The conditions listed in this comment have changed several times, and at
some point the thing that the "if so" referred to was negated.
The text was OK up to 9.6. It was differently wrong in v10, v11 and
master, so fix in all those versions.
The term "item pointer" should not be used to refer to ItemIdData
variables, since that is needlessly ambiguous. Only
ItemPointerData/ItemPointer variables should be called item pointers.
To fix, establish the convention that ItemIdData variables should always
be referred to either as "item identifiers" or "line pointers". The
term "item identifier" already predominates in docs and translatable
messages, and so should be the preferred alternative there.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=c=MZQjUzde3o9+2PLAPuHTpVZPPdYxN=E4ndQ2--8ew@mail.gmail.com
An upcoming HEAD-only patch will standardize the terminology around
ItemIdData variables/line pointers, ending the practice of referring to
them as "item pointers". Make the "Database Page Layout" docs
consistent with the new policy. The term "item identifier" is already
used in the same section, so stick with that.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=c=MZQjUzde3o9+2PLAPuHTpVZPPdYxN=E4ndQ2--8ew@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: All supported branches.
Only hand-assigned type OIDs should be presumed to match across different
PG servers; those assigned during genbki.pl or during initdb are likely
to change due to addition or removal of unrelated objects.
This means that the cutoff should be FirstGenbkiObjectId (in HEAD)
or FirstBootstrapObjectId (before that), not FirstNormalObjectId.
Compare postgres_fdw's is_builtin() test.
It's likely that this error has no observable consequence in a
normally-functioning system, since ATM the only affected type OIDs are
system catalog rowtypes and information_schema types, which would not
typically be interesting for logical replication. But you could
probably break it if you tried hard, so back-patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15150.1557257111@sss.pgh.pa.us
The FirstNormalObjectId test here is a kluge that needs to go away,
but the only substitute we can think of is to add a column to pg_class,
which will take more work than can be handled right now. Add some
commentary in the meanwhile.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15150.1557257111@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit 8fa30f906b reduced the elevel of a number of "can't happen"
_bt_split() errors from PANIC to ERROR. At the same time, the new right
page buffer for the split could continue to be acquired well before the
critical section. This was possible because it was relatively
straightforward to make sure that _bt_split() could not throw an error,
with a few specific exceptions. The exceptional cases were safe because
they involved specific, well understood errors, making it possible to
consistently zero the right page before actually raising an error using
elog(). There was no danger of leaving around a junk page, provided
_bt_split() stuck to this coding rule.
Commit 8224de4f, which introduced INCLUDE indexes, added code to make
_bt_split() truncate away non-key attributes. This happened at a point
that broke the rule around zeroing the right page in _bt_split(). If
truncation failed (perhaps due to palloc() failure), that would result
in an errant right page buffer with junk contents. This could confuse
VACUUM when it attempted to delete the page, and should be avoided on
general principle.
To fix, reorganize _bt_split() so that truncation occurs before the new
right page buffer is even acquired. A junk page/buffer will not be left
behind if _bt_nonkey_truncate()/_bt_truncate() raise an error.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkcWT_-NH7EeL=Az4efg0KCV+wArygW8zKB=+HoP=VWMw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 11-, where INCLUDE indexes were introduced.
pgtls_read_pending is declared to return bool, but what the underlying
SSL_pending function returns is a count of available bytes.
This is actually somewhat harmless if we're using C99 bools, but in
the back branches it's a live bug: if the available-bytes count happened
to be a multiple of 256, it would get converted to a zero char value.
On machines where char is signed, counts of 128 and up could misbehave
as well. The net effect is that when using SSL, libpq might block
waiting for data even though some has already been received.
Broken by careless refactoring in commit 4e86f1b16, so back-patch
to 9.5 where that came in.
Per bug #15802 from David Binderman.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15802-f0911a97f0346526@postgresql.org
equalsJsonbScalarValue() uses a boolean as return type, however for one
code path -1 gets returned, which is confusing. The origin of the
confusion is visibly that this code got copy-pasted from
compareJsonbScalarValue() since it has been introduced in d1d50bf.
No backpatch, as this is only cosmetic.
Author: Rikard Falkeborn
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADRDgG7mJnek6HNW13f+LF6V=6gag9PM+P7H5dnyWZAv49aBGg@mail.gmail.com
A bounded quantifier with m = n = 1 might be thought a no-op. But
according to our documentation (which traces back to Henry Spencer's
original man page) it still imposes greediness, or non-greediness in the
case of the non-greedy variant "{1,1}?", on whatever it's attached to.
This turns out not to work though, because parseqatom() optimizes away
the m = n = 1 case without regard for whether it's supposed to change
the greediness of the argument RE.
We can fix this by just not applying the optimization when the greediness
needs to change; the subsequent general cases handle it fine.
The three cases in which we can still apply the optimization are
(a) no quantifier, or quantifier does not impose a preference;
(b) atom has no greediness property, implying it cannot match a
variable amount of text anyway; or
(c) quantifier's greediness is same as atom's.
Note that in most cases where one of these applies, we'd have exited
earlier in the "not a messy case" fast path. I think it's now only
possible to get to the optimization when the atom involves capturing
parentheses or a non-top-level backref.
Back-patch to all supported branches. I'd ordinarily be hesitant to
put a subtle behavioral change into back branches, but in this case
it's very hard to see a reason why somebody would write "{1,1}?" unless
they're trying to get the documented change-of-greediness behavior.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5bb27a41-350d-37bf-901e-9d26f5592dd0@charter.net
The function had been interpreting SQL_ASCII messages as UTF8, throwing
an error when they were invalid UTF8. The new behavior is consistent
with pg_do_encoding_conversion(). This affects LOG_DESTINATION_STDERR
and LOG_DESTINATION_EVENTLOG, which will send untranslated bytes to
write() and ReportEventA(). On buildfarm member bowerbird, enabling
log_connections caused an error whenever the role name was not valid
UTF8. Back-patch to 9.4 (all supported versions).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190512015615.GD1124997@rfd.leadboat.com
We long ago decided to design the shared PgBackendStatus data structure to
minimize the cost of writing status updates, which means that writers just
have to increment the st_changecount field twice. That isn't hooked into
any sort of resource management mechanism, which means that if something
were to throw error between the two increments, the st_changecount field
would be left odd indefinitely. That would cause readers to lock up.
Now, since it's also a bad idea to leave the field odd for longer than
absolutely necessary (because readers will spin while we have it set),
the expectation was that we'd treat these segments like spinlock critical
sections, with only short, more or less straight-line, code in them.
That was fine as originally designed, but commit 9029f4b37 broke it
by inserting a significant amount of non-straight-line code into
pgstat_bestart(), code that is very capable of throwing errors, not to
mention taking a significant amount of time during which readers will spin.
We have a report from Neeraj Kumar of readers actually locking up, which
I suspect was due to an encoding conversion error in X509_NAME_to_cstring,
though conceivably it was just a garden-variety OOM failure.
Subsequent commits have loaded even more dubious code into pgstat_bestart's
critical section (and commit fc70a4b0d deserves some kind of booby prize
for managing to miss the critical section entirely, although the negative
consequences seem minimal given that the PgBackendStatus entry should be
seen by readers as inactive at that point).
The right way to fix this mess seems to be to compute all these values
into a local copy of the process' PgBackendStatus struct, and then just
copy the data back within the critical section proper. This plan can't
be implemented completely cleanly because of the struct's heavy reliance
on out-of-line strings, which we must initialize separately within the
critical section. But still, the critical section is far smaller and
safer than it was before.
In hopes of forestalling future errors of the same ilk, rename the
macros for st_changecount management to make it more apparent that
the writer-side macros create a critical section. And to prevent
the worst consequences if we nonetheless manage to mess it up anyway,
adjust those macros so that they really are a critical section, ie
they now bump CritSectionCount. That doesn't add much overhead, and
it guarantees that if we do somehow throw an error while the counter
is odd, it will lead to PANIC and a database restart to reset shared
memory.
Back-patch to 9.5 where the problem was introduced.
In HEAD, also fix an oversight in commit b0b39f72b: it failed to teach
pgstat_read_current_status to copy st_gssstatus data from shared memory to
local memory. Hence, subsequent use of that data within the transaction
would potentially see changing data that it shouldn't see.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPR3Wj5Z17=+eeyrn_ZDG3NQGYgMEOY6JV6Y-WRRhGgwc16U3Q@mail.gmail.com
The buildfarm client uses TEMP_CONFIG to implement its extra_config
setting. Except for stats_temp_directory, extra_config now applies to
TAP suites; extra_config values seen in the past month are compatible
with this. Back-patch to 9.6, where PostgresNode was introduced, so the
buildfarm can rely on it sooner.
Reviewed by Andrew Dunstan and Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181229021950.GA3302966@rfd.leadboat.com
When failing to reindex a table or an index, reindexdb would generate an
extra error message related to a database failure, which is misleading.
Backpatch all the way down, as this has been introduced by 85e9a5a0.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_Yo61RwNO3cW6WVYWwH7EYMPuexhKqufb2nFGOdunbcHw@mail.gmail.com
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson, Álvaro Herrera, Tom Lane, Michael
Paquier
Backpatch-through: 9.4
As none of the approaches for avoiding the deadlock issues seem
promising enough, and all the expected reindex related changes have
been made, apply 60c2951e1b to master as well.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4622.1556982247@sss.pgh.pa.us
There's a very old race condition in our code to see whether a pre-existing
shared memory segment is still in use by a conflicting postmaster: it's
possible for the other postmaster to remove the segment in between our
shmctl() and shmat() calls. It's a narrow window, and there's no risk
unless both postmasters are using the same port number, but that's possible
during parallelized "make check" tests. (Note that while the TAP tests
take some pains to choose a randomized port number, pg_regress doesn't.)
If it does happen, we treated that as an unexpected case and errored out.
To fix, allow EINVAL to be treated as segment-not-present, and the same
for EIDRM on Linux. AFAICS, the considerations here are basically
identical to the checks for acceptable shmctl() failures, so I documented
and coded it that way.
While at it, adjust PGSharedMemoryAttach's API to remove its undocumented
dependency on UsedShmemSegAddr in favor of passing the attach address
explicitly. This makes it easier to be sure we're using a null shmaddr
when probing for segment conflicts (thus avoiding questions about what
EINVAL means). I don't think there was a bug there, but it required
fragile assumptions about the state of UsedShmemSegAddr during
PGSharedMemoryIsInUse.
Commit c09850992 may have made this failure more probable by applying
the conflicting-segment tests more often. Hence, back-patch to all
supported branches, as that was.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22224.1557340366@sss.pgh.pa.us
The description of the lock type for speculative insertions was
incorrect, being copy-pasted from another one.
As discussed, also move the description for all the fields of lock tag
types from the structure listing lock tag types to the set of macros
setting each LOCKTAG.
Author: John Naylor
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACPNZCtA0-ybaC4fFfaDq_8p_TUOLvGxZH9Dm-=TMHZJarBa7Q@mail.gmail.com
This improves the user experience when it comes to restrict several
flavors of REINDEX CONCURRENTLY. First, for INDEX, remove a restriction
on shared relations as we already check after catalog relations. Then,
for TABLE, add a proper error message when attempting to run the command
on system catalogs. The code path of CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY already
complains about that, but if a REINDEX is issued then then the error
generated is confusing.
While on it, add more tests to check restrictions on catalog indexes and
on toast table/index for catalogs. Some error messages are improved,
with wording suggestion coming from Tom Lane.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/23694.1556806002@sss.pgh.pa.us
create_merge_append_plan failed to honor the CP_EXACT_TLIST flag:
it would generate the expected targetlist but then it felt free to
add resjunk sort targets to it. This demonstrably leads to assertion
failures in v11 and HEAD, and it's probably just accidental that we
don't see the same in older branches. I've not looked into whether
there would be any real-world consequences in non-assert builds.
In HEAD, create_append_plan has sprouted the same problem, so fix
that too (although we do not have any test cases that seem able to
reach that bug). This is an oversight in commit 3fc6e2d7f which
invented the CP_EXACT_TLIST flag, so back-patch to 9.6 where that
came in.
convert_subquery_pathkeys would create pathkeys for subquery output
values if they match any EquivalenceClass known in the outer query
and are available in the subquery's syntactic targetlist. However,
the second part of that condition is wrong, because such values might
not appear in the subquery relation's reltarget list, which would
mean that they couldn't be accessed above the level of the subquery
scan. We must check that they appear in the reltarget list, instead.
This can lead to dropping knowledge about the subquery's sort
ordering, but I believe it's okay, because any sort key that the
outer query actually has any interest in would appear in the
reltarget list.
This second issue is of very long standing, but right now there's no
evidence that it causes observable problems before 9.6, so I refrained
from back-patching further than that. We can revisit that choice if
somebody finds a way to make it cause problems in older branches.
(Developing useful test cases for these issues is really problematic;
fixing convert_subquery_pathkeys removes the only known way to exhibit
the create_merge_append_plan bug, and neither of the test cases added
by this patch causes a problem in all branches, even when considering
the issues separately.)
The second issue explains bug #15795 from Suresh Kumar R ("could not
find pathkey item to sort" with nested DISTINCT queries). I stumbled
across the first issue while investigating that.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15795-fadb56c8e44ee73c@postgresql.org
In commit 7012b132d0, which added support for aggregate pushdown in
postgres_fdw, the expense of evaluating the final scan/join target
computed by make_group_input_target() was not accounted for at all in
costing aggregate pushdown paths with local statistics. The right fix
for this would be to have a separate upper stage to adjust the final
scan/join relation (see comments for apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths());
but for now, fix by adding the tlist eval cost when costing aggregate
pushdown paths with local statistics.
Apply this to HEAD only to avoid destabilizing existing plan choices.
Author: Etsuro Fujita
Reviewed-By: Antonin Houska
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5C66A056.60007%40lab.ntt.co.jp
Commit bb16aba50 broke the code that maintains SxactGlobalXmin. It
could get stuck when a well-timed READ ONLY transaction runs. If
SxactGlobalXmin stops advancing, transactions on the
FinishedSerializableTransactions queue are never cleaned up, so
resources are effectively leaked. Revert that hunk of the commit.
Also revert another similar hunk that was probably harmless, but
unnecessary and unjustified, relating to the DOOMED flag in case of
RO_SAFE early release.
Author: Thomas Munro
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16170.1557251214%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Heikki Linnakangas