Until now, the -C option of postgres was handled before a small subset
of GUCs computed at runtime are initialized, leading to incorrect
results as GUC machinery would fall back to default values for such
parameters.
For example, data_checksums could report "off" for a cluster as the
control file is not loaded yet. Or wal_segment_size would show a
segment size at 16MB even if initdb --wal-segsize used something else.
Worse, the command would fail to properly report the recently-introduced
shared_memory, that requires to load shared_preload_libraries as these
could ask for a chunk of shared memory.
Support for runtime GUCs comes with a limitation, as the operation is
now allowed on a running server. One notable reason for this is that
_PG_init() functions of loadable libraries are called before all
runtime-computed GUCs are initialized, and this is not guaranteed to be
safe to do on running servers. For the case of shared_memory_size,
where we want to know how much memory would be used without allocating
it, this limitation is fine. Another case where this will help is for
huge pages, with the introduction of a different GUC to evaluate the
amount of huge pages required for a server before starting it, without
having to allocate large chunks of memory.
This feature is controlled with a new GUC flag, and four parameters are
classified as runtime-computed as of this change:
- data_checksums
- shared_memory_size
- data_directory_mode
- wal_segment_size
Some TAP tests are added to provide some coverage here, using
data_checksums in the tests of pg_checksums.
Per discussion with Andres Freund, Justin Pryzby, Magnus Hagander and
more.
Author: Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/F2772387-CE0F-46BF-B5F1-CC55516EB885@amazon.com
An upcoming patch splits single user mode handling out of PostgresMain(). The
startup time only needs to be determined in single user mode. Currently the
initialization happens late, which makes the split a bit harder. As postmaster
determines the time earlier it makes sense to move the time for single user
mode to a roughly similar point in time.
Reviewd-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210802164124.ufo5buo4apl6yuvs@alap3.anarazel.de
Up to now the size of a query's rangetable has been limited by the
constants INNER_VAR et al, which mustn't be equal to any real
rangetable index. 65000 doubtless seemed like enough for anybody,
and it still is orders of magnitude larger than the number of joins
we can realistically handle. However, we need a rangetable entry
for each child partition that is (or might be) processed by a query.
Queries with a few thousand partitions are getting more realistic,
so that the day when that limit becomes a problem is in sight,
even if it's not here yet. Hence, let's raise the limit.
Rather than just increase the values of INNER_VAR et al, this patch
adopts the approach of making them small negative values, so that
rangetables could theoretically become as long as INT_MAX.
The bulk of the patch is concerned with changing Var.varno and some
related variables from "Index" (unsigned int) to plain "int". This
is basically cosmetic, with little actual effect other than to help
debuggers print their values nicely. As such, I've only bothered
with changing places that could actually see INNER_VAR et al, which
the parser and most of the planner don't. We do have to be careful
in places that are performing less/greater comparisons on varnos,
but there are very few such places, other than the IS_SPECIAL_VARNO
macro itself.
A notable side effect of this patch is that while it used to be
possible to add INNER_VAR et al to a Bitmapset, that will now
draw an error. I don't see any likelihood that it wouldn't be a
bug to include these fake varnos in a bitmapset of real varnos,
so I think this is all to the good.
Although this touches outfuncs/readfuncs, I don't think a catversion
bump is required, since stored rules would never contain Vars
with these fake varnos.
Andrey Lepikhov and Tom Lane, after a suggestion by Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/43c7f2f5-1e27-27aa-8c65-c91859d15190@postgrespro.ru
It's possible to execute user-defined SQL in some background processes;
for example, logical replication workers can fire triggers. This opens
the possibility that someone would try to execute LISTEN in such a
context. But since only regular backends ever call
ProcessNotifyInterrupt, no messages would actually be received, and
thus the registered listener would simply prevent the message queue
from being cleaned. Eventually NOTIFY would stop working, which is bad.
Perhaps someday somebody will invent infrastructure to make listening
in a background worker actually useful. In the meantime, forbid it.
Back-patch to v13, which is where we introduced the MyBackendType
variable. It'd be a lot harder to implement the check without that,
and it doesn't seem worth the trouble.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/153243441449.1404.2274116228506175596@wrigleys.postgresql.org
In most cases, the prefix string in a node output is the upper case of
the node structure name, e.g., MergeAppend -> MERGEAPPEND. There were
a few exceptions that for either no apparent reason or perhaps minor
aesthetic reasons deviated from this. In order to simplify this and
perhaps allow automatic generation without having to deal with
exception cases, make them all match.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c091e5cd-45f8-69ee-6a9b-de86912cc7e7@enterprisedb.com
The available refresh options are specified as refresh_options under
REFRESH PUBLICATION, and DROP PUBLICATION itself has an option named
refresh. Clarify what we mean by refresh options to avoid confusion.
Backpatch through v14 where ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... DROP PUBLICATION
was introduced.
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoCm1wJ3A8Q9EmBjRbShYkJ+o+Oa_z9O0hvwhvhUa2BSyg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
Also remove obsolete comments about why the 64-bit integers need to be
printed in a separate buffer. The reason used to be portability, but
now the remaining reason is that we need the string lengths for the
progress displays. That is evident by looking at the code right
below, so a new comment doesn't seem necessary.
All the types supported were listed directly in the README, but it was
very outdated. Rather than listing all the types supported in the
README, this commit adds a reference to look at ResourceOwnerData in
resowner.c to get this information.
The order of the paragraphs is reworked a bit for clarity.
Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqHtfT9z=4H5+F7DOy0OyNHAaVwuRcakt9b2t2uADOaiag@mail.gmail.com
pg_import_system_collations() was a bit inconsistent about how it
reported locales (names output by "locale -a") that it didn't make
pg_collation entries for. IMV we should print some suitable message
for every locale that we reject, except when it matches a pre-existing
pg_collation entry. (This is all at DEBUG1 log level, though, so as
not to create noise during initdb.) Add messages for the two cases
that were previously not logged, namely unrecognized encoding and
client-only encoding. Re-word the existing messages to have a
consistent style.
Anton Voloshin and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/429d64ee-188d-3ce1-106a-53a8b45c4fce@postgrespro.ru
Formerly, we sent signals for outgoing NOTIFY messages within
ProcessCompletedNotifies, which was also responsible for sending
relevant ones of those messages to our connected client. It therefore
had to run during the main-loop processing that occurs just before
going idle. This arrangement had two big disadvantages:
* Now that procedures allow intra-command COMMITs, it would be
useful to send NOTIFYs to other sessions immediately at COMMIT
(though, for reasons of wire-protocol stability, we still shouldn't
forward them to our client until end of command).
* Background processes such as replication workers would not send
NOTIFYs at all, since they never execute the client communication
loop. We've had requests to allow triggers running in replication
workers to send NOTIFYs, so that's a problem.
To fix these things, move transmission of outgoing NOTIFY signals
into AtCommit_Notify, where it will happen during CommitTransaction.
Also move the possible call of asyncQueueAdvanceTail there, to
ensure we don't bloat the async SLRU if a background worker sends
many NOTIFYs with no one listening.
We can also drop the call of asyncQueueReadAllNotifications,
allowing ProcessCompletedNotifies to go away entirely. That's
because commit 790026972 added a call of ProcessNotifyInterrupt
adjacent to PostgresMain's call of ProcessCompletedNotifies,
and that does its own call of asyncQueueReadAllNotifications,
meaning that we were uselessly doing two such calls (inside two
separate transactions) whenever inbound notify signals coincided
with an outbound notify. We need only set notifyInterruptPending
to ensure that ProcessNotifyInterrupt runs, and we're done.
The existing documentation suggests that custom background workers
should call ProcessCompletedNotifies if they want to send NOTIFY
messages. To avoid an ABI break in the back branches, reduce it
to an empty routine rather than removing it entirely. Removal
will occur in v15.
Although the problems mentioned above have existed for awhile,
I don't feel comfortable back-patching this any further than v13.
There was quite a bit of churn in adjacent code between 12 and 13.
At minimum we'd have to also backpatch 51004c717, and a good deal
of other adjustment would also be needed, so the benefit-to-risk
ratio doesn't look attractive.
Per bug #15293 from Michael Powers (and similar gripes from others).
Artur Zakirov and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/153243441449.1404.2274116228506175596@wrigleys.postgresql.org
It's possible for us to copy an AlternativeSubPlan expression node
into multiple places, for example the scan quals of several
partition children. Then it's possible that we choose a different
one of the alternatives as optimal in each place. Commit 41efb8340
failed to consider this scenario, so its attempt to remove "unused"
subplans could remove subplans that were still used elsewhere.
Fix by delaying the removal logic until we've examined all the
AlternativeSubPlans in a given query level. (This does assume that
AlternativeSubPlans couldn't get copied to other query levels, but
for the foreseeable future that's fine; cf qual_is_pushdown_safe.)
Per report from Rajkumar Raghuwanshi. Back-patch to v14
where the faulty logic came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6==O3NNZC3bZ2prRYv3cjm3_Zw1GfzmOjEVqYN4jub2+Q@mail.gmail.com
We have a few WRITE_{name of type}_ARRAY macros, but the one case
using the Index type was hand-coded. Wrap it into a macro as well.
This also changes the behavior slightly: Before, the field name was
skipped if the length was zero. Now it prints the field name even in
that case. This is more consistent with how other array fields are
handled.
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c091e5cd-45f8-69ee-6a9b-de86912cc7e7@enterprisedb.com
If an allocation failed within LLVM it is not safe to call back into LLVM as
LLVM is not generally safe against exceptions / stack-unwinding. Thus errors
while in LLVM code are promoted to FATAL. However llvm_shutdown() did call
back into LLVM even in such cases, while llvm_release_context() was careful
not to do so.
We cannot generally skip shutting down LLVM, as that can break profiling. But
it's OK to do so if there was an error from within LLVM.
Reported-By: Jelte Fennema <Jelte.Fennema@microsoft.com>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AM5PR83MB0178C52CCA0A8DEA0207DC14F7FF9@AM5PR83MB0178.EURPRD83.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch: 11-, where jit was introduced
Two functions, both named check_permissions(), used the same checks to
verify if a user had required privileges to work on replication slots.
This commit removes the duplication, and moves the function doing the
checks to slot.c to be centralized.
Author: Bharath Rupireddy
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart, Euler Taveira
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACUPpVw1u7sQocFVWrSs0n10pt_G_4NPZKSxXK6cW1dErw@mail.gmail.com
Commits ffa2e4670 and 52a10224e caused libpq's connection-establishment
functions to usually leave a nonempty string in the connection's
errorMessage buffer, even after a successful connection. While that
was intentional on my part, more sober reflection says that it wasn't
a great idea: the string would be a bit confusing. Also this broke at
least one application that checked for connection success by examining
the errorMessage, instead of using PQstatus() as documented. Let's
clear the buffer at success exit, restoring the pre-v14 behavior.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4170264.1620321747@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ordinarily, using EXIT this way would draw "control reached end of
function without RETURN". However, if the function is one where we
don't require an explicit RETURN (such as a DO block), that should
not happen. It did anyway, because add_dummy_return() neglected to
account for the case.
Per report from Herwig Goemans. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/868ae948-e3ca-c7ec-95a6-83cfc08ef750@gmail.com
While processing toast changes in logical decoding, we rejigger the
tuple change to point to in-memory toast tuples instead to on-disk toast
tuples. And, to make sure the memory accounting is correct, we were
subtracting the old change size and then after re-computing the new tuple,
re-adding its size at the end. Now, if there is any error before we add
the new size, we will release the changes and that will update the
accounting info (subtracting the size from the counters). And we were
underflowing there which leads to an assertion failure in assert enabled
builds and wrong memory accounting in reorder buffer otherwise.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 13, where memory accounting was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/92b0ee65-b8bd-e42d-c082-4f3f4bf12d34@amazon.com
An out-of-memory failure happening when allocating the structures to
store the connection parameter keywords and values would mess up with
the set of connections saved, as on failure the pthread mutex would
still be hold with the new connection object listed but free()'d.
Rather than just unlocking the mutex, which would leave the static list
of connections into an inconsistent state, move the allocation for the
structures of the connection parameters before beginning the test
manipulation. This ensures that the list of connections and the
connection mutex remain consistent all the time in this code path.
This error is unlikely going to happen, but this could mess up badly
with ECPG clients in surprising ways, so backpatch all the way down.
Reported-by: ryancaicse
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17186-b4cfd8f0eb4d1dee@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 9.6
The subscription parameters are rearranged into two groups:
a) those that control what happens during Create Subscription
b) those that control the replication behavior
This makes the documentation of Create Subscription easier to follow.
Author: Peter Smith
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PtPJDSOxtuMGpO2yDrRPKxcYGL4n7HqJP9HernZE=Cj+g@mail.gmail.com
These are added in the existing tests of pg_ctl for log rotation, that
already tested stderr. The same amount of coverage is added for csvlog:
- Checks for pg_current_logfile().
- Log rotation with expected file name.
- Log contents generated.
This test is refactored to minimize the amount of work required to add
tests for new log formats, easing some upcoming work.
Author: Michael Paquier, Sehrope Sarkuni
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH7T-aqswBM6JWe4pDehi1uOiufqe06DJWaU5=X7dDLyqUExHg@mail.gmail.com
The previous protocol expected a set of matching characters to check if
a message sent was the last one or not, that changed depending on the
destination wanted:
- 't' and 'f' tracked the last message of a log sent to stderr.
- 'T' and 'F' tracked the last message of a log sent to csvlog.
This could be extended with more characters when introducing new
destinations, but using a bitmask is much more elegant. This commit
changes the protocol so as a bitmask is used in the header of a log
chunk message sent to the syslogger, with the following options
available for now:
- log_destination as stderr.
- log_destination as csvlog.
- if a message is the last chunk of a message.
Sehrope found this issue in a patch set to introduce JSON as an option
for log_destination, but his patch made the size of the protocol header
larger. This commit keeps the same size as the original, and adapts the
protocol as wanted.
Thanks also to Andrew Dunstan and Greg Stark for the discussion.
Author: Michael Paquier, Sehrope Sarkuni
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH7T-aqswBM6JWe4pDehi1uOiufqe06DJWaU5=X7dDLyqUExHg@mail.gmail.com
If search_start is greater than the length of the string, we should just
return REG_NOMATCH immediately. (Note that the equality case should
*not* be rejected, since the pattern might be able to match zero
characters.) This guards various internal assumptions that the min of a
range of string positions is not more than the max. Violation of those
assumptions could allow an attempt to fetch string[search_start-1],
possibly causing a crash.
Jaime Casanova pointed out that this situation is reachable with the
new regexp_xxx functions that accept a user-specified start position.
I don't believe it's reachable via any in-core call site in v14 and
below. However, extensions could possibly call pg_regexec with an
out-of-range search_start, so let's back-patch the fix anyway.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210911180357.GA6870@ahch-to
We have long forbidden fetching backwards from a NO SCROLL cursor,
but the prohibition didn't extend to cases in which we rewind the
query altogether and then re-fetch forwards. I think the reason is
that this logic was mainly meant to protect plan nodes that can't
be run in the reverse direction. However, re-reading the query output
is problematic if the query is volatile (which includes SELECT FOR
UPDATE, not just queries with volatile functions): the re-read can
produce different results, which confuses the cursor navigation logic
completely. Another reason for disliking this approach is that some
code paths will either fetch backwards or rewind-and-fetch-forwards
depending on the distance to the target row; so that seemingly
identical use-cases may or may not draw the "cursor can only scan
forward" error. Hence, let's clean things up by disallowing rewind
as well as fetch-backwards in a NO SCROLL cursor.
Ordinarily we'd only make such a definitional change in HEAD, but
there is a third reason to consider this change now. Commit ba2c6d6ce
created some new user-visible anomalies for non-scrollable cursors
WITH HOLD, in that navigation in the cursor result got confused if the
cursor had been partially read before committing. The only good way
to resolve those anomalies is to forbid rewinding such a cursor, which
allows removal of the incorrect cursor state manipulations that
ba2c6d6ce added to PersistHoldablePortal.
To minimize the behavioral change in the back branches (including
v14), refuse to rewind a NO SCROLL cursor only when it has a holdStore,
ie has been held over from a previous transaction due to WITH HOLD.
This should avoid breaking most applications that have been sloppy
about whether to declare cursors as scrollable. We'll enforce the
prohibition across-the-board beginning in v15.
Back-patch to v11, as ba2c6d6ce was.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3712911.1631207435@sss.pgh.pa.us
This switches the default ACL to what the documentation has recommended
since CVE-2018-1058. Upgrades will carry forward any old ownership and
ACL. Sites that declined the 2018 recommendation should take a fresh
look. Recipes for commissioning a new database cluster from scratch may
need to create a schema, grant more privileges, etc. Out-of-tree test
suites may require such updates.
Reviewed by Peter Eisentraut.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201031163518.GB4039133@rfd.leadboat.com
Some plan node types don't react well to being called again after
they've already returned NULL. PortalRunSelect() has long dealt
with this by calling the executor with NoMovementScanDirection
if it sees that we've already run the portal to the end. However,
commit ba2c6d6ce overlooked this point, so that persisting an
already-fully-fetched cursor would fail if it had such a plan.
Per report from Tomas Barton. Back-patch to v11, as the faulty
commit was. (I've omitted a test case because the type of plan
that causes a problem isn't all that stable.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPV2KRjd=ErgVGbvO2Ty20tKTEZZr6cYsYLxgN_W3eAo9pf5sw@mail.gmail.com
When throttling is used, transactions that lag behind schedule by
more than the latency limit are counted and reported as skipped.
Previously, there was the case where pgbench counted all skipped
transactions even if the timer specified in -T option was exceeded.
This could take a very long time to do that especially when unrealistically
high rate setting in -R option caused quite a lot of transactions that
lagged behind schedule. This could prevent pgbench from ending
immediately, and so pgbench could look like it got stuck to users.
To fix the issue, this commit changes pgbench so that it stops counting
skipped transactions as soon as the timer is exceeded. The timer can
make pgbench end soon even when there are lots of skipped transactions
that have not been counted yet.
Note that there is no guarantee that all skipped transactions are
counted under -T though there is under -t. This is OK in practice
because it's very unlikely to happen with realistic setting. Also this is
not the issue that this commit newly introdues. There used to be
the case where pgbench ended without counting all skipped
transactions since before.
Back-patch to v14. Per discussion, we decided not to bother
back-patch to the stable branches because it's hard to imagine
the issue happens in practice (with realistic setting).
Author: Yugo Nagata, Fabien COELHO
Reviewed-by: Greg Sabino Mullane, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210613040151.265ff59d832f835bbcf8b3ba@sraoss.co.jp
We don't allow relations to exceed 2^32-1 blocks, because block
numbers are 32 bits and the last possible block number is reserved
to mean InvalidBlockNumber. There is a check for this in mdextend,
but that's really way too late, because the smgr API requires us to
create a buffer for the block-to-be-added, and we do not want to
have any buffer with blocknum InvalidBlockNumber. (Such a case
can trigger assertions in bufmgr.c, plus I think it might confuse
ReadBuffer's logic for data-past-EOF later on.) So put the check
into ReadBuffer.
Per report from Christoph Berg. It's been like this forever,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YTn1iTkUYBZfcODk@msg.credativ.de
Previously, walreceiver always closed the currently-opened WAL segment
and created its archive notification file, after it finished writing
the current segment up and received any WAL data that should be
written into the next segment. If walreceiver exited just before
any WAL data in the next segment arrived at standby, it did not
create the archive notification file of the current segment
even though that's known completed. This behavior could cause
WAL archiving of the segment to be delayed until subsequent
restartpoints or checkpoints created its notification file.
To fix the issue, this commit changes walreceiver so that it creates
an archive notification file of a current WAL segment immediately
if that's known completed before receiving next WAL data.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200630.165503.1465894182551545886.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
The Value node struct is a weird construct. It is its own node type,
but most of the time, it actually has a node type of Integer, Float,
String, or BitString. As a consequence, the struct name and the node
type don't match most of the time, and so it has to be treated
specially a lot. There doesn't seem to be any value in the special
construct. There is very little code that wants to accept all Value
variants but nothing else (and even if it did, this doesn't provide
any convenient way to check it), and most code wants either just one
particular node type (usually String), or it accepts a broader set of
node types besides just Value.
This change removes the Value struct and node type and replaces them
by separate Integer, Float, String, and BitString node types that are
proper node types and structs of their own and behave mostly like
normal node types.
Also, this removes the T_Null node tag, which was previously also a
possible variant of Value but wasn't actually used outside of the
Value contained in A_Const. Replace that by an isnull field in
A_Const.
Reviewed-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/5ba6bc5b-3f95-04f2-2419-f8ddb4c046fb@enterprisedb.com
Casting the argument of strVal() to (Value *) is useless, since
strVal() already does that.
Most code didn't do that anyway; this was apparently just a style that
snuck into certain files.
Reviewed-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/5ba6bc5b-3f95-04f2-2419-f8ddb4c046fb@enterprisedb.com
Coverity complained that one caller of getFormattedTypeName() failed
to free the returned string. Which is true, but rather than fixing
that one, let's get rid of this tedious and error-prone requirement.
Now that getFormattedTypeName() caches its result, strdup'ing that
result and expecting the caller to free it accomplishes little except
to waste cycles. We do create a leak in the case where getTypes didn't
make a TypeInfo for the type, but that basically shouldn't ever happen.
Back-patch, as commit 6c450a861 was. This isn't a particularly
interesting bug fix, but the API change seems like a hazard for
future back-patching activity if we don't back-patch it.
Various psql backslash commands have both single-letter and long
forms, for example \e and \edit. Previously, tab completion
generally offered the single-letter form but not the long form.
It seems more sensible to offer the long form, because (a) no
useful completion can happen when you've already typed the single
letter, and (b) if you're not so familiar with the command set
as to know that, the long form is likely to be less confusing.
Haiying Tang, reviewed by Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker and myself
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB61136018064660F095CB57A8FB129@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
If we copy data-modifying CTEs from the original query to a replacement
query (from a DO INSTEAD rule), we must set hasModifyingCTE properly
in the replacement query. Failure to do this can cause various
unpleasantness, such as unsafe usage of parallel plans. The code also
neglected to propagate hasRecursive, though that's only cosmetic at
the moment.
A difficulty arises if the rule action is an INSERT...SELECT. We
attach the original query's RTEs and CTEs to the sub-SELECT Query, but
data-modifying CTEs are only allowed to appear in the topmost Query.
For the moment, throw an error in such cases. It would probably be
possible to avoid this error by attaching the CTEs to the top INSERT
Query instead; but that would require a bunch of new code to adjust
ctelevelsup references. Given the narrowness of the use-case, and
the need to back-patch this fix, it does not seem worth the trouble
for now. We can revisit this if we get field complaints.
Per report from Greg Nancarrow. Back-patch to all supported branches.
(The test case added here does not fail before v10, but there are
plenty of places checking top-level hasModifyingCTE in 9.6, so I have
no doubt that this code change is necessary there too.)
Greg Nancarrow and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJcOf-f68DT=26YAMz_i0+Au3TcLO5oiHY5=fL6Sfuits6r+_w@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJcOf-fAdj=nDKMsRhQzndm-O13NY4dL6xGcEvdX5Xvbbi0V7g@mail.gmail.com
The correct nomenclature for the highest privileged user is superuser
and not "super user", this replaces the few instances where that was
used erroneously. No user-visible changes are done as all changes are
in comments, so no back-patching.
Author: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACW3snGBD8BAQiArMDS1Y43LuX3ymwO+N8aUg1Hrv6hYNw@mail.gmail.com
Commit 01e658fa74 added hash support for row types. This also added
support for hashing anonymous record types, using the same approach
that the type cache uses for comparison support for record types: It
just reports that it works, but it might fail at run time if a
component type doesn't actually support the operation. We get away
with that for comparison because most types support that. But some
types don't support hashing, so the current state can result in
failures at run time where the planner chooses hashing over sorting,
whereas that previously worked if only sorting was an option.
We do, however, want the record hashing support for path tracking in
recursive unions, and the SEARCH and CYCLE clauses built on that. In
that case, hashing is the only plan option. So enable that, this
commit implements the following approach: The type cache does not
report that hashing is available for the record type. This undoes
that part of 01e658fa74. Instead, callers that require hashing no
matter what can override that result themselves. This patch only
touches the callers to make the aforementioned recursive query cases
work, namely the parse analysis of unions, as well as the hash_array()
function.
Reported-by: Sait Talha Nisanci <sait.nisanci@microsoft.com>
Bug: #17158
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/17158-8a2ba823982537a4%40postgresql.org
Commit 449ab63505 added the tests that check that postgres_fdw.application_name
GUC works as expected. But they were unstable and caused some buildfarm
members to report the failure. This commit reverts those unstable tests.
Reported-by: Tom Lane as per buildfarm
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3220909.1631054766@sss.pgh.pa.us
Updates/Deletes on a relation were allowed even without replica identity
after we define the publication for all tables. This would later lead to
an error on subscribers. The reason was that for such publications we were
not invalidating the relcache and the publication information for
relations was not getting rebuilt. Similarly, we were not invalidating the
relcache after dropping of such publications which will prohibit
Updates/Deletes without replica identity even without any publication.
Author: Vignesh C and Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Hou Zhijie, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 10, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm0pF6zeWqCA8TCe2sDuwFAy8fCqba=nHampCKag-qLixg@mail.gmail.com
Michael Paquier