Mistakenly relreplident was stored as a bool. That works today as c.h
typedefs bool to a char, but isn't very future proof.
Discussion: 20150812084351.GD8470@awork2.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 9.4 where replica identity was introduced.
This fixes presentation of non-ASCII messages to the Windows event log
and console in rare cases involving Korean locale. Processes like the
postmaster and checkpointer, but not processes attached to databases,
were affected. Back-patch to 9.4, where MessageEncoding was introduced.
The problem exists in all supported versions, but this change has no
effect in the absence of the code recognizing PG_UHC MessageEncoding.
Noticed while investigating bug #13427 from Dmitri Bourlatchkov.
Commit 49c817eab7 replaced with a hard
error the dubious pg_do_encoding_conversion() behavior when outside a
transaction. Reintroduce the historic soft failure locally within
pgwin32_message_to_UTF16(). This fixes errors when writing messages in
less-common encodings to the Windows event log or console. Back-patch
to 9.4, where the aforementioned commit first appeared.
Per bug #13427 from Dmitri Bourlatchkov.
This time, instead of using a core isolation test, put it on its own
test module; this way it can require the pageinspect module to be
present before running.
The module's Makefile is loosely modeled after test_decoding's, so that
it's easy to add further tests for either pg_regress or isolationtester
later.
Backpatch to 9.5.
In commit 95f4e59c32 I added a regression test case that examined
the plan of a query on system catalogs. That isn't a terribly great idea
because the catalogs tend to change from version to version, or even
within a version if someone makes an unrelated regression-test change that
populates the catalogs a bit differently. Usually I try to make planner
test cases rely on test tables that have not changed since Berkeley days,
but I got sloppy in this case because the submitted crasher example queried
the catalogs and I didn't spend enough time on rewriting it. But it was a
problem waiting to happen, as I was rudely reminded when I tried to port
that patch into Salesforce's Postgres variant :-(. So spend a little more
effort and rewrite the query to not use any system catalogs. I verified
that this version still provokes the Assert if 95f4e59c32866716's code fix
is reverted.
I also removed the EXPLAIN output from the test, as it turns out that the
assertion occurs while considering a plan that isn't the one ultimately
selected anyway; so there's no value in risking any cross-platform
variation in that printout.
Back-patch to 9.2, like the previous patch.
This function was using the single-value-per-call mechanism, but the
code relied on a relcache entry that wasn't kept open across calls.
This manifested as weird errors in buildfarm during the short time that
the "brin-1" isolation test lived.
Backpatch to 9.5, where it was introduced.
One of the changes I made in commit 8703059c6b turns out not to have
been such a good idea: we still need the exception in join_is_legal() that
allows a join if both inputs already overlap the RHS of the special join
we're checking. Otherwise we can miss valid plans, and might indeed fail
to find a plan at all, as in recent report from Andreas Seltenreich.
That code was added way back in commit c17117649b, but I failed to
include a regression test case then; my bad. Put it back with a better
explanation, and a test this time. The logic does end up a bit different
than before though: I now believe it's appropriate to make this check
first, thereby allowing such a case whether or not we'd consider the
previous SJ(s) to commute with this one. (Presumably, we already decided
they did; but it was confusing to have this consideration in the middle
of the code that was handling the other case.)
Back-patch to all active branches, like the previous patch.
In some corner cases, it is possible for the BRIN index relation to be
extended by brin_getinsertbuffer but the new page not be used
immediately for anything by its callers; when this happens, the page is
initialized and the FSM is updated (by brin_getinsertbuffer) with the
info about that page, but these actions are not WAL-logged. A later
index insert/update can use the page, but since the page is already
initialized, the initialization itself is not WAL-logged then either.
Replay of this sequence of events causes recovery to fail altogether.
There is a related corner case within brin_getinsertbuffer itself, in
which we extend the relation to put a new index tuple there, but later
find out that we cannot do so, and do not return the buffer; the page
obtained from extension is not even initialized. The resulting page is
lost forever.
To fix, shuffle the code so that initialization is not the
responsibility of brin_getinsertbuffer anymore, in normal cases;
instead, the initialization is done by its callers (brin_doinsert and
brin_doupdate) once they're certain that the page is going to be used.
When either those functions determine that the new page cannot be used,
before bailing out they initialize the page as an empty regular page,
enter it in FSM and WAL-log all this. This way, the page is usable for
future index insertions, and WAL replay doesn't find trying to insert
tuples in pages whose initialization didn't make it to the WAL. The
same strategy is used in brin_getinsertbuffer when it cannot return the
new page.
Additionally, add a new step to vacuuming so that all pages of the index
are scanned; whenever an uninitialized page is found, it is initialized
as empty and WAL-logged. This closes the hole that the relation is
extended but the system crashes before anything is WAL-logged about it.
We also take this opportunity to update the FSM, in case it has gotten
out of date.
Thanks to Heikki Linnakangas for finding the problem that kicked some
additional analysis of BRIN page assignment code.
Backpatch to 9.5, where BRIN was introduced.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150723204810.GY5596@postgresql.org
In 4b4b680c I passed a buffer index number (starting from 0) instead of
a proper Buffer id (which start from 1 for shared buffers) in two
places.
This wasn't noticed so far as one of those locations isn't compiled at
all (PrintPinnedBufs) and the other one (InvalidBuffer) requires a
unlikely, but possible, set of circumstances to trigger a symptom.
To reduce the likelihood of such incidents a bit also convert existing
open coded mappings from buffer descriptors to buffer ids with
BufferDescriptorGetBuffer().
Author: Qingqing Zhou
Reported-By: Qingqing Zhou
Discussion: CAJjS0u2ai9ooUisKtkV8cuVUtEkMTsbK8c7juNAjv8K11zeCQg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 9.5 where the private ref count infrastructure was introduced
newnfa() failed to set the regex error state when malloc() fails.
Several places in regcomp.c failed to check for an error after calling
subre(). Each of these mistakes could lead to null-pointer-dereference
crashes in memory-starved backends.
Report and patch by Andreas Seltenreich. Back-patch to all branches.
pg_dump produced fairly silly GRANT/REVOKE commands when dumping types from
pre-9.2 servers, and when dumping functions or procedural languages from
pre-7.3 servers. Those server versions lack the typacl, proacl, and/or
lanacl columns respectively, and pg_dump substituted default values that
were in fact incorrect. We ended up revoking all the owner's own
privileges for the object while granting all privileges to PUBLIC.
Of course the owner would then have those privileges again via PUBLIC, so
long as she did not try to revoke PUBLIC's privileges; which may explain
the lack of field reports. Nonetheless this is pretty silly behavior.
The stakes were raised by my recent patch to make pg_dump dump shell types,
because 9.2 and up pg_dump would proceed to emit bogus GRANT/REVOKE
commands for a shell type if dumping from a pre-9.2 server; and the server
will not accept GRANT/REVOKE commands for a shell type. (Perhaps it
should, but that's a topic for another day.) So the resulting dump script
wouldn't load without errors.
The right thing to do is to act as though these objects have default
privileges (null ACL entries), which causes pg_dump to print no
GRANT/REVOKE commands at all for them. That fixes the silly results
and also dodges the problem with shell types.
In passing, modify getProcLangs() to be less creatively different about
how to handle missing columns when dumping from older server versions.
Every other data-acquisition function in pg_dump does that by substituting
appropriate default values in the version-specific SQL commands, and I see
no reason why this one should march to its own drummer. Its use of
"SELECT *" was likewise not conformant with anyplace else, not to mention
it's not considered good SQL style for production queries.
Back-patch to all supported versions. Although 9.0 and 9.1 pg_dump don't
have the issue with typacl, they are more likely than newer versions to be
used to dump from ancient servers, so we ought to fix the proacl/lanacl
issues all the way back.
Commit 85e5e222b1 turns out not to have taken
care of all cases of the partially-evaluatable-PlaceHolderVar problem found
by Andreas Seltenreich's fuzz testing. I had set it up to check for risky
PHVs only in the event that we were making a star-schema-based exception to
the param_source_rels join ordering heuristic. However, it turns out that
the problem can occur even in joins that satisfy the param_source_rels
heuristic, in which case allow_star_schema_join() isn't consulted.
Refactor so that we check for risky PHVs whenever the proposed join has
any remaining parameterization.
Back-patch to 9.2, like the previous patch (except for the regression test
case, which only works back to 9.3 because it uses LATERAL).
Note that this discovery implies that problems of this sort could've
occurred in 9.2 and up even before the star-schema patch; though I've not
tried to prove that experimentally.
Commit 2834855cb added a not-very-carefully-thought-out isolation test
to check a BRIN index bug fix. The test depended on the availability
of the pageinspect contrib module, which meant it did not work in
several common testing scenarios such as "make check-world". It's not
clear whether we want a core test depending on a contrib module like
that, but in any case, failing to deal with the possibility that the
module isn't present in the installation-under-test is not acceptable.
Remove that test pending some better solution.
XLogRecPtr was compared with InvalidTransactionId instead of
InvalidXLogRecPtr. As both are defined to the same value this doesn't
cause any actual problems, but it's still wrong.
Backpatch: 9.4-master, bug was introduced in 9.4
Immediately starting to stream after --create-slot is inconvenient in a
number of situations (e.g. when configuring a slot for use in
recovery.conf) and it's easy to just call pg_receivexlog twice in the
rest of the cases.
Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion: CAB7nPqQ9qEtuDiKY3OpNzHcz5iUA+DUX9FcN9K8GUkCZvG7+Ew@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 9.5, where the option was introduced
The allowed syntax for OVERLAPS, viz "row OVERLAPS row", is sufficiently
constrained that we don't actually need a precedence declaration for
OVERLAPS; indeed removing this declaration does not change the generated
gram.c file at all. Let's remove it to avoid confusion about whether
OVERLAPS has precedence or not. If we ever generalize what we allow for
OVERLAPS, we might need to put back a precedence declaration for it,
but we might want some other level than what it has today --- and leaving
the declaration there would just risk confusion about whether that would
be an incompatible change.
Likewise, remove OVERLAPS from the documentation's precedence table.
Per discussion with Noah Misch. Back-patch to 9.5 where we hacked up some
nearby precedence decisions.
commit 9043Fe390f4f0b4586cfe59cbd22314b9c3e2957 broke multibyte
regression tests because the commit removes the warning message when
temporary hash indexes is created, which has been added by commit
07af523870.
Back patched to 9.5 stable tree.
A new test case from Andreas Seltenreich showed that we were still a bit
confused about removing PlaceHolderVars during join removal. Specifically,
remove_rel_from_query would remove a PHV that was used only underneath
the removable join, even if the place where it's used was the join partner
relation and not the join clause being deleted. This would lead to a
"too late to create a new PlaceHolderInfo" error later on. We can defend
against that by checking ph_eval_at to see if the PHV could possibly be
getting used at some partner rel.
Also improve some nearby LATERAL-related logic. I decided that the check
on ph_lateral needed to take precedence over the check on ph_needed, in
case there's a lateral reference underneath the join being considered.
(That may be impossible, but I'm not convinced of it, and it's easy enough
to defend against the case.) Also, I realized that remove_rel_from_query's
logic for updating LateralJoinInfos is dead code, because we don't build
those at all until after join removal.
Back-patch to 9.3. Previous versions didn't have the LATERAL issues, of
course, and they also didn't attempt to remove PlaceHolderInfos during join
removal. (I'm starting to wonder if changing that was really such a great
idea.)
Amit reviewed the replication origins patch and made some good
points. Address them. This fixes typos in error messages, docs and
comments and adds a missing error check (although in a
should-never-happen scenario).
Discussion: CAA4eK1JqUBVeWWKwUmBPryFaje4190ug0y-OAUHWQ6tD83V4xg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 9.5, where replication origins were introduced.
Commit 9e7e29c75a introduced an Assert that
join removal didn't reduce the eval_at set of any PlaceHolderVar to empty.
At first glance it looks like join_is_removable ensures that's true --- but
actually, the loop in join_is_removable skips PlaceHolderVars that are not
referenced above the join due to be removed. So, if we don't want any
empty eval_at sets, the right thing to do is to delete any now-unreferenced
PlaceHolderVars from the data structure entirely.
Per fuzz testing by Andreas Seltenreich. Back-patch to 9.3 where the
aforesaid Assert was added.
Formerly, this function would always return "true" for an appendrel child
relation, because it would think that the appendrel parent was a potential
join target for the child. In principle that should only lead to some
inefficiency in planning, but fuzz testing by Andreas Seltenreich disclosed
that it could lead to "could not find pathkey item to sort" planner errors
in odd corner cases. Specifically, we would think that all columns of a
child table's multicolumn index were interesting pathkeys, causing us to
generate a MergeAppend path that sorts by all the columns. However, if any
of those columns weren't actually used above the level of the appendrel,
they would not get added to that rel's targetlist, which would result in
being unable to resolve the MergeAppend's sort keys against its targetlist
during createplan.c.
Backpatch to 9.3. In older versions, columns of an appendrel get added
to its targetlist even if they're not mentioned above the scan level,
so that the failure doesn't occur. It might be worth back-patching this
fix to older versions anyway, but I'll refrain for the moment.
Further testing revealed that commit f69b4b9495 was still a few
bricks shy of a load: minor tweaking of the previous test cases resulted
in the same wrong-outer-join-order problem coming back. After study
I concluded that my previous changes in make_outerjoininfo() were just
accidentally masking the problem, and should be reverted in favor of
forcing syntactic join order whenever an upper outer join's predicate
doesn't mention a lower outer join's LHS. This still allows the
chained-outer-joins style that is the normally optimizable case.
I also tightened things up some more in join_is_legal(). It seems to me
on review that what's really happening in the exception case where we
ignore a mismatched special join is that we're allowing the proposed join
to associate into the RHS of the outer join we're comparing it to. As
such, we should *always* insist that the proposed join be a left join,
which eliminates a bunch of rather dubious argumentation. The case where
we weren't enforcing that was the one that was already known buggy anyway
(it had a violatable Assert before the aforesaid commit) so it hardly
deserves a lot of deference.
Back-patch to all active branches, like the previous patch. The added
regression test case failed in all branches back to 9.1, and I think it's
only an unrelated change in costing calculations that kept 9.0 from
choosing a broken plan.
If some, but not all, of the length word has already been read, and the
next attempt to read sees exactly the number of bytes needed to complete
the length word, or fewer, then we'll incorrectly read less than all of
the available data.
Antonin Houska
Commit e5550d5fec added some new
tests for ALTER TABLE which involved table scans. When
default_transaction_isolation = 'serializable' these acquire
relation-level SIReadLocks. The test results didn't cope with
that. Add SIReadLock as the minimum lock level for purposes of
these tests.
This could also be fixed by excluding this type of lock from the
my_locks view, but it would be a bug for SIReadLock to show up for
a relation which was not otherwise locked, so do it this way to
allow that sort of condition to cause a regression test failure.
There is some question whether we could avoid taking SIReadLocks
during these operations, but confirming the safety of that and
figuring out how to avoid the locks is not trivial, and would be
a separate patch.
Backpatch to 9.4 where the new tests were added.
pg_resetxlog.h contained two superfluous includes, origin.h superfluously
depended on logical.h, and pg_xlogdump's rmgrdesc.h only indirectly
included origin.h.
Backpatch: 9.5, where replication origins were introduced.
A few of the discrepancies had semantic significance, but I did not
track down the resulting user-visible bugs, if any. Back-patch to 9.5,
where all but one discrepancy appeared. The _equalCreateEventTrigStmt()
situation dates to 9.3 but does not affect semantics.
catversion bump due to readfuncs.c field order changes.
Commit 0ffc201a51 included this object
unconditionally. Being unprepared for that, most external, single-file
modules failed to build. This better aligns the GNU make build system
with the heuristic in the MSVC build's Project::AddDirResourceFile().
In-tree, installed modules set PGFILEDESC, so they will see no change.
Also, under PGXS, omit the nonfunctioning rule to build win32ver.rc.
Back-patch to 9.5, where the aforementioned commit first appeared.
For correctness of summarization results, it is critical that the
snapshot used during the summarization scan is able to see all tuples
that are live to all transactions -- including tuples inserted or
deleted by in-progress transactions. Otherwise, it would be possible
for a transaction to insert a tuple, then idle for a long time while a
concurrent transaction executes summarization of the range: this would
result in the inserted value not being considered in the summary.
Previously we were trying to use a MVCC snapshot in conjunction with
adding a "placeholder" tuple in the index: the snapshot would see all
committed tuples, and the placeholder tuple would catch insertions by
any new inserters. The hole is that prior insertions by transactions
that are still in progress by the time the MVCC snapshot was taken were
ignored.
Kevin Grittner reported this as a bogus error message during vacuum with
default transaction isolation mode set to repeatable read (because the
error report mentioned a function name not being invoked during), but
the problem is larger than that.
To fix, tweak IndexBuildHeapRangeScan to have a new mode that behaves
the way we need using SnapshotAny visibility rules. This change
simplifies the BRIN code a bit, mainly by removing large comments that
were mistaken. Instead, rely on the SnapshotAny semantics to provide
what it needs. (The business about a placeholder tuple needs to remain:
that covers the case that a transaction inserts a a tuple in a page that
summarization already scanned.)
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150731175700.GX2441@postgresql.org
In passing, remove a couple of unused declarations from brin.h and
reword a comment to be proper English. This part submitted by Kevin
Grittner.
Backpatch to 9.5, where BRIN was introduced.
Per the discussion in optimizer/README, it's unsafe to reassociate anything
into or out of the RHS of a SEMI or ANTI join. An example from Piotr
Stefaniak showed that join_is_legal() wasn't sufficiently enforcing this
rule, so lock it down a little harder.
I couldn't find a reasonably simple example of the optimizer trying to
do this, so no new regression test. (Piotr's example involved the random
search in GEQO accidentally trying an invalid case and triggering a sanity
check way downstream in clause selectivity estimation, which did not seem
like a sequence of events that would be useful to memorialize in a
regression test as-is.)
Back-patch to all active branches.
Previously the message erroneously printed the same LSN twice as the
assignment to the start_lsn variable was before the message. Correct
that.
Reported-By: Marko Tiikkaja
Author: Marko Tiikkaja
Backpatch: 9.5, where logical decoding was introduced
I appear to accidentally have switched the comments for
pg_atomic_write_u32 and pg_atomic_read_u32 around. Also fix some minor
typos I found while fixing.
Noticed-By: Amit Kapila
Backpatch: 9.5
Per discussion, it really ought to do this. The original choice to
exclude shell types was probably made in the dark ages before we made
it harder to accidentally create shell types; but that was in 7.3.
Also, cause the standard regression tests to leave a shell type behind,
for convenience in testing the case in pg_dump and pg_upgrade.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
The tuplesort/tuplestore memory management logic assumed that the chunk
allocation overhead for its memtuples array could not increase when
increasing the array size. This is and always was true for tuplesort,
but we (I, I think) blindly copied that logic into tuplestore.c without
noticing that the assumption failed to hold for the much smaller array
elements used by tuplestore. Given rather small work_mem, this could
result in an improper complaint about "unexpected out-of-memory situation",
as reported by Brent DeSpain in bug #13530.
The easiest way to fix this is just to increase tuplestore's initial
array size so that the assumption holds. Rather than relying on magic
constants, though, let's export a #define from aset.c that represents
the safe allocation threshold, and make tuplestore's calculation depend
on that.
Do the same in tuplesort.c to keep the logic looking parallel, even though
tuplesort.c isn't actually at risk at present. This will keep us from
breaking it if we ever muck with the allocation parameters in aset.c.
Back-patch to all supported versions. The error message doesn't occur
pre-9.3, not so much because the problem can't happen as because the
pre-9.3 tuplestore code neglected to check for it. (The chance of
trouble is a great deal larger as of 9.3, though, due to changes in the
array-size-increasing strategy.) However, allowing LACKMEM() to become
true unexpectedly could still result in less-than-desirable behavior,
so let's patch it all the way back.
Andres Freund