static functions not specific to pe_test_vectors
tests. This way, new tests can use them without disrupting the file's
layout. Change report_result() PQExpBuffer arguments to plain strings.
Back-patch to v13 (all supported versions), for the next commit.
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Security: CVE-2025-4207
Also adjust the phrasing in the comments.
Author: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK17%3DPHSDZ%2B0G6jcj12buyyE1bQQc3sbp1Wxri7tODT-SDw%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
For self-referencing foreign keys in partitioned tables, we weren't
handling creation of pg_constraint rows during CREATE TABLE PARTITION AS
as well as ALTER TABLE ATTACH PARTITION. This is an old bug -- mostly,
we broke this in 614a406b4f while trying to fix it (so 12.13, 13.9,
14.6 and 15.0 and up all behave incorrectly). This commit reverts part
of that with additional fixes for full correctness, and installs more
tests to verify the parts we broke, not just the catalog contents but
also the user-visible behavior.
Backpatch to all live branches. In branches 13 and 14, commit
46a8c27a72 changed the behavior during DETACH to drop a FK
constraint rather than trying to repair it, because the complete fix of
repairing catalog constraints was problematic due to lack of previous
fixes. For this reason, the test behavior in those branches is a bit
different. However, as best as I can tell, the fix works correctly
there.
In release notes we have to recommend that all self-referencing foreign
keys on partitioned tables be recreated if partitions have been created
or attached after the FK was created, keeping in mind that violating
rows might already be present on the referencing side.
Reported-by: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
Reported-by: Matthew Gabeler-Lee <fastcat@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Luca Vallisa <luca.vallisa@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAECtzeWHCA+6tTcm2Oh2+g7fURUJpLZb-=pRXgeWJ-Pi+VU=_w@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18156-a44bc7096f0683e6@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAT=myvsiF-Attja5DcWoUWh21R12R-sfXECY2-3ynt8kaOqjw@mail.gmail.com
SQL "SET search_path = 'pg_catalog, pg_temp'" is silently equivalent to
"SET search_path = pg_temp, pg_catalog, "pg_catalog, pg_temp"" instead
of the intended "SET search_path = pg_catalog, pg_temp". (The intent
was a two-element search path. With the single quotes, it instead
specifies one element with a comma and a space in the middle of the
element.) In addition to the SET statement, this affects SET clauses of
CREATE FUNCTION, ALTER ROLE, and ALTER DATABASE. It does not affect the
set_config() SQL function.
Though the documentation did not show an insecure command, remove single
quotes that could entice a reader to write an insecure command.
Back-patch to v13 (all supported versions).
Reported-by: Sven Klemm <sven@timescale.com>
Author: Sven Klemm <sven@timescale.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Add a documentation warning to ts_headline() pointing out that, when
working with untrusted input documents, the output is not guaranteed
to be safe for direct inclusion in web pages. This is because, while
it does remove some XML tags from the input, it doesn't remove all
HTML markup, and so the result may be unsafe (e.g., it might permit
XSS attacks).
To guard against that, all HTML markup should be removed from the
input, making it plain text, or the output should be passed through an
HTML sanitizer.
In addition, document precisely what the default text search parser
recognises as valid XML tags, since that's what determines which XML
tags ts_headline() will remove.
Reported-by: Richard Neill <richard.neill@telos.digital>
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
DST law changes in Chile: there is a new time zone America/Coyhaique
for Chile's Aysén Region, to account for it changing to UTC-03
year-round and thus diverging from America/Santiago.
Historical corrections for Iran.
Backpatch-through: 13
During logical decoding, we advance catalog_xmin of logical too early in
fast_forward mode, resulting in required catalog data being removed by
vacuum. This mode is normally used to advance the slot without processing
the changes, but we still can't let the slot's xmin to advance to an
incorrect value.
Commit f49a80c481 fixed a similar issue where the logical slot's
catalog_xmin was getting advanced prematurely during non-fast-forward
mode. During xl_running_xacts processing, instead of directly advancing
the slot's xmin to the oldest running xid in the record, it allowed the
xmin to be held back for snapshots that can be used for
not-yet-replayed transactions, as those might consider older txns as
running too. However, it missed the fact that the same problem can happen
during fast_forward mode decoding, as we won't build a base snapshot in
that mode, and the future call to get_changes from the same slot can miss
seeing the required catalog changes leading to incorrect reslts.
This commit allows building the base snapshot even in fast_forward mode to
prevent the early advancement of xmin.
Reported-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LqWncUOqKijiafe+Ypt1gQAQRjctKLMY953J79xDBgAg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB57163087F86621D44D9A72BF94BB2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
One place in hash_create() used DynaHashAlloc() as a convenient
shorthand for MemoryContextAlloc(). That was fine when it was
written, but it stopped being fine when 9c911ec06 changed
DynaHashAlloc() to use MCXT_ALLOC_NO_OOM (mea culpa). Change
the code to call plain MemoryContextAlloc() as intended.
I think that this bug may be unreachable in practice, since we now
always create AllocSets with some space already allocated, so that
an OOM failure here for a non-shared hash table should be impossible
(with a hash table name of reasonable length anyway). And there
aren't enough shared hash tables to make a crash for one of those
probable. Nonetheless it's clearly not operating as designed, so
back-patch to v16 where 9c911ec06 came in.
Reported-by: Maksim Korotkov <m.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/219bdccd460510efaccf90b57e5e5ef2@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 16
Commit 3f28b2fcac tried to ensure that the replication origin shouldn't be
advanced in case of an ERROR in the apply worker, so that it can request
the same data again after restart. However, it is possible that an ERROR
was caught and handled by a (say PL/pgSQL) function, and the apply worker
continues to apply further changes, in which case, we shouldn't reset the
replication origin.
Ensure to reset the origin only when the apply worker exits after an
ERROR.
Commit 3f28b2fcac added new function geterrlevel, which we removed in HEAD
as part of this commit, but kept it in backbranches to avoid breaking any
applications. A separate case can be made to have such a function even for
HEAD.
Reported-by: Shawn McCoy <shawn.the.mccoy@gmail.com>
Author: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 16, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALsgZNCGARa2mcYNVTSj9uoPcJo-tPuWUGECReKpNgTpo31_Pw@mail.gmail.com
This assertion, based on pending_since (timestamp used to prevent stats
reports to be too frequent or should a partial flush happen), is reached
when it is found that no data can be flushed but a previous call of
pgstat_report_stat() determined that some stats data has been found as
in need of a flush. So pending_since is set when some stats data is
pending (in non-force mode) or if report attempts are too frequent, and
reset to 0 once all stats have been flushed.
Since 5cbbe70a9c, WAL senders have begun to report their stats on a
periodic basis for IO stats in v16~ and backend stats on HEAD, creating
some friction with the concurrent pgstat_report_stat() calls that can
happen in the context of a WAL sender (shutdown callback doing a final
report or backend-related code paths). This problem is the cause of
spurious failures in the TAP tests.
In theory, this assertion can be also reached in v15, even if that's
very unlikely. For example, a process, say a background worker, could
do periodic and direct stats flushes with concurrent calls of
pgstat_report_stat() that could cause conflicting values of
pending_since. This can be done with WAL or SLRU stats flushes using
pgstat_flush_wal() or pgstat_slru_flush(). HEAD makes this situation
easier to happen with custom cumulative stats.
This commit removes the assertion altogether, per discussion, as it is
more useful to keep the state of things as they are for the WAL sender.
The assertion could use a special state based on for example
am_walsender, but I doubt that this would be meaningful in the long run
based on the other arguments raised while discussing this issue.
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1489124.1744685908@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dwrkeszz6czvtkxzr5mqlciy652zau5qqnm3cp5f3p2po74ppk@omg4g3cc6dgq
Backpatch-through: 15
v14 commit 1f95181b44 and its v13
equivalent caused timing-dependent failures in archive recovery, at
restartpoints. The symptom was "invalid magic number 0000 in log
segment X, offset 0", "unexpected pageaddr X in log segment Y, offset 0"
[X < Y], or an assertion failure. Commit
3635a0a35a and predecessors back-patched
v15 changes to fix that. This test reproduces the problem
probabilistically, typically in less than 1000 iterations of the test.
Hence, buildfarm and CI runs would have surfaced enough failures to get
attention within a day.
Reported-by: Arun Thirupathi <arunth@google.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20250306193013.36.nmisch@google.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Commit 7102070329 fixed a similar bug, but
it missed the case of database-wide ANALYZE ("use_own_xacts" mode).
Commit a07e03fd8f changed consequences
from silent discard of a pg_class stats (relpages et al.) update to
ERROR "tuple to be updated was already modified". Losing a relpages
update of an ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS table was negligible, but a
COMMIT-time error isn't negligible. Back-patch to v13 (all supported
versions).
Reported-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com
Reported-by: Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-XwMKMKJ_GT=p3_-_=j9rQSEs1FbDFUnW9zHuKPsPNEQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
1349d2790 added support so that aggregate functions with an ORDER BY or
DISTINCT clause could make use of presorted inputs to avoid an implicit
sort within nodeAgg.c. That commit failed to consider that a FILTER
clause may exist that filters rows before the aggregate function
arguments are evaluated. That can be problematic if an aggregate
argument contains an expression which could error out during evaluation.
It's perfectly valid to want to have a FILTER clause which eliminates
such values, and with the pre-sorted path added in 1349d2790, it was
possible that the planner would produce a plan with a Sort node above
the Aggregate to perform the sort on the aggregate's arguments long before
the Aggregate node would filter out the non-matching values.
Here we fix this by inspecting ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregate functions
which have a FILTER clause to see if the aggregate's arguments are
anything more complex than a Var or a Const. Evaluating these isn't
going to cause an error. If we find any non-Var, non-Const parameters
then the planner will now opt to perform the sort in the Aggregate node
for these aggregates, i.e. disable the presorted aggregate optimization.
An alternative fix would have been to completely disallow the presorted
optimization for Aggrefs with any FILTER clause, but that wasn't done as
that could cause large performance regressions for queries that see
significant gains from 1349d2790 due to presorted results coming in from
an Index Scan.
Backpatch to 16, where 1349d2790 was introduced
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Kaimeh <kkaimeh@gmail.com>
Diagnosed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAK-%2BJz9J%3DQ06-M7cDJoPNeYbz5EZDqkjQbJnmRyQyzkbRGsYkA%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 16
The original intent in heap_page_items() was to return nulls, not
throw an error or crash, if an item was sufficiently corrupt that
we couldn't safely extract data from it. However, commit d6061f83a
utterly missed that memo, and not only put in an un-length-checked
copy of the tuple's data section, but also managed to break the check
on sane nulls-bitmap length. Either mistake could possibly lead to
a SIGSEGV crash if the tuple is corrupt.
Bug: #18896
Reported-by: Dmitry Kovalenko <d.kovalenko@postgrespro.ru>
Author: Dmitry Kovalenko <d.kovalenko@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18896-add267b8e06663e3@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
We'd try to drop the partitions of a partitioned index separately,
which is disallowed by the backend, leading to an error during
restore. While the error is harmless, it causes problems if you
try to use --single-transaction mode.
Fortunately, there seems no need to do a DROP at all, since the
partition will go away silently when we drop either the parent index
or the partition's table. So just make the DROP conditional on not
being a partition.
Reported-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Author: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxF0QSdkjFKF4di-JGWN6CSdQYEAhGPmQJJCdkSZtd=oLg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
If a GENERATED column is declared to have a domain data type where
the domain's constraints disallow null values, INSERT commands failed
because we built a targetlist that included coercing a null constant
to the domain's type. The failure occurred even when the generated
value would have been perfectly OK. This is adjacent to the issues
fixed in 0da39aa76, but we didn't notice for lack of testing a domain
with such a constraint.
We aren't going to use the result of the targetlist entry for the
generated column --- ExecComputeStoredGenerated will overwrite it.
So it's not really necessary that it have the exact datatype of
the generated column. This patch fixes the problem by changing
the targetlist entry to be a null Const of the domain's base type,
which should be sufficiently legal. (We do have to tweak
ExecCheckPlanOutput to accept the situation, though.)
This has been broken since we implemented generated columns.
However, this patch only applies easily as far back as v14, partly
because I (tgl) only carried 0da39aa76 back that far, but mostly
because v14 significantly refactored the handling of INSERT/UPDATE
targetlists. Given the lack of field complaints and the short
remaining support lifetime of v13, I judge the cost-benefit ratio
not good for devising a version that would work in v13.
Reported-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Author: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxG59tip2+9h=rEv-ykOFjt0cbsPVchhi0RTij8bABBA0Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
Commit 0f21db36d made an assumption that GIN triConsistentFns
would not modify their input entryRes[] arrays. But in fact,
the "shim" triConsistentFn that we use for opclasses that don't
supply their own did exactly that, potentially leading to wrong
answers from a GIN index search. Through bad luck, none of the
test cases that we have for such opclasses exposed the bug.
One response to this could be that the assumption of consistency check
functions not modifying entryRes[] arrays is a bad one, but it still
seems reasonable to me. Notably, shimTriConsistentFn is itself
assuming that with respect to the underlying boolean consistentFn,
so it's sure being self-centered in supposing that it gets to do so.
Fortunately, it's quite simple to fix shimTriConsistentFn to restore
the entry-time state of entryRes[], so let's do that instead.
This issue doesn't affect any core GIN opclasses, since they all
supply their own triConsistentFns. It does affect contrib modules
btree_gin, hstore, and intarray.
Along the way, I (tgl) noticed that shimTriConsistentFn failed to
pick up on a "recheck" flag returned by its first call to the boolean
consistentFn. This may be only a latent problem, since it would be
unlikely for a consistentFn to set recheck for the all-false case
and not any other cases. (Indeed, none of our contrib modules do
that.) Nonetheless, it's formally wrong.
Reported-by: Vinod Sridharan <vsridh90@gmail.com>
Author: Vinod Sridharan <vsridh90@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFMdLD7XzsXfi1+DpTqTgrD8XU0i2C99KuF=5VHLWjx4C1pkcg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
synchronous_standby_names cannot be reloaded safely by backends, and the
checkpointer is in charge of updating a state in shared memory if the
GUC is enabled in WalSndCtl, to let the backends know if they should
wait or not for a given LSN. This provides a strict control on the
timing of the waiting queues if the GUC is enabled or disabled, then
reloaded. The checkpointer is also in charge of waking up the backends
that could be waiting for a LSN when the GUC is disabled.
This logic had a race condition at startup, where it would be possible
for backends to not wait for a LSN even if synchronous_standby_names is
enabled. This would cause visibility issues with transactions that we
should be waiting for but they were not. The problem lasts until the
checkpointer does its initial update of the shared memory state when it
loads synchronous_standby_names.
In order to take care of this problem, the shared memory state in
WalSndCtl is extended to detect if it has been initialized by the
checkpointer, and not only check if synchronous_standby_names is
defined. In WalSndCtlData, sync_standbys_defined is renamed to
sync_standbys_status, a bits8 able to know about two states:
- If the shared memory state has been initialized. This flag is set by
the checkpointer at startup once, and never removed.
- If synchronous_standby_names is known as defined in the shared memory
state. This is the same as the previous sync_standbys_defined in
WalSndCtl.
This method gives a way for backends to decide what they should do until
the shared memory area is initialized, and they now ultimately fall back
to a check on the GUC value in this case, which is the best thing that
can be done.
Fortunately, SyncRepUpdateSyncStandbysDefined() is called immediately by
the checkpointer when this process starts, so the window is very narrow.
It is possible to enlarge the problematic window by making the
checkpointer wait at the beginning of SyncRepUpdateSyncStandbysDefined()
with a hardcoded sleep for example, and doing so has showed that a 2PC
visibility test is indeed failing. On machines slow enough, this bug
would cause spurious failures.
In 17~, we have looked at the possibility of adding an injection point
to have a reproducible test, but as the problematic window happens at
early startup, we would need to invent a way to make an injection point
optionally persistent across restarts when attached, something that
would be fine for this case as it would involve the checkpointer. This
issue is quite old, and can be reproduced on all the stable branches.
Author: Melnikov Maksim <m.melnikov@postgrespro.ru>
Co-authored-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/163fcbec-900b-4b07-beaa-d2ead8634bec@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 13
It's been twenty years since we generated constraint names that
look like "$N". So this advice about double-quoting such names
is well past its sell-by date, and now it merely seems confusing.
Reported-by: Yaroslav Saburov <y.saburov@gmail.com>
Author: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/174393459040.678.17810152410419444783@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
Data loss can happen when the DDLs like ALTER PUBLICATION ... ADD TABLE ...
or ALTER TYPE ... that don't take a strong lock on table happens
concurrently to DMLs on the tables involved in the DDL. This happens
because logical decoding doesn't distribute invalidations to concurrent
transactions and those transactions use stale cache data to decode the
changes. The problem becomes bigger because we keep using the stale cache
even after those in-progress transactions are finished and skip the
changes required to be sent to the client.
This commit fixes the issue by distributing invalidation messages from
catalog-modifying transactions to all concurrent in-progress transactions.
This allows the necessary rebuild of the catalog cache when decoding new
changes after concurrent DDL.
We observed performance regression primarily during frequent execution of
*publication DDL* statements that modify the published tables. The
regression is minor or nearly nonexistent for DDLs that do not affect the
published tables or occur infrequently, making this a worthwhile cost to
resolve a longstanding data loss issue.
An alternative approach considered was to take a strong lock on each
affected table during publication modification. However, this would only
address issues related to publication DDLs (but not the ALTER TYPE ...)
and require locking every relation in the database for publications
created as FOR ALL TABLES, which is impractical.
The bug exists in all supported branches, but we are backpatching till 14.
The fix for 13 requires somewhat bigger changes than this fix, so the fix
for that branch is still under discussion.
Reported-by: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
Reported-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Author: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Author: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Benoit Lobréau <benoit.lobreau@dalibo.com>
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/de52b282-1166-1180-45a2-8d8917ca74c6@enterprisedb.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoAenVqiMjpN-PvGHL1N9DWnHSq673bfgr6phmBUzx=kLQ@mail.gmail.com
Some tests try to invalidate logical slots on the standby server by
running VACUUM on the primary. The problem is that xl_running_xacts was
getting generated and replayed before the VACUUM command, leading to the
advancement of the active slot's catalog_xmin. Due to this, active slots
were not getting invalidated, leading to test failures.
We fix it by skipping the generation of xl_running_xacts for the required
tests with the help of injection points. As the required interface for
injection points was not present in back branches, we fixed the failing
tests in them by disallowing the slot to become active for the required
cases (where rows_removed conflict could be generated).
Author: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 16, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Z6oQXc8LmiTLfwLA@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
WAL senders do not flush their statistics until they exit, limiting the
monitoring possible for live processes. This is penalizing when WAL
senders are running for a long time, like in streaming or logical
replication setups, because it is not possible to know the amount of IO
they generate while running.
This commit makes WAL senders more aggressive with their statistics
flush, using an internal of 1 second, with the flush timing calculated
based on the existing GetCurrentTimestamp() done before the sleeps done
to wait for some activity. Note that the sleep done for logical and
physical WAL senders happens in two different code paths, so the stats
flushes need to happen in these two places.
One test is added for the physical WAL sender case, and one for the
logical WAL sender case. This can be done in a stable fashion by
relying on the WAL generated by the TAP tests in combination with a
stats reset while a server is running, but only on HEAD as WAL data has
been added to pg_stat_io in a051e71e28.
This issue exists since a9c70b46db and the introduction of pg_stat_io,
so backpatch down to v16.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Z73IsKBceoVd4t55@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Backpatch-through: 16
Clarify the project naming in the history section of the docs
to match the recent license preamble changes.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+OCxozLzK2+Jc14XZyWXSp6L9Ot+3efwXUE35FJG=fsbib2EA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
makeDependencyGraphWalker thought that only SelectStmt nodes could
contain a WithClause. Which was true in our original implementation
of WITH, but astonishingly we missed updating this code when we added
the ability to attach WITH to INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE (and later MERGE).
Moreover, since it was coded to deliberately block recursion to a
WithClause, even updating raw_expression_tree_walker didn't save it.
The upshot of this was that we didn't see references to outer CTE
names appearing within an inner WITH, and would neither complain about
disallowed recursion nor account for such references when sorting CTEs
into a usable order. The lack of complaints about this is perhaps not
so surprising, because typical usage of WITH wouldn't hit either case.
Still, it's pretty broken; failing to detect recursion here leads to
assert failures or worse later on.
Fix by factoring out the processing of sub-WITHs into a new function
WalkInnerWith, and invoking that for all the statement types that
can have WITH.
Bug: #18878
Reported-by: Yu Liang <luy70@psu.edu>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18878-a26fa5ab6be2f2cf@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
transformJsonArrayQueryConstructor() applied transformStmt() to
the same subquery tree twice. While this causes no issue in many
cases, there are some where it causes a coredump, thanks to the
parser's habit of scribbling on its input.
Fix by making a copy before the first transformation (compare
0f43083d1). This is quite brute-force, but then so is the
whole business of transforming the input twice. Per discussion
in the bug thread, this implementation of json_array() parsing
should be replaced completely. But that will take some work
and will surely not be back-patchable, so for the moment let's
take the easy way out.
Oversight in 7081ac46a. Back-patch to v16 where that came in.
Bug: #18877
Reported-by: Yu Liang <luy70@psu.edu>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18877-c3c3ad75845833bb@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 16
Since v15 we've had an option to apply a foreign key constraint's
ON DELETE SET DEFAULT or SET NULL action to just some of the
referencing columns. There was not a check for duplicate entries in
the list of columns-to-set, though. That caused a potential memory
stomp in CreateConstraintEntry(), which incautiously assumed that
the list of columns-to-set couldn't be longer than the number of key
columns. Even after fixing that, the case doesn't work because you
get an error like "multiple assignments to same column" from the SQL
command that is generated to do the update.
We could either raise an error for duplicate columns or silently
suppress the dups, and after a bit of thought I chose to do the
latter. This is motivated by the fact that duplicates in the FK
column list are legal, so it's not real clear why duplicates
in the columns-to-set list shouldn't be. Of course there's no
need to actually set the column more than once.
I left in the fix in CreateConstraintEntry() too, just because
it didn't seem like such low-level code ought to be making
assumptions about what it's handed.
Bug: #18879
Reported-by: Yu Liang <luy70@psu.edu>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18879-259fc59d072bd4d7@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 15
Commit 28d3c2ddcf introduced an assertion that if the memorized
downlink location in the insertion stack isn't valid, the parent's
LSN should've changed too. Turns out that was too strict. In
gistFindCorrectParent(), if we walk right, we update the parent's
block number and clear its memorized 'downlinkoffnum'. That triggered
the assertion on next call to gistFindCorrectParent(), if the parent
needed to be split too. Relax the assertion, so that it's OK if
downlinkOffnum is InvalidOffsetNumber.
Backpatch to v13-, all supported versions. The assertion was added in
commit 28d3c2ddcf in v12.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18396-03cac9beb2f7aac3@postgresql.org
The documentation for the special value "system" for sslrootcert could
be misinterpreted to mean the default operating system CA store, which
it may be, but it's defined to be the default CA store of the SSL lib
used.
Backpatch down to v16 where support for the system value was added.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: George MacKerron <george@mackerron.co.uk>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B3CBBAA3-6EA3-4AB7-8619-4BBFAB93DDB4@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: 16
The regression test for logical decoding verifies whether a logical slot
is correctly dropped on a standby when its associated database is dropped.
However, the test mistakenly retrieved slot information from the primary
instead of the standby, causing incorrect behavior.
This commit fixes the issue by ensuring the test correctly checks the slot
on the standby.
Back-patch to all supported versions.
Author: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1fdfd020-a509-403c-bd8f-a04664aba148@oss.nttdata.com
Backpatch-through: 13
The regression tests for logical decoding verify whether a logical slot
exists or has been dropped. Previously, these tests attempted to
retrieve "slot_name" from the result of slot(), but since "slot_name" was
not included in the result, slot()->{'slot_name'} always returned undef,
leading to incorrect behavior.
This commit fixes the issue by checking the "plugin" field in the result
of slot() instead, ensuring the tests properly verify slot existence.
Back-patch to all supported versions.
Author: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSCPR01MB149667EC4E738769CA80B7EA5F5AE2@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Previously, invalidated logical and physical replication slots could
be copied using the pg_copy_logical_replication_slot and
pg_copy_physical_replication_slot functions. Replication slots that
were invalidated for reasons other than WAL removal retained their
restart_lsn. This meant that a new slot copied from an invalidated
slot could have a restart_lsn pointing to a WAL segment that might
have already been removed.
This commit restricts the copying of invalidated replication slots.
Backpatch to v16, where slots could retain their restart_lsn when
invalidated for reasons other than WAL removal.
For v15 and earlier, this check is not required since slots can only
be invalidated due to WAL removal, and existing checks already handle
this issue.
Author: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANhcyEU65aH0VYnLiu%3DOhNNxhnhNhwcXBeT-jvRe1OiJTo_Ayg%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 16
Michael Paquier